History Today: When the Napoleon era ended with Battle of Waterloo loss

One of the greatest military strategists, Napoleon Bonaparte, fought and lost at the Battle of Waterloo on June 18, 1815. This marked the end of the Napoleonic era in European history. On this day in 1858, Rani Lakshmibai, the valiant Queen of Jhansi, died while fighting against British soldiers near Gwalior read more
One of the most important battles in Europe was fought on June 18, 1815. The day saw French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte lose to the Duke of Wellington in the Battle of Waterloo, thus, effectively bringing an end to the Napoleonic era in European history.
If you are a history geek who loves to learn about important events from the past, Firstpost Explainers' ongoing series, History Today will be your one-stop destination to explore key events.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In 1858, Queen of Jhansi Rani Lakshmibai died while battling British forces near Gwalior. She died a heroic death and is considered to be a pivotal figure during the Rebellion of 1857.
Napoleon loses the Battle of Waterloo
June 18 witnessed one of those wars that went on to change the history of Europe. Napoleon Bonaparte was defeated on this day in the Battle of Waterloo. This marked the end of his reign as Emperor of the French and the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars.
After escaping exile on the island of Elba, Napoleon returned to France in March 1815 and regained power, beginning the period known as the 'Hundred Days.' Determined to crush opposition swiftly, Napoleon led his army into present-day Belgium, where the Seventh Coalition forces, primarily British-led troops under the Duke of Wellington and
Prussian troops commanded by Gebhard Leberecht von Blucher, had assembled.
In this oil painting of the Battle of Waterloo, Duke of Wellington is seen ordering his forces. Wikimedia Commons
Napoleon aimed to divide and conquer the coalition forces before they could unite. He initially achieved a victory against the Prussians at Ligny on June 16 and engaged the Anglo-Allied army at Quatre Bras.
However, the main confrontation at Waterloo on June 18 proved to be his undoing. Napoleon delayed his attack until midday to allow the muddy ground to dry after heavy overnight rain, a decision that proved critical. This delay gave the Prussian forces, led by Marshal Gebhard von Blucher, precious time to regroup and march towards Waterloo.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Throughout the day, Napoleon's forces launched repeated, fierce assaults against Wellington's well-fortified positions. Despite heavy casualties on both sides, Wellington's lines held. The timely arrival of Blucher's Prussian army in the late afternoon on the French right flank turned the tide decisively against Napoleon. The French army, exhausted and increasingly outnumbered, began to buckle under the combined pressure. A final, desperate charge by Napoleon's elite Imperial Guard was repulsed, leading to a complete rout of the French forces.
Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo ended his dreams of an empire and forced him to abdicate for a second time. He was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic, where he died in 1821. The victory at Waterloo ushered in a new era of peace and conservative order in Europe, led by the Congress of Vienna.
Rani Lakshmibai dies
She was considered to be one of the most valiant and heroic leaders of the Rebellion of 1857. On this day in 1858, Rani Lakshmibai died while fighting the British forces near Gwalior after they annexed her Kingdom of Jhansi under the controversial Doctrine of Lapse.
Born as Manikarnika Tambe in 1828 in Varanasi, she was married to Maharaja Gangadhar Rao of Jhansi and later became the queen, or Rani, of the princely state. After her husband's death in 1853, the British East India Company refused to recognise her adopted son as heir and annexed Jhansi under the Doctrine of Lapse. This injustice deeply angered Lakshmibai, who vowed to fight for her kingdom's sovereignty.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Queen of Jhansi, Rani Lakshmibai. Wikimedia Commons
When the 1857 revolt against British rule broke out, Rani Lakshmibai emerged as a leading force in the rebellion. She organised an army, trained soldiers, including women, and fiercely defended Jhansi when British troops besieged the city in March 1858. After a prolonged battle, she escaped in disguise and continued resistance.
At Gwalior, she joined forces with other rebel leaders, including Tatya Tope, and together they managed to capture the formidable Gwalior Fort. However, the British soon launched a counter-attack. On June 17, 1858, a fierce engagement took place at Kotah-ki-Serai in Gwalior. Rani Lakshmibai, reportedly dressed as a male soldier and fighting on horseback, led her troops with exceptional bravery. She was mortally wounded during this intense combat, choosing death over capture by the British.
The British praised her courage, with General Rose calling her 'the most dangerous of all Indian leaders.' Though the rebellion was ultimately suppressed, Rani Lakshmibai became a symbol of resistance, courage and patriotism. Her fearless stand against colonial rule continues to inspire generations and holds a revered place in India's freedom movement.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This Day, That Year
>> On this day in 2023, the experimental submersible Titan imploded during a dive into the wreck of the Titanic.
>> The first American woman to fly into outer space, Sally Ride, was launched with four other astronauts aboard the space shuttle Challenger on this day in 1983.
>> In 1979, the SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks) II treaty was signed by US President Jimmy Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

