IBM Sets the Course to Build World's First Large-Scale, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer at New IBM Quantum Data Center
IBM unveiled its path to build the world's first large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer, setting the stage for practical and scalable quantum computing.
Delivered by 2029, IBM Quantum Starling will be built in a new IBM Quantum Data Center in Poughkeepsie, New York and is expected to perform 20,000 times more operations than today's quantum computers. To represent the computational state of an IBM Starling would require the memory of more than a quindecillion (10^48) of the world's most powerful supercomputers. With Starling, users will be able to fully explore the complexity of its quantum states, which are beyond the limited properties able to be accessed by current quantum computers.
IBM, which already operates a large, global fleet of quantum computers, is releasing a new Quantum Roadmap that outlines its plans to build out a practical, fault-tolerant quantum computer.
'IBM is charting the next frontier in quantum computing,' said Arvind Krishna, Chairman and CEO, IBM. 'Our expertise across mathematics, physics, and engineering is paving the way for a large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer — one that will solve real-world challenges and unlock immense possibilities for business.'
A large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer with hundreds or thousands of logical qubits could run hundreds of millions to billions of operations, which could accelerate time and cost efficiencies in fields such as drug development, materials discovery, chemistry, and optimization.
Starling will be able to access the computational power required for these problems by running 100 million quantum operations using 200 logical qubits. It will be the foundation for IBM Quantum Blue Jay, which will be capable of executing 1 billion quantum operations over 2,000 logical qubits.
A logical qubit is a unit of an error-corrected quantum computer tasked with storing one qubit's worth of quantum information. It is made from multiple physical qubits working together to store this information and monitor each other for errors.
Like classical computers, quantum computers need to be error corrected to run large workloads without faults. To do so, clusters of physical qubits are used to create a smaller number of logical qubits with lower error rates than the underlying physical qubits. Logical qubit error rates are suppressed exponentially with the size of the cluster, enabling them to run greater numbers of operations.
Creating increasing numbers of logical qubits capable of executing quantum circuits, with as few physical qubits as possible, is critical to quantum computing at scale. Until today, a clear path to building such a fault-tolerant system without unrealistic engineering overhead has not been published.
The Path to Large-Scale Fault Tolerance
The success of executing an efficient fault-tolerant architecture is dependent on the choice of its error-correcting code, and how the system is designed and built to enable this code to scale.
Alternative and previous gold-standard, error-correcting codes present fundamental engineering challenges. To scale, they would require an unfeasible number of physical qubits to create enough logical qubits to perform complex operations – necessitating impractical amounts of infrastructure and control electronics. This renders them unlikely to be able to be implemented beyond small-scale experiments and devices.
A practical, large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer requires an architecture that is:
• Fault-tolerant to suppress enough errors for useful algorithms to succeed.
• Able to prepare and measure logical qubits through computation.
• Capable of applying universal instructions to these logical qubits.
• Able to decode measurements from logical qubits in real-time and can alter subsequent instructions.
• Modular to scale to hundreds or thousands of logical qubits to run more complex algorithms.
• Efficient enough to execute meaningful algorithms with realistic physical resources, such as energy and infrastructure.
Today, IBM is introducing two new technical papers that detail how it will solve the above criteria to build a large-scale, fault-tolerant architecture.
The first paper unveils how such a system will process instructions and run operations effectively with qLDPC codes. This work builds on a groundbreaking approach to error correction featured on the cover of Nature that introduced quantum low-density parity check (qLDPC) codes. This code drastically reduces the number of physical qubits needed for error correction and cuts required overhead by approximately 90 percent, compared to other leading codes. Additionally, it lays out the resources required to reliably run large-scale quantum programs to prove the efficiency of such an architecture over others.
The second paper describes how to efficiently decode the information from the physical qubits and charts a path to identify and correct errors in real-time with conventional computing resources.
From Roadmap to Reality
The new IBM Quantum Roadmap outlines the key technology milestones that will demonstrate and execute the criteria for fault tolerance. Each new processor in the roadmap addresses specific challenges to build quantum systems that are modular, scalable, and error-corrected:
• IBM Quantum Loon, expected in 2025, is designed to test architecture components for the qLDPC code, including 'C-couplers' that connect qubits over longer distances within the same chip.
