Gen Z High Career Standards Are Paying The Price Of A Broken Market
As Gen Z graduates enter a broken job market, their high-career standards amid workplace obstacles ... More are causing some of them to emotionally unravel, according to some reports.
Gen Z comprises the largest generation in the workplace and is expected to make up 30% of the workforce by 2030. But their influence is already here, along with their expectations around leadership, communication and culture reshaping the rules of the American workplace. But as Gen Zers enter the job market with bold expectations amid a tanking economy, increasing AI dominance and rising layoffs, landing a job isn't easy. Their high career standards, within a system fraught with problems, is causing them to emotionally unravel in the search process.
Perhaps the best part of Gen Z is that they set high standards whether it's promoting healthy work cultures, mentoring their senior employees or raising the bar for side hustles. Don't let anyone tell you Gen Zers are slackers. Andy Kurtzig, CEO of Pearl.com, told me that Gen Z is using AI to become what he calls "solopreneurs."
'We're watching a generational pivot in real time. Gen Z is taking the same tools corporations use to eliminate jobs and flipping the script to create opportunities for themselves,' Kurtzig explains. 'They're using AI to re-imagine career paths, build brands and monetize skills that traditional workplaces often overlook. What used to take funding, mentorship and institutional access, they're now doing with a laptop and a chatbot.'
A national survey by Superprof shows that Gen Z graduates are setting high standards for job hunts, with 40% saying a a toxic work culture is a deal breaker, and 27% refusing to tolerate financial secrecy or low pay. They want a well-paying job, but their priorities are jobs that also provide work-life balance, meaningful work, flexible hours and well-being. But that's not the 2025 job market they're stepping into.
'Gen Z isn't just job-hunting—they're curating an experience,' states Mina Ozdemir, PR manager at Superprof. 'They want work that aligns with their values, lets them grow and doesn't burn them out. If the vibes are off, they're out."
I spoke with Amanda Schneider, founder and president of ThinkLab, who told me that their latest research shows that Gen Z is quietly hoping to rewrite the old apprenticeship model for a new era. 'While older generations often insist that learning only happens through shadowing and in-person osmosis, Gen Z is proving that's no longer true—or at least not entirely true.'
But despite their standards of excellence, is Gen Z raising the bar too high for their own good? Clarify Capital surveyed 1,000 employees on how much time, money and emotional energy it takes to get hired in today's job market. Findings show that Gen Z is footing the emotional and financial bill for a broken system, fueled by rising living costs, minimal financial buffers and a hiring landscape flooded with ghost jobs and automated rejections.
An additional discovery? Gen Z is emotionally unraveling in the job seeking process. Out of the 86% of job hunters, 60% of Gen Z say the churn-and-burn job market is leaving them emotionally stressed and disillusioned before they even begin. Other key findings include:
Some experts contend that the problem isn't that Gen Z's standards are unrealistic. It's that they're better than the broken market they're entering. For example, Michael Baynes, co-founder and CEO of Clarify Capital, told me that Gen Z is paying the price for a broken system in their job hunting.
'The hiring landscape in 2025 has become increasingly inefficient and difficult to navigate,' Baynes says. "Ghost listings, automated rejections and pay-to-play application systems are pushing out young applicants before many have a chance to apply. Notably, three in five applicants abandon the process mid-way, and 46% encounter scams.'
Baynes asserts that the workforce has created an entry system that's burning Gen Z out before they even clock in. He further contends that there are times when the current job market treats entry-level employment as if it's a luxury. He describes multi-step interviews, AI filters and rising costs just to apply as examples of the convoluted process.
'With nearly 90% lacking savings and half getting no offers, today's job search can be financially unsustainable and emotionally crushing,' Baynes points out. "This generation is being asked to invest time, money and energy into a process that very often yields nothing in return."
Moira Corcoran, CPA and finance expert on Pearl, believes their data indicates that Americans, particularly younger generations, are feeling a sense of hopelessness when it comes to their financial outlook.
'With so many saying saving feels futile at this point, many are looking to make drastic changes to their lives in a way that's reminiscent of the 2008 recession,' Corcoran points out. "Between postponing major life decisions like having a child or owning a home to cutting back on summer travel, it is clear consumers are approaching a state of panic–they need ways to access affordable, professional financial advice to navigate these ever-changing economic conditions.'
According to Joseph Semrai, CEO and founder of Context, AI is making it even harder for new grads to get their foot in the door because traditional junior roles no longer exist, and he believes these roles need to be redesigned so that his generation doesn't get pushed out.
'Artificial intelligence is transforming the landscape for early-career roles in a way reminiscent of robotics' disruption of manufacturing jobs decades ago," Semrai observes. 'Entry-level positions traditionally built around tasks like basic data processing, document creation and introductory programming are increasingly automated, presenting new challenges for Gen Z graduates looking to develop foundational skills. However, the strategic response should not be to limit AI's integration but rather to rethink how we structure apprenticeship and early training.'
