Rethink needed on meeting the demand for Stem graduates
K2, known to locals as Chhogo Ri, is an absolute beast of a mountain. Chhogo Ri pretty much translates as Big Mountain in Balti. It is the second highest mountain on the planet and notoriously difficult to climb.
While shorter than Everest, the great peak of the Karakoram range holds a psychological edge that its more famous cousin in the Himalayas doesn't. That comes in the form of the Shoulder.
This false peak, about 8,000m high, looks to all approaching it like the top of the mountain. A sense of belief and joy can quickly turn to anguish for a tired climber, upon quickly realising there's another 600m to the true summit.
Welcome to the position with
Stem
in Ireland. Government has, for decades, pushed hard to produce more graduates with science, technology, maths and engineering degrees. Data published by the
Central Statistics Office
at the start of April looked like stellar news.
READ MORE
Ireland leads the European Union in the number of Stem graduates per capita, at an impressive 40.1 per 1,000, based on 2022 data. Being the best among any group of 27 countries at anything is worth celebrating. Among a group where many have far longer histories in engineering and industry, it's a truly marvellous feat.
Yet it's still not enough. The napkin maths, which are always kinder than the real nitty gritty, says that figure needs to be 20 per cent higher right now just to meet the current staff shortages in Stem fields in the State. That's at least through conventional methods.
In truth, the approach to sourcing workers with Stem skills, which dates back to the 1990s, needs to evolve. Back then, the sole focus on delivering graduates through traditional
third-level
routes made a lot of sense. It was a clear and relatively simple policy. Experience has taught us that overcomplicating policy has all too often been a recipe for delays so Ireland's simple 'we need to do this thing' model was appropriate.
But to meet today's skills gap, the Government needs to rethink its approach. The core focus should continue to be on delivering greater numbers in the conventional way, through university courses. But we need to improve delivery through other supporting channels if the State is to meet demand.
The obvious one is importing talent. It is something Ireland has done for decades in many sectors, including those that are Stem-related, but there are still shortages everywhere. Housing and the cost of living are the easy barriers to point out to the untrained eye but there's a bigger one that is a lot more boring.
Our education and training mindset over the past few decades has been to try to make the person fit the system, when really we should be trying to find a system that works for the individual
The visa process itself for skilled non-EU citizens remains laborious. Part of that is due to the staff in the Civil Service not having enough resources to manage it but there's also the psychological barrier for businesses.
Importing someone from outside of the EU is considered a pain, even though improvements have been made to accelerate approvals in recent years. Companies such as Future Direct, which is entirely focused on managing the visa process, help to fill in the gaps for some employers.
Still, improved communications, buttressed by greater resources in the Civil Service, are needed to make business less wary of importing non-EU talent.
That isn't the only element which needs to be improved. As I said, the process that got Ireland to the top of the EU table was simple. The pipeline was from the Leaving Cert to third level, straight into a Stem course and then out to the workforce to provide a needed skill.
Efforts to address talent beyond the traditional pipeline need to be improved. There are many for whom the traditional route simply doesn't fit.
Our education and training mindset over the past few decades has been to try to make the person fit the system, when really we should be trying to find a system that works for the individual. That covers a broad range of areas, apprenticeships and traineeships through to career changes or in-career upskilling.
When we see people come through from these approaches today, the first thought can be that they are working as intended.
That rather misses the point that these are exceptions rather than the rule in Stem. Improving access and awareness around all of these routes is vital to meeting the industry's staff shortages.
Granted, staff shortages are an issue across every sector. When it comes to the growth and sustainability of the economy, however, Stem and construction (for housing and infrastructure) stick out wildly as core areas that need the bump in bodies more than others.
If these two areas can be locked down and pushed harder, both through organic and inorganic approaches to increasing their workforces, the skills gap issue elsewhere should become easier to resolve.
