Pakistan's ally Turkey to buy AMRAAM missiles worth $225 million from US to boost its air defence: What it means
The United States has approved a $225 million missile sale to Türkiye, a key NATO ally, aimed at enhancing its air defence capabilities. This deal includes 53 AIM-120C-8 AMRAAMs and associated logistical support. While the sale underlines strategic cooperation, it also raises regional stakes, especially with Türkiye's past purchase of Russian S-400 systems. The transaction unfolds amid complex US-Türkiye ties, and coincides with growing military coordination, even as Türkiye eyes further US weapons, including the F-35 fighter jets.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why it matters: An air defence upgrade for Ankara
A complicated but durable US-Turkey military ties
From fallout to forward steps: The S-400 shadow
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Behind the Missiles: Trade, tensions, and energy
In a significant development, the United States has cleared a potential sale of AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) to Turkey. The deal, estimated at $225 million, was confirmed by the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) on 14 May.The proposed package includes 53 AIM-120C-8 missiles and six guidance sections. Alongside, the package also covers AMRAAM containers, BIT reprogramming gear, spares, software, technical documentation, and logistics assistance.'The proposed sale will support the foreign policy goals and national security of the United States by improving the security of a NATO Ally that continues to be a force for political and economic stability in Europe,' said the DSCA.Turkey, a long-standing NATO member and regional military power, will face no difficulties in absorbing the technology into its armed forces, the agency confirmed. RTX Corporation, based in Tucson, Arizona, is the principal contractor. There are no additional US personnel deployments linked to the sale.The AMRAAM deal arrives at a time when Turkey is actively upgrading its air defence posture. The missiles, known for their extended range and precision, will enhance Ankara's ability to secure its airspace and defend US personnel stationed on its soil.'This proposed sale will provide Türkiye with a critical air defense capability to assist in defending its homeland and U.S. personnel stationed there,' DSCA stated. The agency also stressed that this sale would not disrupt the military balance in the region.This sale complements earlier acquisitions. Notably, Turkey had bought the Russian-made S-400 missile system in 2019, a move that drew ire from the US and led to sanctions under CAATSA (Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act). That decision also resulted in Turkey's expulsion from the US-led F-35 fighter jet programme.Despite sharp differences over Syria and Russia, military cooperation between the US and Turkey has continued. For decades, Turkey has relied heavily on US defence exports. It has acquired a large fleet of F-16 fighter jets, along with older F-4 Phantoms and American helicopters like the Black Hawk and Chinook.On land and sea, Turkish forces also use US-origin equipment, including M60 Patton tanks, M113 armoured vehicles, and Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates. In the air, American missiles such as Sidewinder and Maverick support Turkish combat operations.The US has also supplied Turkey with C-130 Hercules transport aircraft and KC-135 refuelling tankers. While Ankara has made strides in drone development, it earlier depended on US-made surveillance UAVs.Turkey's decision to procure the Russian S-400 triggered a diplomatic standoff with Washington. As a result, the US imposed CAATSA sanctions and suspended Turkey from the F-35 programme. Still, Ankara has not backed down on the S-400 deal.President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan remains hopeful of reviving discussions. Ankara seeks to have the sanctions eased so it can resume talks over acquiring F-35s. Turkish officials believe that resolving this dispute could unlock wider defence collaboration between the two nations.The DSCA's green light for the AMRAAM sale may be a sign of thawing relations.This development coincides with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's visit to Turkey for a NATO foreign ministers' meeting. Rubio is also expected to join possible Russia-Ukraine ceasefire talks in Istanbul.The sale could also shape Turkey's role in stabilising conflict zones. The Pentagon is reportedly drawing down troops in Syria, while Turkey has offered thousands of its own soldiers for regional security.Turkey is also willing to monitor potential Black Sea ceasefires, aligning with broader US interests in the region.Turkey has not limited its engagement with the US to defence. It is considering increased imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and is negotiating with Boeing for aircraft purchases. These moves are part of a larger realignment that may further bind Ankara and Washington.Yet tensions remain. President Erdoğan has criticised the US over its support for Kurdish forces in Syria and over its stance on the Palestinian issue. Nonetheless, the sale suggests that both countries are willing to isolate defence cooperation from political differences.If Congress signs off on the sale, it would mark another chapter in the long and complex defence relationship between the US and Turkey. With regional security challenges intensifying and NATO cooperation under pressure, the AMRAAM deal could be a step toward stabilising a key alliance.Whether it leads to a broader resolution over the S-400 fallout remains to be seen. But for now, Ankara is rearming—and Washington is willing to sell.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
27 minutes ago
- India.com
Iran-Israel War: ‘Chernobyl in the Making?' Explosions Rock Iran's Nuclear Plant After US Strikes
