'Despicable': Allahabad High Court slams family's objection to woman marrying person of choice
The Allahabad High Court has condemned the family resistance to an adult woman's decision to marry a person of her choice and called such objections "despicable".
Providing protection to the 27-year-old woman who feared abduction, a bench of Justices J.J. Munir and Praveen Kumar Giri said the right to marry a person of one's choice is protected under Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution of India.
The court was dealing with a petition moved by the father and brother of the woman (fourth respondent) seeking quashing of an FIR lodged by her under sections 140(3) (abduction), 352 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace) and others of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita at Chilh police station of Mirzapur district.
"It is despicable that the petitioners should object to the decision of an adult member of the family, a woman 27 years of age, about marrying a man of her choice. At least that is the right which every adult has under the Constitution by virtue of Article 21," the Bench said in its order dated June 13.
The court clarified that it did not know whether the petitioners i.e. woman's father and brother, "really intend to abduct" her but the matter reflected a larger societal issue, i.e., the "value gap" between constitutional and social norms.
"The fact that there is social and familial resistance to the exercise of such right is a glaring depiction of the 'value gap' between the constitutional norms and those social. So long as there is a gap between the values fostered by the Constitution and those cherished by the society, these kinds of incidents would continue to happen," the court said.
In the FIR, the woman alleged a threat of abduction for wanting to marry a man of her choice. Though the court stayed the arrest of the petitioners in connection with the FIR, it also restrained them from interfering in the woman's life or from assaulting, threatening or contacting her or the man she intends to marry or live with.
"The petitioners shall not contact the fourth respondent (woman) over telephone or any other electronic device or using internet or through friends or associates. The police are also restrained from interfering with the fourth respondent's freedom and liberty in any manner, whatsoever," the court directed.
Granting time to State counsel and to informant to file counter-affidavit in the matter, the court ordered to list the case on July 18.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
37 minutes ago
- Hans India
Police apologises for wrongly identifying scribe as suspect
New Delhi: The Delhi Police has apologised for wrongly identifying a Noida-based journalist as a suspect in a criminal case, an official said on Friday. A team from the Prem Nagar Police Station in outer Delhi, comprising a sub-inspector, a head constable and a constable, was investigating a case registered under sections 318(4) (cheating involving valuable security) and 61(2) (criminal conspiracy) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, he said. 'The team was tracking the location of the accused identified as Rahul, a resident of Bahadurgarh, through his mobile phone,' Deputy Commissioner of Police (Shahdara) Prashant Gautam said. It led the team to a petrol pump in Sector 38, Noida, where they found a man in a car with his wife, whose description matched the suspect, he added. 'When the team asked him to produce an identity card, he reportedly refused and entered into an argument. The man later identified himself as Rahul Shah, a Noida-based journalist,' the DCP said. Upon realising the mistake, the police team apologised and returned to the police station. 'No misbehaviour or force was used during the incident,' the officer said. The confusion was due to the similarity in facial features and the name, the DCP said, adding, 'As soon as the team confirmed that the individual was not the accused, it expressed regret and disengaged from the interaction'. An internal note has been made regarding the incident, and no further action is being pursued.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Habeas corpus untenable for tracing missing person: Telangana HC
H YDERABAD: The Telangana high court recently dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by a woman seeking directions to the police to trace her missing father, who is an advocate. The court ruled that a habeas corpus petition is not maintainable merely for locating a missing person. A division bench comprising Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice BR Madhusudhan Rao observed that the petition failed to establish sufficient grounds for invoking the extraordinary remedy of habeas corpus. The bench clarified that the purpose of a habeas corpus writ is to secure the release of a person from illegal detention, not to trace individuals who are unaccounted for without evidence of unlawful custody. The order was passed in response to a plea by the woman, a resident of Chilkalguda, who claimed her father had been missing for the past year. She alleged that he disappeared while in Kerala, and sought the court's intervention to direct the authorities to trace him. The bench said that the petitioner had previously filed a similar writ petition, which was dismissed for default in April this year due to non-prosecution. Importantly, she had not filed any application to restore the earlier petition. In conclusion, the court held that the present writ was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution and dismissed the petition.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
US Court Orders Release Of Pro-Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil
New Jersey: A U.S. judge ordered on Friday that Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil be released immediately from immigration custody, a major victory for rights groups that challenged what they called the Trump administration's unlawful targeting of a pro-Palestinian activist. Khalil, a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's war on Gaza, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. President Donald Trump, a Republican, has called the protests antisemitic and vowed to deport foreign students who took part. Khalil became the first target of this policy. After hearing oral arguments from lawyers for Khalil and for the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz of Newark, New Jersey, ordered DHS to release him from custody at a jail for immigrants in rural Louisiana by as soon as 6:30 pm (7:30 ET) on Friday. Farbiarz said the government had made no attempt to rebut evidence provided by Khalil's lawyers that he was not a flight risk nor a danger to the public. "There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner (Khalil)," Farbiarz said as he ruled from the bench, adding that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter was unconstitutional. Khalil was the latest in a string of foreign pro-Palestinian students arrested in the U.S. starting in March who have subsequently been released by a judge. They include Mohsen Mahdawi and Rumeysya Ozturk. Khalil, a legal permanent resident of the U.S., says he is being punished for his political speech in violation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Khalil condemned antisemitism and racism in interviews with CNN and other news outlets last year. The Syrian-born activist plans to return to New York to be with his wife Dr. Noor Abdalla and their infant son who was born during Khalil's 104 days in detention. "This ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others," Abdalla said in a statement. "Today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family and the community that has supported us since the day he was unjustly taken for speaking out for Palestinian freedom." The White House condemned the decision to release Khalil, saying he should be deported for "conduct detrimental to American foreign policy interests" and fraudulently obtaining a student visa. "There is no basis for a local federal judge in New Jersey —who lacks jurisdiction — to order Khalil's release from a detention facility in Louisiana," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement. "We expect to be vindicated on appeal." Even though a federal judge ordered Khalil be freed, the immigration proceedings against him continue. The Louisiana immigration judge in his case on Friday denied his asylum request, ruled he could be deported based on the government's allegations of immigration fraud, and denied a bail hearing. Farbiarz's decision rendered the bail request moot. Like others facing deportation, Khalil has avenues to appeal within the immigration system. Farbiarz is also considering Khalil's challenge of his deportation on constitutional grounds, and has blocked officials from deporting Khalil while that challenge plays out. Earlier this month, Farbiarz ruled the government was violating Khalil's free speech rights by detaining him under a little-used law granting the U.S. secretary of state power to seek deportation of non-citizens whose presence in the country was deemed adverse to U.S. foreign policy interests. On June 13, the judge declined to order Khalil's release from a detention center in Jena, Louisiana, after Trump's administration said Khalil was being held on a separate charge that he withheld information from his application for lawful permanent residency. Khalil's lawyers deny that allegation and say people are rarely detained on such charges. On June 16, they urged Farbiarz to grant a separate request from their client to be released on bail or be transferred to immigration detention in New Jersey to be closer to his family in New York. At Friday's hearing, Farbiarz said it was "highly unusual" for the government to jail an immigrant accused of omissions in his application for U.S. permanent residency. Khalil, 30, became a U.S. permanent resident last year, and his wife and newborn son are U.S. citizens. Trump administration lawyers wrote in a June 17 filing that Khalil's request for release should be addressed to the judge overseeing his immigration case, an administrative process over whether he can be deported, rather than to Farbiarz, who is considering whether Khalil's March 8 arrest and subsequent detention were constitutional.
