Minnesota murder case could mark rare return of death penalty; Vance Boelter faces possible federal execution
The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty.
Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty.
It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters.
In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the US courthouse in St Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges.
Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history.
Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976.
'Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options,' Acting US Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets, including officials in other states.
Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea.
On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison.
Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates.
President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions, more than the administration of any other president in modern history.
The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd.
At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged 'there's a tension' and said federal officials 'can speak for themselves.'
Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday.
As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors.
'Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts,' said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. 'Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here.'
Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant U.S. attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors.
'There's no doubt that it's complicated,' Osler said. 'And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling.'
If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: 'a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas.'
After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held.
Thompson told reporters that the federal case 'does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere.'
Boelter's next federal court appearance is June 27. He does not have any further appearances scheduled in state court.
'There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is,' Osler said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Canada, a move away from the Rockies
Recognising a problem is the first step towards a solution. By that metric, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has taken an important step towards repairing a troubled India-Canada relationship. A recent CSIS report acknowledges the existence of Canada-based Khalistani extremists who continue to promote, fund and/or plan acts of violence targeting India. Not only do they mean harm to India, CSIS says these groups also threaten Canadian national security. That is lucid observation. The report's findings dovetail efforts by PM Mark Carney to repair and restore the bilateral relationship left hanging precariously by his predecessor Justin Trudeau. Recognition of continued operations of Canada-based Khalistani extremists is an important departure from the recent past when focus was turned on alleged involvement of Indian officials in the 2023 killing of Canadian citizen Hardeep Singh Nijjar. While perceptions of the threat may differ, acknowledgement that it's an issue of concern for both countries will allow addressing it, and avoid the kind of strange food fight that had broken out before. Like any long-standing relationship, especially between two democracies, there have been ups and downs. But, on balance, it has been a good one. The current fractured geopolitical and geo-economic landscape, exacerbated by unpredictability of the Trump regime - his continued suggestion of annexing Canada and newfound friendship with Pakistan and its generals - adds urgency to restoring and augmenting New Delhi-Ottawa ties. Working together and tackling problems with mutual respect, for mutual benefit, should become a SOP, allowing both nations to leverage the past - beyond the too-recent past, that is - and take on multiple challenges.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court jails retired official caught taking Rs 500 bribe 30 years ago
Bengaluru: Three decades after he was caught red-handed accepting a bribe of Rs 500, a retired village accountant has been sent to jail, with the Supreme Court overturning his acquittal by the Karnataka high court. Nagesh Dondu Shivangekar, now in his 70s, was taken into custody and sent to Hindalga prison, Belagavi district, following the apex court's April 16 order, which reinstated the one-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by a trial court in 2006. The case dates back to Jan 1995, when one Laxman Katambale applied for amendment to mutation entries in Belagavi revenue records pertaining to agricultural land partitioned among him and his brothers. Laxman later approached Nagesh, the then village accountant at Kadoli, to check on the status of his application. Nagesh claimed he had not received any application and asked Laxman to submit a fresh one. On April 3, 1995, Laxman filed a new application, after which Nagesh demanded a bribe of Rs 2,000 to process it. Laxman initially paid Rs 1,500 in two installments and agreed to pay the remaining Rs 500 after the work was done. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pueblo Nuevo: Inicia hoy con Amazon CFD y construye un segundo ingreso. InvestIQ Registrarse Undo However, he later approached Lokayukta police and filed a complaint on April 7, 1995. Acting on the complaint, a trap was laid and Nagesh was caught red-handed while accepting the final Rs 500 instalment. On June 14, 2006, a trial court convicted Nagesh, sentencing him to one year of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 500. However, the Karnataka high court overturned the conviction on March 9, 2012, calling the trial court's findings "highly perverse" and doubting the credibility of the prosecution witnesses on the question of demand and acceptance of the bribe. Lokayukta police challenged the acquittal in the Supreme Court, which reviewed the evidence and found it reliable and corroborative of the prosecution's case. It ruled that the case was proven beyond reasonable doubt and held that the high court had erred in setting aside the trial court's judgment. With that, Nagesh's long reprieve came to an end — thirty years after the offence, he is now behind bars.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Surat trader defrauded of 57L by employees in fake billing scam
Surat: In a major case of internal fraud, a Surat-based trader dealing in children's play equipment was defrauded of Rs 57 lakh by a group of 15 people, including seven of his own employees. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The accused allegedly created fake quotations under the company's name and sold goods without the owner's knowledge, siphoning off large sums over nearly a year. The complaint was filed by Prayag Bhimani, owner of Om Enterprise, a firm based in Marutidham Society, Sarthana, which deals in children's play equipment, gym setups, benches, and sports gear. The firm primarily designs products and outsources manufacturing based on client orders. According to Bhimani, the fraud began after he temporarily handed over business responsibilities to his staff in 2020 due to his father's critical illness during the pandemic. The scam came to light in Dec 2024, when a manager from the 'Rang – The Sky City' project contacted Bhimani about a bill issued by Dhingli Enterprise — a firm unknown to him — instead of a quotation from Om Enterprise. Upon inquiry, Bhimani learned that the firm had been secretly floated by one of his salesmen, Mayank Umreliya, in collaboration with other employees: Hiren Desai and Mitul Jiyani. Bhimani uncovered that his employees had been duping him since 2023. They sent official quotations under the Om Enterprise name, but supplied goods without his approval. In some cases, they stole goods worth Rs 4.97 lakh from the warehouse; in others, they sold poor-quality products procured cheaply from outside vendors. They allegedly colluded with third-party firms to create fake and forged invoices. Among those named in the complaint are Sagar Tilala, Santur Tilala, Prince Pipaliya, Jignesh Kava, Mahesh Ahir, Bhavik Kanani, Kaushal Radadiya, Kinjal Nathani, Kishan Radadiya,Ankit Desai, Hitesh Desai, and Mukesh Makwana — many of whom are proprietors of other firms who either supplied fake bills or accepted illicit transactions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The accused also reportedly leaked confidential business data to outside vendors, causing further financial and operational damage. In response, Sarthana police have registered cases under various sections related to theft, cheating, and forgery and invoked the Information Technology Act for data theft. An investigation is underway.
