Iranian dissidents slam Whoopi Goldberg for ‘offensive' comparison about the brutal regime

Iranian dissidents are speaking out over Whoopi Goldberg's 'offensive' claim that life for Black Americans is equivalent to living under Iran's brutal autocracy.
'Whoopi Goldberg's comparison between being Black in America and living under Iran's authoritarian regime is deeply misguided and dismisses the brutal realities faced by millions of Iranians,' Dr. Sheila Nazarian told Fox News Digital.
Advertisement
Goldberg sparked backlash during a heated argument with her fellow 'The View' co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin on Wednesday. Griffin elaborated on the many human rights violations perpetrated by the Ayatollah's regime in Iran was guilty of, including executions of gay people and imprisonment of women who go outside with their hair uncovered.
'Let's not do that, because if we start with that, we have been known in this country to tie gay folks to the car. Listen, I'm sorry, they used to just keep hanging Black people,' Goldberg insisted as Griffin pushed back and said the situations weren't comparable.
'In the year 2025 in the United States, is nothing like if I step foot wearing this outfit into Iran right now,' Griffin said.
'It is the same,' Goldberg responded.
Advertisement
When Griffin tried to explain that life in modern-day America was night and day with the theocratic regime in Iran, Goldberg countered, 'Not if you're Black.'
5 Iranian dissidents criticized Whoopi Goldberg for her 'offensive' claim on 'The View' that life for Black Americans is equivalent to living under Iran's autocracy.
ABC
5 Goldberg sparked backlash during a heated argument with fellow co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin.
ABC
Nazarian, a renowned plastic surgeon whose family fled Iran in 1985 when she was six after her father was put on a government list to be killed, told Fox News Digital that Goldberg's comparison was not only inaccurate but deeply offensive.
Advertisement
'While racism is a serious and ongoing challenge in the U.S., comparing this to life under a totalitarian theocracy like Iran is not only inaccurate – it's offensive to those who suffer daily under that regime. In Iran, the government controls nearly every aspect of life. People can be imprisoned, tortured, raped or even executed for peaceful protests, for criticizing the regime, or simply expressing their opinions online,' Nazarian said.
Iran's theocratic regime is deeply unpopular with its public, and widespread anti-government protests frequently break out in the Islamic Republic. The country was gripped by widespread unrest after Iran's morality police were accused of murdering Mahsa Amini, a Kurdish woman, for not wearing a hijab in public.
5 Mourners attend the funeral of victims of an Iranian missile attack which destroyed a three-storey building in the northern Arab-Israeli city of Tamra on the weekend killing four women on Tuesday.
AFP via Getty Images
'It's astonishing that Whoopi Goldberg would even suggest that life for Black Americans is somehow equivalent to living under the rule of the Ayatollah in Iran. The very fact that she, as a woman — and a woman of color — has a platform where she can speak freely, express dissenting views, and appear uncovered on national television is proof of the immense freedoms she enjoys,' Iranian-American journalist Lisa Daftari told Fox News Digital.
Advertisement
Catch up on the latest news of Iran's attack on Israel
This is not the first time Goldberg has faced controversy for comments she made. In 2022, Goldberg was suspended from 'The View' following remarks about the Holocaust that many found offensive.
Goldberg claimed that The Holocaust wasn't 'about race' instead saying the genocide of six million Jews from 1933 to 1945 was the result of 'man's inhumanity to other man.' The daytime talk show co-host swiftly apologized for her comments, saying she 'misspoke.'
5 Israeli security and rescue forces work at the scene of an Iranian missile attack in Holon, central Israel.
Xinhua/Shutterstock
5 Protesters on the streets in the West Azerbaijan province, Iran.
Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
Fox News Digital reached out to 'The View' for comment.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

10 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Police are at my door. Do I need to answer? What to know if law enforcement knocks in Texas

