Susan Magnier backs billionaire husband John over alleged €15m land deal that collapsed

Susan Magnier, the wife of billionaire John Magnier, has told the High Court of kitchen table negotiations which led to a €15m offer for a tract of land in Tipperary.
Appearing by video link at the High Court Mrs Magnier said she was present when the vendors received their €15m offer. Mrs Magnier said the proposed vendors and an estate agent then moved to another room to ring the trustees and a beneficiary of Barne Estate before returning to the meeting.
She told Caren Geoghegan SC, for the Magniers, that all parties afterwards had a "light-hearted" dinner in the wake of the alleged deal.
Lawyers acting for Mr Magnier, founder of the world-famous Coolmore Stud, have claimed before the High Court that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a "full-frontal assault" on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy 751 acres of land in Tipperary for €15 million.
Mr Magnier's proceedings claim that Barne Estate reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell the land at the higher price of €22.25m to Mr Regan, the founder of the New York building firm JT Magen.
Mr Magnier – along with his adult children - wants to enforce the alleged deal.
They say the deal was struck at an August 22, 2023, kitchen meeting at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home. They also claim an exclusivity agreement that was in effect from August 31 to September 30 stipulated that the estate would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier.
Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust.
The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed.
The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. Mr Regan is not a party to the case.
Friday's evidence
Mrs Magnier, whose husband concluded his evidence in the case on Friday morning, said that she was present at the kitchen table meeting with the defendants and estate agent John Stokes on the night of August 22, 2023, when the purchase was allegedly agreed.
Mrs Magnier claims that after the Thomson-Moores were offered the €15m, Mr Thomson-Moore allegedly told the table that he, his wife, Anna, and Mr Stokes had to make phone calls to the trustees and Mr Thomson-Moore's sister to get their consent and went to another room.
Mrs Magnier said that when Mr Stokes returned he was "elated" that a deal was done and was "clearly delighted". "Everyone was happy. We all shook hands and we asked if they would stay for dinner and they said they would," said Mrs Magnier.
Niall F Buckley SC, for the defendants, said that Mr Stokes will give evidence that he never said the trustees were going to be contacted on the night and that phone evidence will show that no trustee was contacted immediately after the offer.
"I clearly heard them say they were going out to call the trustees and to call the sister," said Mrs Magnier.
Farm manager at Coolmore Joe Holohan, who was also present at the kitchen table meeting, said that Mr Magnier wanted to get a deal done on the night, as there was "no messing around" with Mr Magnier.
Mr Holohan claims that Mr Stokes and the Thomson-Moores left the kitchen saying they had to go to make phone calls and that when they returned to the table that Mr Stokes was smiling "from ear to ear" and that all parties then shook hands.
"It was like a weight off their shoulders, they came back different, very happy people, and we shook hands," Mr Holohan told the court.
The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett next week.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Extra.ie​

an hour ago

• Extra.ie​

Dublin Airport hits out at council's enforcement notice

Dublin Airport's operator has been hit with a planning enforcement notice for breaching the highly contested passenger cap, describing it as 'a sorry indictment of the mess that is the Irish ­planning system'. Describing the airport as the most vital piece of transport infrastructure in Ireland, a DAA spokesman said: 'The system is quite simply broken and needs to be overhauled.' The airport is limited to ­handling a maximum of 32 ­million passengers a year under a condition of the planning ­permission granted in 2007 for Terminal 2. Dublin Airport. Pic: Getty Images However, the DAA and many airlines have challenged that limit, saying it is limiting the country's economic growth and could result in higher fares for passengers. Earlier this month, Dublin ­Airport said it was expecting more than ten million ­passengers to pass through during the peak months. A High Court-imposed pause on the cap, won by the airlines, means more than 36 million ­people could use the airport this year. Last year, the airport handled 33.3million passengers. Dublin Airport. Pic: Getty Images Fingal County Council confirmed yesterday it had issued a planning enforcement notice to DAA for breaching the cap. The council is reported to have received complaints from 60 individuals about the alleged planning breach. In a statement, the council said its enforcement notice included a two-year period to comply with planning conditions imposed by An Bord Pleanála over passenger capacity at Dublin Airport. Pic: Mark Gusev/Shutterstock A council spokesman said: 'The two-year period provides an opportunity for DAA to ­progress their planning ­applications to increase ­passenger capacity at Dublin Airport or take such other steps as they consider appropriate to achieve compliance.' Mayor of Fingal Tom O'Leary, a Fine Gael councillor, said the county council had to follow the legal process. He continued: 'This makes it even more urgent for the Government to assist in any way that they can to try and sort out the capacity issue at Dublin Airport. They need to do whatever they can to ensure that the ­airport can grow in an orderly manner and that the residents around it are looked after.' However, the DAA said that until changes were made to the cap, Ireland's national airport was 'hamstrung' and could not get on with its mandate to grow Ireland's connectivity. 'The airport needs to be reclassified as national strategic ­infrastructure, with decisions made by a national planning body and not a local authority,' a spokesman said The High Court pause on the cap is likely to continue for a year while certain matters related to aircraft take-off and landing slot allocations are examined by the European Court of Justice. The Government plans to remove the cap through legislation, starting in autumn. Ryanair has called for urgent action from the Government, stating that local authorities should not oversee national transport infrastructure. A Department of Transport spokesman said it was aware of the enforcement notice. They continued: 'The minister has recently reiterated the importance of DAA continuing to engage proactively with the planning authority and the ­Aircraft Noise Competent Authority to facilitate progress on the two planning applications DAA has lodged.'

