I tested Gemini Advanced, ChatGPT, and Copilot Pro. Here's which AI searched best
With AI chatbots now built into search engines, browsers, and even your desktop, it's easy to assume they all do the same thing. But when it comes to getting useful search results, some outperform the rest.
I wanted to test Gemini Advanced, ChatGPT, and Copilot Pro head-to-head to see which one helps you get answers faster and more accurately. These are the paid versions, all promising live web access, smarter context, and fewer hallucinations.
Recommended Videos
So, I gave each AI the same set of prompts—from current events to deep-dive research queries—and judged them on five fronts: accuracy, depth, follow-up quality, mistakes, and usability. Here's how they stacked up.
Test 1: Accuracy and real-time info
To start things off, I asked all three AIs a current events question that needed real-time knowledge, not just general facts. I asked: 'Who won the latest NBA playoff game?' Gemini Advanced only showed me a scoreboard with the teams and the final scores, with no extra context, highlights, or player stats. It also pulled scores from May 10 – two days earlier than expected – which is a bit outdated for a real-time query.
ChatGPT Plus gave me a more detailed answer with extra data, such as the Timberwolves taking a 3-1 series lead over the Warriors. It also mentioned how Julius Randle and Anthony Edwards combined for 61 points—Randle with 31 and Edwards with 30. It also included source links under each paragraph (that worked when testing this), making it easy to double-check the info. I also liked that when the cursor hovered over the source link, it would highlight the text it got from that source. My only complaint? It buried the answer under too many details. A quick summary up top would've helped.
On the other hand, Copilot Pro gave me a more concise answer from the get-go and asked if I wanted additional information. I have to give this round to Copilot Pro—it nailed the direct answer and even offered a follow-up.
Test 2: Depth of response
For the second test, I asked a broader question that required more than just a quick fact: How can I create a strong password? Gemini Advanced gave me more tips than ChatGPT and provided source links below each tip for easy double-checking. It also used longer sentences, which made the whole response feel more readable without too much scrolling, unlike ChatGPT, which gave fewer tips and didn't include any source links. However, it did ask if the conversation was helpful, something Gemini didn't do.
Copilot Pro also gave less information and no source links. Still, it did show a few relevant follow-up questions, such as: Why is a strong password important for security? Can you give me an example of a strong password? How does a password manager keep my information safe? I also found the emojis alongside each tip were a fun touch.
Test 3: Follow-up flexibility
For this test, I asked each AI a follow-up question after its original response, something that built on the conversation naturally. I wanted to see how well it handled context and whether it actually understood what I was asking. I followed up with, 'Can you explain why using personal information in passwords is bad?'
ChatGPT gave me three main points, a couple of extra security tips to follow, plus a bottom-line summary that wrapped it all up. Copilot Pro gave me three tips and a few sentences on how to stay safe. Gemini, however, was the only one that didn't include specific safety tips at the end. It gave a few more reasons why using personal info is bad and added a bit more information.
I must admit that Copilot Pro and ChatGPT took this prize and gave Gemini something to improve on. This time, none of the three included source links, which felt like a missed opportunity.
Test 4: Mistakes and hallucinations
One of the biggest risks with any AI assistant is its tendency to say things that aren't true confidently. They hallucinate and say things that are sometimes funny and other times alarming. So, I gave each chatbot a few fact-based prompts to see how accurate they were and whether they flagged uncertainties, something they all passed with flying colors.
I started with a simple one and asked when Microsoft was founded, and Gemini Advanced answered with a one-liner: 'Microsoft was founded in 1975.' ChatGPT, on the other hand, went into a bit more detail, saying, 'Microsoft was founded on April 4, 1975, by Bill Gates and Paul Allen.' Copilot Pro gave a longer answer: 'Microsoft was founded on April 4, 1975, by Bill Gates and Paul Allen in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. It started as a small software company, but it quickly grew into one of the world's largest and most influential tech companies. Quite the success story, right?' I like how Copilot struck a balance, giving me enough context without overwhelming me and even suggesting three clickable follow-up questions. I have to admit that the answer I liked best was from Copilot Pro.
Next, I asked all three AI assistants,' Which is the best AI assistant available?' Gemini gave a solid overview of the top AI assistants, including a quick rundown of what each can do. It even added a section called 'Other notable AI assistants' with less popular options.
What I really liked, though, was the part where it explained which assistant might be the better pick, like choosing Gemini if you prioritize certain features, or going with ChatGPT or Copilot Pro if you rely more on other things. That side-by-side comparison is actually helpful.
ChatGPT said there is no single best option, depending on why you need it. Copilot Pro said several options are available, each with specific strengths.
