What to know before investing in gold in 2025, according to experts
Gold has had
quite the run-up
in recent years. In fact, if you had invested in gold at the start of 2023, your investment would have grown by about 68% by March 2025.
The surge in gold prices
comes down to many factors, but
high inflation
and geopolitical tensions are chief among them. These uncertain economic influencers push investors toward safer, less volatile assets — among which gold is typically king.
But gold isn't the same as other assets you might invest in. And while it can certainly be
a good addition to your portfolio
, it's important to be educated about the process before jumping in.
Learn how to add gold to your investment portfolio today
.
Are you thinking of buying gold for your portfolio in 2025? Here's what experts say to know before you do:
Gold prices
have been rising for some time now, and the precious metal has hit record highs several times. But that growth isn't over yet, at least according to most projections.
"Gold is currently trading at an all-time high, and analysts are forecasting gold to go higher," says Brett Elliott, director of content at precious metals marketplace APMEX. "Some revised forecasts suggest gold could run up another 14% this year from current levels. This is unusual and incredible. Gold normally averages about 8% per year."
So if you're looking to buy in, the sooner you can act, the better — especially if you want to take advantage of
those forecasted increases
. Just take note: While you may be able to turn a profit on
a short-term gold investment
, this is one asset that's best for long-term financial goals.
"Are you thinking inflation is going to be a longer-term issue for major economies?" says Steven Conners, president of Conners Wealth Management. "Are you concerned about fiat currency, which is essentially paper money? What is your asset allocation versus other assets in your portfolio? Does it represent a reasonable percentage of your overall asset allocation?"
Get started with gold investing now, before prices climb again
.
If you're looking to
buy physical gold
, do your research first. There are all kinds of ways to buy in — coins, bars, jewelry, etc. And not all of them will suit every goal.
"We carry over 30,000 products at APMEX and some of them are meant to be investments, some are meant to be collected, and some are art," Elliott says. "You want to match the right product to your purpose."
Elliott advises new investors to "Focus on products that are well known and highly liquid, like American Gold Eagles or gold bars from MKS PAMP — something that's easy to sell when you're ready and carries a reasonable premium with low counterfeit risk."
Keep in mind that you can invest in gold in other ways, too,, including
gold individual retirement accounts (IRAs)
,
gold stocks
or
gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
, to name a few.
And just as you should compare your gold options,
you should also compare gold dealers
.
"The most important decision you'll make is where to buy from," Elliott says. "Choose a reputable dealer, preferably one that has been in business for some time with good reviews and will also buy back from you when you're ready to sell."
Be sure to compare at least a few different dealers. These can be online marketplaces, in-person precious metal exchanges or even pawn shops. Whatever they are, just make sure you do your research before purchasing from them.
"You don't need to buy from the first dealer, website, or ETF you come across since other vendors might offer the same product with lower fees or premiums," says Ben Nadelstein, head of content at Monetary Metals. "Gold is fungible, meaning that one ounce of pure gold is chemically identical to any other ounce. If your main goal is to gain exposure to the price of gold, buyers can focus on buying bullion products with the lowest premiums available."
Gold is typically a good investment if you're looking for a way to safeguard your wealth,
protect against inflation
and
diversify your portfolio
. But you might also consider investing in other precious metals, too.
"Keep in mind that gold is currently at all-time highs, meaning we are in uncharted territory," Elliott says. "No one knows where the top is or when a reversal might come. Some investors are shifting towards silver right now because of that. It's about 40% to 45% below its current all-time high, meaning there's a lot of room for it to rise before it hits a theoretical ceiling."
If you're not sure what the best precious metal investment is for your portfolio — or how to go about it, get in touch with a financial advisor. They can help you make the right decisions for your goals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Will Elliott's Push Mean Break-up Boost for Phillips 66?
