Police need greater financial powers to fight organised crime
Chair of the Ministerial Advisory Group on Organised Crime, Steve Symon.
Photo:
RNZ / Nick Monro
The head of the Ministerial Advisory Group on Organised Crime says police need greater powers to monitor bank accounts and seize suspects' assets.
Chair Steve Symon said cash and assets seized by police were less than five percent of the $1.6 billion of criminal profits each year.
"The police have powers under the Search and Surveillance Act to watch a person or to intercept their cellular communications but we don't have a method by which they can obtain their bank transactions over 30 days. What police would have to do is ask for a new order every single day," Symon said.
The Ministerial Advisory Group on transnational and organised crime was set up in February, to provide independent, expert advice and recommendations to improve the cross-government response to what Associate Police Minister Casey Costello described as "an increasing threat".
It had since
met with a number of agencies
, including Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Inland Revenue, Customs, Police and the Serious Fraud Office, as well as non-governmental stakeholders like banks, NZ Post, Auckland Airport and gang members.
The group was providing monthly reports on different facets of organised crime in the country which Symon said would culminate in a final overarching report in September.
This month's report was focused on ways to restrict criminals' ability to launder money and export profits, thereby reducing the country's attraction to transnational criminal groups.
Symon said lawmakers needed to be bold if the country was to shift the dial on the growing problem of organised crime.
"Organised crime is now effectively acting like large corporations who are there to make money and not concerned with how they make that money.
"Illicit tobacco, methamphetamine, exploiting migrants is a way they can make money. Using all these opportunities to take advantage of the good will of the New Zealand public," Symon said.
Symon said tougher controls on large cash purchases, carrying cash across the border and industries paying cash to fly beneath the radar would limit the potential for criminal exploitation.
He said police and border control agencies needed to establish better communication and co-operation with financial institutions to enable them to stop scammers getting access to victims' money and to seize criminals' assets and funds more efficiently.
"One of the things that keeps coming up is the need for us to work as a team. It's not just the police, not just Customs, not just these other enforcement agencies that can support them but it's looking more broadly than that.
"Looking at our team as [including] the private sector, the banks, the telecommunications companies, the airfreight companies. All these different businesses than can help us collectively to work as a team to try and stamp out organised crime," he said.
He said safeguards intended to protect from unjust seizures were instead contributing to a situation where confiscation processes were too slow and inefficient to provide effective disruption and deterrence.
"We're trying to be very mindful that we don't want to interfere in a person's rights [but] what we're also trying to do is to offer up tools that might help the police and other enforcement agencies to immediately deal with the problem. To avoid situations where by the time we get to conviction the money's gone.
"So to give agencies the opportunity to seize funds and seize assets now and then to go through the correct process to go through any court processes that might follow," Symon said.
The group's report recommended the government attack organised crime by:
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Middle East military action 'extremely worrying', NZ backs efforts towards diplomacy
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says NZ will continue to call for diplomacy and dialogue. Photo: RNZ/Calvin Samuel The foreign affairs minister says the government will gather the facts before taking a position on the United States' airstrikes on Iran. The US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, with President Donald Trump saying the country's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been "completely and totally obliterated." Trump said Iran "must now make peace" or there would be further attacks. In response, Iran has accused the US of launching "a dangerous war," and of violating the United Nations Charter and international law. But on Sunday afternoon, shortly after the attack was launched, Foreign Affairs Ministers Winston Peters said the New Zealand government was waiting for the facts. "Look, this has just happened. These are circumstances in which we will first of all gather the facts, and the circumstances, before we give our opinion." Peters said the crisis was "extremely worrying" and New Zealand would continue to call for diplomacy and dialogue. "Ongoing military action in the Middle East is extremely worrying, and it's critical further escalation is avoided. We strongly support efforts towards diplomacy and urge all parties to return to talks," he said. "Iran's nuclear activities have long worried New Zealand. We want Iran to comply with its international obligations. Our concern is that further military action is not going to deliver a sustainable solution to this problem. "We're a long way from the region, but New Zealand will continue to convey these measures in favour of diplomacy and dialogue directly to Iran, Israel, and the other parties involved in possible talks." Labour's defence spokesperson Peeni Henare backed Peters' calls for a return to talks, but said the government should acknowledge the US breached international law and be "perhaps a bit stronger" in the first instance. Henare said Trump's statements had made it "quite clear" what had happened. "Countries can't call for peace and de-escalation, only to take the action that's been taken." Waikato University law professor Alexander Gillespie said the airstrikes were "clearly" illegal in terms of international law. "There's nowhere in the UN charter that says you can bomb someone who won't negotiate with you. But whether you get to a point where that is actually condemned is going to be very different," he said. "There's the theory of international law, with the UN Charter, and then there's the reality of international politics at the moment, which means that America will not be condemned internationally by the Security Council or even through the International Court of Justice." The prime minister is heading to NATO this week. New Zealand is not a member, but in recent years has been invited as a partner along with fellow Indo-Pacific Four nations Australia, Japan and South Korea. While Christopher Luxon would be "on the margins," Gillespie expected he would be watching closely to see what like-minded partners were saying. "This is an act which is not self-defence, and even if you argued it was pre-emptive self-defence, it wasn't necessary because there were other options of diplomacy still open. It will create difficulties if we speak out and say that, I don't think we're in a position to do that right now, for fear of the reaction that you get from America." Australia's government has already issued a statement on the airstrikes. "We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security," the statement said. "We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy." The government is sending a C-130J Hercules plane to the Middle East, along with Defence Force and Foreign Affairs personnel, to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel. Defence minister Judith Collins said the plane was a contingency, and would not be able to aid in evacuation flights until airspace restrictions in the region eased. In the meantime, those who were able to leave via a safe route were urged to do so. Peters said the flights would get people to a safe place. "We're not bringing them home. We're getting them to where they can make arrangements to get home." The government has been warning New Zealanders in the region to leave for a long time, Peters said. The number of New Zealanders registered as being in Iran or Israel had increased in recent days. The decision to send the Hercules was made even before knowledge of the airstrikes had come through. "Our anxiety was enunciated and formulated into policy, warnings, and collections of views months ago. We've been saying it, and it's a sad circumstance here, but we said 'look this is very dangerous, get out,'" Peters said. Citing security reasons, Collins would not say where the plane and personnel would be based. Both Henare and Gillespie supported the move. "I think if we're ready and on standby, at the very least, to make sure we can respond to our citizens and their needs, and also those of our diplomatic staff, I think that's a really smart move," Henare said. Gillespie said sending a plane was prudent in case the situation worsened quickly, and the damage became more indiscriminate.

RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Wellington woman goes on trial accused of killing mother
Helen Gregory was found dead at her home in the Wellington suburb of Khandallah. Photo: RNZ / Hamish Cardwell The trial of a 53-year-old accused of killing her mother is set to begin at the High Court in Wellington today. Helen Gregory, 79, was found dead at her home in the Wellington suburb of Khandallah in January last year. Her obituary said she was a dearly loved mother and grandmother, with at least six grandkids. According to her neighbours, she was an avid gardener, "a lovely person" who was "fit as a fiddle", and a keen churchgoer. Her daughter Julia DeLuney, 53, who lives in Paraparaumu, is charged with her murder. She pleaded not guilty in July 2024. She applied for name suppression, with her lawyer Hunter de Groot arguing there would be a "firestorm" of coverage similar to the trial of Auckland eye surgeon Philip Polkinghorne. But Justice Grau declined the application, saying this case's "level of intrigue" was not comparable. DeLuney has been living at home on electronically monitored bail while she awaits trial. The trial is set down for four weeks, and the Crown is expected to call more than 100 witnesses. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
40 minutes ago
- RNZ News
'Nowhere to go' for more than 100,000 Kiwis
Cookie has lived on and off the streets for most of his life after stints in state homes, a boys home, and jail. Photo: Davina Zimmer At 10.30am on a cold day in central Auckland, 61-year-old Cookie sits on a small blue bottle crate on the pavement, strumming his guitar and singing. The impromptu performance is taking place in Cookie's 'lounge'. On the ground next to him is his small mattress with a light duvet - that is his bedroom. All of it is surrounded by road cones to protect his patch. Cookie has lived on and off the streets for most of his life after stints in state homes, a boys home, and jail. He says he has seen a sharp rise in the number of people living rough on the streets in recent months, which puts a strain on available food and resources. Statistics back that up - according to Auckland Council, the number of people sleeping rough or in their cars in the city has risen from 426 last September to 653 this January. Cookie blames family breakdowns and a rise in mental health issues for the increase in street living, and says the latter plays a role in behavioural fallout. Experts point to several other factors as well, including unaffordable housing, a housing shortage, the cost-of-living crisis, and social and systemic factors. "If we're really honest, there's been a crisis around homelessness for a very long time in Aotearoa," says Aaron Hendry, who set up an organisation, Kick Back, to offer wraparound support for young people sleeping rough, including 24/7 accommodation, health services, and legal advice. "I think what we're seeing though is an escalating crisis." At the time of the 2023 Census, 112,496 people were estimated to be severely housing deprived. But the number of people actually living rough on the streets has jumped since then, according to those working with the homeless. "The truth is that no one, no government, has really done enough, fast enough, to respond to homelessness and to respond to youth homelessness specifically. Yet, over the last couple of years, we've seen some very intentional decisions which are exacerbating the crisis and making the experience of homelessness far more dangerous and far more likely to occur." He says one of the obvious examples is the move to introduce stricter entry criteria for emergency housing, and the requirements that make it more difficult to stay. "The reality that we have seen ... is young people going into Work and Income and asking for support for shelter and being denied that support and as a result having to sleep on the streets and not being able to get access to housing. He's seen children as young as nine turn up looking for help. "Experiencing homelessness is really, really dangerous... The consequences are significant trauma, it's often really significant mental health deterioration, physical health deterioration. In the worst-case scenario, people die in really dangerous and complex situations." He suggested New Zealand follow the lead of Wales, which trialled the "Duty to Assist" legislation, which is a homelessness prevention strategy that's been successfully implemented to enforce the human right to housing. It holds local authorities accountable for their role in preventing homelessness. "In practicality in New Zealand this would mean that if you went to Work and Income and you were sleeping on the street or maybe you were at risk of experiencing homelessness because something was going on, Work and Income would have an obligation - a legal obligation - to provide you with support to prevent that experience of homelessness or get you shelter tonight so they could start supporting you to get into stable accommodation." He has some other "simple advice" for the government. "They could roll back their emergency housing reforms, they could roll back the reforms around the welfare system, which has made it more punitive on people, they could start committing to a strong public housing build programme ... they could invest in a strategy to end and prevent homelessness. "Right now the government could make some really clear decisions to start working toward a future where homelessness doesn't exist. "If my child was sleeping on the street, on Queen Street tonight, it would be a crisis for me and I would do everything I could to make sure that that child was looked after, right? "I think our government needs to understand that they have the same level of responsibility for children in this country and for all of us as a society and we need to understand that homelessness is a crisis, and respond to it with the energy that a crisis would demand." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter .