Smokey Robinson sues former housekeepers for defamation over rape allegations
Smokey Robinson has filed a defamation lawsuit against four former housekeepers who accused him of rape and prompted a police investigation.
Robinson and his wife Frances Robinson filed the counterclaim on Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court against the women and their lawyers, whose allegations, they say, were 'fabricated in an extortionate scheme'.
The filing is a fast and forceful legal and public pushback from the 85-year-old Motown music luminary in response to the women's May 6 lawsuit and a May 15 announcement from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department that its Special Victims Bureau is 'actively investigating criminal allegations' against Robinson.
The women are seeking at least 50 million dollars, alleging Smokey Robinson repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted them in his home when they worked for him between 2007 and 2024.
They said Frances Robinson, a co-defendant, enabled him and created an abusive workplace.
The counterclaim opens with friendly text messages from the women to contradict their claims against Robinson, whose songs, including Tears Of A Clown and The Tracks Of My Tears, established him among the biggest hitmakers of the 1960s.
The filing says the women 'stayed with the Robinsons year after year', holidayed with them, celebrated holidays with them, exchanged gifts with them, asked for tickets to his concerts, and sought and received help from them including money for dental surgery, financial support for a disabled family member, and 'even a car'.
The filing — which includes photos from the holidays and gatherings as exhibits — says that despite the couple's generosity, the women 'secretly harboured resentment for the Robinsons and sought to enrich themselves through the Robinsons' wealth'.
'Unfortunately, the depths of Plaintiffs' avarice and greed know no bounds,' the counterclaim says.
'During the very time that the Robinsons were being extraordinarily generous with Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs were concocting an extortionate plan to take everything from the Robinsons.'
John Harris and Herbert Hayden, attorneys for the former housekeepers, said in a statement that the defamation suit 'is nothing more than an attempt to silence and intimidate the survivors of Mr. Robinson's sexual battery and assault. It is a baseless and vindictive legal manoeuvre designed to re-victimise, shift blame and discourage others from coming forward.'
The lawyers said they intend to get the Robinsons' lawsuit thrown out by invoking California's laws against using the courts to silence and intimidate people who sue.
The four women, whose names are withheld in their lawsuit, each allege that Robinson would wait until they were alone with him in his Los Angeles house and then sexually assault and rape them.
One woman said she was assaulted at least 20 times while working for Robinson from 2012 until 2024. Another said she worked for him from 2014 until 2020 and was assaulted at least 23 times.
The Sheriff's Department would give no details on its investigation beyond confirming its existence.
Robinson, who was a central figure in the Motown Records machine with his group the Miracles and as a solo artist, is a member of both the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame and the Songwriters Hall of Fame.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
4 days ago
- Spectator
Heaven is Angel Delight
I once heard an American complain that, being married to an Englishwoman, he was regularly baffled by the contents of his kitchen cupboards – salad cream, Ambrosia custard and Robinsons barley water. It was 'like industrial processed food but from the Shire'. It is probably this quality of baffling foreigners that allegedly enabled drug runners to use sachets of Angel Delight – the ultimate English ultra-processed food, surely to be found on many a table in Hobbiton, if only for second dinner – to smuggle cocaine into Indonesia. What could be more natural than an Englishman carrying real artificial flavours in his luggage so he didn't have to make do with nasi goreng and chicken satay? (When I went to Japan for a year, my luggage was filled with proper tea bags.) The Balinese police have, however, got wise to their MO, and three Britons have appeared in court charged with drug smuggling, for which they could face execution