21 hours ago

• News18

Are Indians The Most Overworked People On Earth? Netizens Debate Over Viral Post Claim

Last Updated: His observation, made in response to a conversation about reservation and employment, has sparked wide-ranging responses online A viral post on social media platform X has reignited discussions around work culture, education pressure, and social mobility in India. The comment, made by user named, Akshat Shrivastava, claimed that 'Indians are the most overworked people on earth. Not by choice. But, by system." His observation, made in response to a conversation about reservation and employment, has sparked wide-ranging responses online — from agreement to criticism, and everything in between. In a detailed post, Shrivastava outlined why he believes this pattern of overwork is deeply embedded in Indian society. He wrote: 'Kids studying for IITs would easily study 10-12 hours/day. This ability to 'slog" continues at work. This habit to 'slog" continues in adult life… While their European colleagues would have 'down time", Indians would sacrifice their sleep, family and health, to serve their company." Shrivastava pointed to the pressures young Indians face early in life, stating that the drive to overwork often stems from a lack of options and economic security. 'What's the root cause of all this? Well, it comes down to building survival instincts from a young age. Many hardworking kids have no choice but to slog. Build merit–> build a better life. That's their only option to a better life." His post was a reply to another user, Ravi, who had commented on the reservation system, stating that general category students do not lose seats to reserved category applicants, but to other general category candidates. Shrivastava's response quickly went viral, sparking a flurry of reactions. Some users supported his perspective, agreeing that Indian society encourages relentless effort from a young age. 'Indians don't hustle out of ambition. They hustle because the system taught them there's no safety net, only grind or fall," a comment read. 'Glorifying 'slogging' as the only path feels like accepting a broken system. Isn't the real tragedy that survival depends on such extremes?," another user responded. Others, however, pushed back against the idea that overwork should be normalised. 'Hard work is not a problem. Mindset is. Indians need to know: hard work isn't always the key to success — leverage is." 'Indians are often trapped in a cycle of relentless hard work, chasing middle-class stability without questioning the true return on investment for their efforts. The grind for IIT or NIT can open doors, but why does the pressure to top the class start so early, robbing teens of their youth?," another added. One user sharply criticised Shrivastava for lacking social insight, despite his strong grasp of financial matters: 'I've never seen someone so brilliantly astute when it comes to financial literacy and that part of the horizon and then be a completely oblivious illiterate when it comes to social aspects. just fascinating that someone can be this knowledgeable and this ignorant at the same time."

NDTV

a day ago

• NDTV

X User Says "Indians Are The Most Overworked People On Earth", Sparks Discussion

Akshat Shrivastava, a finance advisor and a content creator, has sparked a debate online after saying that Indians are the most overworked people on earth, not by choice, but because of systemic pressures ingrained from a young age. Taking to X, Mr Shrivastava cited the example of children studying 10-12 hours a day to prepare for competitive exams. This ability to "slog", he argued, carries over into adulthood. "Many hardworking Indians migrate abroad. While their European colleagues have downtime, Indians sacrifice their sleep, family and health to serve their company," he wrote. The content creator attributed this pattern to a survival mindset that begins from a young age. "What's the root cause of all this? Well, it comes down to building survival instincts from a young age," he said, adding: "Many hardworking kids have no choice but to slog." "Build merit - build a better life. That's their only option. They work silently, putting in hours. Right from the time they are 12-13-year-old kids. Why? because working hard is 100x better than entitled begging," he wrote. [1] Indians are the most overworked people on earth. Not by choice. But, by system. Example: kids studying for IITs would easily study 10-12 hours/day. This ability to "slog" continues at work. [2] This habit to "slog" continues in adult life. Example: many hardworking… — Akshat Shrivastava (@Akshat_World) June 19, 2025 Mr Shrivastava's post has triggered mixed reactions on social media. While several users agreed with him, others shared their critical perspective. "Indians are often trapped in a cycle of relentless hard work, chasing middle-class stability without questioning the true return on investment for their efforts. The grind for IIT or NIT can open doors, but why does the pressure to top the class start so early, robbing teens of their youth?" questioned one user. "Indians don't hustle out of ambition. They hustle because the system taught them there's no safety net, only grind or fall," expressed another. "It's not hustle culture, it's survival culture. For many Indians, hard work isn't ambition-it's the only way out," commented a third user. "India's work ethic is rooted in survival, not passion. From competitive exams to corporate cubicles, the system teaches us that hard work is the only escape from poverty and mediocrity. This mindset-while admirable-often rewards burnout, not brilliance. Children sacrifice play for tests, adults sacrifice health for targets," said another. However, one user wrote, "Hard work is not the problem. Mindset is. Indians need to know: hard work is not the key to success - leverage is." "If you are born among 1.5 billion people in a 3rd world country, Hard work and Struggle are inevitable," expressed another.

