X users were glued to the Musk v. Trump blowup. Could this be good for the platform?
The blowup between the president of the United States and the world's richest man has played out on social media in real time, the latest, perhaps ultimate example of how X has become Elon Musk's personal platform, his own reality show where anyone can tune in to watch the mercurial twists and turns of his unpredictable personality.
And tune in they did.
The feud has birthed countless memes, hot takes and speculation, with some X users bringing out the popcorn emojis while rejoicing that the site has returned to its 'fun' roots — back when it was called Twitter. While it's not yet clear if the feud will have any permanent effects on X's audience size or advertising business, its owner reposted a meme late Thursday suggesting that, at least for now, it was good for getting active users to tune into the platform. CEO Linda Yaccarino agreed.
'X operates as a personality-driven platform, and Musk's high-profile conflicts can fuel engagement at least in the short term,' said Sarah Kreps, director of Cornell University's Tech Policy Institute. 'The platform has leaned into spectacle as a growth strategy, and controversy often drives traffic.'
President Donald Trump, of course, posted through the breakup on his own personal platform, Truth Social with three updates targeting Musk directly on Thursday. But Truth Social's audience is just a fraction of X's, and social media experts at this stage don't see it siphoning the former Twitter's user base as a result of the feud. Trump was banned from Twitter in 2021 following the January 6 riots on the Capitol and he returned more than 2.5 years later after Musk reinstated his account. On X, he has nearly 106 million followers — compared with less than 10 million on Truth Social, where he's continued to post following the feud — at least 10 times on Friday.
'It's a niche platform with limited reach outside Trump's core base,' Kreps said. 'That said, if Trump were to fully re-engage there and disengage from X entirely, it could fragment the right-wing audience somewhat. But barring major user migration, X still dominates in political discourse.'
Trump hasn't indicated that he'd leave X — and Musk hasn't said he'd consider banning him — but the president has not posted on the site since June 3, although the official White House account has continued to send updates.
According to Mobile app analytics firm Sensor Tower, X and Truth Social both saw mobile app usage skyrocket on Thursday as the Musk-Trump blowup played out on the two men's respective social platforms. U.S. mobile app active users on X between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m. Eastern were up 54%, while Truth Social saw a fivefold increase. Overall, Sensor Tower estimates that X's audience is about 100 times larger than Truth Social's.
On BlueSky, meanwhile, many users seemed to delight in watching the drama unfold on the platform they (mostly) left behind, posting screenshots from X, Truth Social as well as their own share of memes and commentary. But the site, which has welcomed users disillusioned with Musk's politics and policies on X, is unlikely to become a huge draw for Trump die-hards.
'It's too early to measure any long-term shifts in user behavior, but political audiences on X have tended to be resilient, even in the face of controversy,' Kreps said. 'Trump supporters are unlikely to abandon the platform en masse unless there's sustained antagonism or a perceived shift in content moderation policy. Right now, this looks more like a personality clash than an ideological break so user migration feels speculative at this stage.'
As for X's advertising business, Emarketer analyst Jasmine Enberg said she doubts the feud will have a material effect.
'Advertisers who were spending small sums on the platform due to Musk's proximity to Trump may rethink their commitments,' she said. 'At the same time, the breakup between Musk and Trump hasn't eliminated the threat of legal or business repercussions given the FTC investigation into the alleged ad boycott, so there's still incentive for those brands to stay.'
According to The New York Times, which cited unnamed sources, the Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether roughly a dozen advertising and advocacy groups violated antitrust law by coordinating boycotts among advertisers that didn't want their brands to appear next to hateful or other objectionable content.
