Luxury Lethargy Sets In As The Market Braces For Up To A 5% Drop In 2025
Side view of crop anonymous female wearing blue dress and high heels while lying on sofa near coffee ... More table with potted plant and bag on sunny day
The personal luxury goods market faces a decline of up to 5% this year as consumer enthusiasm wanes, according to the latest projections from Bain and Company in association with Altagamma. Not since the 2008-2009 financial crisis has the luxury market experienced such a significant contraction, except for the 2020 Covid pandemic.
Besides the obvious flashpoints creating uncertainty in the market, including rising geopolitical tensions, currency fluctuations and volatile economic pressures, luxury consumers are disillusioned by the industry's offerings, particularly after post-pandemic price increases threw a monkey wrench into brands' traditional price-value relationship.
'There's a sense of emotional detachment, even among the wealthy, who can't explain why the same bag that cost $1,200 before now costs $2,000 – prices are too high for such a low level of creativity,' Bain's senior partner Federica Levato shared with me. 'The disillusionment and detachment we talk about is particularly noted among younger consumers.'
Rising luxury consumer detachment was reflected last year, as the luxury market declined 1% at current exchange rates to $418 billion (€364 billion) – or remained flat at constant rates. Yet, most telling was that the luxury market lost some 50 million customers over the last two years. Today, the estimated number of luxury consumers worldwide is approximately 353 million, down from 400 million in 2022.
'This is true alienation, meaning many people are just not buying anymore,' she observed, adding that engagement with luxury brands across all demographics, not just the younger aspirational cohort, has declined since 2022.
Brand-related searches and engagement rates are down more than 40% and social media follower growth has plummeted by 90% – 'largely due to price fatigue and stagnant creativity.'
For an industry that thrives on artistic creativity, the growing churn in luxury brand senior executives and creative directors is taking its toll. Consumers may not be aware of what's going on behind the curtain, but they see it in the stores and the brands ultimately feel it on their top and bottom line.
'While companies are waiting for a new creative director to introduce a new collection, it can take nine months to a year for the transition – like giving birth to a baby,' Levato explained. 'Consumers may not know about the shifts, but they see it when no new products arrive and the brands are totally silent during the transition.'
And she added, 'Then there's also a 50% probability that the new collection doesn't work, as has been the case for some brands in the recent past.'
All this is sinking to luxury brands' bottom line. Bain notes that since 2021, margins (defined by earnings before interest and taxes) have either stagnated or declined, even among top industry performers, and margins are expected to erode further in 2025.
'All the macroeconomic uncertainties, tariffs, lower traffic, fewer new products – over 70% of luxury brands are pulling back volume from multi-brand retail platforms – have an impact on the topline, but have a more than proportional impact on the bottom line and on the EBIT,' Levato said.
'The message is to some extent is positive because brands are not hitting the brakes on investments in technology, marketing, clienteling and stores, but they still must absorb the costs,' she continued, adding further price increases are probably off the table in the current environment.
Saying the luxury market faces 'far-reaching disruptions,' the Bain report also stresses the industry's proven resiliency, yet Levato stresses industry players can't rest on their laurels.
'As the industry faces an increasingly complex global landscape, luxury brands are entering a pivotal new chapter – one that demands sharper focus, greater cultural relevance, and growth rooted in purpose.
'At the heart of this transformation is a redefinition of value and meaning that resonates across all generations – with those shaping luxury today, and those who will define it tomorrow,' she observed.
Because the U.S. is the world's richest market – last year 1,000 new millionaires were minted here each day, totaling nearly 400,000, and more than half of all new millionaires globally – and the largest personal luxury market by far – the Americas totaled about $115 billion last year with the lion's share in the U.S., compared to $51 billion in Mainland China – what happens here will have a profound impact on the global personal luxury market overall.
According to the Affluent Consumer Research Company's May luxury tracking survey, luxury consumer fatigue is measurable. Specifically, 52% of the 300+ affluent Americans with incomes of $250,000 and above reported being disappointed with luxury options, and 46% were unable to justify new purchases.
But most telling is that among those affluents who tend to opt for the luxury option most often, 55% said they're bidding their time, and the same 55% share signaled that the available options simply do not move them.
'Purchase hesitation isn't one-size-fits-all,' observed ACRC's founder and CEO Chandler Mount. 'At the top of the market, it's not about affordability – it's about emotional resonance. They're bidding their time, a signal of flexibility, not resistance. Yet, there remains a lack of enthusiasm and emotional draw for affluent consumers.' Note: I am professionally affiliated with ACRC.
While Americans wait for luxury goods brands to present more compelling options, Bain reports that the luxury experiences market, including hospitality, fine dining, cruising and private jets, is 'flourishing,' as consumers prioritize meaningful experiences over goods, particularly among older consumers, where wealth tends to accumulate.
At its core, luxury is a cultural construct rooted in personal meaning, social status, and an expression of self-worth. While owning an abundance of luxury goods can confer some of those advantages, increasingly affluent and high-net-worth individuals are turning luxury expression inward toward personal growth and well-being.
This cultural shift in consumer consciousness has profound implications for the goods side of the luxury market. 'This isn't a trend – it's a complete reconstruction of how success is defined by the world's most affluent and influential consumers,' said Mark Miller, chief strategy officer at Publicis Groupe's Team One agency. 'It's a shift from building high-net-worth to pursuing high-life-worth.'
He was speaking about Team One's latest study entitled 'Worth Beyond Wealth,' based upon research among its exclusive Global Affluent Collective. The collective represents the top 10% of global earnings across 22 countries and totals some 4,200 consumers aged 25 and above.
'The most provocative finding is how they've moved beyond asking 'What do I own?' to 'Who am I becoming?' This transformation demands an entirely new approach from premium brands,' he continued.
Findings that popped in the study, which combined both qualitative and quantitative research, include:
This shift toward pursuit of high-life-worth through meaningful experiences requires luxury goods brands adapt to a new 'return on worth' price-value framework. Miller described this as a selective abundance approach, where people with means will spend abundantly on things that have special worth and save abundantly, i.e. trade down, in purchases that are substitutable or replaceable.
'There's a strong need in this world of selective abundance for luxury goods brands to not just make things that are functionally excellent – consumers will know the difference – but to offer a value proposition that goes above and beyond the functional things they make,' he explained, stressing the need for greater high-life-worth storytelling, rather than relying on product features, benefits, brand heritage, design and quality.
'Luxury is no longer only about having exceptional things – it's about integrating excellence with impact. The best premium brands won't just sell luxury – they'll help architect high-worth lives,' shared Tahini Candelaria, Team One's director of cultural anthropology.
Miller added, 'Luxury isn't just about possessions anymore. It's about acquiring the learning and relationships to become a more evolved version of who I aspire to be over time.'
While the Bain study acknowledges some of this – 'Across generations, drivers linked with self-reward, status, personal identity and the celebration of achievements will continue to drive engagement, reinforcing and building the lasting relevance of luxury with the consumers' lives,' Claudia D'Arpizio said in a statement – Team One's perspective pushes the concepts of luxury as self-reward, status, personal identity and celebrating achievements further toward value beyond what money can buy.
These insights require luxury goods brands to reframe their value proposition above the price-value relationship toward a return on worth. 'The notion of worth is becoming far more dominant in how affluent consumers express themselves. Luxury consumption is becoming more conscious, purposeful, meaningful and impactful with a long-tail orientation that looks to the future, not to the past,' Miller concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
35 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Oil Futures Diverge on U.S. Holiday Price Lag, Contract Expiration
Oil prices were mixed in European afternoon trade on Friday, with Brent crude down more than 2% to around $77 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate edging 0.7% higher to $74 a barrel. Brent futures fell after President Trump set a two-week deadline to decide whether the U.S. will strike Iran, easing fears of an imminent military intervention. The international oil benchmark had settled 2.8% higher on Thursday at $78.85, its highest close since January.
