Wong clarifies Australia's stance on Trump bombing Iranian nuclear sites
Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek have confirmed to Sunrise that the Albanese government does support President Trump's strikes on Iran's three nuclear sites.
The issue of support had become controversial after the Australian government released a statement on Sunday, following the bombing attacks by US B-2 stealth bombers and submarines, that was silent on the issue.
WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Penny Wong confirms Australia's support for US strike on Iran.
'We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace,' the statement read.
'The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.'
But early Monday morning Plibersek cleared up the confusion, which had become a point of attack for the Coalition, who had described the Albanese Government's statement as 'ambiguous'.
'Yes we do support the strike ... we certainly don't want to see full-scale war in the Middle East as it is a delicate and difficult time,' Plibersek said.
'We would encourage Iran to come back to the negotiating table. We've been saying that for some time now, along with the rest of the intenational community.
'No one wants to see Iran develop a nuclear weapon, we know they have been enriching uranium towards that goal.
'Now is the time for reinvigorated efforts towards diplomacy, because a full-scale war in the Middle East would be a terrible thing.'
7NEWS understands Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will convene the National Security Committee of Cabinet, and will address the nation later this morning.
The National Security Committee, officially known as the National Security Committee of Cabinet, is the paramount decision-making body for national security and major foreign policy (including usage of the Australian Defence Force) matters in the Australian Government.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says what happens next is crucial.
'We need to avert an escalation to full-scale war,' Wong said to Sunrise.
'I am sure you will be hearing from the prime minister later today.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
25 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
'Fence sitting and confusion': Iran strikes show the growing gap between Canberra and Washington
The Albanese government is finding it hard to come to terms with the way the world works now and that's particularly obvious in its approach to Washington under Donald Trump. But it's also means the government is caught flatfooted when important things happen – like the weekend's US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, for example. The government's stumbles and confusion are starting to have consequences for Australia's security and for our alliance relationship with America. This is probably going to get worse as the gap between Canberra and Washington grows. The mounting policy differences are in areas that matter to Washington and that are getting harder to hide. Australia has shifted away from the US when it comes to our approach towards Israel, the Palestinians and the Middle East. Mr Albanese left Australia's reaction to the US strikes on Iran to an unnamed spokesperson over the weekend. It wasn't until Monday that foreign minister Penny Wong belatedly said Australia supported the strikes. And not only has Australia shifted its UN vote for the first time in 20 years from support to Israel and the US, but minister Wong has gone further, saying Australia might recognise a Palestinian state before a peace process concludes. The government's default position of being critical of Israel because of the destruction in Gaza has left it flatfooted on efforts to stop the Iranian regime's nuclear program. The result is fence sitting and confusion. It was Monday afternoon before we heard briefly from the prime minister, echoing Penny Wong's words. That's well after other world leaders reacted to the upending of Middle Eastern security. Trump has told us he doesn't make a final decision until the last second. Mr Albanese seems only to know what to say and think well after the event. Australia's confusion seems to be noticed in Washington. It's telling that President Trump contacted UK prime minister Keir Starmer, before the US strikes, but didn't call America's other AUKUS partner, Mr Albanese. At the heart of things is the uncomfortable fact that the Albanese government's instincts and policies are widely divergent from Trump's America. That played to the government's advantage in our recent election. Voter anxiety about the early, chaotic days of Trump's second term let Mr Albanese paint Peter Dutton as the 'mini-Trump' and ride a wave of anxiety back into office. Great for domestic politics, but not great for alliance relations. The larger problem, though, is the growing gap between Australia and America on China as a security threat and on defence investment. The Albanese government has made a lot of domestic political mileage out of 'stabilising' the relationship with Beijing. Mr Albanese has already met Xi Jinping three times – in Bali, Beijing and Rio. In