Pak Nominates Trump For Nobel Peace Prize Over 'Role In India-Pak Conflict'
Islamabad:
The Pakistan government on Saturday said it has decided to formally recommend US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize for his "decisive diplomatic intervention" during the recent India-Pakistan conflict.
The announcement came in a post on X, with the headline: "Government of Pakistan Recommends President Donald J Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize".
The announcement came three days after Trump hosted Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir at the White House.
"The Government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis," it said.
Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. The on-ground hostilities from the Indian and Pakistan sides that lasted for four days ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10.
Trump has been persistently claiming that he stopped a war between India and Pakistan. New Delhi has been maintaining that India's fierce counter-attack that day forced Pakistan to plead for ending the hostilities.
The Pakistan government's post on Saturday said that "at a moment of heightened regional turbulence", President Trump "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi".
It further stated that the US president "de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation, ultimately securing a ceasefire and averting a broader conflict between the two nuclear states that would have had catastrophic consequences for millions of people in the region and beyond".
"This intervention stands as a testament to his [Trump's] role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue," it read.
The government also acknowledged Trump's "sincere offers" to help resolve the issue of Jammu and Kashmir. The government noted that Trump's leadership during the 2025 Pakistan-India crisis "manifestly showcases the continuation of his legacy of pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building".
Pakistan remains hopeful that Trump's "earnest efforts" will continue to contribute towards regional and global stability, particularly in the context of ongoing crises in West Asia, including the humanitarian tragedy unfolding in Gaza and the deteriorating escalation involving Iran, the post said.
Trump, meanwhile, bemoaned that he won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for "stopping" the war between India and Pakistan or for his efforts in the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Iran conflicts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
26 minutes ago
- The Print
Our take on Israel-Iran conflict, India-Canada ties, Kamal Kaur murder and more—in 50 words
This week, we saw the Israel-Iran conflict marking the end of the Middle East equilibrium, Asim Munir recommending the Nobel Peace Prize for Trump, Akal Takht justifying Kamal Kaur's vigilante murder, and India-Canada resuming diplomatic ties. Read our 50-word editorials on them and much more. 20 June Hindi vs English vs everything else is a tired political template. Language isn't a class war
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Posters at Ooty railway station stoke allegations of Hindi imposition
Two posters that had been put up in the Udhagamandalam Railway Station stoked allegations of Hindi imposition and appropriation following which they were removed. In one poster, a quote by national poet Subramania Bharathi, transliterated into English as: 'Let us bring various literary forms and noble thoughts from all over the world,' was falsely attributed to Indian National Congress former president, Madan Mohan Malaviya. Meanwhile, another poster had a quote by Madabhushi Ananthasayanam Ayyangar, which read: 'Non-Hindi speaking too realise their dreams with simple spoken Hindi.' A section of visitors to the station objected to these posters with some voicing their opposition on social media. 'While the quote by Ananthasayanam Ayyangar can be seen as a subtle means of promoting Hindi, the other poster, of the quote by Bharathiar being falsely attributed to Malviya entirely is condemnable. As the posters have been sanctioned by the Union government, to be put up in a public space, the accuracy of such posters, and their potential to be interpreted as a means of imposing Hindi, should have been checked and vetted before being allowed to be put up,' said an activist from the Nilgiris, who had drawn the attention of the Southern Railways to the issue. Tweeting about the issue, Nilgiris MP A. Raja of the DMK said 'Hindi imposition is unacceptable! The use of Hindi in Indian railway stations in increasing every day. Especially in my constituency in the Nilgiris, the banners installed in Hindi at the 100-year-old Udhagamandalam railway station are hurting the sentiments of the Tamil people. I request the relevant authorities to immediately remove them. Tamil Nadu will never accept the imposition of Hindi.' He has also written to the Railway Minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw urging him 'to respect the linguistic sentiments of the people of Tamil Nadu and avoid compulsory inclusion of Hindi where it is not contextually necessary.' When contacted, M. Vasudevan, Senior Divisional Commercial Manager of the Salem Division of Southern Railways said the posters have been removed. 'There is no ulterior motive for the posters being put up, and they have been there for more that four or five years. We are checking how they were put up at the railway station,' said Mr. Vasudevan, who added there were other posters too, including those of quotes by poet Rabindranath Tagore. 'There are two posters which were brought to our notice, and as we do not want to court any controversies, they were removed immediately,' said Mr. Vasudevan.
