Ayrshire Scottish Water workers walk out in pay dispute as strike action resumes
Strike action at Scottish Water sites in Ayrshire has resumed following a dispute over pay
Scottish Water employees from across Ayrshire have walked out yesterday morning as a dispute over pay escalates.
Workers from three unions have all rejected the latest pay deal from Scottish Water and industrial action is set to continue for the rest of this week.
Unite the Union, the GMB and Unison members at the Camphill Wastewater Treatment Works near Kilbrinie, Cumnock Underwood Wastewater Treatment Works and Irvine Meadowhead Wastewater Treatment Work are all taking part in the strikes.
Scottish Water have said that the strike action is "unnecessary" and that their latest proposal would see an average pay increase of around seven per cent over two years.
However, the unions have said the "marginally improved" offer no longer included a "£200 performance-related bonus" which was part of the reason they initially agreed to postpone scheduled action on Friday, May 2 and Tuesday, May 6.
They have also said that Scottish Water's counterparts in Northern Ireland received a £1,500 non-consolidated payment and a five per cent wage rise in December.
The strikes have the potential to directly impact Scottish Water's ability to respond to water leakages, flooding, pollution and quality concerns.
Sharon Graham, Unite general secretary, said: 'Scottish Water executives are short-changing their workers and the Scottish people while they laugh all the way to the bank with their eye-watering pay packages.
'Our members will not be forced into accepting a pay offer which has barely moved an inch since October last year.
'Unite continues to stand with our members in their fight for better jobs, pay and conditions at Scottish Water.'
Sam Ritchie, Unite industrial officer, added: 'Unite's members at Scottish Water have overwhelmingly rejected the latest wage offer. It amounted to a marginal improvement which was totally unacceptable.
'Management also withdrew an offer to increase a performance related bonus which has further infuriated the workforce.
'For months Scottish Water has had the opportunity to make a fair and reasonable offer to our members, and they have consistently refused to do so.
'The chief executive, Alex Plant, has refused to become involved in pay negotiations while walking away with a publicly-funded pay package worth nearly half a million pounds.
'The strike action will go ahead next week over seven days because of Scottish Water's indifference and arrogance towards its workers.'
Patricia McArthur, Unison's Scottish Water branch secretary, said: 'Staff are extremely frustrated. They deserve better than game-playing by senior Scottish Water managers.
'The company seems more interested in spending public money on anti-union tactics than in finding a solution to this pay dispute.
'Its managers proposed a possible pay offer, but then retracting it, only to come up with something much worse."
Simon Macfarlane, Unison's Scotland regional manager, said: 'Scottish Water workers keep this essential public service running. They've not taken the decision to strike lightly, but have been pushed too far.
'The latest pay offer falls far short of what other public sector workers in Scotland have received. Scottish Water staff will now form picket lines across the country to demand the fair deal they deserve."
Peter Farrer, chief operating officer at Scottish Water, said: 'This week's industrial action is unnecessary. It will mean union members losing valuable wages and add extra costs to the business which are ultimately paid for by customers.
'We invited the joint trade unions to talk over the weekend but unfortunately they refused to meet without preconditions.
'Given how close the vote against our latest pay offer was, we felt a resolution was possible and would be welcomed by all our colleagues.
'It is now time for the joint trade union leadership to return to the table with a sensible solution that ends this dispute.
'In the meantime, we have robust plans in place to maintain essential services should the trade unions press ahead with their strike action.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
UWS lecturers to be balloted on strike action over job cuts
The university, which has campuses in Paisley, Ayr, Dumfries, Hamilton and London, had a deficit of £14.4m in 2023/24 and is expected to post an £8.4m deficit for the current financial year. The EIS union is looking to secure a guarantee that there will be no compulsory redundancies as part of the process, with a consultative ballot showing support for strike action if that guarantee is not made. Read More: The union said it has held "unproductive discussions with university management" over the changes and the announcement of job cuts. It has now announced that its members will be balloted on a strike, opening on Monday, June 23, and to close at 12:00 PM on Tuesday, July 22. Garry Ross, EIS National Officer for Higher Education, condemned the university's approach, stating, "It is deeply regrettable that the University of the West of Scotland has chosen to make this large number of job cuts and pushed staff to the point of balloting for strike action. The proposed redundancies are a short-sighted and a damaging strategy that will have a devastating impact on the livelihoods of dedicated staff, many of whom have worked at UWS for years. "Furthermore, it will inevitably lead to a decline in the academic provision, research capacity, and overall student experience at the university. We urge UWS to step back from this path and engage meaningfully with the EIS ULA (University Lecturers Alliance) to secure a no compulsory redundancy guarantee. "The EIS ULA branch at UWS has a strong mandate from its members to move to this statutory ballot, with a previous consultative ballot showing overwhelming support for strike action if a no compulsory redundancy guarantee was not secured. "Members are resolute in their commitment to protect jobs and ensure the continued excellence of UWS as a vital institution within the Scottish higher education landscape. "The EIS ULA calls upon UWS management to reconsider its position on any planned redundancies and enter into negotiations aimed at achieving a fair and equitable resolution to their dispute that safeguards jobs and protects the future of the university. "The union remains committed to finding a negotiated settlement but is determined to win the ballot and will not hesitate to take industrial action if necessary to defend its members and the integrity of academic provision at the University of the West of Scotland." A UWS spokesperson said: "Our organisational change project is designed to put our university finances on a more sustainable footing, to enable an even better student experience and enhanced graduate outcomes. "In common with the rest of the higher education sector across the UK, the university is operating in a very challenging financial environment exacerbated by external factors that have driven a significant change in the size and shape of our student population, and the associated funding."
