SDP unveils 2025 manifesto with sweeping proposals on healthcare, housing, education and tax
The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) unveiled a comprehensive manifesto on 20 April 2025, outlining an ambitious suite of policies aimed at reducing living costs and reshaping public systems in healthcare, housing, and education.
The manifesto, titled 'Thrive, Not Just Survive', was launched at Yew Tee Square by party chairman Professor Paul Tambyah.
Prof Tambyah, flanked by party leaders Bryan Lim, Jufri Salim, and Gigene Wong, described the document as a promise to the electorate.
'It's a promise that we want you all to hold us accountable to,' he said, urging voters to expect transparency and commitment from the party if elected.
The manifesto outlines over 40 proposals, categorised under six thematic pillars: fair taxation, universal healthcare, environmental and social respect, rational immigration, affordable housing, and an inclusive education system.
Affordable housing through the NOM scheme
A core feature is the Non-Open Market (NOM) housing scheme. Under this, new Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats would exclude land cost, reflecting only construction and administrative expenses.
SDP estimates NOM flat prices to start at S$90,000 for a two-room unit, scaling up to S$270,000 for a five-room flat. NOM flats would be sold back to HDB at the original price minus lease usage, with no access to the resale market.
To address housing delays, HDB would be required to maintain buffer stock. First-time families and expectant couples would also benefit from balloting priority under a proposed Young Families Priority Scheme.
Healthcare reform with universal access
Healthcare is another focus. The SDP proposes a single-payer national insurance system, replacing MediSave, MediShield and CareShield with a simplified structure.
It includes tax-funded maternal and paediatric care, arguing this will help counter falling birth rates and ease financial strain on families.
Primary care for chronic illnesses would operate on a risk-pooling model. Public hospital running costs would be tax-funded. The party also calls for dismantling healthcare clusters—arguing they create waste and inefficiencies—and returning to a unified public health sector.
Hospice and home care would also be tax- and donation-funded, while private sector healthcare costs would be reined in through tighter oversight.
Economic proposals and GST reduction
In education, SDP proposes abolishing the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE), citing stress and inequality. It advocates nationalised preschools, interest-free student loans repayable upon employment, and smaller class sizes capped at 20 students.
The curriculum would be expanded to include arts, digital literacy, and project-based learning, while reducing the content load in traditional subjects. It also proposes removing school rankings and implementing a Dedicated-Teacher System, where one teacher guides a class for three years.
The party supports democratised university governance and centralising special needs education under government management with agency support.
The manifesto also outlines major tax reforms. Chief among these is the proposal to reduce the Goods and Services Tax (GST) from 9% to 7%, and to abolish it entirely on essentials such as food and medicine.
SDP also calls for a national minimum wage and a retrenchment insurance system funded by Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions. It argues that current schemes like the Jobseeker Support Scheme are insufficient and overly complex.
To boost economic equity, the party proposes divesting inefficient government-linked companies, phasing out state investor Temasek, and increasing transparency around GIC operations.
For seniors, SDP wants a broader Silver Support Scheme covering 80% of low-income elderly, providing them with S$500 monthly from a small share of reserve investment interest.
Education overhaul and PSLE abolition
In education, the SDP is proposing a fundamental transformation of the current system, which it criticises as overly focused on competition and elitism. Central to its proposal is the complete removal of the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE), which it describes as a key source of stress and inequality.
Instead, the party advocates a holistic approach to learning that places greater emphasis on creativity, collaboration, and individual development. It calls for smaller class sizes capped at 20 students and the introduction of a Dedicated-Teacher System, where the same teacher guides a class for three consecutive years to enhance student support.
SDP also proposes nationalising all preschools, ensuring equal access to early childhood education regardless of socio-economic status. It argues that existing government kindergartens remain insufficient in scope, leaving lower-income families at a disadvantage.
The curriculum would be broadened to include speech and drama, digital literacy, student collaboration, and humanities, while reducing the content burden of subjects like mathematics and science. All forms of school and class ranking would be eliminated to reduce unnecessary academic pressure.
At the tertiary level, interest-free student loans would be provided, with repayments beginning only upon employment. SDP also supports full academic autonomy, calling for democratically elected university leadership and greater academic freedom.
Immigration, identity and labour market integrity
On immigration, the party supports a 'talent track' system, where foreign professionals must meet strict skill and credential standards. Companies would be required to prove that local talent is unavailable before hiring foreigners.
