logo
Coolmore plans to demolish Parkville farm buildings stalled

Coolmore plans to demolish Parkville farm buildings stalled

BreakingNews.ie09-06-2025

Contentious plans to demolish JP Magnier owned derelict farm buildings at Parkville near Clonmel in Co Tipperary have been stalled.
This follows Dr Alan Moore of the Save Parkville Farm Group lodging an appeal with An Bord Pleanála against the Tipperary County Council's grant of planning permission.
Advertisement
JP Magnier is the son of well-known stud owner John Magnier, and in March 2024, the Magniers' Coolmore is reported to have paid €2.425 million, or almost €38,000 an acre for the 64-acre farm at Parkville - the lands had a guide price of €1.28 million.
The Council granted planning permission to the Coolmore-linked Melclon UC for the demolition of existing derelict buildings at Parkville together with all associated site development works despite local opposition which included a farm-gate demonstration on October 3rd last at the site.
In the appeal, Dr Alan Moore contends that the permission conflicts in its entirety with the aims and recommendations of Tipperary County Council plan policy in relation to vernacular farm buildings.
In his original objection, Dr Moore stated that "We have lost far too many similar structures both in Tipperary and nationally. There is no excuse for making the same mistake again."
Advertisement
The Moore appeal includes a personal letter that under-bidder to the Parkville property, John Hurley, sent to the Magnier family last October.
Mr Hurley was runner up to Coolmore in the bidding for the property at auction last year and in his letter, Mr Hurley said that himself and his late father had been stewards to Parkville for nearly 50 years where they rented the property.
Mr Hurley says: 'Parkville was more than just a farm to us: it was a legacy, a responsibility and a testament to the enduring bond between man and land. We poured our hearts and souls into it, ensuring its beauty and history remained intact.
Melclon lodged its plans on September 18th last, and in his letter dated October 8th, Mr Hurley said that 'this letter is written with a heavy heart with both sorrow and a deep sense of injustice'.
Advertisement
Mr Hurley said to the Magnier family that it is crucial to address the recent peaceful protest that took place outside the gates of Parkville.
Mr Hurley followed up his letter to the Magnier family with a formal objection to the planning application.
A notice placed on the gate at the site by the applicants stated that 'these lands contain a derelict yard of rubble stone construction. After decades of serious neglect, it is heavily overgrown and crumbling and is now a serious health and safety concern'.
The notice states that 'the owner has applied for demolition on health and safety grounds."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Court hears from John Magnier's 'right hand man' in multi-million Barne Estate row
High Court hears from John Magnier's 'right hand man' in multi-million Barne Estate row

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

High Court hears from John Magnier's 'right hand man' in multi-million Barne Estate row

A senior advisor described as a "right-hand man" to bloodstock billionaire John Magnier, who is involved in a legal battle over the purported multi-million sale of a Tipperary estate that fell through, has told the High Court he was not secretly "kept in the loop" of the tax affairs of the vendors. Financial advisor at world-famous Coolmore Stud, Eddie Irwin, also rejected a description of him by counsel for Barne Estate as Mr Magnier's "fixer"and "right hand man". Advertisement Mr Irwin said Coolmore did not use "catchphrases or fancy titles" but agreed with counsel that he would be called to work on projects if things went "wrong". Mr Irwin, who has 40 years' experience working with Mr Magnier, was called in to aid in securing the Barne Estate deal which the Magniers believed they had shook hands on in August 2023 for €15 million. However, the Magnier side were ultimately gazumped in being the preferred buyer by Irish-born, US-based construction magnate Maurice Regan, who offered €22.25 million. The case centres on Mr Magnier's claim that Mr Regan engaged in a "full-frontal assault" on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre tract and that Barne estate reneged on the deal. Advertisement Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. At the High Court on Friday, Mr Irwin said he met with Mr Thomson-Moore in early September 2023 and they contacted tax experts KPMG after the Thomson-Moore family requested tax liability advice. A KPMG tax expert met with the Thomson-Moores later in the month as a "favour" to Coolmore, who were large clients of KPMG. Mr Irwin did not attend that meeting but allegedly sent a WhatsApp message to Mr Magnier telling him "off the record" that the tax expert, who was named in court, allegedly told him that the Thomson-Moores were considering whether to retain KPMG and that the expert had informed the Thomson-Moores of what approach he recommended. Advertisement Mr Irwin answering Martin Hayden SC for Barne Estate denied he had an "off-the-record" report from the expert that, counsel alleged, would keep him "in the loop" in return for introducing the Thomson-Moores to KPMG. Mr Irwin said that the wording of the WhatsApp message was an "aberration" and "unfortunate" and that he meant for Mr Magnier not to share information already known from previous meetings as it was a "private" and not for dissemination. Mr Irwin told Mr Hayden that the named expert was an "innocent, decent and honourable" man, who was being "defamed" in the court as someone who would keep him "in the loop" on private tax matters. However, Mr Irwin said he did have "grave" concerns at the time that the tax issue raised by the Thomson-Moores was put forward just before the September 29th, 2023, end of an exclusivity agreement and may not have been a genuine one. Advertisement Mr Irwin told Mr Hayden that he was told by Mr Magnier that a week after the alleged handshake deal that his son-in-law, David Wachman, received a call from Mr Regan, who was "angry and abusive" about the purported sale. Mr Regan told Mr Wachman that he would outbid the Magnier side by €5 million to prevent the deal going through, claimed Mr Irwin. After the expiration of the exclusivity agreement on September 29th, 2023, Mr Irwin contacted Eugene McCague, a former partner at legal heavyweights Arthur Cox, who represent Coolmore in these proceedings, and sought legal advice should the matter be litigated. In early October 2023, with the exclusivity agreement now expired, the local estate agent involved in the sale, John Stokes, told the Magniers that the Barne Estate had been subject to a €20 million bid. Advertisement The Magnier side then upped their bid to €16 million with a separate, additional offering of €500,000 to establish a trust for a member of the Thomson-Moore family. Mr Irwin said he was told by the auctioneer that the Thomson-Moore's were happy to accept the Magnier offer but the Barne Estate solicitors never sent the contracts and the deal was never done. Ireland Ireland closing embassy in Tehran amid 'deteriorat... Read More The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of trustees to finalise any agreement and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. Mr Regan is not a party to the case. The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett next month.