Following a recent proxy battle and boardroom fight, activist investor Elliott Management is well on its way to oversee an unlocking of substantial value trapped by Phillips 66's (NYSE:PSX) conglomerate structure. This article will look at what has happened between Phillips 66 and Elliott Management and what I expect to happen going forward. Phillips 66, which was spun off from ConocoPhillips (COP) in 2012 is operates in the Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing sector. The term Refining & Marketing can also be known as Downstream in the oil and gasindustry. As at the end of Q1 2025, Phillips 66 had five operating segments: Midstream, Chemicals, Refining, Marketing and Specialities, and Renewable Fuels. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Sign with PSX. By contrast, larger peer Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) has three operating segments: Refining & Marketing, Midstream, and Renewable Diesel. Its midstream operations are primarily conducted through MPLX (MPLX), a master limited partnership listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker MPLX. Marathon Petroleum owns the general partner and a majority limited partner interest in MPLX. Valero Energy (NYSE:VLO), another PSX peer also has just three operating segments: Refining, Renewable Diesel, and Ethanol. If we look at ExxonMobil's (XOM) downstream business, which Exxon calls Product Solutions, it consists also of three segments: Energy Products, Chemical Products, and Specialty Products. Midstream companies tend to run as separate entities, operating in the Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation sub-sector. Examples would include MPLX, or Kinder Morgan (KMI), or Williams (WMB). So, a very simplistic view would suggest Phillips 66 operates in an unwieldy manner. This typically causes a conglomerate discount, which activist investor Elliott is known for attacking. According to Elliott's April 28, 2025 presentation titled Streamline 66: Elliott's Perspectives on Value Creation In September 2023, Elliott approached Phillips 66 with a clear message: its assets were significantly undervalued and underperforming. Initially, the Company acknowledged challenges, particularly in refining, reaffirmed its $14 billion mid-cycle EBITDA target and the Executive Chairman announced his retirement. Elliott released a statement stating the Company leadership deserved investor support so long as they demonstrated meaningful progress against their targets over the following year, but if performance did not improve more change would be needed. To support long-term value creation, Elliott sought to enhance the Board by adding two directors with relevant industry expertise. Yet cooperation quickly stalled. Despite the quality of the candidates proposed, Phillips 66 was slow to act and ultimately rejected several well-qualified individuals. Only after Elliott formally submitted nominations did the Company appoint Bob Pease to the Board in February 2024. In addition, throughout 2024 the Company's operating performance deteriorated and the Company continues to be woefully short of its EBITDA target. Since February 2025, Elliott has been more public about itsposition, with a campaign called Streamline 66. Its goals, according to the Perspectiveson Value Creation presentation, were fourfold: Improve accountability of Phillips 66's management by adding credible directors with a mandate for change Unlock substantial value trapped by Phillips 66's conglomerate structure Refocus the Company on operational excellence by adding deep industry expertise to the Board Instill a culture of ambition where Phillips 66 aims to be the top performing refining company in the world Elliott's core idea is that Midstream should trade at about 9-12x EBITDA, while Refining and Chemicals should trade at 6-7x EBITDA. Elliott notes that PSX trades like a refiner, therefore undervaluing the Midstreambusiness, due to a large conglomerate discount. Elliott is also saying that PSX's refining profitability dramatically lags peers. According to the Perspectives on Value Creation presentation, Elliott also used a third-party refining industry analytics firm, Baker & O'Brien and its PRISM Model to help understand the intrinsic profitability of Phillips 66's refinery assets relative to its actual results and peers. Before I came a full-time investor, I used to work in oil trading, and Baker & O'Brien PRISM Model was a sophisticated tool to understand how refineries could optimize their performance. So, it is quite impressive that Elliott has utilized this in their analysis of PSX's refining business. The Perspectives on Value Creation presentation slides 80 through 87 analyse PSX's regional competitiveness and concludes that PSX's refining assets are comparable to peers Marathon and Valero its underperformance is primarily driven by pooroperational execution, rather than the quality of the assets. But why should we care about