EXCLUSIVE Britain's railway deserts revealed: Map shows which UK towns are furthest from their local train station as some face two-hour long journey to reach their nearest platform
From seaside resorts to market towns surrounded by beautiful countryside, they are among Britain's most picturesque locations.
But if you fancy a visit and don't have a car, you can probably forget about it – as these spots are also some of the country's worst-connected areas by rail.
MailOnline has looked at the towns furthest away from stations - finding that Campbeltown, the UK's cheapest seaside location for buying a house, comes top.
Further popular coastal locations in South West England such as Minehead and Bude are also more than 20 miles away from stations, as is Hay-on-Wye in Wales.
Elsewhere, other towns do have stations but the services are so infrequent that they are often deserted - with Denton near Manchester being the UK's least-used.
And the winding nature of some rural routes in Scotland and Wales means towns in areas connected by rail are still much quicker to travel between by car.
Here is a look at where in the UK could be defined as a 'railway desert':
Furthest towns from stations
The UK's most remote town for rail travel is Campbeltown in Argyll and Bute, which is 87 miles or more than two hours' drive away from the nearest station at Oban.
The setting hit the headlines this week for being the UK's cheapest seaside town, with research by Lloyds Bank finding it would cost a buyer an average of £103,000.
Campbeltown is also a rare example of a UK location that has never been connected to the country's main rail network, even before the Beeching cuts of the 1960s.
All it has ever had was a station on a light railway network to nearby Machrihanish between 1906 and 1934, although it does have an airport given its remote setting.
While Scotland has several scenic rural lines serving hamlets, some bigger towns lack a station. These include Fraserburgh in Aberdeenshire, which is 35 miles from the nearest stop at Inverurie. Nearby Peterhead is 31 miles from the same station.
The town in England furthest from a station is thought to be Bude in Cornwall, at 29 miles from Okehampton.
Minehead in Somerset follows, at 24 miles from Taunton station.
Another popular but hard-to-reach town by rail is Hay-on-Wye in Powys, which is 21 miles from the nearest stop at Hereford on the other side of the England/Wales border.
Other destinations far from train stations include Middleton-in-Teesdale in County Durham, which is 21 miles from the nearest stop at Bishop Auckland.
Hawick in the Scottish Borders is 17 miles from Tweedbank station; while Keswick in Cumbria is 17 miles from Penrith station.
Meanwhile Hunstanton in Norfolk is 16 miles from King's Lynn station; and Louth in Lincolnshire is 15 miles from Market Rasen station.
Least-used stations
While the above locations have no station at all, other parts of the country remain badly-connected despite trains still operating through them due to their infrequency.
For example, Denton in Greater Manchester was Britain's least-used railway station in 2023/24 with 54 entries and exits.
It is on the line between Stockport and Stalybridge, which was built to take trains to Leeds but saw its timetable cut in the 1990s after services were re-routed.
Denton is served by two Northern trains per week – one in each direction – which are both on Saturday mornings. A train to Stockport departs at 8.42am, while a service to Stalybridge leaves at 9.04am.
Railway stations are often kept open despite being rarely used because it is easier to arrange for a train to stop infrequently than obtain permission for closure.
In second place was Shippea Hill in Cambridgeshire with 70 entries and exits, while Ince & Elton in Cheshire was third with 86; and Polesworth in Warwickshire fourth with 118.
Reddish South in Greater Manchester came fifth with 128; Coombe Junction Halt in Cornwall was sixth with 140; and Chapelton in Devon with 186.
Completing the top ten were Clifton in Greater Manchester with 202; Elton & Orston in Nottinghamshire with 212 and Kildonan in the Highlands with 240.
Estimates of entries and exits are published by the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) and are largely based on ticket sales, with the latest set being released last November.
Worst performing stations
Another metric for looking at the UK's worst areas for train connections is to consider performance over the past six months, as ranked by the website On Time Trains.
This puts Ynyswen station in South Wales top of the pile, followed by Lockerbie in Scotland in second, then Penrith and Oxenholme in Cumbria in third and fourth.