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Dispute Resolution: Is Decentralization The Answer?
Saro McKenna is the CEO of Dacoco GmbH and cofounder of Alien Worlds. Although the godfather of online dispute resolution, Ethan Katsh, once observed that "the power of technology to resolve disputes is exceeded by the power of technology to generate disputes," as human beings, we cannot help ourselves. Even the prospect of AI sentience and bots capable of overpowering their flesh-and-bone creators cannot halt our penchant for relentlessly leveraging tech to achieve advancement in one area or another. As far as disputes are concerned, the technology that has increasingly been used to intercede is blockchain. This is no surprise. Of all the suggested use cases for a censor- and tamper-proof decentralized digital ledger, jurisprudence rightly ranks high. Over the past decade, many technologists have attempted to adapt traditional legal concepts and resolve conflicts on-chain, with mixed success. So, why is blockchain considered the best "lawtech" tool to settle disputes? Decentralized dispute resolution is appealing because of its ability to bypass centralized authorities that are prone to bias or bureaucracy. Smart contracts and empowered jurors streamline arbitration, handling all kinds of disputes with transparency. As traditional legal systems often prove unwieldy or unfit for specific disagreements, DDR offers fast, fair outcomes. Evidently, there are many factors that entice developers to build Web3 protocols that are concerned with dispute resolution. Blockchain, being apolitical, decentralized and transparent, is perceived to be perhaps the best vehicle for administering justice when two or more parties are in disagreement. These parties can consist of individuals or even companies and governments. Perhaps blockchain is too broad a term, however, because it is often specific features of certain chains, like decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and smart contracts, that prove useful in an arbitration capacity. The economic incentives baked into blockchains are another important consideration, with the general idea being that users can become jurors, reviewing evidence and voting for the party they believe is right. In blockchain-based systems, jurors are usually financially motivated to make a sound judgment, i.e., one that accords with the majority. Kleros is one of the earliest examples of a decentralized adjudication system, one that uses jurors and game theory to produce judgments in a secure and inexpensive way. Founded in 2017, the Ethereum-based arbitration service was designed to "resolve any kind of dispute," building on the work of early Web3 pioneers like Vitalik Buterin and Paul Sztorc, whose idea to use Schelling Point-based incentives for blockchain oracles gave rise to the notion of "decentralized truth-telling." In the case of Kleros, the probability of crowdsourced jurors being selected is proportional to the amount of tokens staked. Staking, then, signifies one's willingness to participate in the adjudication process in contrast to the traditional court system, where jurors are selected at random. Arbitration fees, meanwhile, make it difficult for attackers to spam the system by creating frivolous disputes. Many similar protocols appeared around this time, among them Jur (2018) and Aragon (2016). While the former focused on enterprise use cases and selected jurors based on their reputation rather than token stake, the latter favored a subscription model and was intended for arbitration within DAOs themselves. Although they held promise, neither project is currently actively maintained. The popularization of DeFi around 2020 prompted renewed interest in dispute resolution, most notably in the case of the UMA protocol's Data Verification Mechanism (DVM), which resolves disputes about the price of a synthetic token derivative contract. This type of system, of course, has a much narrower focus than projects like Kleros, which seek to be multipurpose courts. A watershed moment for DDR occurred in 2021 when a Mexican court enforced a decentralized arbitration award governed by Kleros, which related to a real estate dispute. Last year, Mexico also passed the General Law of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, the first national legislation recognizing decentralized justice as a valid dispute resolution system. Central to the premise of DDR is the idea that arbiters can come to a fair and transparent judgment based on the available evidence: the wisdom of the crowd, enforced on-chain. Arbiters play a key role in the recently unveiled Worker Proposal System of blockchain-based metaverse Alien Worlds (which I cofounded), which is centered on the activity of various DAOs. While the system empowers users to suggest and execute new projects, arbiters act as neutral mediators in any disputes that arise. For example, arbiters can step in and cast a deciding