what Elliott thinks? Well, Elliott has recent form in Refining & Marketing where it started an engagement with Marathon Petroleum in 2019 which resulted in a new executive leadership, the saleof Speedway to 7-Eleven for about $17 billion, and improved operating performance with proceeds used to repurchase its own shares. The stock has risen dramatically in the last five years. Elliott also pushed other large companies to realize value from their conglomerate discounts. Two recent examples I have followed include GSK plc (GSK) where in 2021 it called for a full separation of its Biopharmaand Consumer Health businesses, resulting ultimately in Haleon plc (HLN) being spun out into an independent Consumer Health business. In 2017 Elliott began pushing for BHP plc (BHP) to unify its dual-listed structure and for the metals and mining company to exit its petroleum business. By 2021, BHP moved its primary listing to Sydney, removing its complex dual-listed structure, and became a more streamlined and focused mining company, returning substantial funds to shareholders. Following more than a year of apparently contentious engagement, Elliott started a proxy fight to replace four board members at the 2025 shareholder meeting. While the campaign was backed by the three main proxyadvisory firms ISS, Glass Lewis and Egan-Jones, Phillips 66's largest passive investors (BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street), who sided with the company. This is likely because many of the shares held by BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street are in index tracking vehicles PSX is a S&P 500 constituent and they don't tend to ever vote against managements. In my opinion each of the four board members Elliott was proposing were highly qualified to sit on the board of a Refining & Marketing company. On May 21, 2025, the proxy contest concluded with a split result. Elliott won two board seats for Sigmund Cornelius and Michael Heim and PSX won the other two seats, for Bob Pease and Nigel Hearne. The case of Bob Pease is interesting. He was originally blessed by Elliott joining PSX's board in February 2024, but a year later, Elliott wanted him replaced. In a letter to shareholders Mr Pease said I do not know why Elliott now wants me off the Board. But Elliott wrote in its Perspectives on Value Creation presentation that Mr. Pease has failed to acknowledge Phillips' clear performance issues and has adopted the Company's empty,self-congratulatory rhetoric. GuruFocus News also noted that a proposal to "declassify the Board of Directors over a three-year period was not approved" by the shareholders. Also, a non-binding shareholder proposal requesting the Board toadopt a policy requiring directors to submit a resignation letter effective at the next annual meeting was not approved. Elliott wanted PSX to have board membership voted on each year, as is best practise for corporate governance but this was rejected in the vote. Elliott in a press release following the vote said it will continue to actively engage with the Company while holding management and the Board accountable for delivering on their commitment to improve shareholdervalue. As we have seen before, Elliott is a patient activist investor. The two board members they have managed to get on the board Sigmund Cornelius and Michael Heim are industry veterans. Cornelius is a former Chief Financial Officer of ConocoPhillips, and was previously on the board of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, now a PSX joint venture with Chevron (CVX) which Elliott wants PSX to divest. Cornelius in an Elliott presentation said of his priorities upon joining the board: It's a different structure than Marathon or Valero and they have been the better performers. I will insist that we take a harder look at this structure. Heim is one of the founders and former President and Chief Operating Officer of Targa Resources (TRGP) which is an important midstream company and one of the New York Stock Exchange's largest stocks in the Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation subsector. Heim served in numerous executive leadership roles over the course of over 16 years at Targa and said in an Elliott presentation Midstream businesses can be growth engines, but they need the right structure to compete. Phillips' midstream business is constrained in so many ways in the current structure. I think people will be amazed at what is possible with these assets. So, it's clear to me that Elliott will still push hard for a separation of PSX's midstream segment. With a consensus Midstream segment EBITDA of about $4.1 billion, and at a 9.7x multiple Elliott sees Midstream achieving gross proceeds of about $39.5 billion. The TEV/EBITDA multiple of 9.7x is based on an average of Midstream peers Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), MPLX, ONEOK, Inc (OKE), and Targa Resources. It also sees a sale of CPChem grossing $13 billion, which is derived