Shop owner reacts after selling winning EuroMillions ticket

Clifford's Centra in Cork city, Ireland, has been identified as the shop that sold the winning €250 million EuroMillions jackpot ticket.
Shop owner Ted Clifford expressed excitement, initially thinking the news was a prank, and highlighted his shop's previous success in selling winning tickets.
This €250 million prize is the largest ever EuroMillions win in Ireland and marks the 18th Irish jackpot winner.
The winner has already contacted the National Lottery, which will provide support for managing the significant sum.
Ted Clifford plans to use the €25,000 prize money awarded to the shop to host a 'big celebration' for his staff.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

23 minutes ago

• Sky News

Former Centrica chief Laidlaw in frame to chair embattled BP

Sam Laidlaw, the former boss of Centrica, is among the candidates being considered as the next chairman of BP, Britain's besieged oil and gas exploration giant. Sky News has learnt that Mr Laidlaw is being considered by BP board members as a potential successor to Helge Lund, who announced in April that he would step down. BP's chair search comes with the £62bn oil major in a state of crisis, as industry predators circle and the pace of its strategic transformation being interrogated by shareholders. Elliott Management, the activist investor, snapped up a multibillion pound stake in BP earlier this year and is pushing its chief executive, Murray Auchincloss, to accelerate spending cuts and ditch a string of renewable energy commitments. Mr Lund's departure will come after nearly a quarter of BP's shareholders opposed his re-election at its annual meeting in April - an unusually large protest given that his intention to step down had already been announced. BP's senior independent director - the Aviva chief executive Amanda Blanc - is said to be moving "at pace" to complete the recruitment process. A number of prominent candidates are understood to be in discussions with headhunters advising BP on the search. Mr Laidlaw would be a logical choice to take the role, having transformed Centrica, the owner of British Gas, during his tenure, which ended in 2014. Since then, he has had a long stint - which recently concluded - on the board of miner Rio Tinto, which has been fending off activist calls to abandon its London listing. He also established, and then sold, Neptune Energy, an oil company which was acquired by Italy's Eni for nearly £4bn in 2023. Last December, Mr Laidlaw was appointed chairman of AWE, the government-owned body which oversees Britain's nuclear weapons capability. He also has strong family connections to BP, with his father, Christopher Laidlaw, having served as its deputy chairman during a long business career. One person close to BP said the younger Mr Laidlaw had been approached about chairing the company during its previous recruitment process but had ruled himself out because of his Neptune Energy role. The status of his engagement with BP's search was unclear on Saturday. Another person said to have been approached is Ken MacKenzie, who recently retired as chairman of the mining giant BHP. Mr MacKenzie headed BHP during a period when Elliott held a stake in the company, and is said to have a good working relationship with the investor. Shares in BP have continued their downward trajectory over the last year, having fallen by nearly a fifth during that period. The company's valuation slump is reported to have drawn renewed interest in a possible takeover bid, with rivals Shell and ExxonMobil among those said to have "run the numbers" in recent months. Reports of such interest have not elicited any formal response, suggesting that any deal is conceptual at this stage. BP is racing to sell assets including Castrol, its lubricants division, which could command a price of about $8bn.