Knock! Knock! Knock! There's a stranger at your doorstep. You rush to the peephole to see who's there. It's the police. They ask you to open the door. Your next move could be costly. Do you open the door, ask questions, or ignore them? Following what prosecutors have described as the "political assassination" of Minnesota State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband — part of an attack that also injured Sen. John Hoffman and his wife — many Americans are now questioning their legal and practical options in response to the incident. The suspect in the case, Vance Boelter, 57, was dressed in a police officer's attire, complete with a black tactical vest, and carried a flashlight, as an officer would, according to an affidavit filed in federal court and written by Special Agent Terry Getsch of the FBI. Boelter was also driving an SUV equipped with a fake "POLICE" license plate and "law enforcement-style emergency lights," the affidavit said. "This is the police. Open the door," Boelter shouted outside at around 2 a.m. on June 14, according to Hoffman's family members, Getsch wrote in the affidavit. Here's what to know about answering the door for law enforcement in Texas. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution offers safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures, granting your home the greatest degree of protection. As a result, law enforcement officers cannot enter your residence without valid legal authority. If the police knock on your door, you're not obligated to answer or let them in. According to this tactic, known as a 'knock and talk,' is designed to begin a voluntary conversation, but your participation is entirely optional. Law enforcement knocking on your door can be intimidating. Most people's first inclination is to answer the door for them. However, that doesn't mean you have to. Here are five things to keep in mind if police officers knock on your door: You don't have to open the door unless they have a warrant. If officers don't present a search or arrest warrant, you're not legally obligated to let them in. Ask if they have a warrant — and see it. If they claim to have one, you can request to see it through a window or have them slide it under the door before opening up. Don't step outside your home or invite them in unless you want to. Once you open the door or step outside, you may unintentionally waive some of your Fourth Amendment protections. Stay calm and polite — but say little. You have the right to remain silent. You can simply say, 'I don't wish to speak without a lawyer,' and that's enough. If they don't have a warrant, they can't enter unless there's an emergency. This includes things like hearing screams, seeing someone in danger, or suspecting a crime is actively happening inside. According to the Texas Constitution Search & Seizures §9, the law says the people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions, from all unreasonable seizures or searches, and no warrant to search any place, or to seize any person or thing, shall issue without describing them as near as may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation. According to Texas law, there are situations of "exigent circumstances," also known as warrantless search and seizure in Texas. Under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the law authorizes officers to enter homes without a warrant in exigent circumstances. Examples of this include: Protection of life (first aid, extracting children who appear to be in danger, protecting an undercover officer or informant). Protection of property (such as extinguishing a fire or stopping a burglary). Preventing destruction of evidence. Pursuing a fleeing felon ('hot pursuit'). According to the Texas District & County Attorneys Association, exigent circumstances can justify an officer's initial entry into a residence, especially when the goal is to help someone in danger or ensure public safety. However, once the immediate emergency is under control, officers are no longer permitted to continue searching without legal authority. A warrant or another specific exception must be in place to allow further examination of the premises, though officers may secure the location while obtaining one. Notably, the exigent circumstances rule does not create a blanket exception for murder scenes that would permit unrestricted searches; entry is only permitted to assist victims or locate an attacker. -USA TODAY Network Amanda Lee Myers contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: If police knock on your door, do you need to open? What Texas law says

The Hill

20 minutes ago

• The Hill

Democrat calls for renaming of Russell Senate Office Building

Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) is urging senators to rename the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill because of former Sen. Richard Russell's history of opposing civil rights and avowing white supremacy. 'Throughout his career, Senator Russell engaged in constant lobbying on behalf ofopponents to Civil Rights,' Green wrote in a letter to senators Thursday about the Georgia Democrat who died in 1971. 'Perhaps most telling of his beliefs, during a lengthy filibuster against anti-lynching legislation, Senator Russell professed a willingness to uphold 'white supremacy in the social, economic, and political life of our state.'' 'His public assertions, including ones that declared America 'a white man's country' and his outspoken opposition to 'political and social equality with the Negro,' further underscored his divisive ideology,' Green added. Russell, who was Georgia's governor for two years in the 1930s, held his Senate seat for nearly four decades until his death. Green asked senators to revert to using the name 'Old Senate Office Building' for the structure built in the early 1900s that 33 senators and five committees currently occupy. It was named in honor of Russell the year after he died. 'It has long past time to remove this insult to people of goodwill from a building paid for and maintained with public funds,' Green wrote. 'The notion that the Senate cannot agree on a new permanent name does not prevent the Senate from reverting to the previous name, which was 'The Old Senate Office Building,' until a new permanent name is approved.' Green sponsored a House resolution in 2020 urging senators to change the name, but the effort was opposed by the then-Republican senators from Georgia. 'Renaming the Russell Senate Office Building is a powerful step in rejecting Russell's legacy rooted in racial division and oppression,' Green said in a statement on his renewed push. Georgia Democratic Sens. Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock both took office in 2021. Warnock is the state's first Black senator, and Ossoff is the first Jewish senator from Georgia. Ossoff and Warnock's offices didn't immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on whether they support the change.

Yahoo

24 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Seven men arrested after two people injured at protest outside Iranian Embassy

Seven men have been arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm after two people were injured during a protest outside the Iranian Embassy. Metropolitan Police officers responded to reports of an altercation in Princes Gate in Knightsbridge, west London, shortly after 9.50am on Friday, a force spokesperson said. Two men were treated for injuries at the scene by the London Ambulance Service (LAS) before one was taken to a major trauma centre and the other to hospital. Their injuries are not thought to be life-threatening. The protest group involved in the incident is said to be 'pro-Iranian monarchy', the force said. The seven arrested men, whose ages have not yet been given, currently remain in police custody. Officers remain at the scene and the area has been cordoned off while initial investigations take place. Police have imposed conditions to stop protestors from gathering in the area until 1pm on Sunday. One man was arrested and taken into custody on suspicion of breaching the conditions. An LAS spokesperson said: 'We were called at 9.56am today (June 20) to reports of an assault in Princes Gate, SW7. 'We sent a number of resources to the scene including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars and our Tactical Response Unit. 'We treated two patients at the scene and took one to hospital and one to a major trauma centre.' Footage shared on social media appeared to show two men lying on the ground in a fenced-off section of the road. One man, who was shirtless, had blood covering his nose and mouth, while the other man lay motionless clutching his left leg and ankle, with police officers attending both individuals. A number of national embassies are located on or near Prince's Gate, including the Embassy of The Islamic Republic of Iran.