Also in the top ten are Kearsley and Blackrod in Greater Manchester; Chilworth in Surrey; Baglan and Llansamlet in South Wales; and Dolwyddelan in North Wales.
However, many of these stations are rural with a low service frequencies, and so their performance figures can be skewed by a relatively small number of cancellations.
A further measure to consider is therefore the worst performing stations out of the top 500 busiest stations, which puts Deansgate in Manchester at the top.
Many of the others in the top ten are in the North West - including Lancaster in second, Warrington Bank Quay in third and Manchester Oxford Road in fifth.
Also on the list are Tamworth, Macclesfield, Bolton, Stoke-on-Trent and Stafford – with Mill Hill Broadway in North West London completing the set.
Narrowing this down to the top 100 busiest stations, the worst performing are Manchester Oxford Road, Milton Keynes Central, City Thameslink in London, Manchester Piccadilly and York.
Also in that top ten are Coventry, St Albans, Bath Spa, Leicester and Sheffield.
Other anomalies
Some locations are connected to major stations by train, but the journey can take significantly longer than by car given the slow pace of services.
For example, Inverness to Wick on the Far North line in Scotland takes just over four-and-half hours by train, compared to about two hours and 20 minutes by road.
Others include Shrewsbury to Pwhelli in Wales which is nearly four hours by train but again about two hours and 20 minutes by road.
Another example is Middlesbrough to Whitby in North Yorkshire which is over one-and-a-half hours by train but 50 minutes by car.
And in South Wales, if you want to get from Swansea to Aberystwyth by rail it will take more than five hours going via Shrewsbury - or just over two hours by car.
And the largest town in Britain that cannot be reached by train is believed to be Gosport in Hampshire, after the station was closed to passengers in 1953.
The town is however only five miles away from Fareham station, and is linked to nearby Portsmouth via the Gosport Ferry which takes about four minutes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
We test portable health snacks ahead of festival season
GLASTONBURY kicks off on Wednesday, meaning festival season is now in full swing. That's great if you like music, partying and booze, but not so brilliant if you are trying to keep on top of your health as food and drinks at venues come with high prices and low nutrients. One of the best things you can do is take some healthy portable snacks. Today, I've put some to the test. . . Turkey bar ROAM free-range turkey bar is just that – a meat bar with a 12-month shelf life that you don't need to put in the fridge. Perfect for festivals. This is 91 per cent turkey meat, with some whey protein concentrate to boost the protein levels and some salt, sugar, flavourings, mustard, yeast extract and herbs. It is just 95 calories per 45g bar, with 16.7g of protein. This is a great idea – think of a Peperami type snack without all the additives and made with just natural ingredients. From £2 a bar. 40 Day Health Challenge dietitian's top 10 tips for healthy snacking Seaweed crisps EMILY sriracha seaweed crisps are made out of just that – seaweed – which is a ' superfood ' as it is rich in antioxidants, vitamins and minerals. It contains iodine, which is great for thyroid function. Obviously, you're better off with fresh seaweed as these also contain tapioca, corn oil, rice powder, sugar, salt and dried molasses. They look like a very thin prawn cracker with seaweed inside. They're spicy, crunchy – but oddly soft at the same time. However, you get used to this. These are moreish. They have a bit of an odd smell, but that would probably go unnoticed at a festival. These are 5 per cent fibre but 36 per cent fat and 98 calories for an 18g bag. They are on offer at Ocado for 80p. Corn nibbles INDULGE crunchy corn nibbles were originally served as in-flight snacks so they are packed with flavour because, when we're flying, the reduced moisture and lower air pressure diminish our sense of taste. I tried the Tex Mex cheese, which is made from corn, sunflower oil, salt, cheese flavouring, maltodextrin starch from potatoes, colouring from red pepper and an antioxidant. These are five per cent fat and five per cent fibre. Only 99 calories per 20g bag. They are crunchy and cheesy, but there is a lot of powder on them, so wet wipes at the ready. The little bags are a bit fiddly too. Don't try if you don't love corn, as you can certainly taste that, but a healthy on-the-go snack if you do. They are £7.99 for a multipack of eight at
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE ABBA legend's torment over secret Nazi past... and the 'incomprehensible grief' that still haunts her
It's been more than 50 years since the Eurovision Song Contest catapulted them to global stardom and just three years after their multi-million-dollar virtual extravaganza Voyage opened in London. But as breathless rumors swirl that a Mamma Mia 3 is in the works, ABBA are almost as relevant now as they were in the band's 1970s heyday.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Are turbulent times ahead for Rolls-Royce?