Demolition begins on part of 1960s Bootle shopping centre
Demolition begins on part of 1960s Bootle shopping centre

BBC News

time6 hours ago

  • BBC News

Demolition begins on part of 1960s Bootle shopping centre

The demolition of parts of a Merseyside 1960s shopping centre has of The Strand in Bootle are being knocked down as part of a project to transform the demolition marks the next step in the Bootle Strand Transformation Project and is part of a broader vision for the town Paulette Lappin, Sefton Council's cabinet member for regeneration, skills and employment said it was "a significant moment not just for Bootle, but for the whole of Sefton". "The Strand has played an important role in the lives of generations, and now we're laying the foundations for a future that reflects our community's aspirations," she said."Today's progress is the result of years of collaboration, local insight, and determination to secure a brighter future."The Strand has been a central part of Bootle's identity and economy since it opened in 1968, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS).It was purchased by Sefton Council seven years ago for £32.5m and the local authority laid out plans for a landmark regeneration project to secure its future. 'Drive regeneration' Plans were accelerated in March 2023 with the award of £20m as part of the government's Levelling Up fund alongside additional funding from the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA).Councillor Mike Wharton, LCRCA cabinet member for business, investment and trade, said the space was once underused, but was "now becoming a real community asset by supporting local culture, creating opportunities, and helping to drive regeneration in Bootle".Phase one of the project will deliver public spaces, retail and leisure units, business accommodation, improved transport links, and community and cultural facilities, the council works are now under way, with demolition and initial site works scheduled to continue through to December 2025. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Planning permission refused for new petrol station on site of Creeslough tragedy
Planning permission refused for new petrol station on site of Creeslough tragedy

BreakingNews.ie

time6 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Planning permission refused for new petrol station on site of Creeslough tragedy

An Bord Pleanála has overturned planning permission for a new filling station on the site of the explosion in Creeslough, Co Donegal, in which 10 people were killed. Donegal County Council granted permission to Vivo Shell Limited to redevelop a service station and shop at the site in February. Advertisement The decision was appealed by a number of family members of those killed in the October 2022 blast. On Friday An Bord Pleanála revealed it was turning down the application. The planning authority said the proposed plan was "out of character" with its surroundings in the village. The body said: "Having regard to the existing character and the prevailing pattern of development in Creeslough, it is considered that the proposed development (as amended), by reason of its overall architectural treatment, scale and design, would be out of character with its surroundings, would seriously detract from the architectural character and setting of Creeslough and the streetscape and approach from Letterkenny generally. Advertisement "It is considered therefore, that the proposed development would be contrary to Policy ED-P-9, of the County Development Plan, 2024 2023 being of inappropriate layout and building design in the context of the existing landscape. "To permit the proposed scheme (as amended) at this prominent location could have such a negative effect on the visual amenity and local character of Creeslough as to negatively impact on the wider, long-term regeneration and renewal of the village. "The proposed development would, therefore, seriously injure the visual amenities of the area and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area." The proposed rebuild had allowed for the demolition of the existing building and the construction of a new structure that includes a shop, post office, deli, off-licence and fuel forecourt. Advertisement A memorial garden and light-based sculpture with 10 metal poles commemorating those who perished in the tragedy was also planned for the site. However, many of the families who lost loved ones in the tragedy said this was an insult to their memory considering they died in the metal and rubble of the blast. The families are still digesting the news while was relayed to them by their legal team and was also delivered by Donegal County Council. One of the family members who lost a loved one in the tragedy said: "This is terrific news. When we got the news yesterday that there would not be an oral hearing we were so disappointed and feared the worst. Advertisement "This is tremendous news. We simply do not want a new service station on the site in which our loved ones died." A statement on behalf of the families welcomed the decision to quash the application for a new building on the site. Ireland Families of Creeslough tragedy victims outraged af... Read More "Proposing development on this site while a criminal investigation is still ongoing was deeply inappropriate," the statement said. "The families believe the ground should be treated with dignity and respect, given the scale of loss and trauma suffered. The initial decision to grant planning permission rubbed salt in the wounds of the families." Darragh Mackin, the families' legal representative, said: "Today's decision has restored faith in the rule of law, where victims are treated with dignity and respect. "We continue to call for a full public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the tragedy. The families remain committed to seeking truth, accountability and justice."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store