SDP opposes what it terms 'unbridled immigration,' claiming it has contributed to job competition and overcrowding. It also seeks to abolish the Ethnic Integration Policy and remove racial identifiers from national identity cards to foster a unified national identity.
Environmental priorities and climate action
Climate-related proposals include a moratorium on forest destruction, stronger promotion of electric vehicles (EVs) for public transport, and increased funding for renewable energy innovation.
The party highlighted the ongoing loss of green spaces, linking it to declining public well-being and warning of increased environmental degradation if current trends continue.
A strategic electoral push
The manifesto was launched days ahead of Nomination Day on 23 April, with the General Election set for 3 May.
The SDP is focusing on a 'northern strategy,' with declared candidates in Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC, Sembawang GRC, Sembawang West SMC, and Bukit Panjang SMC.
SDP Secretary General Dr Chee Soon Juan will contest Sembawang West SMC, while Prof Tambyah returns to Bukit Panjang SMC.
'People know that if they vote us in, we will speak up on issues that matter,' said Prof Tambyah.
While the proposals are extensive and transformative, SDP asserts they are feasible, pointing to the government's S$6.8 billion budget surplus for 2025 as a potential funding source.
As the campaign enters its final stretch, voters are now presented with a clear alternative vision, one that the SDP claims prioritises dignity, equity, and sustainability over short-term handouts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
IAEA says entrances to tunnels at Iran's Isfahan site hit by US strike
Satellite image shows a close up view of destroyed buildings at Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center, after it was hit by U.S. airstrikes, in Isfahan, Iran, June 22, 2025. Maxar Technologies/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES. MANDATORY CREDIT. MUST NOT OBSCURE LOGO. Satellite image shows a close up view of buildings at Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center, before it was hit by U.S. airstrikes, in Isfahan, Iran, June 16, 2025. Maxar Technologies/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES. MANDATORY CREDIT. MUST NOT OBSCURE LOGO. IAEA says entrances to tunnels at Iran's Isfahan site hit by US strike VIENNA - Entrances to tunnels used to store part of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile at the sprawling Isfahan nuclear complex were hit in U.S. military strikes overnight, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Sunday. "We have established that entrances to underground tunnels at the site were impacted," the International Atomic Energy Agency said in a statement. Officials have previously said much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium was stored underground at Isfahan. In a statement to the U.N. Security Council soon after the IAEA statement was issued, the agency's chief Rafael Grossi appeared to confirm the tunnels hit were part of the area used for the storage of that stockpile. "Entrances to tunnels used for the storage of enriched material appear to have been hit," he said, referring to Isfahan. Iranian officials have said measures would be taken to protect the country's nuclear material without informing the IAEA. Grossi said Iran could do that in a way that respects its so-called safeguards obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. "Any special measures by Iran to protect its nuclear materials and equipment can be done in accordance with Iran's safeguards obligations and the agency. This is possible," Grossi told the Security Council. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Muslim countries to set up contact group to seek Israel-Iran de-escalation
FILE PHOTO: Turkey's President Tayyip Erdogan meets with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi as they are flanked by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and members of Turkish and Iranian delegations, during the 51st Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), in Istanbul, Turkey, June 21, 2025. Murat Cetinmuhurdar/PPO/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo ANKARA - The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation said on Sunday it would set up a ministerial contact group to establish regular contact with international and regional parties to support de-escalation efforts after U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. In a joint declaration following a meeting of the 57-member group's foreign ministers in Istanbul, the OIC condemned "the aggression of Israel" against Iran, stressing "the urgent need to stop Israeli attacks and their great concern regarding this dangerous escalation". It also urged the international community to take deterrent measures against attacks on Iran and "make Israel accountable for crimes committed". While the joint declaration from the meeting in Istanbul did not mention the overnight U.S. strikes, the group also agreed on a separate 13-article resolution on the Israel-Iran conflict, in which it condemned both the Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, adding the OIC was in full solidarity with Tehran. It also called on the International Atomic Energy Agency to "unequivocally condemn those attacks and to report those attacks to the Security Council," adding the "barbaric attacks" violated international law, according to a draft of the resolution. It said the OIC also called on Israel to "join without delay the treaty of Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and place all its nuclear facilities and activities under comprehensive IAEA safeguards." U.S. ally Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons and says it struck Iran to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. OIC members also reaffirmed Iran's "inherent right to self-defence and to take all necessary measures to fully protect its sovereignty and citizens, and to prevent recurrence of such criminal acts against its territory in future," the text showed. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