Irish Examiner

11 hours ago

• Irish Examiner

High Court hears from John Magnier's 'right hand man' in multi million Barne Estate row

A senior advisor described as a "right-hand man" to bloodstock billionaire John Magnier, who is involved in a legal battle over the purported multi-million sale of a Tipperary estate that fell through, has told the High Court he was not secretly "kept in the loop" of the tax affairs of the vendors. Financial advisor at world-famous Coolmore Stud, Eddie Irwin also rejected a description of him by counsel for Barne Estate as Mr Magnier's "fixer"and "right hand man". Mr Irwin said Coolmore did not use "catchphrases or fancy titles" but agreed with counsel that he would be called to work on projects if things went "wrong". Mr Irwin, who has 40 years' experience working with Mr Magnier, was called in to aid in securing the Barne Estate deal which the Magniers believed they had shook hands on in August 2023 for €15m. However, the Magnier side were ultimately gazumped in being the preferred buyer by Irish-born, US-based construction magnate Maurice Regan, who offered €22.25m. The case centres on Mr Magnier's claim that Mr Regan engaged in a "full-frontal assault" on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre tract and that Barne estate reneged on the deal. Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. At the High Court on Friday, Mr Irwin said he met with Mr Thomson-Moore in early September 2023 and they contacted tax experts KPMG after the Thomson-Moore family requested tax liability advice. A KPMG tax expert met with the Thomson-Moores later in the month as a "favour" to Coolmore, who were large clients of KPMG. Mr Irwin did not attend that meeting but allegedly sent a WhatsApp message to Mr Magnier telling him "off the record" that the tax expert, who was named in court, allegedly told him that the Thomson-Moores were considering whether to retain KPMG and that the expert had informed the Thomson-Moores of what approach he recommended. Mr Irwin answering Martin Hayden, counsel for Barne Estate, denied he had an "off-the-record" report from the expert that, counsel alleged, would keep him "in the loop" in return for introducing the Thomson-Moores to KPMG. Mr Irwin said the wording of the WhatsApp message was an "aberration" and "unfortunate" and that he meant for Mr Magnier not to share information already known from previous meetings as it was a "private" and not for dissemination. Mr Irwin told Mr Hayden that the named expert was an "innocent, decent, and honourable" man, who was being "defamed" in the court as someone who would keep him "in the loop" on private tax matters. However, Mr Irwin said he did have "grave" concerns at the time that the tax issue raised by the Thomson-Moores was put forward just before the September 29, 2023, end of an exclusivity agreement and may not have been a genuine one. Mr Irwin told Mr Hayden that he was told by Mr Magnier that a week after the alleged handshake deal that his son-in-law, David Wachman, received a call from Mr Regan, who was "angry and abusive" about the purported sale. Mr Regan told Mr Wachman that he would outbid the Magnier side by €5m to prevent the deal going through, claimed Mr Irwin. After the expiration of the exclusivity agreement on September 29, 2023, Mr Irwin contacted Eugene McCague, a former partner at legal heavyweights Arthur Cox, who represent Coolmore in these proceedings, and sought legal advice should the matter be litigated. In early October 2023, with the exclusivity agreement now expired, the local estate agent involved in the sale, John Stokes, told the Magniers that the Barne Estate had been subject to a €20m bid. The Magnier side then upped their bid to €16m with a separate, additional offering of €500,000 to establish a trust for a member of the Thomson-Moore family. Mr Irwin said he was told by the auctioneer that the Thomson-Moore's were happy to accept the Magnier offer but the Barne Estate solicitors never sent the contracts and the deal was never done. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore, and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of trustees to finalise any agreement and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. Mr Regan is not a party to the case. The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett next month.

Irish Independent

14 hours ago

• Irish Independent

Man at centre of HR firm ‘spying' row gets injunction against agents allegedly following him

Today at 13:31 The man at the centre of the "spying" row between two HR giants has been granted a High Court order restraining suspected hired agents from following and harassing him and members of his family. Keith O'Brien was formerly a payroll manager with Rippling, a US-headquartered multibillion-dollar HR software provider, until it was discovered he was passing the company's trade secrets to rival Deel Inc which is also a US-headquartered multibillion-dollar firm.