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Political Line newsletter: Violence as political currency
(This is the latest edition of the Political Line newsletter curated by Varghese K. George. The Political Line newsletter is India's political landscape explained every week. You can subscribe here to get the newsletter in your inbox every Friday.) Violence within national societies and among nation states marks a collapse of order A lawmaker in Minnesota, U.S.A., was killed and another injured in an act of political violence in the past week. The suspect had a list of 45 elected officials, all Democrats, who he wanted to eliminate, say reports. U.S. President Donald J. Trump survived two assassination attempts during the last election campaign. In December, the CEO of United Healthcare was shot dead, again in an act of alleged political violence. The suspect had apparently been upset with the unfairness of the U.S. health insurance sector. Mr. Trump's Attorney General has decided to seek the death penalty for the suspect. The suspect hails from an affluent family, and was disenchanted with the U.S. political order. American public opinion is divided over the case, as many people sympathise with the accused. In India, instances of political violence — mob lynching particularly — are being reported frequently. Historically, India and the U.S. have been pulverised by violence: the Civil War, Partition, and other events. Those were violent churns that would eventually lead to the expansion of democracy in both countries. The current era of violence is markedly different from popular violence in the past, I feel. Violence earlier was the birth pang of democracy; what we currently witness is the result of an erosion of democracy that we thought had brought an end to violence as the currency for political exchanges. The violence around us today denotes a breakdown of order, among nations and within nations. Rules do not apply, and the 'might is right' principle is back with a vengeance. The distinction between state and non-state actors has been erased. This violence is a statement by political actors that they do not trust the rules any longer. See the following examples. India says there is no distinction between the Pakistani state and the terrorists it supports; India's drive against Maoist insurgents and illegal immigrants in the country is admittedly beyond the enforcement of law. Law often delays the enforcement of order, according to this worldview. If Bangladeshi migrants have to be expelled through a deportation process, it will be too time consuming; so let's just 'push' them back. Israel accuses its rivals of committing terrorism, but it has little regard for any rules of democracy, order, or even war. Israel publicly threatens to kill the leader of a fellow member of the United Nations, Iran. In the U.S., the Trump administration is stretching the scope of law — if not entirely ignoring it — to deal with illegal immigration. We are in an era where violence is not merely happening, but there is a celebration of it as a virtue, or even a moral duty of the patriotic, the faithful, and the seeker of justice. Eric Hobsbawm, writing in 1994, (The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991) was already revising his earlier opinion, which was only a decade old then, about the future of humanity in the 21st century. While avoiding any definitive predictions, the historian of capitalism, modernity, and nationalism was, in the mid-1980s, hopeful that the kind of large-scale wars of the 20th century would be improbable in the 21st. But he would revise that opinion soon. 'There is less reason to feel hopeful about the future than in the middle 1980s, when the present author concluded his trilogy on the history of the 'long nineteenth century' (1789-1914) with the words: 'The evidence that the world in the twenty-first century will be better is not negligible. If the world succeeds in not destroying itself [i.e. by nuclear war], the probability will be quite strong.'' Federalism Tract: Notes on Indian Diversity Digging in The political battle over the antiquity of Tamil culture, between the State government and the Centre continues. The Centre controls archaeology in the country, but the State of TN has taken proactive measures to insert itself into archaeological excavation. The Centre wants the lead author of a report to rewrite it, and the State has objected to these efforts as a move to deny Tamils their due. Talking of antiquity of cultures, the Centre is supporting efforts to decipher the Indus Valley script, which remains an enigma a full century after it was discovered. The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) will host a three-day international brainstorming conference in August, which will assemble scholars working on the question. Finding the foreigner It is one thing to theoretically argue that illegal immigrants should be deported from the country, but identifying the foreigner in India is not an easy task. BJP governments in different parts of the country are targeting Bengali-speaking citizens, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has said. She said residents of the State with valid documents were being labelled illegal Bangladeshi immigrants.