• IBM Quantum Kookaburra, expected in 2026, will be IBM's first modular processor designed to store and process encoded information. It will combine quantum memory with logic operations — the basic building block for scaling fault-tolerant systems beyond a single chip.
• IBM Quantum Cockatoo, expected in 2027, will entangle two Kookaburra modules using 'L-couplers.' This architecture will link quantum chips together like nodes in a larger system, avoiding the need to build impractically large chips.
Together, these advancements are being designed to culminate in Starling in 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Bawaba
an hour ago
- Al Bawaba
U.S. bans WhatsApp on government devices
Published June 23rd, 2025 - 03:44 GMT WhatsApp is owned by Meta, the tech giant led by Mark Zuckerberg, which also owns Instagram and Facebook. ALBAWABA- The U.S. House of Representatives has officially announced a ban on the use of WhatsApp across all government-issued devices, citing serious concerns over data security and user privacy. Also Read Iran lifts ban on Google Play and WhatsApp The popular messaging app has been classified as high-risk due to the lack of encryption for stored data and potential vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive information. This move comes amid heightened global scrutiny of data privacy, especially in light of regional tensions. Also Read JD Vance calls previous presidents 'dumb' except Trump Notably, Iranian authorities had earlier urged users to uninstall WhatsApp and Instagram following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, warning of security breaches that allow user data to be collected and funneled to Israeli intelligence, claims now seen by some as reinforced by the U.S. decision. WhatsApp is owned by Meta, the tech giant led by Mark Zuckerberg, which also owns Instagram and Facebook. The integration of these platforms under Meta has raised additional concerns about centralized data handling and cross-platform tracking. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
Al Bawaba
10 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
GMC Acadia and Chevrolet Traverse Recognized for Excellence in Safety by IIHS
General Motors is proud to announce that the 2025 GMC Acadia and Chevrolet Traverse have earned Top Safety Pick designations from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). These recognitions, awarded in March and April respectively, reinforce GM's long-standing commitment to safety and highlight the company's ongoing efforts to build vehicles that help protect everyone on the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is an independent, nonprofit scientific and educational organization dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries and property damage from motor vehicle crashes through research and evaluation and through education of consumers, policymakers and safety professionals. This achievement is the result of years of development, testing, and collaboration across GM's global safety, engineering, and manufacturing teams. Both the GMC Acadia and Chevrolet Traverse are built at GM's Lansing Delta Township Assembly plant in Michigan, USA. Both vehicles underwent rigorous internal validation in addition to meeting the IIHS's stringent testing protocols. These recognitions affirm GM's capability to design and produce vehicles that meet some of the highest safety standards in the the Chief Marketing Officer for Chevrolet and GMC at GM Africa & Middle East, Furrukh Jawaid said, 'Being recognized by IIHS is a proud moment for GM and underscores our ongoing commitment to safety as a core brand value. It's a testament to the collaborative work of our global teams across engineering, safety, and manufacturing who bring this vision to life. As we pursue our goal of a future with Zero Crashes, Zero Emissions, and Zero Congestion, safety remains at the forefront. Our customers place their trust in us every time they get behind the wheel, and we take that responsibility seriously. These accolades are not just awards, they are a reflection of our promise to deliver safe, reliable vehicles for every journey.'The 2025 GMC Acadia and Chevrolet Traverse feature a comprehensive suite of standard and available safety technologies, including automatic emergency braking, forward collision alert, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, pedestrian detection, and blind zone steering assist. These systems are supported by robust vehicle structures and occupant protection technologies designed to perform in real-world crash scenarios. Moreover, Daniel Oden, Regional Quality Manager at GM Africa & Middle East added, 'The IIHS Top Safety Pick awards for the GMC Acadia and Chevrolet Traverse reflect our deep and ongoing commitment to vehicle safety. From concept to production, our teams work with precision and purpose to ensure every safety standard is met and exceeded. These recognitions are the result of extensive engineering, rigorous testing, and a clear focus on protecting drivers, passengers, and everyone sharing the road. Safety is not an added benefit. It is a fundamental principle that guides our development process and informs every decision we make.' GM's approach to safety extends beyond vehicle design. A human problem requires a more human solution. That's why GM looks at safety differently. Road safety is not just about vehicle features, it's also about understanding the behaviors, environments, and systems that contribute to crashes. GM takes a holistic approach, combining research, data analysis, technology development, and community advocacy to help reduce traffic injuries and fatalities. This includes partnerships with academic institutions, nonprofits, and public entities to support traffic safety and systemic change. For customers, these awards offer assurance that the vehicles they drive meet rigorous safety standards and are equipped with features designed to help protect their families. As GM continues to invest in new safety innovations, the company remains focused on raising the bar for what safety can and should look like across the automotive industry.