The take-off of Rolls-Royce shares is the talk of the City. The engineering giant, synonymous with British manufacturing prowess, saw its share price hit a record high this month in one of the most remarkable comebacks ever seen in the Square Mile. Garlands have been strewn over its Turkish-born boss, Tufan Erginbilgic, who took the helm in 2023 and has been hailed as a miracle worker for bringing the aero-engine maker back from the brink of financial ruin in the pandemic. Not only has Rolls-Royce recovered, it has become one of the best performers in the FTSE 100 index. But there's a rule in the world of big money: if something looks too good to be true, it probably is. This could be the case for Rolls-Royce and 'Turbo' Tufan, who earned the nickname due to the ferocious pace at which he works. Amid all the excitement, the City has overlooked a damaging row between Rolls-Royce and airlines including British Airways and Virgin Atlantic – which some believe could soon bring the engine maker and its share price back to earth. The issue is Rolls's Trent 1000 engines, which power Boeing's 787 Dreamliner. The Trent 1000s proved popular but are showing their age after clocking up more than 20 million flying hours. And they have been dogged by serious maintenance problems stretching back nearly a decade, with hundreds of planes grounded and even routes cancelled. Both BA and Virgin were forced to cancel hundreds of long-haul flights and re-routed passengers when planes were taken out of service for unscheduled repairs. BA's prestigious routes to the Gulf States have been among the more prominent casualties. There was a furore last year when the airline scrapped direct flights from Heathrow to Bahrain and Kuwait, two of Britain's closest allies in the region, because of problems with the Rolls engines, some of which are prone to maintenance problems in hotter climates. Although flights to Bahrain were reinstated after a campaign led by The Mail, the Kuwait route and flights to Abu Dhabi remain suspended. This is a setback when businesses are desperate to forge trade links to the Gulf. Technical faults on the Trent 1000 have dogged Rolls since 2016, when a design flaw – which led to cracks forming in the turbine blades of some engines – was identified. According to Shai Weiss, the Virgin Atlantic boss, the Trent 1000 needs three times the attention of other turbines. The problems have so far cost Rolls up to £3 billion in repairs and payments to the airlines – and the row shows no sign of being resolved. If anything, it is likely to intensify as the summer travel season unfolds. Rolls-Royce has been spared President Trump's punishing trade tariffs under the recent US-UK trade deal. But it has been hurt by his America First policies: it missed out on one of the biggest ever engine orders from Qatar last month, losing to US rival GE. Not everyone, then, is convinced by the Rolls-Royce renaissance. The company's harshest critic is Willie Walsh, the former BA boss who now leads the International Air Transport Association trade body. The blunt Irishman has described the rise in Rolls shares as 'baffling' – and that was back in December, when the price was a good deal lower than today. Walsh accuses Rolls of basic engineering failings and of luring airlines to buy its turbines with, effectively, false claims. 'They built the engines and promised us great things,' he said. 'What they didn't say is: this engine is going to be 25 per cent more fuel efficient. But, by the way, you're going to have to change it every couple of months. 'I doubt anybody would have bought their engines if that's what they were saying.' But investors seem happy to set aside these concerns. Shares continue to be swept up in the hope Rolls will win lucrative defence contracts as Britain rebuilds its military strength. There's some sense to this: as well as making turbines for passenger planes, Rolls-Royce produces engines for combat vehicles, fighter jets, submarines, ships and helicopters. Rolls has also chosen to build the next generation of mini nuclear reactors. These factors have helped it overtake drugmaker GSK and data provider Relx to become Britain's sixth-largest company, with a valuation of £75 billion. Credit is certainly due to Tufan, who conducted a root and branch overhaul after taking charge. He put every aspect of the business under the microscope and imposed what he describes a 'zero tolerance for mediocrity' regime. Such is his obsession with performance that he instigated a three-and-a-half-month-long study of how Rolls fared against its rivals before he even arrived. This delved deep into internal processes and was the basis of a highly detailed strategy to rebuild the balance sheet and improve profitability. So far as the stock market is concerned, the medicine is working. There has been an astonishing £68 billion rise in the value of Rolls-Royce shares in the two years since Tufan arrived. Having lost £4 billion in a year in the pandemic, Rolls made an operating profit of £2.5 billion last year, its highest ever. Any investor shrewd enough to have bought £1,000 worth when he joined would now have a holding worth almost £8,500. That is an alchemy of wealth creation that even the tech giants of Silicon Valley would struggle to match. 