Telegraph

44 minutes ago

• Telegraph

EU fantasies of toppling the dollar are totally delusional

It's a nice problem to have amid the Trump-inspired madness that grips today's foreign exchange markets. But it's a problem none the less. The Swiss franc keeps on appreciating, and there seems to be almost nothing the authorities can do to stop it. Increasingly alarmed by its trajectory, the Swiss National Bank last week cut its official policy rate back down to zero, and there is now talk of rates going negative again by summer's end. But to little effect. Switzerland's safe haven attributes have rarely been in such high demand. Rising geopolitical tensions have combined with growing loss of trust in the dollar as the bedrock of the global economy to send the franc soaring, almost regardless of whatever rate of interest it carries. Lest it be gold, there are few repositories of wealth thought more secure than Switzerland. Contrast that with the UK, where Bank Rate is still firmly stuck at 4.25pc with stubbornly persistent inflation to match. Thanks substantially to the lower import prices that the surging franc brings about, prices as a whole are going down not up; there is little or no cost of living crisis. This is great for consumers, not so much for Swiss industry, which has to match these deflating prices at home and abroad. But thus far at least, it's coped remarkably well. I've never bought the idea that a competitive economy needs a weak currency. Persistent devaluation has been the British way for decades now, and little good has it done either. At best, it's only smoothed the decline – a tranquiliser to avoid having to face up to the hard yards of painful structural adjustment. While the UK has grown poorer, the Swiss grow ever richer – living proof that a strong currency goes hand in hand with a competitive economy. The one is a reflection of the other. Bad, uncompetitive companies are quickly weeded out and dispensed with, while the disciplines of having to compete with cheaper foreign goods and services forces the survivors into imaginative innovation and productivity gain. You can, however, have too much of a good thing, and this is the unfortunate position that Switzerland now finds itself in. Broadly speaking, Switzerland produces in appreciating francs, but sells in equally fast depreciating dollars. There is only so far countervailing productivity improvement can take you. Theoretically, Donald Trump's tariff policies should make the dollar stronger, in that all other things being equal, they ought to reduce the size of the deficit. But it hasn't worked out that way. In practice, they've only further undermined international confidence in US economic management more widely. To most observers, it looks as if the White House is deliberately trying to tank the dollar. And on one level, it is; a depreciating dollar temporarily helps domestic producers by making imports more expensive. When combined with tariffs – effectively a sales tax on foreign producers – US industry gets a double boost. Trump wants the best of both worlds; he wants a weak dollar, but he also very much likes the dollar's commanding position in the global economy for the geopolitical power it bestows. Sadly for him, it's not clear he can have both. To support a weak dollar, he needs to make dollar assets less attractive to foreign investors. As Stephen Miran, the head of Trump's council of economic advisers, has suggested, this might be achieved by imposing a withholding tax on income generated by US assets, or by converting foreign holdings of US Treasuries into 100-year bonds. Trump's problem is that the less attractive the US makes itself to foreign investors, the less likely it is that the dollar can sustain its dominant reserve currency position. Use of the dollar for sanctions against countries the US has got a problem with has further undermined trust in the currency as both a store of value and reliable means of exchange. International trust relies crucially on the idea of a global order based on agreed rules, the very thing Trump wants to dispense with. So the dollar turns weaker, and together with the Trump tariff shock, it drives up domestic US inflation. Despite almost daily berating from Trump, Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, is sitting on his hands and refusing to reduce interest rates in the precipitous way the president demands. The more Trump complains, the more Powell digs in. Determination not to give way has become a matter of principle, almost regardless of its economic merits. Powell's stance is totemic in the wider struggle to protect institutional integrity from presidential diktat. Once Federal Reserve independence goes, the whole fragile structure of dollar hegemony begins to crumble. Even Trump must know that. Meanwhile, Europe is cutting fast – with the notable exception of the UK, where inflation remains a problem. Normally, America's higher interest rates relative to Europe would cause the dollar to strengthen, but the trust issue has provoked a very different response – a weaker dollar despite a widening interest rate gap. Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, sees Trump's antics as an opportunity for a 'global euro moment'. It has long been the ambition of European policymakers to look the mighty dollar in the face, and eventually usurp its position in the international monetary system. This has always seemed fanciful. For all its grandstanding, the EU remains a disjointed confederation of fiscally sovereign and often deeply divided nations, with no centralised Treasury function to speak of, no banking union and no unified sovereign debt market. This makes its monetary union acutely vulnerable to existential crisis. Lagarde might think of herself as queen bee, but her powers and reach are remarkably limited. As long as this remains the case – and there is little sign of it changing – Lagarde's musings are just delusional nonsense. Where reserve managers have been diversifying away from the dollar, it has, moreover, tended to be into gold, not the euro. Indeed, gold recently overtook the euro as the biggest central bank reserve asset after the dollar. A rather more potent long term threat comes from China, whose central bank digital currency and the infrastructure being built around it are deliberately designed to provide an alternative to the dollar for trade and investment. Those who take umbrage at Trump's America can try China instead. Who's to say it's less reliable than a country that slaps record tariffs on some of its closest allies? Regrettably, Switzerland is just too small to act as a global reserve currency. As it is, it struggles to manage the inflows of international capital looking for safety amid the bedlam of today's world. Already, the Swiss National Bank balance sheet is swollen by its various currency interventions to a size considerably bigger than that of Switzerland's entire economy. It can surely go no further in printing Swiss francs to buy foreign assets. But as I say, it's a nice problem to have.