May he announced he would fly to Beijing to meet Xi for the fourth time. Yet six months into Trump's second term, he has yet to meet the US President and we hear he has nothing planned except perhaps at September's UN General Assembly. Beyond the personal level, the Albanese government looks at least as conflicted and confused on China policy as it does on the Middle East. At the National Press Club a couple of weeks ago, Mr Albanese couldn't bring himself to put 'China' and 'security' into the same paragraph when asked was China a national security threat. Instead we got a word salad about complexity, relationships, the broader region and binaries. He's out of step with the majority of Australians who polling shows see an aggressive China as a security threat to Australia and the region. For Washington, China is the priority security challenge. Mr Albanese has added to Australian weakness on security by dismissing American calls for us to invest enough in our own security. He's made spending two per cent of GDP on defence into some kind of statement of sovereign strength, when he must know that won't even pay for the conventional military he plans, let alone eight nuclear submarines. To American eyes and ears, this is a heady brew that undercuts Australia's reliability as an ally. It can only make hardheaded folk in Washington wonder why on earth America should weaken its own Navy by handing over nuclear submarines from its own fleet to strengthen Australia when we seem determined to free ride on American taxpayers and American power. And far from working closely with the US and its other regional partners and allies to deter China, we seem willing to discount the threat and double down on our trade dependency on Beijing. After all, AUKUS exists to deter Chinese aggression. If Australia doesn't share that purpose, then AUKUS no longer makes sense. As we get further into Trump's second term, Australia and the US are drifting further apart. That might make many critics of the Trump administration happy, but the growing gap between Canberra and Washington undercuts our decades long reliance on the US for our security. And it seems the Albanese government is yet to notice. Michael Shoebridge is a contributor and the founder and director of Strategic Analysis Australia
AU Financial Review
28 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Meet the real life Batwing that bombed Iran's nuclear sites
The B-2 Spirit bomber is one of the world's most advanced aircraft and played the starring role in Donald Trump's early Sunday morning air raid on Iran's nuclear sites. The Pentagon revealed seven aircraft were involved in the stunning strike, delivering their bunker-buster bombs to target the underground nuclear enrichment plant at Fordow, in a marathon 37-hour operation.
The Age
39 minutes ago
- The Age
Petrol, electricity and gas price spikes inevitable if Iran chokes shipping
Australian petrol, electricity and gas price spikes are inevitable if Iran closes its shipping channels to the world, blocking the conduit for Middle Eastern energy exports representing about 20 per cent of globally traded oil and gas. Iran's parliament is reported to have agreed to close the Strait of Hormuz, but it is unclear if the nation's military will implement a blockade, which could draw brutal retaliation from the US and its allies. However, just the threat of global disruption can drive commodity prices higher. When Vladimir Putin invaded of Ukraine in 2022, fears over shortages due to widespread embargoes on Russia's oil and gas exports helped drive price spikes along with the physical shortage of fuel. Any shift in global markets will impact local energy prices because Australia imports the vast majority of its petroleum. Despite Australia being a major gas exporter, local gas prices are set by the international market because buyers here compete with the rest of the world. Loading Schneider Electric senior director Lisa Zembrodt, who advises some of Australia's biggest corporate energy users, said disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz would affect 20 per cent of the world's petroleum liquids consumption and 20 per cent of liquified natural gas. She said more than 80 per cent of these exports go to Asian markets, which drives prices in Australia. 'When the price of oil rises, we see this at the pump. When the international price of gas rises, the price of gas as a fuel for heating may rise, despite that we produce twice as much as we consume domestically. The cost of gas-fired generation can also rise, causing electricity prices to rise at times when gas is setting the price in the market - for example recently during the cold snap in Victoria.' And while only around 10 per cent of Australia's electricity is generated by gas, it is the most expensive compared to the dominant fuel sources of coal and renewable energy, which means it sets a benchmark price that drives all the others up if its price spikes. The 2022 electricity crisis culminated in price spikes so high that the regulator imposed the first-ever suspension of the market, and bills have remained elevated ever since.