'It's been a monster performer,' says Jamie Murray of Shore Capital stockbrokers. Rolls has a loyal army of 150,000 small shareholders who have stuck with the company through thick and thin since it was privatised under the Thatcher government in 1987. Younger investors are also enjoying the ride. Rolls is one of the most popular shares on investment platforms such as Trading 212 which are used by newer generations of share owners. There is no denying Tufan's actions – cutting costs, slashing 2,500 jobs and re-negotiating loss-making contracts – have been a big factor in transforming the 119-year-old company's fortunes. Naturally, Tufan has reaped personal rewards. He has pocketed £18 million in salary and bonuses in the last two years, including £7.5 million to persuade him to leave his former employer, BP. His performance is all the more impressive given the tough climate facing aviation – particularly a post-pandemic shortage of components and spare parts. Rolls-Royce is not the only manufacturer facing complaints. Problems with turbines made by American rival Pratt & Whitney have led to more than 40 of Wizz Air's planes being grounded. And investigators are still looking at what caused an Air India flight from Ahmedabad to Gatwick to crash just after take-off this month, killing 270 people. The Boeing Dreamliner, which was powered by recently serviced GE engines, had 'a clean history', Air India's chairman said this week. The question, then, is this: can Rolls-Royce's gravity-defying performance continue? Those with long memories know that Rolls – which was declared insolvent in 1971 due to cost overruns and development problems with its RB211 engine – has had a chequered past. Nationalised by Edward Heath's Conservative government, its fortunes have yo-yoed ever since. The famous car-making arm was separated out in 1973 and is now owned by BMW. Some say Tufan, a British and Turkish citizen with a background in engineering, has been a lucky general. His arrival at Rolls coincided with a post-pandemic bounce in flying among business passengers and holiday makers. But Tufan and Rolls-Royce will need more than luck in the months ahead. The problems with the Trent 1000 and other engines in the core civil aerospace business – which accounts for just over half of Rolls's £17.8 billion of sales and the bulk of profits – remain a dangerous Achilles' Heel. While Tufan cannot be blamed for the difficulties he inherited, he has so far not managed to draw a line under them – certainly not so far as the airlines are concerned. BA, for example, told The Mail on Sunday it was 'very disappointed' that it had been forced to make changes to its schedules because of the failings. 'Our teams continue to work closely with Rolls-Royce,' a spokesman added. And, while the original design faults on the Trent 1000 engines have now been fixed, Rolls accepts the supply chain shortages could last for another 18 months, meaning more delays, more grounded flights – and even higher air fares. 'The supply chain environment remains challenging,' said the spokesman, admitting that there had also been 'a significant increase in Trent 1000 major refurbishments' last year. Rolls has responded by committing £1billion to a series of upgrades across the Trent family of engines aimed at reducing the number and frequency of repairs. Erginbilgic hopes to put a new high-pressure turbine blade into all the engines in the Rolls fleet over the next two years in a move that will more than double the amount of time the Trent 1000 spends in the air. The improvements cannot come soon enough for customers and passengers. And, as for what this means for the stellar share price, experts are divided. Analysts at Bank of America think the company could be worth up to £100 billion – in other words, the shares could climb significantly higher. Its long-term success depends on whether the company can deliver cleaner, greener, quieter engines – and, in that respect, the Trent 1000 saga does not augur well. For the moment, Rolls is flying high. But its critics, while still in a small minority, are adopting the brace position – in case of a sudden and troubling loss of altitude.