by firing squad if found guilty. Angel Delight was invented in 1967 in the research department of Bird's in Banbury – right in the heart of the Shire. The market research showed that there was a demand for a bland, creamy-textured instant pudding; and, of course, the dessert company bosses didn't get where they are today without knowing a good thing when they see one. It hit sales of £2 million in the first year. I'd be lying if I said that it tastes as good as I remember it; but whenever I eat Angel Delight I am taken back to my childhood in the 1970s. It's not the flavour in itself – back then, Bird's experimented with blackcurrant, peach and coffee-and-walnut flavours, which have rightly been consigned to the memory hole – so much as the memory of a midweek treat. No one ever planned to have Angel Delight, so there was never any burden of expectation on it; and we would often be 'allowed' to make it ourselves, which made it taste even sweeter than an Arctic roll from the freezer compartment. Attempts to add to it – I have heard tales of crumbling flakes over the chocolate version, or taking a blowtorch to demerara sugar over butterscotch for Angel Delight brûlée – only take that memory away. (I am not even going to mention the decadence of ready-made pots which I saw in the supermarket last week.) The chef Kirk Haworth, winner of The Great British Menu, says that it is the combination of all these factors that gives Angel Delight its power: from the colour and the 'mainstream' flavours to its being 'very attractive textually on the palate', along with the fact that you don't need to be a chef to make it. And, he says, everyone comes back to the first flavours that entered their palate. Last year, as part of a project to reinvent nostalgic classics, his evolution of Angel Delight was as a drink: 'We aerated the flavours, and then we made the colours with desiccated coconut; it was playful and inner-childish but super light and fluffy, when we put gas into the mixture, almost like air.' Kirk runs Plates London, a Michelin-starred restaurant in Old Street, with his sister Keeley. He has no children, but his sister does; has he introduced them to the delights of Delight? He pauses. 'No.'
Reuters
4 days ago
- Reuters
Producer Tyler Perry accused of sexual harassment and assault in lawsuit
June 18 (Reuters) - An actor on the U.S. BET television show "The Oval" has filed a civil lawsuit that accuses media mogul Tyler Perry of repeated sexual assault and harassment. Derek Dixon is seeking $260 million in punitive damages from Perry in a lawsuit filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court and reported by TMZ on Tuesday. In the suit, Dixon accuses Perry of "a sustained pattern of workplace sexual harassment, assault and retaliation." An attorney for Perry called the lawsuit "a scam." "This is an individual who got close to Tyler Perry for what now appears to be nothing more than a scam," attorney Matthew Boyd said in a statement. "But Tyler Perry will not be shaken down and we are confident these fabricated claims of harassment will fail." Perry is a successful actor, writer and producer of dozens of TV shows and films, including the "Madea" movie series. Forbes estimates his net worth at $1.4 billion. The lawsuit claims Perry met Dixon when he was working on the event staff at a party Perry was hosting, and that Perry offered him a role on the series "Ruthless" in 2019 and a bigger part later on "The Oval." Dixon alleges that Perry sent unwanted, sexually suggestive text messages to him. The suit includes screenshots of what it said were exchanges between the two. "What's it going to take for you to have guiltless sex?" said one of the messages that Dixon said was from Perry. After the messages, Perry's behavior escalated to sexual assault, the lawsuit said. One night at Perry's home, the lawsuit said, Perry told Dixon he was too drunk to drive and urged him to stay in a guest room. Dixon said he woke up in the middle of the night to find Perry in bed with him and rubbing his thigh. In another case, Perry "forcibly pulled off Mr. Dixon's clothing, groped his buttocks, and attempted to force himself on Dixon," the lawsuit said. Dixon tried to remain friendly with Perry while rebuffing his advances in order to keep his job, the lawsuit said. Perry made it clear to Dixon that his TV character could be killed off if he ignored Perry or did not take part in his "sexual innuendos," the lawsuit said.
