Mass demonstration calls for Spain's leader to resign over corruption
Tens of thousands of people have taken part in an opposition-organised demonstration in Spain's capital, Madrid, accusing the government of Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez of corruption and urging him to call early elections.
Protesters, many waving red and yellow Spanish flags, massed on Sunday in the Plaza de Espana, a large square in the centre of Madrid, and chanted, 'Pedro Sanchez, resign!'
The conservative Popular Party (PP) called the rally after leaked audio recordings allegedly documented a member of the Socialist Workers' Party, Leire Diez, waging a smear campaign against a police unit that investigated corruption allegations against Sanchez's wife, brother, and his former transport minister and right-hand man Jose Luis Abalos.
Diez has denied the allegations, telling reporters on Wednesday that she was conducting research for a book and was not working on behalf of the party or Sanchez. She also resigned from Sanchez's party.
PP leader Alberto Nunez Feijoo has accused the government of 'mafia practices' over the affair and said Sanchez is 'at the centre' of multiple corruption scandals.
Sanchez and his government have been embroiled in numerous scandals with perhaps the most significant being the 'Koldo Case', or 'Masks Case', which concerns corruption allegations in the awarding of public contracts for medical supplies, particularly masks, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The case involves Abalos and his former adviser Koldo Garcia Izaguirre, the latter of whom is accused of using his influence to secure contracts for certain companies and receiving substantial commissions in return.
Sanchez considered stepping down in April 2024 after a Madrid court opened an investigation into his wife, Begona Gomez, on suspicion of influence peddling and business corruption.
The right-wing organisation Manos Limpias (Clean Hands) initially made the allegations against Gomez, who is accused of using her position to influence the awarding of government contracts and of irregularities in her professional activities.
Sanchez has dismissed the probes against members of his inner circle and family as part of a 'smear campaign' carried out by the right wing to undermine his government.
But Feijoo urged Sanchez to call early elections and told the rally: 'This government has stained everything – politics, state institutions, the separation of powers.'
The PP estimated that more than 100,000 people attended the rally, held under the slogan 'Mafia or Democracy', while the central government's representative in Madrid put the turnout at 45,000 to 50,000.
'The expiry date on this government passed a long time ago. It's getting tiring,' protester Blanca Requejo, a 46-year-old store manager who wore a Spanish flag draped over her back, told the AFP news agency.
Sanchez came to power in June 2018 after ousting his PP predecessor Mariano Rajoy in a no-confidence vote over a corruption scandal involving the conservative party.
Recent polls indicated the PP holds a slim lead in support over the Socialists. Spain's next general election is expected in 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Hundreds protest against NATO summit, Israel-Iran conflict in The Hague
Hundreds of people have protested in The Hague, in the Netherlands, against NATO and increased military spending in advance of a summit, as Iran's conflict with Israel and the United States intensifies by the day. People demonstrated on Sunday against the military alliance, Israel's punishing war in Gaza and the Israel-Iran conflict, hours after the US targeted three nuclear sites in Iran in a sudden escalatory move in support of its biggest ally in the Middle East. Hossein Hamadani, 74, an Iranian who lives in the Netherlands, told The Associated Press news agency that they are 'opposed to war'. 'People want to live a peaceful life … Things are not good. So why do we spend money on war?' he added. Following the US's attack on Iran, an unnamed NATO official told the Reuters news agency that the alliance was watching the situation 'closely'. The summit is expected to kick off on Tuesday, with leaders of the 32 NATO-allied countries to meet a day later on Wednesday. During the meeting, the heads of state will discuss an increase in defence spending, which has been repeatedly demanded by US President Donald Trump, along with thinly veiled threats to leave the military alliance. On Thursday, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez spoke out against the agreement to increase defence spending to 5 percent of national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as not only 'unreasonable but also counterproductive'. In a letter to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Sanchez asked for a 'more flexible formula' that either makes the spending target optional or excludes Spain from its application. But Trump said a day later that Madrid was 'notorious' for underspending on defence and said it needed to pay what other NATO members were paying. The allied countries have ramped up defence spending since Russia invaded Ukraine more than three years ago; however, almost a third of the members still do not meet the bloc's current target of at least 2 percent defence spending.
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Is it time for Europe to choose China over the US?