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
Holyrood must yet again mitigate against harm caused by Westminster
This announcement, just like the Scottish Child Payment, is progressive, and tackling child poverty at source. Time and time again the Scottish Government are having to mitigate against the harmful policies from Westminster, just like they did with Westminster's abolition of the universal Winter Fuel Payment. READ MORE: Scottish Government names date for ditching two-child cap Those mitigating measures along with the public outcry resulted in a U-turn by the Labour government at Westminster and rightly so. On the pressing and urgent issue of child poverty, can we expect a U-turn from Westminster with the immediate withdrawal of the damaging two-child cap on benefits? Catriona C Clark Falkirk
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
With independence, Scotland could become a beacon for peace
Firstly Scotland is acting as a staging post for the US bombing missions in Iran and their assistance to Israel's war. Prestwick Airport, which is owned by the Scottish Government, has seen large numbers of US war plans landing and being refuelled on their way to wage war on Iran and to assist the Israeli war effort. It's time the Scottish Government closed this route for war by banning US war planes at Prestwick. READ MORE: Scotland may be 'complicit in war crimes' allowing US to use Prestwick Secondly, if this war in the Middle East extends to a global war, Scotland's nuclear base at Faslane will be the number one target for attack, and if it's hit then much of Glasgow will disappear. Surely it's time that this expensive and ineffective nuclear base was closed. Thirdly, Scottish arms industries are supplying the Israeli war machines with vital spare parts and it's time this was ended. Of course I realise that none of this can be achieved while Scotland is part of the UK and where Starmer's Labour government is guilty of failing to condemn Israel for genocide in Gaza or the US for its warlike interventions. Instead, they are grovelling to Trump in the hope of crumbs from his table. Support for Scottish independence has reached a new high of 56% recently. Let's turn that into a pro-independence majority in the Scottish Parliament elections next year. If that happens, the Scottish Parliament should declare our independence, end our complicity in war and instead make Scotland a beacon for peace in the world. Hugh Kerr (former MEP) Edinburgh ARE nuclear weapons defensive or offensive? It seems the answer depends on whether the UK Government is talking about a lauded 'friend' or a condemned 'foe', a supposedly 'democratically elected' President or a supposedly 'expertly elected' Ayatollah. The obscene devastation in Gaza and unabated slaughter of its people on the pretext of responding to the horrendous terrorist acts of October 7 is a totally disproportionate portend of what an expansionist, war-mongering, fanatical regime might impose on the rest of the Middle East if Iran is neutered militarily. This may suit Western governments (which appear to have learned little from the catastrophic consequences of war rhetoric ahead of the illegal invasion of Iraq), with 'energy companies' keen to further exploit Iran and the region's massive oil and gas reserves, but when will the British public stand up and say 'enough is enough'? READ MORE: UK providing 'political cover' for US and Israel after Iran attack Proscribing a protest group as a terrorist organisation for spray-paint vandalism would simply demonstrate how far the UK Government, aided and abetted by much of the UK mainstream media, is prepared to go in order to justify its lethal bias in the Middle East, where an out-of-control despot intent on obliterating cities and massacring civilians wreaks generational havoc. Scotland, as an independent country, could choose a different path by genuinely promoting global nuclear disarmament and by ending compelled complicity in the actions of a 'British state' still posturing as a global super-power in order to feed the greed of international capitalist moguls and the wealthy British establishment while more inconsolable mothers cradle lifeless children in their forlorn arms. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian ARE we really expected to believe that British planes are working with the Israelis only to help find the hostages, and only information pertinent to this is given to the Israelis and shared with the US? Why are the hostages still not found? Why are British spy planes still flying over Gaza? Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed and wounded since May 27th, when the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began distributing food in southern Gaza. On June 17, at least 51 people were killed and 200 wounded, including children, while waiting for food. Westminster talks big about finding a diplomatic solution while supporting Israel with British aircraft. Is this not complicity in war crimes? READ MORE: UK Defence Secretary walks into oncoming traffic to escape Israel questions Now that Iran is in the picture, Gaza is no longer in the news. This allows the IDF to run further amok in the Occupied Territories, destroying homes and businesses. What will be the end result of this destruction? The Riviera of the Middle East? Keir Starmer is so enamoured with his 'special relationship' with Donald Trump and his rhetoric about Israel's right to defend itself that he ignores the message of the many thousands of UK citizens who march in protest against the treatment of the Palestinians and especially the carnage in Gaza. Sophocles gives a message from the past that is so relevant for now: 'whoever makes his journey to a tyrant's court becomes his slave, although he went there a free man'. Marion McPherson Ayr PALESTINE Action stage a protest at an RAF base and the Home Secretary announces she plans to proscribe them. The IDF slaughters in excess of 55,000 Palestinians and we give them armaments and surveillance assistance! READ MORE: Mark Brown: Donald Trump's ultimatum is a threat to Iran and the Middle East In the US, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified before congress in March that Iran had a stock of materials but was not building nuclear weapons. President Trump did not challenge this, but now says she was 'wrong' and that intelligence showed Iran had a 'tremendous amount of material' and could have a nuclear weapon 'within months'. Ms Gabbard has now made a statement to the effect that Iran could produce nuclear weapons 'within weeks' and that her March testimony (which seemed crystal clear at the time ) had been taken out of context by 'dishonest media'! To paraphrase the Doors from 1967 – strange days indeed! Alan Woodcock Dundee