vote when there is a disagreement about project milestones. In this particular arbitration model, a blockchain escrow account is also used since the Worker Proposal System is designed to furnish the awarded party with tokens for meeting pre-agreed targets. Arbiters must complete an identity verification process, demonstrate a solid understanding of the Alien Worlds ecosystem, commit to a minimum term of four months to ensure continuity and dedicate specific weekly hours to their role. They are also paid a set rate for performing this role. As the primary contributor to Alien Worlds, my company, Dacoco, takes a notable approach to dispute resolution by blending Web2 and Web3 concepts in a unique way. While disputes are enforced on-chain, and a DAO system transparently manages worker proposals, the arbiter functions similarly to an independent mediator in any traditional legal process. In other words, Dacoco is not relying entirely on blockchain to adjudicate. In most cases, protocols promising to administer decentralized justice have failed to achieve their objectives, whether due to technical, market or other challenges. This is a great shame because on-chain arbitration offers many advantages over a sluggish legal system that is notorious for its inequity (the most powerful people can afford the best litigators) and complexity. Although decentralized dispute resolution has yet to gain widespread adoption, and many challenges remain, expect lawtech solutions to grow more sophisticated over time and for traditional courts to follow Mexico's lead in recognizing such systems. In a sense, it is analogous to the way in which the financial world has gradually recognized Bitcoin, a consequence of the number of individuals storing their wealth in the network. Ultimately, the best and most efficient solutions have a tendency to break into the spotlight. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
European shares show slight rise despite Iran-Israel crisis, while oil stays high
European shares showed a slight rise in early trading and oil prices remained high on Wednesday as investors tracked the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. US benchmark crude oil was down around 0.43% at $74.52 per barrel, while Brent, the international standard, slipped around 0.52% to $76.05, although both WTI and Brent remain high on the month. Crude prices rose more than 4% on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump left a Group of Seven summit in Canada early and warned that people in Iran's capital should evacuate immediately. Within about eight hours, Trump went from suggesting that a nuclear deal with Iran remained 'achievable' to urging Tehran's 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives. Iran and Israel continued to exchange airstrikes on Wednesday. The fighting has driven prices for crude oil and gasoline higher because Iran is a major oil exporter and it sits on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude passes. Past conflicts in the area have caused spikes in oil prices, though they've historically proven brief after showing that they did not disrupt the flow of oil. European stocks, meanwhile, showed faintly positive trends in early trading. The DAX 40 was up around 0.11% at 23,461.41, the CAC 40 rose 0.29% to 7,706.08, the STOXX 600 was broadly flat, while the FTSE 100 rose 0.23% to 8,854.79. Related Israel-Iran crisis: How vital is the Strait of Hormuz for oil market? Trump demands Iran's 'unconditional surrender' again as conflict with Israel continues Earlier in the day, Asian stock markets showed a varied picture. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 jumped 0.78% to 38,837.48. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 1.17% to 23,698.65 while the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.3% to 3,388.77. The Kospi in Seoul gained 0.54% to 2,966.20 while Australia's S&P/ASX 200 shed 0.1% to 8,533.10. On Tuesday, US stocks slumped under the weight of higher oil prices and weaker than expected retail sales in May. Trump raised the temperature on Israel's fight with Iran by calling for 'Unconditional surrender!' on his social media platform and saying, 'We are not going to' kill Iran's leader, 'at least for now'. The S&P 500 fell 0.84% to 5,982.72 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.7% to 42,215.80. The Nasdaq composite fell 0.91% to 19,521.09. On early Wednesday morning in the US, S&P futures rose 0.11% to 5,991.50, Dow Jones futures increased less than 1% to 42,245.00, while Nasdaq futures advanced by 0.13% to 21,759.00. The markets will be looking to the Federal Reserve as it makes a decision on its interest rates today. The nearly unanimous expectation among traders and economists is that the Fed will make no move. In currency trading early on Wednesday, the US dollar fell 0.2% to 144.94 Japanese yen. The euro edged 0.18% higher, to $1.1502. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
