Family uses AI to present message in court from loved one no longer alive
Artificial intelligence (AI) is all around us and while some use it to create funny animated pictures of themselves, others use it to "bring back" their loved ones that have departed.
Maybe we've hit a new frontier in courtroom proceedings – recently, a simulated version of a deceased man created with AI spoke directly to his assailant during a sentencing hearing in Arizona. The AI-generated avatar of Christopher Pelkey, developed by his family, was presented in Maricopa County Superior Court, just before Gabriel Paul Horcasitas was sentenced for fatally shooting Pelkey during a 2021 road-rage incident. The digital recreation of Pelkey appeared on video wearing a green sweatshirt and a full beard, standing against a plain white background. Early in the video, the avatar clarified that it was an AI representation, a point made clear by minor audio irregularities and imperfect synchronization of speech and facial movements. In the message, the avatar expressed a sense of tragic irony about the encounter, suggesting that under different circumstances, they might have become friends. Pelkey, a 37-year-old US Army veteran, lost his life in the incident. His family chose to create the AI message to honor his memory and articulate their pain. Since the video was not used as evidence, the court allowed greater flexibility in presenting it during the sentencing phase. Horcasitas, who had already been found guilty of manslaughter and endangerment, received a sentence of ten and a half years in state prison.Stacey Wales, Pelkey's sister, wrote the script for the avatar after finding it difficult to fully express her grief in her own words. Although she admitted she could not forgive Horcasitas, she believed her brother would have taken a more empathetic approach. The video, she explained, was meant to remind the court of her brother's humanity and the lasting impact of the tragedy. She worked with her husband and a friend, both of whom are in the tech industry, to produce the simulation.The use of generative AI in this case introduces a new and emotionally charged way of applying technology in the legal system. While courts have been cautious about AI, especially after incidents where lawyers used fake cases created by AI, this new use without evidence adds another level of complexity.Harry Surden, a law professor at the University of Colorado, pointed out that using generative AI in court raises ethical concerns. He explained that simulated content can skip over careful thinking and appeal directly to emotions, making it more powerful – and possibly more problematic – than regular evidence. He stressed that while these tools may seem real, they are still made up and should be treated as such.
Image credit – OpenAI Let's hope nobody is in the aforementioned situation, but if you want to give AI videos a try, you could do so by using ChatGPT, for example – it's a straightforward process that combines AI-generated content with video creation tools.What to do: Generate a script: Use ChatGPT to create a script for your video.
Choose a text-to-video tool: Pick a text-to-videoplatform.
Customize and edit: Adjust voiceovers, visuals, and background music.
Export and share: Export the video and upload it to platforms like YouTube.
First, you'll use ChatGPT to generate a script for your video. Then, you can choose a text-to-video platform (you can find those online) to convert the script into a video, adjusting settings such as voiceovers and visuals. Finally, after previewing and editing the video, you can export it and share it across platforms like YouTube or social media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
2 days ago
- Phone Arena
AT&T wins court approval to pay $177 million settlement over data breaches
Last year AT&T suffered through data breaches that exposed personal data belonging to tens of millions of the carrier's customers. That led to a class action lawsuit being filed against the wireless provider by AT&T subscribers. The nation's third-largest carrier eventually agreed to settle the class-action lawsuit for the tidy sum of $177 million and on Friday the settlement was approved by U.S. District Judge Ada Brown in Dallas. Brown called the settlement fair and reasonable. There were two data breaches announced by AT&T last year with one revealed in May and the other in July. Depending on the breach involved, an AT&T customer who can show that they suffered losses "fairly traceable" to the breaches will receive a payment up to $2,500 or a payment up to $5,000. After paying off those who were victimized by direct losses, smaller payments will go out to those whose personal information was accessed in the data breaches. One of the incidents resulted in call logs being copied from a company workspace on a Snowflake cloud platform. The data copied covered six months of customer call and text data from 2022 covering almost all of the carrier's customers. In March 2024, AT&T said that it was investigating data covering 7.6 million current account holders and 65.4 million former account holders whose personal data was released on the dark web. AT&T said it believed the data set dated back to 2019 or earlier. Despite agreeing to the settlements, AT&T made it clear that it believes it was not at fault denying that it was "responsible for these criminal acts." The carrier claims, "We have agreed to this settlement to avoid the expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation." AT&T expects final approval of the settlement to come late in 2025 with settlement payments expected to start arriving early in 2026. The FCC is also doing detective work trying to find out why, in 2023, an AT&T cloud vendor whose contract expired a few years before, was the subject of a data breach allowing 8.9 million customers to have their data exposed. This data was supposed to have been deleted prior to the data breach. Luckily, the vendor was not responsible for storing very sensitive data and most of the information exposed was AT&T customers' bill balances. This data covered customers who were with AT&T from 2015 through 2017 and the data should have been deleted in 2017 or 2018. To settle this incident, AT&T paid a $13 million fine imposed on it by the FCC. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
6 days ago
- Phone Arena
New Metro employee lists some of the shady stuff he's already seen take place in his store