In the end, Musk 'remains a divisive figure, regardless of his position in the White House,' Enberg said, and any efforts by X to make the platform less divisive — such as a recent program designed to elevate content that people agree on —'can only go so far with brands and consumers if he continues to use X as his own personal megaphone to amplify controversial content.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
How Trump targeted Harvard's foreign students and what court says now
Harvard University, known globally for its academic excellence and diverse student body, has found itself at the center of a political storm. Former U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration have repeatedly tried to restrict the university's ability to host international students — a move that directly challenges Harvard's global identity. Now, recent court rulings have provided temporary relief, but the situation remains SECURITY 'S ATTEMPT TO CUT HARVARD INTERNATIONAL STUDENT PROGRAMMEOne of the major actions came from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which tried to revoke Harvard's certification to host international students under the Student Exchange and Visitor Program. This program allows institutions to issue key visa documents (like the F-1 student visa), and without it, Harvard wouldn't be able to enroll students from responded by suing the government, claiming that DHS didn't follow proper procedures. In May, a federal judge temporarily blocked DHS's action. Then, in a more recent ruling, the judge issued a preliminary injunction, halting the move until the legal case is fully resolved — which could take months or longer. While the ruling is a win for Harvard, the judge noted that DHS still has the right to evaluate Harvard's status through regular procedures. For now, the university remains certified, but the review ENTRY BAN FOR INCOMING HARVARD STUDENTSadvertisementIn a separate action, Trump issued a presidential proclamation to stop new international students from entering the U.S. if they planned to attend Harvard. The administration argued that allowing these students in was not in the country's quickly challenged this in court, arguing that targeting students bound for one specific school didn't meet the legal standard of banning a "class of aliens." The same judge stepped in again to pause this entry ban — with no end date set yet. Harvard is now waiting for the judge to make a longer-term decision on this linked his efforts to concerns about antisemitism on Harvard's campus, especially during pro-Palestinian protests. But Harvard's leadership has insisted they're already working to address these issues and won't bow to political VISA SCRUTINY AND DISCRIMINATION CONCERNSIn another move, the Trump administration ordered US embassies and consulates to inspect the social media accounts of anyone applying for a visa to study or work at Harvard. The idea was to screen for content that could be seen as anti-American or after, the State Department expanded this to include all student visa applicants across the country, not just those going to Harvard. Visa applicants were told to make their social media accounts public, raising concerns about privacy and were also told to give priority to schools where international students make up less than 15% of the student body. Since Harvard and other Ivy League schools have higher percentages of foreign students, this effectively places them at a IT MATTERS?International students are a major part of Harvard's community — making up about 26% of the total student population. In certain programs, like public policy, business, and law, that number is even say the Trump administration's actions are part of a broader effort to pressure elite universities into changing campus policies related to protests, admissions, and academic hiring. Supporters argue that the government is simply holding institutions accountable. Either way, Harvard believes it's being unfairly targeted, and the courts are now playing a key role in deciding what comes next.(With AP inputs)Tune InMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Spy chief flip-flop? After Trump's 2nd rebuke over Iran intel, Tulsi Gabbard shifts tone
File photo of Tulsi Gabbard and US President Donald Trump A rare and public fracture has emerged within the highest levels of the US national security establishment, as director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Saturday revised her stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions, hours after being directly contradicted by President Donald Trump. In a striking turn, Gabbard posted on X that her earlier testimony to Congress, where she said that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, had been taken "out of context." She acknowledged that US intelligence now believes Iran could have a nuclear weapon "within weeks to months" if it decides to finalise assembly. "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," Gabbard wrote. "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." Her statement came after a sharp rebuke from President Trump, who told reporters Friday, "She is wrong," in response to her previous assertion that Iran is not actively building a nuclear weapon. The president had earlier dismissed her analysis outright, saying, "I don't care what she says," during a press interaction earlier in the week. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The disagreement comes at a particularly sensitive moment, as the White House weighs its strategic posture in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict. Trump's public alignment with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long warned of Iran's nuclear capabilities, further highlights the rift within the administration. Despite the public back-and-forth, officials within the administration have attempted to downplay the tension. They emphasised that uranium enrichment by Iran does bring it closer to a weapons threshold, even if the final steps toward weaponisation have not been confirmed. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the intelligence community's assessment has not undergone a fundamental change. According to the source, spy agencies still believe that Iran would need up to three years to develop a deliverable nuclear warhead capable of striking a target.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Who will use Tesla's robo-taxi? There are 2 big challenges.