Ireland should celebrate being the best in the EU at delivering Stem graduates. Now it needs to aim higher to be the best it can be for its own future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
‘Very volatile conflict', says Harris as evacuation of 15 Irish citizens from Israel underway amid US strikes on Iran
EFFORTS are under way to evacuate 15 Irish citizens from Israel, Tanaiste Simon Harris has said. The Foreign Affairs Minister confirmed that an operation was ongoing to evacuate 15 Advertisement 2 US strikes on Iran had made a 'volatile situation even more dangerous' Credit: AFP or licensors 2 Simon Harris confirmed that the evacuation of Irish citizens from Israel is currently underway Credit: � 2025 PA Media, All Rights Reserved He said they were working with a smaller number of citizens in Around 29 Irish citizens in Iran had registered with the Irish embassy and around 200 in Mr Harris said he spoke to Iran's deputy foreign minister on Sunday, at their request, who was 'full of anger'. Talking to the reporters at Government Buildings, he said: 'He did say to me that it was the view of Iran that the aggressors would have to learn lessons and pay a price. Advertisement READ MORE ON ISRAEL-IRAN 'Of course I articulated in the strongest possible terms that Ireland and the Mr Harris said the Taoiseach They said they are in close contact with their European counterparts before a meeting of EU foreign leaders on Monday and of EU leaders later in the week. Advertisement Most read in Irish News Exclusive The 'Iran should commit not to develop nuclear weapons and disavow its nuclear and uranium enrichment programme. The Sun reports from inside as Israel as tensions flare following US air strikes ' BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL LAWS Martin added that the escalation on Sunday should not draw attention away from the Advertisement He said: 'We shouldn't lose sight of the catastrophe that is still unfolding in Gaza while the war between Iran and Israel continues. 'What is happening in Staff from Ireland's embassy in Harris said there were no plans to withdraw Irish troops and that 'decisions are being made constantly' to ensure their safety. Advertisement 'VOLATILE CONFLICT' When asked whether he supported US President 'We're now entering a moment of particular danger, because I think the chances now of a spiral of escalation are more likely than ever before, and there is a real prospect now of the international community losing all control of this very, very volatile conflict.' He said there was only a 'very small' number of Irish citizens, many dual nationals, seeking an evacuation, and they were working with European counterparts. He said a significant update on this would be available in the hours ahead. Advertisement 'EXTRAORDINARILY DANGEROUS TIME' Speaking on 'But imagine if we were waking up this morning to a situation where radiation levels were extraordinarily high, and the health and human danger that that would have presented far beyond Iran as well. So this is an extraordinarily dangerous time.' He said that it was 'sadly true' that international legal norms are not being adhered to, citing the He said there was a diplomatic process in train and his understanding from readouts was 'there was a commitment from the Iranian side to further talks'. Advertisement POSSESSION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS Harris said 'The way to address this was always through a negotiated solution. Any alternative to that is simply too dangerous for civilians, for the 'Together with my EU counterparts, we will in the coming hours and days discuss and review the latest developments and consider the next steps Europe can usefully play to support de-escalation.' Minister for Culture Patrick O'Donovan said people woke up on Sunday 'terrified, really, to be quite honest, about the prospect of what's unfolding'. Advertisement 'TERRIFYING' He told RTE's The Week In Politics it is 'terrifying' for citizens in Iran and Israel. He said: 'It does take great people to make leaps of faith in particular places in time to come forward, whether it was in relation to (Anwar el-Sadat) in Egypt, and later on in relation to 'Because, ultimately, as the Taoiseach said, this is terrifying – not only for the innocent communities that are living in both countries, but as well as that for the neighbouring countries in the Middle East, who we obviously all hope are not drawn into a much bigger conflict.'
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Evacuation of 15 Irish citizens from Israel under way, Tánaiste says
An operation is ongoing on Sunday evening to evacuate a group of 15 Irish citizens and their dependents from Israel, Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris has confirmed. He also said Irish diplomats were working to assist a small number of Irish citizens from Iran but did not specify the number. Speaking to the media at Government Buildings on Sunday afternoon, Mr Harris said the evacuation operation was being done in partnership with other EU countries. 'There is an evacuation under way of Irish citizens and their dependents, 15 in total. We've been working closely with EU counterparts in relation to that 'I hope to be in a position to issue further details on that shortly,' he said.. READ MORE Mr Harris said the Department of Foreign Affairs had been working with a 'small number of citizens in Iran who have expressed a wish to be evacuated'. He said the challenges in evacuating citizens from both countries was 'not easy'. 'The airspace is closed, and the only way of being evacuated is over the land border, involving long journeys that are not only difficult (to navigate) but also dangerous,' he said. He praised the 'extraordinary work' being done by Irish diplomats in difficult and 'often very dangerous' circumstances. He said consular staff in both countries had a citizens' register and some 200 citizens had registered in Israel and 29 in Iran. Mr Harris also spoke by phone on Sunday afternoon with Iran's deputy foreign minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi about the US bombing of Iran. The call took place following a request from Iran's government. The Tánaiste said he got no indication from the Iranian minister that it would change its stance on refusing to return to negotiations. 'Being very honest, during the call I was met with an Iranian counterpart (who was) full of anger, and talking, in his words, about the aggressor. 'I made the point that he was talking to a representative of a European country that hasn't in any way been an aggressor, and in fact, that the European Union has been consistent in our approach and united in our approach across 27 member states that we need to see de-escalation, diplomacy and dialogue.' He said he did not get any indication as of now that the position of Iran has changed. 'That's not a reason enough to keep engaging the talks shortly,' he added.