Not all of the shady stuff that goes on at wireless stores happens at a T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, or Boost Mobile corporate or authorized reseller location. There's probably a good chance that the MVNOs are also up to their necks in funny business. For example, this recently hired Metro store manager had left the company he worked for where he was a manager. He decided to apply for a job at a Metro store and was hired. On social media, he wrote about what he experienced. Having worked sales at a prepaid wireless firm before, this Redditor was used to seeing things that weren't quite kosher taking place. Sure enough, during the first few days of training, he discovered that this Metro location was shady. Now there is shady and there is SHADE- D . This might have gone beyond the latter as the new employee said that even after all of the things he experienced at other prepaid firms, "This was another level." Most Metro stores are owned by independent companies. | Image credit-Metro For example, he explained how system numbers were blocked to prevent customer surveys from being sent out. Store personnel filled out their own surveys and submitted those instead. Talk about the fox guarding the hen house. Fake receipts were handed out and sometimes, no receipt was handed out at all. A fake receipt printer was on hand to make it appear that a phone number was being inputted on some machine. The reps would pretend to port over a number or straight out refuse to do it. Not surprising, the new employee saw his colleagues overcharging customers and he said that a lot of what was going on was "straight up theft since they weren't using the official POS (Point of Sale) machine and just taking payment on something separate." Since Metro doesn't have Corporate stores, when he reported what he saw, it wasn't through Metro or customer service. It might not matter who he reported this to. Another Redditor works at a different Metro location and his experience is just as bad. This rep says he works for a Metro dealer that does things the right way, and when he did see employees near him "shaft the customer," he reported them although he pointed out that "nothing gets done to them." He claims that T-Mobile just wants to report its share of the profits from Metro. That would be done to keep the stock rising. Someone else had an intriguing thought. T-Mobile might not care what is happening to Metro customers not because the majority of these stores are owned by independent dealers, but because the carrier has a plan for these customers. The goal, according to this post, is to run Metro like a stepping stone that converts prepaid customers to postpaid customers. To prove his point, he states that he has been receiving texts for at least a year from Metro telling him how he can get a new phone for free by switching to T-Mobile from Metro and the texts list all the "benefits" he can receive from being a T-Mobile customer instead of a Metro subscriber. This right here is a big reason why this business remains a cesspool. Management at the companies that own the individual stores surely know what is going on as do the suits at T-Mobile . But no one wants to be responsible for killing the duck that lays the golden eggs. So instead, complaints are buried because the stores are making too much money for multiple firms. This is all done at the expense of the customers, many of whom are laughed at right behind their backs. If the regulatory agencies would make an example out of some of the firms running prepaid stores that cheat customers, and the major carriers that enter into deals with these shady outfits, we might start to see the start of a very much-needed cleanup of the industry. Switch to Total 5G+ Unlimited 3-Month plan or Total 5G Unlimited and get a free iPhone. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Buy at Total Wireless
Phone Arena
16-06-2025
- Phone Arena
AT&T customers need to read this so they don't become the victim of a similar scam
An AT&T customer just got scammed by a rep at an AT&T Store. This is something that could happen to almost anybody not intricately familiar with what an eSIM is and what services they should not be charged for at a carrier store. Here is what happened. The eSIM on a Redditor's iPhone stopped working so he decided to head down to the AT&T Store for help. Now, to be honest, he doesn't say whether he went to a corporate-owned location or a third-party authorized reseller. It really doesn't change the gist of this story nor should it reduce the importance of the lesson that you will take away from it. When the AT&T customer gets to the store, he is told by the rep that it will cost him $30 to have his eSIM reset. But before anything else is said or done, the rep goes on to say that the credit card reader is down and as a result, the charge must be paid for in cash. So the customer hands over $30 to the rep who does the work he needs to do to reset the eSIM on the customer's iPhone. A few hours later, the customer is well away from the store, his iPhone is working but there is a thought gnawing away at his brain. He starts to wonder whether the story he was given by the AT&T rep about the about the credit card reader being down was a bunch of crap and that by collecting $30 in cash from him, he paid the salesman for a service that wasn't supposed to cost him anything. If true, the $30 in cash that the customer handed over to the store employee ended up going right into the enterprising rep's pocket. Inside of an AT&T Store in Salem, Mass. | Image credit-AT&T Other Redditors quickly called what happened "a scam" with one suggesting that the rep be reported. Some pointed out that if the salesman worked at an AT&T corporate store, this would be "a pretty severe code of business conduct violation." As it turned out, the customer did leave what he called "a harsh Google review calling out the employee by name, and plans on speaking to the store manager on Monday. One problem we can see on the horizon, the customer has no proof that he paid the $30 cash. In fact, the receipt that was emailed to him by the rep shows that he was charged $0. Here's something I really don't get. Why would a rep risk his job over $30 unless he has the support of management to pull these scams and knows that he won't be fired. For the record, resetting an eSIM at an AT&T Store, whether corporate or authorized reseller, is free to the customer. So if you are an AT&T customer and need to reset an eSIM on your handset, it shouldn't cost you anything. Switch to Total 5G+ Unlimited 3-Month plan or Total 5G Unlimited and get a free iPhone. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Buy at Total Wireless