as a mid-cycle EBITDA of $1.9 billion at a TEV/EBITDA multiple of 6.4x using Dow Inc (DOW) and LyondellBasell Industries (LYB) as peers, plus $750 million in saved outlay on capex for a CPChem expansion project. On Elliott's calculations (slide 133 of Perspectives on Value Creation) PSX could be worth between $151 and $169 per share in the near term, based on a sum of the parts valuation: Source: Elliott's Perspectives on Value Creation, April 28, 2025 / The City LetterNote that PSX announced in May it is selling JET business in Germany and Austria $2.8 billion enterprise value, which is close enough to Elliott's $3.0 billion enterprise value assumption. This sale is an indication that PSX is already taking on board some of Elliott's demands. Assuming PSX spins Midstream at $39-40 billion, then the key for the $169 price target is if PSX can achieve refining EBITDA per barrel at parity with Valero, based on 2026 expected throughput. The Baker & O'Brien refining assets analysis suggests that "the kit", the refinery systems themselves, can do this. It's now just a question of management ambition. It may have been better had Brian Coffman been nominated to the board, given his refining expertise, but I expect Elliott will monitor this and revisit it in the future if improvements don't start coming through. Phillips 66 has the GF Score of 72, which implies that the company is Likely to have average performance. Without Elliott shaking things up, that's probably what could be expected going forward. Meanwhile Marathon Petroleum has a GF Score of 80 and Valero Energy has a GF Value score of 78. PSX underperforms mainly because it scores a Growth Rank of 2/10. The Growth Rank is scored through revenue growth and EBITDA growth. PSX's lower growth rank aligns with Elliott's point that PSX has been underperforming and could do better with renewed management drive and better refining performance. Like Marathon Petroleum, PSX has a Moat score of 7, which means Entry-level wide moat, clearly possessing durable advantages This also confirms Elliott's thesis that PSX has a lot of potential if management can beshaken up. As minority investors, we can almost freeride on the back of Elliott. The only things to note are that Elliott could walk away at any time, although I think that is unlikely and that Elliott may have some macro hedges in place founder Paul Singer told the In Good Company podcast earlier this year that that is usually the case in their investments. This means Elliott may be less exposed to the macro risks that are inherent in PSX: refining and chemical margins and midstream volumes. So, any standalone investment, without hedges, would incur these risks. In my opinion, as part of a diversified portfolio, a minority investor can bear these risks and look torealize the significant upside that Elliott is looking to squeeze out, which at the time of writing is about 30%. Elliott has a strong track record of patiently encouraging and sometimes forcing companies to rid their conglomerate discount through business spin-offs and changes at the board and executive management level. The May 2025 annual shareholder vote was a partial victory for Elliott and I expect the new board members Sigmund Cornelius and Michael Heim to put forth the case to spin out the PSX Midstream business, which may take 12-18 months to fully execute. Investors can afford to wait for this value to be realized over time. PSX has an Altman Z-score of 3.43 which is strong and means there is no immediate financial danger. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Thames Water's creditor rescue plan opposed by environmentalists, junior creditors
LONDON (Reuters) -Senior creditors bidding to control Britain's Thames Water are trying to convince regulator Ofwat that their plan is the only way to prevent a state rescue. But opponents have criticised it on both environmental and financial grounds. WHAT IS THE PLAN? Senior creditors, among them Aberdeen, Apollo Global Management and M&G and hedge funds Elliott and Silver Point Capital, have offered 5 billion pounds ($6.8 billion) of new equity and debt, plus a write-off of billions of pounds of existing debt. In return, they want the regulator to agree a reset of the environmental and investment regime, to include leniency on fines over pollution incidents. The group believes these steps will get Thames Water's credit rating back to investment-grade as quickly as possible, which is an Ofwat requirement. WHAT DO CRITICS SAY? Critics including environmental groups say such an easing of the rules would be a reward for failure, and argue that some of the investors stand to make big returns should regulation be relaxed. WHAT DO THE CREDITORS SAY? The creditors say that, without changes, Thames Water is stuck paying fines instead of investing in its assets. "We're not in there to say, look, make it really easy on us. We're in there to say make it reasonable on us," a senior creditor involved