Hogmanay cash clawback will be ‘transparent'
Edinburgh council is still working to reclaim almost £430,000 in grants and income from organisers of last year's cancelled Hogmanay event.
All of the city's outdoor Hogmanay events on 30 and 31 December last year were cancelled due to severe weather, with attendees securing refunds from organiser Unique Events.
Council officers presented a report to councillors on the 2024/25 winter festivals on Thursday, which showed that the winter festivals were largely successful.
However, it also said that the city was still working to secure almost £220,000 in expected income from Unique Events, and £208,000 in grant money used for the event.
Officers said an open-book audit will be conducted into the Hogmanay celebrations, in order to 'ensure no enrichment has occurred' as a result of the cancellation.
SNP councillor Lesley McInnes asked officers: 'Is there a clear indication about when those items of outstanding repayment to the council will be settled?'
Adam Henry, a council officer covering festivals and events, said: 'We're working with the contractors at the moment, and agreeing a payment plan for those.
'We've had the most recent submission of their accounts, and the figure stated [in the report] has been revised and increased. We're currently expecting a figure in excess of £208,000.
'That process is ongoing, but we expect it to be concluded shortly.'
Mr Henry also said that the organisers were working with their insurance adjusters, and that they expected payment to be made shortly.
Gareth Barwell, the city's Executive Director of Place, added: 'We are aware this is a very high public interest matter. Just to give an undertaking for the record that there will be a public domain report on this when we conclude it.
'There are some legal issues we're dealing with which means we can't discuss it in a public forum right now.
'But I do want to reassure members of the public that there will be a report that comes back that sets out a settlement sum and a justification behind it, so everyone can understand how those final figures have been arrived at.'
The city expected to make a total profit from the Hogmanay celebrations of just under £669,000, just under two-thirds of which has been paid by the event organisers.
In 2024, Unique Assembly, a partnership of Unique Events and Assembly Festivals, was given a three year contract to run the city's winter festivals, with two year-long extensions possible.
The 2024/2025 Hogmanay was carried out by Unique Events on its own, while future Hogmanay celebrations will be carried out by Unique Assembly.
Councillors agreed to note the report, and added a request for officers to ask the organisers for details of air pollution monitoring they said they would carry out.
Additionally, they agreed to an addendum expressing concern over the 'governance, legal compliance and financial enforcement' of the winter festivals contracts and asking for a private briefing from the council's legal team on that subject.
However, the committee had already received a briefing from the legal team by the time the committee meeting was conducted.
Conservative councillor Tim Jones said: 'My initial concerns here were that critical facts regarding the governance, legal compliance and financial enforcement of the contracts had not been fully disclosed and discussed.
'Now we have received a legal briefing which needs time to be considered. If my understanding is correct, we are going to have another report brought back for discussion.'
Labour councillor Margaret Graham, convener of the Culture and Communities Committee, said: 'The findings of this report demonstrate the many benefits Edinburgh's winter festivals deliver to local communities, businesses, and charities, despite the cancellation of last year's outdoor events.
'Our Winter Festivals, which last year attracted a footfall of almost 3m, contribute significantly to the wellbeing of our residents by providing activities for all ages and income brackets to enjoy during the festive season.
'The events bring positive economic benefit for the city and for Scotland as a whole, supporting jobs in the tourism, hospitality and leisure sectors, among others.
'However, it's essential that we continue to be transparent around the enforcement of the contract, and as agreed at Culture and Communities Committee additional briefings on the matter will be delivered to members, alongside an open book audit of Edinburgh's Hogmanay.'