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What is the nuclear world order and how did we get here?
In the corridor adjacent to the UN General Assembly Hall at UN headquarters in New York, a giant photograph of the mushroom cloud billowing up from the destroyed city of Nagasaki hangs on the wall. It is part of a permanent exhibition designed to remind passersby of the horrors of nuclear war. After all, the UN was set up in no small part to prevent it ever happening. "Nuclear weapons post a threat to our very existence," reads a nearby quote from the UN Secretary General António Guterres. "The total elimination of nuclear weapons remains the highest disarmament priority of the United Nations," it adds. One wonders, though, how many delegates have ever paused to ponder the terrifying images on display. Considering that since the US dropped two atomic bombs on Japan eighty years ago, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians, several more countries have acquired their own nuclear arsenals. In fact, in that same UN exhibition, a flat screen television monitor shows the number of nuclear tests in the world since World War II. As the reel begins, isolated flashes in the US and the former Soviet Union first appear. The number of explosions steadily gathers pace through the Cold War until the grainy screen displays a mesmerising crescendo of detonations across the whole planet. It's hardly surprising that many historians believe we were miraculously lucky to escape nuclear annihilation in the 20th Century. So, what is the state of the world nuclear order today? The International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN's nuclear watchdog, estimates that today 30 nations have nuclear capability. But only nine have nuclear weapons. They are, in order of the most nuclear warheads in their possession: Russia, the United States, China, France, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea. There are an additional six nations that host nuclear weapons namely Italy, Türkiye, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands for the United States and Belarus for Russia. There could have been a lot more, according to John Erath, a former US State Department diplomat, now with the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington DC. "When the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was signed in the late 1960s," he told RTÉ News, "the general estimate was that in 10 years, we would have had 20 nuclear powers". The NPT was a cornerstone UN treaty aimed at curtailing the spread of nuclear weapons and committing member states to nuclear development for peaceful means only. The treaty recognised only five nuclear powers who were, and still are, the permanent members of the UN Security Council - China, France, Russia, UK and US. Today, 191 UN member states are signatories to the NPT. Five are not, namely Israel, North Korea, India, Pakistan and South Sudan. "There has been some success for non-proliferation, and I credit the NPT for getting us there," he said. Some countries such as South Africa, Brazil, Argentina, Japan and South Korea had very advanced nuclear capabilities, Mr Erath told RTÉ News. Brazil had even mastered the entire fuel cycle. "[These countries] could build nuclear weapons in no time, but they decided their security needs do not require them to do so," Mr Erath said. Other nations, though, took a different view. The race for a nuclear deterrent Nations usually decide to pursue a nuclear deterrent in response to their own security concerns - whether real or perceived - despite the enormous price tag and the risk of international condemnation. "Nobody likes having nuclear weapons," John Erath said, adding "they're tremendously expensive, very dangerous and very difficult to build and maintain". He added: "So, the real question is: Why do these threats exist and lead countries to decide to develop and build nuclear weapons?" A report published earlier this year by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons found that the nine nuclear-armed states collectively spent $100 billion (€87 billion) on their arsenals in 2024. The report found that's the equivalent of $3,100 (€2,705) per second. In 2003, North Korea - one of the poorest countries in the world where 60% of people live below the poverty line - quit the NPT and three years later, carried out its first nuclear test. It followed a speech by then US President George Bush in the wake of the 9/11 attacks branding North Korea, along with Iran and Iraq, an "Axis of Evil". In the spring of 2003, the US illegally invaded Iraq on the false pretext that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling "weapons of mass destruction". "North Korea took [the Axis of Evil speech] to mean that they were next on the list," Mr Erath said. How much the toppling of Saddam Hussein in neighbouring Iraq fed into Tehran's decision-making over its nuclear programme is hard to assess. Iran remained in the NPT and claimed it was developing nuclear power for civilian use. But officials elsewhere, especially hawkish policymakers in the US and Israel, accused Iran of stringing negotiators along while secretly enriching uranium to weapons grade. It's fair to assume that the successful acquisition of a nuclear deterrent by North Korea - a fellow member of the so-called - won't have been lost on the Iranian leadership. And there were lessons to be drawn elsewhere too. At the end of the Cold War, Ukraine was in possession of the world's third largest nuclear arsenal, inherited from the collapsed Soviet Union. However, the control systems and launch codes remained in Moscow, which limited Ukraine's ability to use them independently. Nevertheless, under pressure from the Clinton administration in the US, which sought to denuclearise eastern Europe, and in exchange for assurances on territorial integrity from Russia, the UK and the US, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons. It was a key foreign policy decision that former US