Indian Express

a day ago

• Indian Express

Gulab jamun paratha, rasgulla sabzi to Maggi momo, these food innovations are not for the faint hearted

I usually refrain from turning up my nose at any community's food, because I genuinely believe that food and spices are a window into the history and culture of a people. But I draw the line at dishes that seem to exist solely as an assault on the senses – creations that have nothing to do with culinary tradition. Gulab jamun parathas or rasgulla sabzi fall in that category. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for innovation in the kitchen. Without it, we wouldn't have French fries, baked Alaska, or even something as everyday as vada pav. But I do think innovation should have some taste in it. Pun fully intended. This week, I've decided to list all the culinary eccentricities I've come across after seeing yet another video criticising one of my favourite innovations, the Hawaiian pizza. Now, you either love pineapple on your pizza or you don't. I fall firmly in the first camp. I enjoy how the sweet pineapple cuts through the sharpness of the cheese, the saltiness of the ham, and the spiciness of the pizza sauce. Yet, I know many who would rather go hungry than eat Hawaiian pizza. It takes me back to a childhood appetiser I was once served at a friend of my parents' house – cubes of cheese, pineapple, and olives skewered on toothpicks. The pineapple was the surprise element, and in a good way. A post shared by Sarah Hussain (@zingyzest) Hawaiian pizza was not invented in Hawaii. It was created in 1962 in Canada by a Greek-born chef named Sam Panopoulos. The name came from the brand of canned pineapple he used. And honestly, after trying the monstrosity that is Chicago's deep-dish pizza, I'll take Hawaiian any day. In its own way, Hawaiian pizza reminds me of another oddball 'delicacy' – the American chopsuey, which my father adored. It is crispy noodles topped with a slightly sweet tomato-based vegetable sauce thickened with cornstarch. No Chinese person has likely ever eaten it, but it was a huge hit in the 80s and 90s. That said, some food 'innovations' truly baffle me. Case in point: Momo Pizza. I haven't had the courage to order it, and I doubt I ever will. The photo alone was enough. Pizza slices were twisted at one edge around a single momo per slice. This was then baked, which means the momo covering was crisped up. Who is ordering this? Now that I've mentioned momos, what in heaven's name are Maggi momos? Who came up with it? This is not Maggi noodles cooked with momos in it. It's quite the opposite – it's momos filled with Maggi noodles. If the salt content doesn't kill you, the carbohydrates and your dying senses surely will. Tandoori momos look so frightening, both as a concept and in their lurid red looks, you have to marvel at the people who order these. There are, of course, combinations which I don't understand, but others swear by. Malai cheeni toast is one of them. It's India's answer, and a vegetarian one at that, to the French toast. Thick slices of bread are slathered with butter and toasted, then topped with a thick layer of cream and sprinkled with sugar. Instant heart attack on a toast. I shouldn't scoff though, because Jamie Oliver – the chef who revolutionised school meals in the United Kingdom, written multiple cookbooks, hosted many more television shows, and has multitudinous restaurants in his name, recently put up a video of ice cream with extra virgin olive oil and sea salt! The sea salt I understand, but EVOO on ice cream? And just after that, I saw a reel showing a mango-Coke float – mango pieces muddled in a glass and topped with Coke. Why? My uncle used to relish having boiled rice with ghee and ketchup. So really, there's no accounting for taste. And if the British – with all their stiff upper lips – can eat blood pudding and call it a delicacy, then why should rasgulla sabzi be singled out? Write in or tweet to me and share the strangest food combinations you've ever tried or come across. Author of The Sweet Kitchen, and chef-owner of Food For Thought Catering ... Read More