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
20 hours ago
- Scotsman
Acorn carbon capture: Crunch talks as Scotland wind farm chiefs poised to wrestle over seabed
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been told to 'get a grip' of the energy transition after it emerged crunch talks are being held between wind farm bosses and those developing Scotland's Acorn carbon capture project because the two proposals want to use the same area of seabed. The Scotsman can reveal that bosses behind Scotland's proposed carbon capture project in St Fergus are holding discussions with wind farm chiefs as two key energy developments are poised to overlap in the North Sea. The area is located around 47 miles off the Aberdeenshire coast, with both projects having been granted permission to use the same strip of seabed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Shell and Scottish Power are brining forward the MarramWind proposals Concerns have been raised the proposed Acorn carbon capture and storage (CCS) project, which has been pushed forward after the UK government handed it £200 million of funding in Rachel Reeves's Spending Review earlier this month, will partially overlap in the North Sea with the MarramWind floating wind development. Two licences for same plot of the seabed Crown Estate Scotland issued licences to Pate Blue Dot for the Acorn storage site, as well to Shell and Scottish Power for the MarramWind project that will produce around 3GW of renewable energy. The Acorn storage site, called its 'foundation store', will make use of the seabed, where the harmful carbon will be injected deep into the rocks. The MarramWind project proposes up to 225 floating turbines that will also be moored to the seabed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But those behind the Acorn CCS project have insisted any overlap will not derail the long-delayed proposals that will be based onshore at the St Fergus gas terminal near Peterhead - despite a significant part of one of the project's two storage sites falling in the same plot of the seabed leased to the MarramWind project. The MarramWind proposals and the Acorn CCS storage site overlap on the seabed | Crown Estate Scotland The Acorn CCS project is expected to have capacity to store up to 10Mt of CO₂ per year. If all goes to plan, both the Acorn and the MarramWind projects are expected to be up and running in the early 2030s. SNP ministers under fire A scoping report produced as part of the MarramWind proposals, published in January 2023, highlighted 'seabed obstructions', including 'carbon capture storage projects'. Scottish Labour North East MSP Mercedes Villalba said: 'The lack of oversight from the Government here is staggering. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour MSP Mercedes Villalba "It is frankly absurd that under the SNP's watch, two incompatible projects can be granted seabed rights on the very same plot. This is yet another case of the SNP selling off Scotland without a care for the consequences.' She added: "Our energy transition will continue to be disorderly, with workers paying the price, until the Government gets a grip on offshore development. READ MORE: Rosebank and other North Sea oil and gas fields could be given green light under new guidelines "That starts with technical due diligence of projects such as these and transparent accounting of what exactly public funding grants are being spent on." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Conservative shadow energy secretary Douglas Lumsden said the revelation was 'just the latest example of SNP incompetence'. Conservative MSP Douglas Lumsden | supplied The North East MSP added: 'How they have managed to sell the same bit of seabed to two different parties is anyone's guess – but they need to resolve this mess fast, while also ensuring the taxpayers' best interests are served. Acorn deem overlap 'manageable' A spokesperson for the Acorn project said: 'We are aware of recent questions regarding a potential overlap between the Acorn CO₂ storage site and the proposed MarramWind offshore wind farm. 'This is a known and manageable spatial interaction. Any area of overlap is limited and does not affect Acorn's ability to develop, operate, or monitor the CO₂ store. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Acorn carbon capture project will be built next to the St Fergus gas terminal (Photo: Paul Campbell/PA Wire) | Paul Campbell/PA Wire 'Interactions of this kind are not uncommon, and the wind and carbon storage sectors are actively collaborating across the UK to manage them. The Crown Estate's co-locate forum is one example of how such overlaps are being addressed constructively. While this case is in Scottish waters, the same principles of early engagement and joint resolution apply. 'We are also working closely with Crown Estate Scotland, with whom we hold the necessary agreements, to ensure all required arrangements are in place to support Acorn's continued development. 'We remain fully committed to progressing Acorn at pace towards a final investment decision, working in partnership with the UK and Scottish governments and other key stakeholders. We are equally supportive of the successful delivery of all projects that contribute to Scotland's just transition and net zero ambitions.