NBC News
4 days ago
- NBC News
Jury has reached a decision in the Karen Read murder retrial
A jury has reached a verdict in the retrial of Karen Read, the Massachusetts woman whose widely watched murder trial in the 2022 death of her boyfriend, a Boston police officer, ended with a hung jury last year. She has been charged with second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter while driving under the influence and leaving the scene of a collision causing death. The trial lasted more than two months and featured dozens of witnesses, including a series of experts who, at times, offered highly technical testimony. These specialists aimed to fill in an evidentiary record that contained no eyewitness accounts or video of the events that left O'Keefe mortally wounded outside the suburban home of a now-retired Boston police sergeant during blizzard-like conditions on Jan. 29, 2022. O'Keefe, 46, died of blunt force trauma to the head, according to the medical examiner's report. Hypothermia was listed as a contributing factor. Prosecutors alleged that Read, fueled by intoxication and anger over her crumbling relationship, reversed her SUV into her boyfriend and left him for dead in the front yard of the former sergeant, Brian Albert. Read, 45, had just dropped off O'Keefe at Albert's home for a gathering when the prosecution said she struck him. "She could have broken up with him," special prosecutor Hank Brennan told jurors in his closing argument. "She doesn't drive away. She takes that 6,000-pound Lexus and she makes a decision. The decision is, she steps on the gas after banging it into reverse." Among the key pieces of evidence cited by the special prosecutor was data gathered from Read's SUV. He called a biomechanical engineer who testified that at 12:32 a.m., outside Albert's home, her Lexus was captured driving forward 34 feet, then suddenly accelerating backward for 53 feet at 24 mph. No direct evidence of the hit was presented at trial, but the engineer testified that dozens of cuts on O'Keefe's right arm were "consistent" with injuries caused by the Lexus' broken taillight. The prosecutor presented crime scene photos that showed what he called a "debris field" — bits of red plastic scattered around the site of the apparent collision. He also pointed to Read's own words as evidence of her guilt. Read found O'Keefe's body shortly after 6 a.m., and first responders who'd been summoned to the scene recalled her repeatedly saying, 'I hit him.' Read rejected those allegations and said she watched O'Keefe enter Albert's home. Her attorneys said that her words had been twisted into a confession and that she was the victim of law enforcement misconduct and a tunnel-vision investigation. In the first trial, Norfolk County Superior Court Judge Beverly Cannone allowed Read's lawyers to present a third-party culprit defense — or an alternative theory of the crime — and identify Brian Albert and a federal agent, Brian Higgins, as possible suspects in a conspiracy that sought to frame Read for O'Keefe's death. (Both men have denied this.) Cannone ruled Thursday that the attorneys had not met the threshold to do so in the recent proceedings and barred the defense from identifying them as such in their closing argument. But she allowed the lawyers to argue that authorities failed to properly investigate Higgins, an agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives who'd been at the Jan. 29 gathering at Albert's home. The defense introduced a lengthy series of text messages between Higgins and Read in the weeks before O'Keefe's death that showed the two flirting. But she stopped texting him on Jan. 23 — a move defense attorney Alan Jackson previously suggested could have prompted Higgins to hurt O'Keefe. Both Higgins and Albert testified during the first trial. Neither appeared at the retrial. The defense instead focused much of its attention on challenging the circumstantial evidence cited by the prosecution. An accident reconstruction expert testified that neither the damage to Read's SUV nor the injuries to O'Keefe's arm were consistent with a collision. A pathologist testified that his arm injuries appeared to be dog bites. "There was no collision," Jackson said repeatedly during his closing argument. Some of the defense's most powerful testimony came from a snow plow driver who passed Albert's home several times in the hours after the alleged collision. Asked if he saw a 216-pound, six-foot-one man lying in the yard, he responded flatly, 'no.' One of the most notable details about the proceedings was the absence of former Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor. Proctor led the investigation into O'Keefe's death and was fired over revelations that emerged in the first trial that he shared investigative details with non-law enforcement personnel and made derogatory comments about Read. Defense lawyers argued that he led a biased and "corrupt" investigation — an allegation Proctor denied in the first trial — and although he was listed as a possible witness for both the prosecution and defense, neither called him to testify in the retrial. "That should stop you in your tracks," Jackson said in his closing argument. "Wouldn't you want to hear from the lead investigator?" "Michael Proctor was clearly radioactive," he added. "The Commonwealth stayed away from him." In his closing argument, the special prosecutor said he didn't need Proctor's testimony to prove Read's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. "I'm not saying you shouldn't be disgusted by the text messages," Brennan, the special prosecutor, said. "You should. But that doesn't change the physical evidence, the scientific evidence and the data." "He was terminated," Brennan added. "He was held responsible for what he did. He should have been. But that doesn't mean you get a free pass. That doesn't change the facts."