Iran-Israel War: Tensions in the Middle East soared further on June 22 as explosions echoed through Iran's southern port city of Bushehr, home to the country's only operational nuclear power plant. The Israeli military claimed responsibility for the strike, saying it also targeted missile launchers in Isfahan and Ahvaz. The timing of the attack – barely hours after the United States struck three Iranian nuclear sites – has raised serious fears of a looming nuclear crisis. While Iranian officials have yet to confirm any damage to the nuclear plant itself, concerns are mounting. Built with Russian assistance, the facility operates using nuclear fuel supplied by Moscow. The same fuel is shipped back to Russia after use to mitigate proliferation risks. As of now, Iranian authorities report no radiation leaks. But the attack is being viewed in international circles as a dangerously provocative move. Rafael Grossi, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), had previously warned that a direct strike on the Bushehr plant could trigger catastrophic consequences. 'A hit on the facility could lead to a massive release of radioactivity, affecting not just Iran but its neighbours as well,' he had said while addressing the UN Security Council. Experts agree that if a direct strike compromises the reactor, the fallout could mirror nuclear disasters of the past. The comparison many are drawing is to Chernobyl. In that 1986 tragedy, a botched test led to an explosion and fire at a reactor in Ukraine, spreading radioactive contamination across Europe and causing long-term health damage to thousands. According to international nuclear safety protocols, any such incident at Bushehr would demand swift protective actions. These would likely include mass evacuations, iodine distribution, food and water restrictions and large-scale radiation monitoring across several hundred kilometres. Russia has issued its own warnings. With more than 600 personnel, including 250 permanent staff, stationed at the Bushehr facility, Moscow had reportedly sought assurances from Israel for their safety. Rosatom chief Alexey Likhachev said any damage to the site could unleash a disaster on the scale of Chernobyl. The Israeli military had previously claimed its mention of Bushehr as a target was a mistake. But the latest strikes tell a different story. As images of smoke rising over Bushehr surface on social media and satellite data, the world is left to reckon with the possibility that a new chapter in warfare – one where nuclear power plants become battlefronts – may be closer than ever imagined. For now, the region holds its breath. Radiation levels remain normal. But questions remain – how close did the world come to a nuclear nightmare? And what happens if the next missile does not miss?
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
These Four Countries Ready For War In Space, And They Have Already Shot Down Satellites
New Delhi: After dominating land and sea, the world's military focus is now shifting upwards – toward space. What was once the realm of science, communication and exploration is now quietly turning into the next frontier of warfare. A handful of countries are not only building space surveillance networks and deploying military satellites, but also preparing for possible battles by developing and testing weapons that can destroy enemy satellites. Here's a closer look at the four countries that have already demonstrated their ability to strike in space by deliberately destroying their own satellites, sending a signal to the rest of the world. United States The United States was the first to show the world what an anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon could do. Back in 1985, the U.S. Air Force used an F-15 fighter jet to launch a missile that successfully destroyed one of its own satellites. Since then, the United States has built the largest and most sophisticated network of GPS, surveillance and reconnaissance satellites in orbit. Washington's space capabilities are unmatched in terms of both quantity and precision. Russia Russia, once a space pioneer as part of the former Soviet Union, continues to remain a major force in the militarisation of space. Over the years, it has conducted several low-profile ASAT tests. In December 2021, the United States accused Russia of destroying one of its own satellites using an ASAT missile, which resulted in a massive cloud of debris – threatening other satellites and the International Space Station. That incident raised global alarms about the growing dangers of space militarisation. China China joined the elite space warfare club in 2007 by launching a missile that destroyed one of its own defunct weather satellites in low Earth orbit. The event left behind a huge trail of space debris, drawing criticism from space agencies around the world. It also signaled Beijing's arrival as a serious space power. In the years since, China has continued to expand its military space programmes, launching dozens of military satellites and developing capabilities that could one day be used in space-based conflicts. India India's entry into the field came in March 2019, when it carried out 'Mission Shakti', a successful ASAT test that targeted and destroyed a satellite in low-Earth orbit. Carried out by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the test put India among the few countries with demonstrable space strike capabilities. Though India has repeatedly said its intentions are peaceful and defensive, the test was a reminder of New Delhi's growing strategic edge. What This Means Space is no longer just about exploration or navigation. These demonstrations show that if tensions rise on Earth, satellites in space, critical for communication, navigation, military coordination and intelligence, could become prime targets. The four countries listed above have made it clear that they are ready to fight in space if the time comes. And they are not just testing the waters, they have already taken the shot. As technology advances and geopolitical rivalries grow more intense, the silent skies above might no longer remain so silent.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's Nuclear ‘Truth' EXPOSED: Satellite Photos Reveal Iran's Bombed Nuclear Sites
'World War 3 Could Be Just Around The Corner,' Russian Fm Lavrov Says The Russian Foreign Ministry has responded sharply to the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. In a televised interaction, Sergei Lavrov warned of potential global consequences if nations bypass the UN Charter. His remarks echo President Putin's earlier caution about the risk of World War Three. The Kremlin has accused the West of double standards and economic self-sabotage. Watch. 1.6K views | 4 hours ago