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Belfast-based Green energy supplier, North Channel Wind has announced a major milestone in Northern Ireland's quest for 100% clean energy, following the Department for the Economy's publication of the Offshore Renewable Energy Action Plan A spokesperson for MarramWind said: 'We are engaging directly with Acorn on relevant co-location considerations for a small part of the proposed MarramWind site.' A spokesperson for Crown Estate Scotland told The Scotsman it 'has a responsibility to consider the requirements of a range of sectors'. The spokesperson said: 'ScotWind option agreements were awarded in accordance with the spatial parameters provided by the Scottish Government's sectoral marine plan for offshore wind energy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We have worked closely with the Acorn project and relevant ScotWind projects to facilitate co-existence by including suitable provisions in the ScotWind agreements. These provisions relate not only to the area of seabed immediately related to the Acorn Project area, but also to the wider areas required to monitor operation of the planned Acorn Project storage areas.' Research into 'co-location' 'Crown Estate Scotland's determination to ensure co-location issues are resolved is reflected in our sponsorship of the offshore wind and carbon capture and storage (CCS) co-location forum. The forum's work includes research by scientists at the University of Aberdeen, who are investigating the best approach to testing and demonstrating the co-location of offshore wind and CCS activities in the future.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Crown Estate Scotland are working on the spatial planning of sites and it is the Scottish Government's understanding that any potential overlap of the Acorn carbon capture store and the Marram offshore wind development is limited and will not impact on Acorn's ability to develop, operate or monitor the CO₂ store. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
‘Bloated' civil service in Scotland hits record size as SNP ministers told to act
Figures highlighted by Scottish Labour have shown the overall growth in the public sector workforce north of the Border. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been told they must deal with the 'bloated' size of the devolved civil service after the number of workers hit a record high. Figures for the first quarter of this year have revealed civil servants working in Scotland's public sector reached 27,400 full-time equivalent (FTE) roles – the highest at any point under devolution. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It means about one in every 200 people living in Scotland were working for the Scottish Government in the first three months of this year. First Minister John Swinney addressing the Scotland 2050 conference in Edinburgh. The number employed by 'other public bodies', often referred to as quangos, also rose by another 200 positions to stand at 21,500 FTE. The figures were highlighted by Scottish Labour, which pointed out staff numbers in the NHS workforce had fallen by 200 over the same period to 161,300 FTE. Anas Sarwar's party subsequently accused the SNP Government of being 'desperately out of touch' and of 'putting self-interest over Scotland's interests'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The public sector employment data goes back to the early devolution era in 1999, when 14,100 civil servants were recorded. A total of 15,800 FTE civil servants worked in the public sector in the first quarter of 2007. The workforce growth has emerged just days after First Minister John Swinney raised the prospect of workforce cutbacks during a keynote speech about national renewal in Glasgow on Monday. Mr Swinney said his Government was committed to avoiding compulsory redundancies as he claimed Scotland's public sector would have to shrink. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee earlier this week said the Government would aim to make savings of £1 billion over five years through public sector reform, cutting 'back office costs' to redirect money to the frontline. He said the number of public bodies would be reduced to drive a more efficient system alongside a new review of public sector buildings. Under a different measurement, of the Scottish Government's directly employed staff, numbers have remained between 8,000 and 9,000 FTE since 2021. Scottish Labour Finance spokesperson Michael Marra said: 'Frontline services are stretched to breaking point and NHS staff numbers are falling amid a deadly crisis – but the SNP is sparing no expense on its own bloated operation. 'Once again, the SNP is putting self-interest over Scotland's interests. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This SNP Government is desperately out of touch with the priorities of the people of Scotland. 'A Scottish Labour government will prioritise frontline services over government bureaucracy and pointless quangos.' The Scottish Government said care should be taken when interpreting quarterly changes in workforce sizes, and stressed the Scottish Government's 'core workforce' had come down by 5 per cent since 2022. A spokesman said: 'It is common for there to be seasonal variation in staffing levels in public services, for example as newly qualified nurses enter the workforce each year following graduation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Public sector workers have a vital role in the funding, development and delivery of key services ranging from education, health and social care, to transport and safeguarding the natural environment – also providing impartial expert advice to the public, parliament, and ministers. 