Test 5: Usability and interface experience
A great AI answer is only half the story; the other half is how easy it is to read the information it gives you. So, I spent time using each AI assistant's interface to see how smooth, intuitive, and helpful the overall experience felt.
Copilot Pro stood out by giving me just enough information to answer my question clearly, without overwhelming me or leaving me confused about what it meant. I also like how it blends into Microsoft Edge and Windows 11 since it results in fewer mouse movements to open it. It was also good to see those relevant follow-up questions that saved me from typing out the question.
If there's one area where Copilot Pro fell short, it was with shopping links. It provided them, but only after asking twice. And, in some cases, the link led to the wrong places. I also found the main Copilot page a little too cluttered, with buttons and suggestions all squeezed together. I get that it's trying to be helpful, but sometimes less is more.
Gemini Advanced heavily relies on the Google ecosystem. The side panel works well across Gmail, Drive, and Docs, and it's handy for pulling in context from whatever you're working on. Visually, it looks clean and modern, with a color scheme that gives it a polished, almost elegant feel.
I also liked how Gemini gives more detailed responses than the others. That's great if you're looking for depth, though if you prefer shorter replies, you can ask it to simplify things. It handled product searches well when I asked it to provide links.
ChatGPT keeps things minimal but in a good way. The interface is clean and easy to navigate, and I liked that the input box is at the top of the screen, which feels more natural to use. However, when I tried using it to find links for products, it struggled. Some responses didn't include links at all, and when they did, they weren't always clickable or useful.
Final thoughts
After testing all three assistants across different scenarios, one thing became clear: no single AI does everything perfectly. Each one has strengths and quirks that make it better suited for certain tasks or users.
ChatGPT is still the most consistent when it comes to natural, well-written responses. It's easy to use, but it would be nice if it fixed the link issue mentioned earlier. Gemini Advanced gives you the most information upfront, sometimes too much, but its integration with Google tools is a real advantage when you want to add more files to your search.
Copilot Pro is the one I'd be least likely to stick with, even though I liked how it handled response length and follow-up suggestions. But the cluttered interface and unreliable links made it harder to trust on a daily basis—and for me, that's a deal-breaker. At the end of the day, the best AI chatbots really depends on what you value the most: clarity, depth, or usability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
21 minutes ago
- The Verge
Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds meet for the first time.
Posted Jun 22, 2025 at 10:45 AM UTC Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds meet for the first time. Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, have surprisingly never met before. That all changed at a recent dinner hosted by Sysinternals creator Mark Russinovich. The world's of Linux and Windows finally came together in real life, and Dave Cutler, Microsoft technical fellow and Windows NT lead developer, was also there to witness the moment and meet Torvalds for the first time. 'No major kernel decisions were made,' jokes Russinovich in a post on LinkedIn.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chime versus SoFi: Which Is the Better Fintech Stock Right Now?
Chime operates an online banking platform that is similar to SoFi. SoFi is acquiring new members, increasing revenue, and accelerating profit at a pace superior to the competition. 10 stocks we like better than SoFi Technologies › It's been a hot couple of weeks for the fintech sector. Digital banking platform (NASDAQ: CHYM) and stablecoin operator Circle (NYSE: CRCL) both completed initial public offerings (IPOs) in which shares of both companies soared. While artificial intelligence (AI) is still the biggest megatrend fueling the stock market right now, the back-to-back IPOs from Circle and Chime have brought some renewed interest to the financial services arena. Given the overlapping business models of Chime and SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI), another budding neobank, investors may be wondering which stock is the better buy right now. Let's assess Chime and SoFi from both an operational and valuation perspective. After doing so, I think smart investors will be able to determine a clear winner between the two digital banking platforms. SoFi offers many of the same financial services products that you may see at traditional banks. By offering lending, insurance, and investment management, SoFi has proven that it can compete with legacy banking providers by offering a similar, diversified portfolio of products. The main differentiator between SoFi and most of its competitors is that the company operates entirely online and lacks physical brick-and-mortar infrastructure. By creating a one-stop shop for financial services, SoFi is offering a level of convenience that is hard to match. In turn, SoFi is not only able to keep its customers loyal to the platform, but also has leveraged its comprehensive ecosystem by cross-selling additional services to existing members. SoFi refers to this strategy as its financial services productivity loop -- essentially building a model in which the lifetime value of customers increases over time, ultimately creating a competitive advantage over incumbent providers. At the end of the first quarter, SoFi boasted 10.9 million customers on its platform that use a total of 15.9 million products. This implies that each user in SoFi's network is using 1.4 products on average. As the chart above illustrates, SoFi's business model is