Robo-taxis represent an early test case of two critical points for Tesla. Will American consumers trust robots? And will damage to the brand done by CEO Elon Musk's politics jump from Tesla cars to Tesla taxis? Investors will get early indications on both points on Sunday, when the electric-vehicle company is set to launch its robo-taxi service in Austin, Texas on Sunday. Invitations to a select group of customers have been sent out, allowing people to hail a handful of cars operating in a relatively small area. Human safety monitors will be sitting in the front passenger seat, and Tesla will have so-called teleoperators standing by to step in remotely if needed. Alphabet's Waymo, the dominant robo-taxi service so far, uses teleoperators as well. The modest launch might be a disappointment, but it is still a very big deal. It's a chance for Musk to finally deliver self-driving cars, after promising them repeatedly for the better part of a decade, wrote Guggenheim analyst Ronald Jewsikow in a recent report. 'The June robo-taxi launch represents a seminal achievement after [years] of self-driving promises," Jewsikow wrote. That is particularly positive in that it comes from an analyst who rates Tesla stock at Sell. Expanding the service to bring in significant revenue, helping to justify years of investment, is a much bigger deal for Tesla and Tesla investors. A challenge to overcome there will be any potential pushback from consumers turned off by Musk's support for President Donald Trump and rough-and-ready efforts to slash the size of the federal government. Tesla car sales fell 13% year over year in the first quarter, partly because left-leaning shoppers, the group most likely to buy electric vehicles, steered clear of the brand. Wall Street expects a 10% decline in the second quarter, according to FactSet. While Tesla management acknowledged challenges for the brand on their first-quarter earnings conference call, isn't clear whether that will affect the robo-taxi launch. Like so much with Tesla, opinions vary widely. 'One hundred percent," said GLJ analyst Gordon Johnson, when asked if Tesla's brand problems will extend to robo-taxis. He said he doesn't believe the technology is ready, citing the fact that Tesla has chosen to use in-car safety monitors. 'The backlash from consumers will likely be severe given it seems Tesla is endangering the driving public in Austin with this launch," Johnson said. A longtime Tesla bear, he rates the shares at Sell. Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Andres Sheppard, who rates the shares at Buy, doesn't see any major backlash coming. 'We don't think so," said Sheppard. 'There should be some getting used to the vehicles and the technology." Aside from branding, the fact that the technology is unfamiliar could represent a barrier to adoption. Not everyone will feel comfortable without a driver, or even a safety monitor, in the car. Still, that shouldn't be a problem early on for any self-driving technology. 'The people I talk to, colleagues and friends, are excited to [try] it," says Zacks stock strategist Andrew Rocco, adding that early on, 'Airbnb sounded like a crazy idea." Rocco runs Zacks' Technology Innovators Portfolio, which holds Tesla stock. Alphabet's Waymo hasn't had trouble filling its self-driving cabs. It completes more than 250,000 paid cab rides each week with a fleet of some 1,500 taxis. It is tough to argue that Waymos aren't better than regular drivers. It reports 88% fewer crashes with serious injuries, and 79% fewer accidents in which air bags are deployed. So far, self-driving cabs are doing just fine. 'Consumers love robo-taxis," Jewsikow said. Today, Waymo has about 15% of the ride-hailing market in San Francisco, up about 14 percentage points since the start of 2024. Whatever happens, investors should brace for volatility. For months to come, every problem, be it an act of vandalism or a car unable to complete a trip, and every success, such as service expansion, will be scrutinized by investors and Wall Street. Tesla investors, however, are used to that. Tesla stock, by some measures, is about three times as volatile as other large tech stocks. Write to Al Root at