As Donald Trump barrels through his second term in the White House, Europe faces a question it has long avoided: Should it continue clinging to its alliance with the United States, or is it time to chart a new course – perhaps one that leads eastwards? In April, Chinese President Xi Jinping urged Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to encourage the European Union to 'resist together' against Washington's 'unilateral coercion'. This coercion is not limited to trade; it extends to politics, culture and global strategy. For Europe, the question is not simply whether the US remains a powerful ally but whether it is still the right one. A closer relationship with China now offers distinct advantages – an idea likely to be discussed at the EU-China summit in July. While European attitudes towards China remain cautious, as demonstrated by recent tariffs targeting low-cost imports from platforms like Temu and Shein, Europe's strategic reflex still defaults to the US, especially in finance and defence. That reflex, born of history, is increasingly out of step with Europe's long-term interests. The US has long pursued a consistent global aim: to preserve its position as the world's sole superpower. But under President Trump, US global leadership has taken a darker turn. Basic democratic principles are being eroded. Human rights, academic freedom and social justice have come under sustained assault. From unconditional support for Israel's devastating assault on Gaza – widely condemned as a genocide – to greenlighting a newly launched war on Iran, mass deportations and the dismantling of university funding, Trump's United States is actively undermining the values it once claimed to champion. China, of course, has its own challenges. It lacks press freedom, censors dissent and tightly controls public discourse. But is the democratic West still so different? In an information landscape dominated by a handful of tech billionaires, platforms like X and Facebook amplify misinformation and conspiracy theories while marginalising serious public debate. The treatment of whistleblowers such as Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden further suggests that truth itself has become a threat to what now passes as American democracy rather than a foundation of it. Europe must also confront the economic and political model it shares with the US. Democracy, once a source of pride, increasingly functions as ideological cover for oligarchy – rule by and for the few. Trump embodies this shift, treating democratic norms as obstacles to unending accumulation. But he is not alone in this. Across the West, wealth is increasingly concentrated and politics increasingly unresponsive to the needs of most of its people. The contrast between Washington and Beijing in foreign affairs also warrants attention. China maintains one overseas military base, in Djibouti, and a handful of small support outposts. The US, by contrast, operates more than 750 military installations worldwide. That vast footprint may soon serve Trump's revived imperial imagination: He recently shared a video envisioning Gaza as the 'Riviera of the Middle East' after saying its Palestinian residents would be resettled elsewhere. China, meanwhile, opposed such forced displacement and reaffirmed the Palestinian right to resist foreign occupation. China is also becoming an increasingly attractive destination for education. With more than 3,000 universities serving over 40 million students, its system is both expansive and accessible. Tuition ranges from $1,500 to $3,000 a year, in stark contrast to the $40,000 charged by many US institutions. Universities like Tsinghua are gaining global recognition for high-impact research. And while these institutions operate under strict censorship, they remain a serious alternative – especially as US campuses now face student repression, visa crackdowns and mounting political interference. Why, then, does the EU remain tethered to an alliance that increasingly undermines its values and interests? The truth is that Europe is not yet politically sovereign. It lacks a unified economy, military, tax system and labour market. From north to south, east to west, the continent is fragmented – linguistically, culturally and politically. In a 2017 speech at the Sorbonne, French President Emmanuel Macron spoke of 'European sovereignty'. But that is precisely what Europe still lacks: the ability to evaluate its interests independently and form alliances accordingly. Until that sovereignty becomes reality, any talk of shifting alliances – however urgent – remains largely theoretical. China is prepared for a new era of cooperation. Europe, paralysed by internal division and outdated loyalties, is not. Yet Trump's United States is doing everything it can to make the eventual choice for Europe clearer by the day. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Spain rejects NATO's 5% defence spending hike as ‘counterproductive'
Spain has reportedly asked to opt out of NATO's proposed defence spending target of 5 percent of GDP, risking disruption to a key agreement expected at next week's alliance summit. In a letter addressed to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte on Thursday, Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez urged the alliance to adopt a more flexible framework, according to media reports. The letter, seen by the Reuters and Associated Press news agencies, called for either the target to remain optional or for Spain to be exempt entirely. 'Committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive,' Sanchez wrote, warning that it would undermine efforts by the European Union to build its own security and defence base. 'As a sovereign Ally, we choose not to.' Sanchez insisted Madrid does not intend to block the outcome of the upcoming summit. But any agreement on increased defence spending must be approved unanimously by all 32 NATO members, giving Spain leverage to delay or water down the deal. Spain currently spends approximately 1.28 percent of its GDP on defence, the lowest among NATO members, according to alliance estimates. While Sanchez has pledged to accelerate the country's path to NATO's current 2 percent goal, he argues that going beyond that risks harming the welfare state and compromising Spain's broader policy vision. NATO's push for higher spending follows calls by US President Donald Trump and others to share the burden more fairly across the alliance. Rutte has suggested a new formula that allocates 3.5 percent of GDP to core military spending and an additional 1.5 percent to broader security needs. The United States, NATO's largest military contributor and Ukraine's main backer since Russia's 2022 invasion, is estimated to have spent 3.38 percent of its GDP on defence in 2024. Trump has repeatedly claimed European allies are not pulling their weight, and has threatened to withhold support for those who fall short. Sanchez, however, said rushing to meet a 5 percent target would force EU states to buy military equipment from outside the bloc, damaging the continent's attempts to bolster self-sufficiency in defence. The proposal also faces resistance from Spain's political left. The left-leaning Sumar party, part of Sanchez's coalition, opposes the move, while Podemos, not in government but often a key parliamentary ally, has also rejected it. 'If the government needs parliamentary support to approve spending, it will have a very difficult time in the current situation,' said Josa Miguel Calvillo, a professor of international relations at the Complutense University of Madrid, speaking to Reuters. Italy has also raised concerns, reportedly seeking to shift the proposed deadline for the new target from 2032 to 2035 and drop the requirement to increase spending by 0.2 percent annually. One senior European official told Reuters that Spain's rejection complicates talks but said discussions are ongoing. 'It doesn't look good, indeed, but we are not over yet. Spain has demonstrated to be a steadfast ally so far.'