paying off in spades, underscored by accelerating revenue growth and a transition to consistent profitability. While SoFi's business is rocking, Chime doesn't appear too far behind. In the table below, I've summarized a number of financial metrics and key performance indicators for SoFi and Chime. Category SoFi Chime Revenue -- Trailing 12-month ($) $2.8 billion $1.8 billion Members 10.9 million 8.6 million 3-year membership compound annual growth rate (CAGR) 41.3% 22.3% Net income (Trailing 12-Months) $482 million ($28.3) million Market capitalization (as of June 18) $17 billion $10.6 billion Data source: SoFi Investor Relations and Chime S-1 Filing. The obvious takeaway from the figures above is that SoFi is a larger business than Chime in terms of revenue. This is not entirely surprising, given that SoFi's platform boasts more than 2 million more members than Chime. The more subtle factor that I'd like to point out is that SoFi is far more profitable than Chime. Perhaps the biggest contributor to SoFi's profitability profile is the rate at which it is acquiring new members relative to the competition. Per the table above, SoFi's three-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for user acquisition is almost double that of Chime's. By onboarding more users, SoFi has been able to more quickly monetize these members and command superior unit economics compared to its peers. While Chime's growth is impressive, the company lags behind SoFi on a number of critical metrics. While I suspect that Chime may see a brief uptick in its operations thanks to the notoriety that came with the IPO, I question if the company will ever eclipse SoFi's size. Although SoFi is a bit pricey compared to traditional bank and financial services stocks based on its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, I think the shares deserve a premium due to the company's technology-first platform. I see SoFi growing into its valuation thanks to future earnings growth. If I had to choose between the two digital bank stocks explored here, I'd pick SoFi without thinking twice. Before you buy stock in SoFi Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SoFi Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Adam Spatacco has positions in SoFi Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase and PayPal. The Motley Fool recommends Capital One Financial and recommends the following options: long January 2027 $42.50 calls on PayPal and short June 2025 $77.50 calls on PayPal. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Chime versus SoFi: Which Is the Better Fintech Stock Right Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BofA outlines the bull and bear arguments surrounding IBM shares
- Shares in International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM) has surged so far this year, spurred on by hopes around the software group's artificial intelligence ambitions. IBM has said that it now has a "book of business" for its ChatGPT-like generative AI that is worth $6 billion, while CEO Arvind Krishna has said that customer interest in utilizing different AI models would likely fuel demand in the future. The company has also been specializing in developing tools that allow clients to build out their own AI-enhanced agents. Speaking to Reuters in May, Krishna suggested that, using IBM's Granite suite of AI models, along with alternatives from Mistral and Facebook-owner Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), these agents could be constructed in mere minutes. These capabilities will lead to an acceleration of the rate of growth of its AI operations, Krishna said at the time. The comments came after IBM announced in April that it would invest some $150 billion in the United States, where it has long had a presence as a manufacturer of mainframe computers. Krishna noted that quantum computers -- a new type of computer that harnesses quantum mechanics to carry out tasks -- will also be made in the country. "There's going to be a very healthy market that behooves us to invest and lean in," Krisna told Reuters. Yet, even as optimism surrounds IBM's AI ambitions, a murky economic outlook clouded its most recent earnings. Faced with the looming threat of sweeping U.S. tariffs, analysts have warned that many companies may be reining in spending, potentially weighing on IBM's key consulting arm. A push by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to slash government spending has also led to the shelving of 15 federal contracts at IBM that accounted for $100 million in business. Revenue from the consulting segment slipped in the most recent quarter by 2%, although IBM backed its 2025 target for top-line growth on a constant currency basis of at least 5%. Writing in a note to clients, analysts at BofA led by Wamsi Mohan said that IBM shares, despite trading at all-time highs, are "interesting due to the transformational initiatives undertaken by management." "IBM underwent a significant transformation over the last five years by shifting their software segment towards strategic M&A investments, shedding lower growth/high cost businesses, and rebalancing their portfolio towards cloud and AI trends," the brokerage wrote. However, they flagged that less rosy assessments of the stock have highlighted that IBM is "structurally under-owned and underweight." "This disconnect stems from the underperformance from 2010-2019 as revenues, margins and free cash flow were under pressure. While the turnaround [from 2020-2025] is acknowledged by bears, the valuation relative to growth profile remains a hurdle for many," the analysts said. Weighing these arguments, the BofA strategists lifted their price target for the stock to $320 from $290 and reiterated their "buy" rating of the stock. Related articles BofA outlines the bull and bear arguments surrounding IBM shares UBS identifies key thematic opportunities for stock market investors This sector is uniquely positioned to capture infrastructure spend growth: analyst Sign in to access your portfolio