President Bill Clinton came to regret following Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and full scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. "I feel a personal stake because I got them [Ukraine] to agree to give up their nuclear weapons," Mr Clinton said in an interview with RTÉ's Prime Time, in April 2023. "And none of them believe that Russia would have pulled this stunt if Ukraine still had their weapons," he said. Russia's so-called "stunt" coupled with US President Donald Trump's ambivalence about defending Europe reignited the debate in Europe over its own nuclear deterrent. French President Emmanuel Macron - which is the EU's only nuclear power - floated the idea of extending the French "nuclear umbrella" to cover all of Europe. That would mean deploying French warheads across the continent like Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands while Türkiye currently hosts American nuclear weapons. Mr Macron's opening gambit was greeted warmly by leaders in Germany, Poland, Lithuania and Denmark. But Russia slammed the French president's move as "extremely confrontational". Mr Trump's 'America First' doctrine also prompted a re-think in South Korea, where opinion polls now show that more than three quarters of South Koreans support the idea of a national nuclear deterrent. And in south Asia, India, which tested its first bomb in 1974, cited the need for a deterrent against regional rivals China and Pakistan. In response, Pakistan - with the help of China as well as the clandestine nuclear technology-smuggling network run by Pakistani scientist AQ Khan - became a nuclear power in 1998. Neither country has signed the NPT and last year Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India said he was reconsidering India's "no first use," policy – a long-standing commitment to a retaliatory strike only. A sudden outbreak of conventional hostilities between the two regional enemies in April, once again raised the spectre of nuclear war. Israel and Iran One of the world's most secretive and controversial nuclear programmes belongs to Israel, centred around the Dimona nuclear reactor in the Negev desert. Israel is believed to possess 90 plutonium-based nuclear warheads but has never publicly admitted its nuclear capability. Israel's nuclear ambiguity and its non-membership of the NPT meant it never faced international sanctions over its nuclear programme, unlike North Korea, Iran and for a time, India and Pakistan. Last week, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran's nuclear programme posed an existential threat to Israel. Iranian leaders have frequently called for the eradication of Israel. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that Israel was doing "the dirty work" for other countries, by taking out Iran's nuclear potential. But while Iran's nuclear programme will likely be set back given recent strikes by Israel, and the US overnight, it's unlikely to be destroyed altogether, Mr Erath told RTÉ News. "The most important factor in producing a nuclear weapon is knowledge," he said, "and it's very difficult to kill knowledge". "It's tremendously expensive in terms of resources that both Israel and Iran would be putting into this and most importantly, the cost in human lives," he said. Before the US targeted three Iranian nuclear faciities, Natanz, Isfahan and Fordo, anti-nuclear campaigners had called Israel's initial airstrikes "illegal and unjust". "Israel is the only country in the region that has nuclear weapons," Susi Snyder of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons told RTÉ News, "Iran does not". "Iran was not posing an existential threat to Israel, and that is just a false narrative that Israel is portraying right now in order to justify what is honestly an illegal action," she said. Mad times The famous doctrine of MAD – Mutually Assured Destruction – was credited with keeping the peace during the Cold War. It held that a nuclear strike by the United States or the Soviet Union would trigger retaliation, thereby guaranteeing mutual annihilation. In the 1980s, scientists predicted that even if humans survived the first round of bombs, the explosions would emit so much smoke and ash into the atmosphere, it would block out the sun, triggering a "nuclear winter" that could kill all life on earth. That was surely something neither side would be willing to risk. But on a number of occasions during the 20th Century, the world came perilously close to such a disaster - notably the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 when the USSR positioned nukes in Cuba and NATO's Able Archer war game of 1983, which the Soviets mistook for a real attack and readied their nuclear arsenals to strike back. Is MAD still relevant today? Anti-nuclear campaigners argue that more nuclear-armed states make for a more dangerous world, while rising global tensions increase the risk of deliberate or accidental use. And there's little sign that the world's largest nuclear powers are interested in changing course. President Vladimir Putin formally announced a revision of the Russian nuclear doctrine last year, lowering the threshold for a nuclear strike. Under President Xi Jinping, China has rapidly expanded its nuclear arsenal, while the US continues to pour money into the modernisation of its nuclear programme. "The era of reductions in the number of nuclear weapons in the world, which had lasted since the end of the Cold War, is coming to an end," according to Hans Kristensen, Stockholm International Peace Research. "Instead, we see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements." Technological advancements have also dramatically increased the potency of modern atomic bombs. The United States, for example, is building a new bomb designed to be 24 times more powerful than the one dropped on Hiroshima. At the centre of the UN exhibition stands a charred and mottled statue of St Agnes holding a lamb. It was found face down in the ruins of a Roman Catholic Cathedral in Nagasaki.