'They have responded to many significant issues in recent times, such as the pandemic, impacts of the war in Ukraine and the cost-of-living crisis, while taking on more devolved responsibilities in areas such as social security, equal opportunities, consumer advocacy and advice, and expanded tax powers.' Union leaders have warned against any plans for widespread job cuts across the public sector. Unison Scottish secretary Lilian Macer this week described any cuts as a 'political choice' rather than a financial necessity, pointing out Holyrood's budget would increase by £2.9 billion a year on average in the wake of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Spending Review.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Tourist taxes: be careful what you wish for, because holidaymakers have choices too
In these divided times, seeing multi-party agreement is uplifting. The setting: Glasgow city administration committee on Thursday 19 June. SNP, Labour, Conservatives and Greens joined in voting in favour of the city's visitor levy. From January 2027, people staying in hotels and all other commercial accommodation in Glasgow will pay 5 per cent on top of the bill. Each year, tourists and business travellers will provide £16m for the council to spend on civic improvements and promoting Glasgow. Edinburgh has already decided to charge overnight guests 5 per cent on top of the room rate, starting in July next year. Good to see the two big Scottish cities agreeing on something, too. Back in Glasgow, Ricky Bell of the SNP said there was 'no evidence to suggest that the introduction of a levy would be detrimental to the city'. Free money, then. And (almost) nobody who lives and votes in Glasgow will pay it. What's not to like? A load of locations across Europe and the wider world already have similar tourist taxes. Paris and Rome hardly seem short of tourists, so Mr Bell is surely right: a levy will not deter visitors. At the risk of disrupting such rare unity, I beg to differ. A couple staying in a three-star hotel in the French capital pay £9.50 per night in Paris tourist tax. I shall assume the room itself costs £110, which is what I have been seeing apart from during the Olympics slump last summer. With accommodation tax at 10 per cent in France, the pair will pay just short of 20 per cent in levies – which corresponds to the current rate of VAT in Scotland and the rest of the UK. With their new 5 per cent charge, Edinburgh and Glasgow will leap ahead in the proportion they extract from tourists. By next summer, the 'stealth' visitor tax on foreigners known as air passenger duty will extract £15 for European flights and £102 for North American visitors. It all adds up. Edinburgh and Glasgow are great cities, and share freely with visitors their immense cultural wealth in the shape of world-class museums and galleries. The assumption is that tourist demand is inelastic – the city councils can put on taxes without dampening the desire to visit. I am not so sure. If it were the case, why stop at 5 per cent – let's try 10, or 20? The UK already looks unwelcoming, with a £16 admission fee in the shape of the Electronic Travel Authorisation and a refusal to accept perfectly secure European Union identity cards – disenfranchising around 300 million EU citizens who don't have passports. Edinburgh is a special case. The capital is a huge tourism draw, home to the industry of government and a key business hub. But Glasgow does not enjoy such fortune. If accommodation looks too pricey, visitors from northern England may switch to day trips; other tourists will stay at properties beyond the city's boundaries and the reach of the levy. Either way, the entire spend at a Glasgow property is lost. Another unintended consequence could be that visitors switch to cheaper, characterless budget hotels rather than independent enterprises. Imposing a flat levy across the year looks odd, too. To stretch the season and persuade people to visit off-peak, it would be smarter to have a 15 per cent tax for the four months from the start of June to the end of September, falling to zero for the rest of the year. Fees for visitors are worthwhile if they are substantial and change behaviour The shrewdest tourism tax I have seen in a long while is the brand-new €20 (£17) charge for each passenger arriving on a cruise ship to the Greek islands of Mykonos and Santorini from July to September. Cruise firms are understandably cross that it has been introduced so late in the day. As Paul Ludlow, president of Carnival UK, told me: 'When things are sprung on us late, it's not the way in which we'd like to work.' The principle, though, is sound: 'We really don't need thousands more people arriving for the day and contributing little to the islands' economies, so the least we can do is extract €50,000 from the average ship.' I support every city, region and nation making choices about taxes and tourism. But every tourist has choice, too.
