Iran hangs nine convicted Islamic State members
Iran has executed nine men convicted of plotting to carry out attacks inside the country in 2018 on behalf of the Islamic State group, the judiciary said on Tuesday.
"The death sentences of nine members of the terrorist group Daesh were carried out after confirmation by Iran's Supreme Court," the judiciary's Mizan Online news outlet reported, using the Arabic acronym for IS.
They "had planned to carry out terrorist attacks against civilians in Iran", it added.
The nine were arrested following a deadly clash with a Revolutionary Guards patrol on Iran's western border in January 2018.
"This terrorist cell intended to infiltrate Iran and conduct simultaneous attacks in border and central cities," Mizan quoted Guards ground forces commander General Mohammad Pakpour as saying at the time.
Guards units, supported by intelligence officers, tracked the suspects down and captured them in a deadly exchange of fire in the western mountains in which three officers were killed.
"Some of the terrorists blew themselves up with suicide vests," Pakpour said. "Three of our forces were martyred during the operation."
Equipment seized included machine guns, grenades, thermal cameras and large stockpiles of ammunition.
Judicial officials said the men were charged with waging war against God -- a capital offence in Iran -- through armed rebellion, terrorism and illegal possession of military weapons.
"The defendants were given a fair trial with legal representation and were sentenced based on evidence, confessions and witness testimonies," Mizan said.
The Tehran Revolutionary Court handed down the death sentences, which were later upheld by the Supreme Court.
"The judiciary's resolve to confront terrorism remains firm," Mizan said.
Shiite-dominated Iran is a major target for the Sunni extremists of IS. Iran regularly announces arrests of suspected IS members accused of plotting attacks.
On Sunday, police said they had detained 13 suspected members of the group in coordinated raids across four provinces.
Last month, Iran executed a man convicted of spying for Israel.
Iran is the world's second most prolific executioner after China, according to human rights groups including Amnesty International.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Hyderabad woman duped of Rs 22 lakh: fraudsters pose as cops; use fake court notices
Representative Image HYDERABAD: A 65-year-old woman from Kapra lost 22 lakh to fraudsters posing as Delhi police officers. Threatening to arrest her on charges of drug trafficking and money laundering, the fraudsters coerced the victim into transferring the money with a false promise to return it after 'RBI verification'. Based on the victim's complaint, Rachakonda police registered a case on Friday. The victim, a retired private-sector employee, told police she received a call on June 16 from a man who introduced himself as inspector Gopesh Kumar. Claiming her Aadhaar was linked to a money laundering case, he showed her fake Supreme Court and RBI notices through WhatsApp video calls and threatened immediate arrest unless she complied with his legal instructions. The caller ordered her to wear white clothes and remain on video for a virtual appearance before the judge. She was forced to disclose bank balances for an asset assessment. She transferred 2 lakh on June 17 and 20 lakh on June 19 after being assured the money would be returned after investigation. When the fraudsters demanded additional payments, the victim consulted relatives and realised the documents were fraudulent. Police are analysing call data records and bank transaction details to trace the accused.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Manipur's Churachandpur district grinds to halt over Kuki killing
Guwahati: An indefinite shutdown called by the Indigenous Tribal Leaders' Forum (ITLF) has brought life to a standstill across Manipur's Churachandpur district and other Kuki-dominated areas. The protest follows the killing of an elderly Kuki woman during a reported crossfire. The victim, Hoikholhing Haokip , wife of the Langchingmanbi village chief, was allegedly killed during an exchange of fire between security forces and unidentified militants on Thursday, June 19. The ITLF condemned the incident as a "grave injustice" and blamed the authorities for failing to protect civilians in conflict-hit areas. "This is not just a tragic loss for one family, but a glaring example of the state's breakdown in law and order," the organisation said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Algeria: Jewelry On Sale For Half Price! (See Price List) Luxury Jewelry | search ads Undo Six Kuki civil society organisations have demanded a high-level investigation into the killing and called for swift justice for the victim's family. Meanwhile, violence continued in other parts of the state on the same day. In Bishnupur district, a farmer identified as Ningthoujam Biren Singh was shot in the arm by an unknown assailant while working in his paddy field in Phubala Maning. Live Events Singh, a resident of Phubala Awang Maning Leikai and a member of the Meitei community , was initially taken to the District Hospital in Bishnupur and later referred to the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) in Imphal. His condition is currently stable. In response to these incidents, combined security forces launched a search operation in and around Langchingmanbi, Heichanglok, and western areas of Phubala village. During the operation, security personnel came under fire and retaliated.
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
Invoking anti-gangster law to counter one communal violence incident triggered by a social media post is misuse: SC
The Supreme Court has concluded that the use of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act — a law meant to counter organised crime — in a solitary case of communal disturbance caused by an 'incendiary' social media post, amounts to a misuse of the stringent penal law. The recent judgment, authored by Justice Sandeep Mehta, came after the court heard an appeal filed by people accused under the State law for mobbing and vandalising the business establishment of a man who posted content derogatory to a particular religion on social media. 'When juxtaposed with the object and intent of the U.P. Gangsters Act, which was enacted to combat organised gang-based crime and dismantle criminal syndicates that pose a persistent threat to public order, the application of the Act to the appellants based on a single incident of communal violence flaring up from an incendiary post made against a particular religion represents a significant departure from its legislative purpose,' Justice Mehta wrote. 'Colourable exercise of power' The judgment said the application of the Gangsters Act in the current case bore the 'hallmark of colourable exercise of power for purposes extraneous to the Act's legitimate objectives'. The court reminded the State government of Article 21 of the Constitution that 'no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law'. Justice Mehta observed that the procedure prescribed by law must be fair, just, reasonable, and not arbitrary, presumptive, or oppressive. The constitutional guarantee of personal liberty acquired even greater significance when an 'extraordinary legislation with stringent provisions' like the U.P. Gangsters Act was invoked by the State, he said. 'The power conferred upon the State cannot be wielded as an instrument of harassment or intimidation, particularly where political motivations may be at play,' Justice Mehta emphasised. 'Need solid evidence' Extraordinary penal provisions, particularly those that substantially abridge regular procedural safeguards like the U.P. Gangsters Act, must be invoked only if the evidence met a threshold of credibility and substantiality. 'The materials relied upon must establish a reasonable nexus between the accused and the alleged criminal activity… When a statute creates serious fetters on personal liberty, the evidentiary foundation for its invocation must be commensurately strong, supported by concrete, verifiable facts rather than vague assertions,' the top court held. Quashing the FIR and allowing the appeal, the court said the case failed to meet the 'essential threshold' required to invoke the Gangsters Act. It had rested 'largely on presumptive theories rather than presenting tangible material to establish the probability that the appellants were engaged in organised criminal activity,' the court said.