Wamda
14 hours ago
- Wamda
Why should MENA family offices rethink direct startup investments
For many family offices, the answer is to go direct. Direct investments—bypassing funds and investing straight into startups—have long held a certain allure. The idea of owning a bigger slice of a promising company, skipping management fees, and maintaining control is deeply appealing. But beneath the surface, this strategy often conceals more risk than reward. "After an inheritance or liquidity event, families often make larger investments than their risk tolerance allows," says Christopher Aw, a board director at Operation Snow Leopard and an advisor to multiple family offices. "I've seen wealth vanish from poorly executed direct deals. It's easy to think you can afford the risk because you have a lot of capital, but it adds up quickly." While some family offices succeed with direct investing, many more misjudge the time, expertise, and diligence required to make it work. Christopher adds, "Some family offices now think VC is a bad investment, but in reality, it's one of the best asset classes for high returns—they just didn't approach it the right way." The illusion of control Direct deals offer the illusion of proximity and influence. But unlike institutional VCs, most family offices don't have the operating muscle, domain expertise, or network to properly evaluate early-stage startups. Due diligence often relies on intuition or informal connections, rather than structured frameworks. "Some families think they know the space well enough and don't bring in outside experts, which can be risky," Christophers says. "Deep tech is cutting-edge by definition, so even financial professionals struggle to truly understand it." This overconfidence, especially post-liquidity, can be dangerous. Many families, flush with capital, jump into unfamiliar sectors with limited support. Worse, they tend to over-concentrate—placing big bets on a few deals instead of building diversified exposure. The case for indirect investing So what's the alternative? For family offices, the most practical approach is indirect investing through venture capital funds, or what Christopher calls building a "large passive portfolio". These funds are managed by seasoned professionals who know how to manage risk, structure portfolios, and gain access to high-potential deals. "The best strategy is for family offices to build a large passive portfolio," says Christopher. "Direct deals might seem like passive investments, but they're not—they require a lot of active involvement. Few people do it well." In the MENA region, over 83% of family offices now invest in private equity, with many increasing allocations to VC in recent years. In MENA, approximately 58% of family offices are active in venture capital and other regional studies. The region is home to over 124 single-family offices, collectively investing more than $383 billion across 7,200+ deals. This doesn't mean family offices should avoid direct investing entirely. But the approach must be strategic. Investing selectively, alongside a trusted VC partner or as a co-investor, allows families to benefit from expert insight while retaining a degree of ownership and control. Learning the hard way In the Middle East, where family-run businesses form the backbone of the private sector, the temptation to invest directly is particularly strong. Relationship-driven business culture reinforces the instinct to back people you know. However, as several families have painfully discovered, familiarity does not ensure success. "I know families that lost millions on direct deals that sounded great at dinner parties," Christopher says. "It's not just about capital—it's about discipline, structure, and humility." For fund managers seeking LPs in the region, this presents both a challenge and an opportunity. Many families are sceptical of traditional funding structures, scarred by past mistakes. But others are starting to see the value of partnering with experienced managers, especially in complex sectors like fintech, AI, and cross-border logistics. Some of the most notable investments led by MENA-based family offices include Mayhoola's acquisition of Valentino for €700 million in 2012 (and its partial sale to Kering for €1.87 billion in 2023) and Al Nowais Investments' $1 billion commitment to renewable energy in Egypt. These landmark deals illustrate both the scale and ambition of regional capital. And while the excitement around private credit is starting to cool, it still holds appeal—especially for family offices seeking steady returns in the 10–12% range. Private credit offers a more flexible option compared to private equity, which may yield 15–17% but comes with greater illiquidity. This shift reflects a broader trend: as family offices expand and evolve, more individuals are branding themselves as family office representatives. It's a signal of the growing influence these entities have in shaping capital markets. "At the end of the day, the families who win are the ones who ask hard questions, surround themselves with experts, and stay honest about what they don't know," says Christopher.
