Trump abruptly leaves G7 Summit as Israel-Iran conflict intensifies
CALGARY, Alberta — US President Donald Trump departed the Group of Seven – or G7 – summit being held in a resort town in the Canadian Rockies on Monday night due to the intensifying conflict between Israel and Iran and growing regional instability in the Middle East.
World leaders at the summit scrambled to find a way to contain the five-day-old conflict that has taken the lives of dozens of people across Israel and Iran.
Earlier, Trump had warned that Tehran needs to dismantle its nuclear program before it's 'too late'.
The US president said Iranian leaders would 'like to talk' but they had already had 60 days to reach an agreement on their nuclear ambitions and failed to do so before an Israeli aerial assault began four days ago. 'They have to make a deal,' he said.
Summie host, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the world is looking to the G7 for leadership during these testing times.
'We're gathering at one of those turning points in history,' Carney said. 'The world's more divided and dangerous.'British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz convened for an informal meeting lasting one hour shortly after their arrival at the summit late on Sunday.Merz, speaking to reporters at the summit, said his country is planning to draft a final communique proposal on the conflict, stressing that Iran must under no condition 'be allowed' to acquire nuclear weapons-capable material.Trump said Iran "is not winning this war. And they should talk and they should talk immediately before it's too late.' The US president was also asked on whether Washington will join Israel in its military operation in Iran, but Trump declined to comment on the matter.Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Monday that they have signed a trade deal that will slash tariffs on UK auto and aerospace industry imports.The new deal was announced on the sidelines of the summit. Trump and Starmer did however note that negotiations are still ongoing on the steel production sector.Trump insists that the deal with the UK is 'fair for both', adding that he expects it to produce a lot of jobs and income for both nations. Starmer took a similar tone to Trump as he addressed reporters saying the deal is a sign of strength and a 'very good day' for both countries.Reaching an agreement is significant as Trump has threatened much of the world with substantial import tariffs that have caused market instability and heightened the risk of a global trade war.Although he has backed off on several of his suggested tariffs, he has persisted in indicating that officials from his administration are vigorously engaged in negotiations for new trade agreements with numerous nations — despite the fact that very few have come to fruition.The agreement follows the leaders' announcement in May revealing that they'd reached a framework for a trade pact. This pact aims to significantly reduce US import taxes on British cars, steel, and aluminum in exchange for enhanced access to the British market for US goods, such as beef and ethanol.However, the agreement reached on Monday exclusively addresses British cars and aerospace materials, with further negotiations required for steel.London says the new deal would give British firms like Rolls Royce which produces engines for airplanes as well as high-end luxury vehicles a major boost, receiving an exemption from the 10% tariffs originally imposed.The US president also stirred controversy at the summit as he suggested that the G7 should expand to the G8, including Russia, or even the G9 with China.Trump expressed his preference for the organization's expansion despite the fact that Russia and China are authoritarian regimes within a group whose members are democratic nations.Trump asserted that it was a 'very big mistake' to remove Russia in 2014 after it annexed Crimea, a move that preceded Russia's wider invasion of Ukraine in 2022.The comments added more complexity regarding Trump's interests as he is set to meet on Tuesday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about ending the brutal war started by the invasion.'The G7 used to be the G8. Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have Russia in,' Trump said, referring to Justin Trudeau, who was elected prime minister a year after Russia's removal. Stephen Harper was the Canadian prime minister at the time.'I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in, and you wouldn't have a war right now if Trump were president four years ago,' Trump said. 'They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though I wasn't in politics then.'Asked by a reporter if China should also be added, Trump said: 'It's not a bad idea. I don't mind that if somebody wants to see just China coming in.'The US president said it's important for world leaders to be able to speak with one another at summits.'Putin speaks to me. He doesn't speak to anybody else," Trump said. "He doesn't want to talk because he was very insulted when he got thrown out of the G8, as I would be, as you would be, as anybody would be.' — Euronews
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Middle East tensions put investors on alert, weighing worst-case scenarios
Investors are mulling a host of different market scenarios should the US deepen its involvement in the Middle East conflict, with the potential for ripple effects if energy prices skyrocket. They have honed in on the evolving situation between Israel and Iran, which have exchanged missile strikes, and are closely monitoring whether the US decides to join Israel in its bombing campaign. Potential scenarios could send inflation higher, dampening consumer confidence and lessening the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. This would likely cause an initial selloff in equities and possible safe-haven bid for the dollar. While US crude prices have climbed some 10 percent over the past week, the S&P 500 has been little changed as of yet, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks. However, if attacks were to take out Iranian oil supply, 'that's when the market is going to sit up and take notice,' said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth. 'If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today's WTI price and that is where things get negative,' Hogan said. The White House said on Thursday President Donald Trump would decide on US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks. Analysts at Oxford Economics modeled three scenarios, ranging from a de-escalation in the conflict, a complete shutdown in Iranian production, and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, 'each with increasingly large impacts on global oil prices,' the firm said in a note. In the most severe case, global oil prices jump to around $130 per barrel, driving US inflation near 6 percent by the end of this year, Oxford said in the note. 'Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about the potential for second-round inflation effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the US this year,' Oxford said in the note. Oil impact The biggest market impact from the escalating conflict has been restricted to oil, with oil prices soaring on worries that the Iran-Israel conflict could disrupt supplies. Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18 percent since June 10, hitting a near 5-month high of $79.04 on Thursday. The accompanying rise in investors' expectations for further near-term volatility in oil prices has outpaced the rise in volatility expectations for other major asset classes, including stocks and bonds. But other asset classes, including stocks, could still feel the knock-on effects of higher oil prices, especially if there is a larger surge in oil prices if the worst market fears of supply disruptions come true, analysts said. 'Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil,' Citigroup analysts wrote in a note. 'To us, the key for equities from here will come from energy commodity pricing,' they said. Stocks unperturbed US stocks have so far weathered rising Middle East tensions with little sign of panic. A more direct US involvement in the conflict could, however, spook markets, investors said. Financial markets may be in for an initial selloff if the US military attacks Iran, with economists warning that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs. Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead. On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3 percent in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3 percent higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro. Dollar woes An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the US dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished US exceptionalism. In the event of US direct engagement in the Iran-Israel War, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said. 'Traders are likely to worry more about the implicit erosion of the terms of trade for Europe, the UK, and Japan, rather than the economic shock to the US, a major oil producer,' Thierry Wizman, Global FX & Rates Strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note. But longer-term, the prospect of US-directed 'nation-building' would probably weaken the dollar, he said. 'We recall that after the attacks of 9/11, and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened,' Wizman said.
Asharq Al-Awsat
3 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
NATO Scrambles to Overcome Spain Block on Summit Spending Deal
NATO struggled Friday to overcome a block from Spain on a new defense spending deal that US President Donald Trump has demanded for a summit next week. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Thursday threw a last-minute hand grenade into preparations for the gathering in The Hague by coming out strongly against the agreement, AFP said. In a blistering letter to NATO chief Mark Rutte, Sanchez said that committing to a headline figure of five percent of GDP "would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive". The outburst from Madrid's center-left leader has sparked fury from other NATO members who fear it could derail the carefully crafted compromise designed to keep Trump happy at the summit. Ambassadors held a round of negotiations at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Friday, but broke up without a deal being reached. Several diplomats said talks could drag on through the weekend in an effort to reach a breakthrough or the start of the summit on Tuesday. "There is no clarity yet," one diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing deliberations. In a bid to satisfy Trump's demand to spend five percent of GDP on defense, NATO chief Rutte has corralled allies towards a diplomatic trade-off. That would see them agree to coughing up 3.5 percent on core military needs, and 1.5 percent on a looser category of "defense-related" expenditures such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. As a string of reluctant European capitals fell into line, officials believed they were comfortably on track to reach the deal for the Hague summit. Washington's allies fear that Trump -- who has previously threatened not to protect countries he thinks don't spend enough -- could blow a hole in NATO if he doesn't get what he wants. Spain has been one of the lowest spending NATO countries on defense in relative terms. The country is only set to hit the alliance's current target of two percent this year after a 10 billion euro ($11.5 billion) injection. Sanchez is facing a difficult balancing act of aligning with NATO allies and cajoling his junior coalition partner, the far-left alliance Sumar, which is hostile to increasing military spending.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan recommends Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for defusing conflict with India
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani government has decided to formally recommend United States (US) President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize for his 'decisive diplomatic intervention' during last month's India-Pakistan military standoff, it said on Saturday. The statement came after Trump took credit for a peace deal negotiated in Washington between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda and complained he had been overlooked by the Norwegian Nobel Committee for his mediating role in conflicts between India and Pakistan, as well as Serbia and Kosovo. Trump campaigned for office as a 'peacemaker' who would use his negotiating skills to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza, although both conflicts are still raging five months into his presidency. Indian officials have denied that he had any role in its ceasefire with Pakistan. In a post on X, the Pakistani government said President Trump demonstrated 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation last month. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue,' it said, appreciating Trump's efforts that ultimately secured a ceasefire and averted a broader conflict between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. The military standoff was triggered by a militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan. Islamabad denied complicity. The four-day standoff had raised fears of wider conflict between the South Asian rivals who have fought multiple wars, including two over the disputed region of Kashmir. Trump also offered to mediate the Kashmir dispute between Pakistan and India. 'Pakistan also acknowledges and greatly admires President Trump's sincere offers to help resolve the longstanding dispute of Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan — an issue that lies at the heart of regional instability,' the government said. 'Durable peace in South Asia would remain elusive until the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Jammu and Kashmir.' Islamabad hoped that Trump's legacy of 'pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building' will continue and help resolve various ongoing crises in the Middle East. 'Pakistan remains hopeful that his earnest efforts will continue to contribute toward regional and global stability, particularly in the context of ongoing crises in the Middle East, including the humanitarian tragedy unfolding in Gaza and the deteriorating escalation involving Iran,' the government added.