One way to accommodate Gen Z high career standards is Semrai's suggestion that companies actively redesign junior positions around meaningful collaboration within AI systems. 'Young professionals should be engaging closely with AI-generated outputs, auditing the reasoning behind automated decisions, challenging assumptions and refining final results,' Semrai concludes. "Recent research from institutions like MIT Sloan underscores that entry-level employees gain the most when they actively interact with AI, rather than passively consuming its outputs.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) Faces $7 Billion Lawsuit While Partnering With Innovative Biotech
Eli Lilly has been in the spotlight recently with a 3.96% share price increase over the past month. The selection of RyboDyn Inc. to join Lilly Gateway Labs stands out among recent developments, signaling strengthened research capabilities in precision immunotherapies and potentially bolstering investor confidence. Additionally, the company's legal entanglement with the lawsuit concerning Actos, following a class certification affirmation, highlights ongoing challenges in the pharmaceutical sector. The company's ongoing talks to acquire Verve Therapeutics also show its commitment to growing its gene-editing capabilities. These events have added weight to the broader market's trends. We've identified 2 warning signs for Eli Lilly (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of. The best AI stocks today may lie beyond giants like Nvidia and Microsoft. Find the next big opportunity with these 27 smaller AI-focused companies with strong growth potential through early-stage innovation in machine learning, automation, and data intelligence that could fund your retirement. Recent developments at Eli Lilly, such as the RyboDyn Inc. collaboration, have potential implications for its strategic growth, particularly in precision immunotherapies. This aligns with the company's narrative of expanding capabilities in oncology and immunology, indicating possible enhancements in revenue and earnings forecasts over the long term. Additionally, as Eli Lilly progresses with Phase III trials, including those for orforglipron, the anticipated product approvals could bolster revenue avenues by tapping into high-demand markets like diabetes and obesity treatments. Over the past five years, Eli Lilly's total shareholder return was a very large 430.14%, demonstrating substantial long-term growth despite recent underperformance against the US Pharmaceuticals industry, which saw a 8.9% drop over the past year. This impressive five-year return provides context to the company's current position, underscoring a history of robust shareholder value creation. Given the ongoing acquisition talks with Verve Therapeutics and Eli Lilly's significant investment in both manufacturing and R&D, the outlook for future revenue and earnings remains optimistic. However, potential regulatory hurdles and pricing pressures, particularly in the U.S. market, highlight possible challenges. The shares, with a current price of US$775.12, are 21.0% below the analyst consensus target of US$981.63. This discount suggests room for growth, should the company meet or exceed the analyst expectations on revenue and earnings. Learn about Eli Lilly's future growth trajectory here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:LLY. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stellantis Evaluates Maserati's Future, Including Potential Sale -- Reuters
Stellantis (STLA, Financials) is weighing a possible sale of its luxury brand Maserati as part of a broader strategic review, according to a Reuters report citing two unnamed sources familiar with the matter. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 11 Warning Signs with STLA. The discussions reportedly began before newly appointed CEO Antonio Filosa officially takes the helm. Maserati's future is under review as Stellantis navigates a shrinking U.S. market, Chinese competition, and steep tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on foreign-made cars and parts. Despite the internal review, a Stellantis spokesperson told Reuters that Maserati is not for sale. McKinsey declined to comment. Maserati's sales fell by over 50% last year to 11,300 units, with no new models currently scheduled for launch. A new business plan is expected once Filosa begins his tenure. Stellantis' board remains split on the brand's futuresome directors reportedly view Maserati as a reputational asset, while others believe it lacks viability for a sustainable relaunch. Analysts say streamlining Stellantis' 14-brand portfolio could improve profit margins. The company's shares have lost roughly two-thirds of their value since March 2024. Chinese automakers such as Chery could emerge as potential buyers, echoing earlier moves like Geely's acquisition of Volvo or SAIC's purchase of MG. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Advisors Can Avoid Becoming Over-Reliant on AI
Apparently there's no AI in team. Artificial intelligence is being hailed as a key element of the fourth industrial revolution, and new tools are now assisting financial advisors with taking notes, drafting emails, and brainstorming thought leadership content. In fact, the vast majority of advisors said generative AI helped their practices, according to a survey earlier this year. But AI isn't a silver bullet. It lacks emotional intelligence and a human touch. Advisors risk damaging client relationships if they become too reliant on automation — even for routine tasks. 'AI is poor at empathy so far,' said Adrian Johnstone, CEO of the CRM platform Practifi. 'Advisors need to recognize where the personal connection is most powerful, and use AI to automate and alleviate the lesser functions.' READ ALSO: What the GENIUS Act Means for Stablecoins and Advisors and Why UBS Is the Only Wirehouse to Allow Podcasting Today, most advisors use AI to boost meeting efficiency and streamline workflows. Ideally, this frees up more time to spend with clients, but misusing these tools can backfire. 'The common refrain of disaffected clients is: 'I pay you to understand me, my goals, and my fears, not to outsource me to a machine,'' Johnstone said. Wealth management is built on bespoke service, but AI hasn't yet learned to fully adapt to individual client needs and goals. While tools that draft emails and website content are improving, the output still reads 'hollow and generic,' Johnstone warned. Use it or Lose it. Client-facing AI tools can be 'extremely risky' because they can't interpret emotional undertones of client's concerns, said Rafael Loureiro, CEO of an estate planning platform. Still, AI can be useful for quick, factual tasks. 'If it's midnight on a Sunday and a client asks, 'What was my marginal tax rate last year?' that's a perfect use case,' Loureiro said. 'It's not doing financial planning, but answering factual questions.' Everything in Moderation. This isn't the first time new tech or strategies meant to disrupt the wealth management industry have wound up causing trouble for advisors and their clients. Will Trout, director at Datos Insights, pointed to the 2008 financial crisis as a warning. 'Firms that over-relied on risk models without human oversight suffered catastrophic losses,' he told Advisor Upside. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive financial advisor news, market insights, and practice management essentials, subscribe to our free Advisor Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