Times

an hour ago

• Times

What a TSB bank sale could mean for customers

TSB, one of Britain's biggest high street banks and mortgage lenders, has been put up for sale by its Spanish owner. Banco Sabadell is looking to sell TSB as it battles to fend off an €11 billion (£9.4 billion) hostile takeover from its Spanish rival, BBVA. Potential UK bidders for the high street bank include NatWest, Barclays, Santander and HSBC. TSB has more than 5 million customers, about 5,000 staff and 175 branches in the UK. Any offer for the bank would need shareholder approval and a sale would take time to finalise. We look at what it could mean for millions of TSB customers and shareholders. • Business live: follow the latest news on companies, markets and economics The primary driver is BBVA's drawn-out attempt to make a hostile takeover of Sabadell. Selling TSB could raise significant capital, which Sabadell could use to reward shareholders and make the company a tougher target for a BBVA acquisition. If BBVA does succeed in taking over Sabadell, the expectation is that it would look to sell TSB anyway. Sabadell bought the bank from Lloyds Banking Group for £1.75 billion in 2015. TSB said that for now, it's 'business as usual,' and customers shouldn't need to do anything differently. The bank is expected to remain a UK-based entity and will continue to be covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), which protects deposits of up to £85,000 if the firm holding your money fails. If TSB were sold, current accounts would probably be switched to the new owner. Those unhappy with a change could easily move banks using the Current Account Switch Service, which pledges to transfer customer deposits, direct debits and standing orders within seven days. While TSB has offered competitive current account deals in the past (such as its Classic Plus account, which offered cashback and savings features), some of its savings deals have not always been the most competitive. TSB now offers two current accounts. The Spend & Save account pays £5 a month cashback if you make 20 payments in a calendar month. It also gives you access to an easy access saver paying up to 2.05 per cent (which includes a 1.04 percentage point bonus for a year). • From threats to inviting us to tea: SJP changes its tune (and fees) The Spend & Save Plus account, which costs £3 a month, offers the same perks plus £100 interest-free overdraft and an easy access regular saver paying up to 5 per cent on up to £250 a month. The backing of another, potentially larger bank and an injection of capital could allow TSB to launch more attractive products and interest rates and become a stronger player in the market. TSB had £33.9 billion worth of mortgage lending on its books at the end of 2023, according to the banking association UK Finance. It can be worrying when the lender in charge of your mortgage changes hands, but it's not unusual — and TSB went through the process at its last sale in 2015. Any transfer would also be overseen and closely monitored by the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority, the City watchdog, to protect customers. A new owner could change interest rates offered to borrowers starting a new mortgage deal, but those locked into a fixed rate would stay on the same terms and conditions until that deal expired. About 10 per cent of TSB's shares were held by private investors who bought them at £2.60 each when the bank floated on the stock exchange in June 2014. These were later sold to Sabadell when it acquired the bank in 2015. While no official price has been disclosed, sources familiar with the bank suggest that a sale could generate up to £2 billion. Laith Khalaf at the wealth manager AJ Bell said that if the bank were sold, those investors would get a windfall of up to £129.20 as well as the profit on selling shares at the £3.40 price offered by reported pre-tax profits of £285.1 million on income of £1.14 billion last year, up 21.1 per cent on the £235.5 million earned in 2023. It had total assets of £46.1 billion at the end of 2024.