in the plan told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity because talks are private. DEBT WRITE-DOWN Under the proposal, there would be a more-than 3 billion pound impairment of about 16 billion pounds of senior debt, with about 1 billion pounds of junior debt likely to be wiped out, according to a source close to the talks. The senior creditor said demands that his group take a bigger hit and "suck it up" did not recognise the threat a collapse of Thames Water could pose in terms of higher borrowing costs for water assets spreading to other projects. That is a big risk for the government, which wants to upgrade Britain's creaking infrastructure. Thames Water's senior debt is currently trading at around 70 pence in the pound. The creditor group has offered to take a haircut of around 20 pence in the pound, a source said - more than the hedge funds which bought in at a distressed level paid for their debt, and on paper offering them a hefty return. "The senior creditors are seeking preferential treatment, including unfair immunity from environmental fines, in a process they have engineered to exclude all other stakeholders," said a source close to the Class B group of junior creditors. ($1 = 0.7360 pounds)
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Vantage West Credit Union Launches BNPL to Expand Financial Inclusion
Arizona credit union increases member access to flexible financing by enabling them to split their eligible debit card purchases to pay over time TUCSON, Ariz., June 16, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Vantage West Credit Union (Vantage West), a credit union headquartered in Tucson, Arizona with over $3 billion in assets and serving over 200,000 members, has added Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) to its suite of online banking products. With the launch of this program, accessible through its digital banking experience, Vantage West is expanding access to financial flexibility for its entire membership. Vantage West has selected equipifi, a leading BNPL platform designed for financial institutions, to power its solution. Now, whenever members make eligible purchases on their existing credit union debit card, they will be able to split the payments for these transactions over time. Through equipifi, Vantage West's BNPL program generates offers that are personalized to each member's financial context and goals. Members will be able to view and accept their BNPL offers in their digital banking experience and receive the funds in their checking account in moments. "Vantage West exists to serve our community by providing financial tools that align with their evolving needs," said Sandra Sagehorn-Elliott, President and CEO of Vantage West. "By launching BNPL with equipifi, we are delivering a much-needed service that not only benefits our membership but also caters to their individual needs. We're excited to bring expanded access to flexible financing to our membership, and to continue to help them thrive." "BNPL is a powerful tool when provided by credit unions because it creates financial flexibility and opportunities for their entire membership in a way that is safe and tailored for individual members," said Bryce Deeney, co-founder and CEO of equipifi. "By launching the solution in their digital banking experience, credit unions like Vantage West are positioning themselves to better serve their members, from everyday budgeting decisions to unexpected expenses." Over sixty credit unions have launched their own BNPL product to their members. equipifi's data shows that over 81 percent of members continue to use BNPL in year two, with overall usage increasing by 38 percent. In the US, BNPL is projected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 25.5 percent between 2022-2026. About Vantage West Credit UnionStriving to provide its members with the personalized service, knowledge and honesty they deserve in a financial partner, Vantage West is proud to be among the largest credit unions in Arizona. From a one-room Air Force barrack 70 years ago to $3 billion in assets and serving over 200,000 members, Vantage West has been dedicated to earning and rewarding the loyalty of the people and communities they serve, so they can all thrive together. Learn more at About equipifi equipifi is the leading Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) platform for financial institutions in the United States. This is a white label solution designed to align with consumer purchase habits, payment preferences, and financial goals. The equipifi platform seamlessly integrates with leading banking cores and digital banking platforms to deepen customer engagement, grow market share, increase revenue, and provide a single place to view, accept, and manage BNPL plans on their existing banking app. For more information, please visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE equipifi; Vantage West Sign in to access your portfolio