US strikes on Iran nuclear sites are real-life test of hard power's limits
A combination picture shows satellite images over Fordow, before and after the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 2, 2025 (L) and June 22, 2025. Planet Labs PBC via REUTERS VIENNA/PARIS - U.S. military strikes overnight in which President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites were "obliterated" will put to the test the widely held view that such attacks can delay a nuclear programme but not kill a determined push for atom bombs. As Iran's nuclear programme has expanded and become more sophisticated over the past two decades, many officials and nuclear experts have warned: You can destroy or disable a nuclear programme's physical infrastructure but it is very hard or impossible to eliminate the knowledge a country has acquired. Western powers including the United States have publicly suggested as much, complaining of the "irreversible knowledge gain" Iran has made by carrying out activities they object to. "Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge," the Washington-based Arms Control Association said in a statement after the U.S. strikes with massive bunker-busting bombs on sites including Iran's two main underground enrichment plants at Natanz and Fordow. "The strikes will set Iran's programme back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities, possibly prompting it to consider withdrawing from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and possibly proceeding to weaponisation." Israel has also said it has killed Iranian nuclear scientists but, while little is known about the personnel side of Iran's nuclear programme, officials have said they are sceptical about that having a serious impact on Iran's nuclear knowledge, even if it might slow progress in the near term. The West says there is no civilian justification for Iran's enrichment of uranium to near weapons-grade fissile purity. Iran says its nuclear objectives are solely peaceful and it has the right to enrich as much as it wants. Iran's nuclear programme has made rapid advances since Trump pulled the United States out of a 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers that placed strict limits on its atomic activities in exchange for sanctions relief. After the U.S. withdrawal in 2018 and the re-imposition of U.S. sanctions, Iran pushed past and then far beyond the limits imposed by the deal on items like the purity to which it can enrich uranium and how much it can stockpile. URANIUM STOCK At least until Israel's first strikes against its enrichment installations on June 13, Iran was refining uranium to up to 60% purity, a short step from the roughly 90% that is bomb-grade, and far higher than the 3.67% cap imposed by the 2015 deal, which Iran respected until the year after Trump pulled out. The last report on May 31 by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog that inspects Iran's nuclear facilities, showed Iran had enough uranium enriched to up to 60%, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. It has more at lower levels like 20% and 5%. The exact impact of Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and materials has yet to be determined. In addition to the enrichment sites, the U.S. struck Isfahan, where officials have said much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium stock was stored underground. One important open question is how much highly enriched uranium Iran still has and whether it is all accounted for. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60%, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack there. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi told state TV last weekend Iran would take measures to protect nuclear materials and equipment that would not be reported to the IAEA, and it would no longer cooperate with the IAEA as before. NORTH KOREA LOOMS LARGE The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since the first Israeli strikes nine days ago, but has said it is in contact with the Iranian authorities. What Iran will do next in terms of its nuclear programme is also unclear. Its threat to pull out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty hints at a race for nuclear weapons, but Iran has maintained it has no intention of doing so. The only other country to announce its withdrawal from the NPT is North Korea in 2003. It expelled IAEA inspectors and went on to test nuclear weapons. "Our biggest concern is that we end up with a North Korea scenario whereby these strikes convince the Iranians that the only way to save the regime is to go for the bomb. Nobody is bombing North Korea now, are they?" a European official said. Even if inspections continue, because of Trump's withdrawal in 2018 Iran had already scrapped extra IAEA oversight provided for by the 2015 deal. That means the agency no longer knows how many centrifuges Iran has at undeclared locations. The IAEA says that while it cannot guarantee Iran's aims are entirely peaceful, it also has no credible indication of a coordinated nuclear weapons programme. The Israeli and now U.S. strikes have already raised fears among diplomats and other officials, however, that Iran will use those centrifuges to set up a secret enrichment site, since one could be built inside a relatively small and inconspicuous building like a warehouse. "It is quite possible that there are enrichment sites that we don't know about. Iran is a big country," a Western official said, while adding that Iran could also choose to bide its time. "In two years, if Iran were to start from scratch, they would only need a few months to reconstitute a new programme and to get back to where they were yesterday." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
