Trump hints Iran seeks negotiations but says it may now be too late
US President Donald Trump said he was still deciding whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran, claiming Tehran now wants talks at the White House but may have waited too long.
Trump held his second Situation Room meeting in two days with his national security team as he left the world guessing about his potential order of military action.
'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Trump told reporters at the unveiling of one of two giant new flagpoles at the White House.
'I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate.'
He added that 'the next week is going to be very big' when it comes to determining Iran's fate.
The White House said Trump would be briefed in the Situation Room again later yesterday, a holiday in the United States.
Trump's comments came after the Islamic republic's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected his demands for an unconditional surrender and warned the United States of 'irreparable damage' if it intervenes.
A day after saying Khamenei was an 'easy target', Trump told AFP in the Oval Office that a change of leadership in Tehran 'could happen.'
But Republican Trump, who faces opposition from the isolationist wing of his support base to joining any more foreign wars, insisted that he had not yet made up his mind on whether to take US action.
'I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final (decision),' Trump said. 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change. Especially with war.'
The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had told aides on Tuesday he had approved attack plans for Iran but was holding off to see if Iran would give up its nuclear program.
'All options are on the table,' a White House official told AFP when asked about the report.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio was set to meet in Washington with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, the State Department said, for talks expected to focus on Iran.
'Very late'
Trump appeared to be in no hurry to reach what would be one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency -- spending more than an hour dealing with the installation of his new flagpoles.
He said Iran was reaching out to try to strike a deal on its nuclear program to end the conflict with US ally Israel.
'They want to come to the White House, I may do that,' Trump said. He added however that it was 'very late to be talking... There's a big difference between now and a week ago.'
Iran denied it had offered to send officials to Washington.
'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House,' Iran's mission to the United Nations posted on X.
Trump had favored a diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear program, seeking a deal to replace the agreement he tore up in his first term in 2018.
But since Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched strikes on Iran six days ago Trump has moved in behind the key US ally and is now weighing whether to use American military power against Tehran too.
Trump said Wednesday that Iran was 'weeks' away from being able to make a nuclear bomb. He noted that the United States is the only country with 'bunker buster' bombs capable of taking out Iran's Fordow nuclear plant 'but that doesn't mean I'm going to do it.'
The US president said he had told Netanyahu to 'keep going' with Israel's offensive against Iran, adding that they were speaking every day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
3 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Alarming Fox Report Says Tactical Nukes 'Not Off The Table' For Trump's Iran Response
The Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) has reportedly informed American officials that destroying Iran's heavily fortified Fordow nuclear facility might require the use of a nuclear weapon, based on The Guardian . Officials, briefed on the limitations of the GBU-57 — a 30,000-pound conventional bunker-buster bomb — are worried that even if President Trump give the order it may not be powerful enough to reach and destroy the deeply buried site. The report described that conventional bombs might have to be used to soften the terrain, followed by the dropping of a tactical nuclear weapon from a B-2 stealth bomber. The latest reporting has sought to clarify that President Trump is not considering the nuclear option, nor has it yet to be formally presented to him by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. From fresh 'anonymous' White House statement present contradictory information. So very quickly, here we are … there's prominent public discourse about the 'possibility' or eventual 'necessity' of a nuclear bomb. As the Quincy Institute's Eli Clifton observes: It's disturbing but not surprising how the entire Executive Branch communications apparatus can be activated into total war-hysteria mode seemingly overnight. Israel is urging the US under Trump to target Fordow with whatever it takes, given it lacks the capability to carry out such a strike. But at least it's 'comforting' that a tactical nuke is off the table, for now… or wait: 'none of the options are off the table' – a fresh FOX report claims, citing a senior White House official. Heinrich on Iran: An article stated that Trump was not considering a tactical nuke— that it was not one of the options that was presented to him. I was just told by a top official here that none of that report is true— that none of the options are off the table — Acyn (@Acyn) June 19, 2025 All this is premised on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that Iran is in fact pursuing a nuclear weapon. Dangerously the White House seems to be siding with Israeli intelligence over the assessment of the US intelligence community, as presented by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, who may have already been sidelined in White House Situation Room discussions. * * * The Publication Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists are meanwhile warning that it's possible that the Fordow enrichment facility could be destroyed and yet still it won't make the Iranian nuclear threat go away … If the Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear program, started on June 13, is to prove successful in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, then a necessary—but not sufficient—step will involve the elimination of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant. At the Fordow plant, located near the city of Qom, the Iranians have enough centrifuges (including IR-6s, their more advanced type) and uranium hexafluoride gas to produce several nuclear weapons. They could probably produce enough weapon-grade (90 percent) enriched uranium for one nuclear weapon within five to six days. Perhaps more important, Fordow itself is a hardened facility, built within a mountain and protected from many forms of attack. It could—in theory—continue to operate even after other nuclear facilities in the country have been destroyed, with its material then fueling nuclear weapons to be produced clandestinely. If Israel decides to continue down the military path against Iran's nuclear program, it has no choice but to ensure that the Fordow enrichment plant no longer poses a threat.
Gulf Insider
3 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group Will Arrive In Mideast Waters This Weekend
The USS Nimitz carrier strike group is en route to Middle East waters and is expected to arrive this weekend, a US official tells Fox news on Friday, after the carrier departed the South China Sea on Monday. This is the latest confirmation that the US Navy will now have two aircraft carriers in the Middle East at the same time. While reports previewed this movement earlier this week, making it no surprise, this is the first revelation of a more precise timeline. As for the prior reporting via military sources, Stars & Stripes stated, 'The aircraft carrier and its strike group left Bremerton, Wash., in March for the Indo-Pacific region for what is expected to be the ship's final deployment. Now, the Nimitz and the warships sailing with it will join the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson in the Middle East, the defense official said. Currently, the USSCarl Vinson is already positioned in the Arabian Sea, while the Navy has also lately confirmed deployment of the carrier USS Gerald R. Ford to the Mediterranean, presumably as 'back-up' – though that mission had long been shechuled. As for the Nimitz, itsis currently underway westbound from the Strait of Malacca. So this will place in total three carriers within reach of the Middle East theatre of operations. Stars & Stripes has recently offered the following background on the last week of the Iran-Israel aerial war: Each carrier strike group typically brings with it one attack submarine, one cruiser and two or more destroyers, in addition to an air wing of F/A-18 Super Hornets and (on some carriers) F-35 Lightning strike fighters. The overall package delivers a powerful land-attack punch, but also enhances regional air defense with a combination of anti-aircraft, anti-drone and anti-ballistic-missile capabilities. Two destroyers operating in Central Command have already been involved in defeating Iranian ballistic missile attacks on Israel over the past week, a Navy official told Norfolk's WAVY. USS The Sullivans and USS Arleigh Burke both expended interceptors over the weekend to shoot down Iranian attacks, the official confirmed. President Trump conveyed via the White House Press Secretary on Thursday afternoon that he will make a decision on striking Iran within the next two weeks. Trump words and 'warning' to Tehran were as follows: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'
Gulf Insider
3 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
IAEA Chief Warns UN Security Council That Strike On Iran's Bushehr Plant Would Create Nuclear Disaster
The head of the UN nuclear watchdog IAEA,Rafael Mariano Grossi, has issued fresh remarks before the Security Council on Friday, warning that Israeli strikes on Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant is where the consequences of an attack could be most serious. The active and operating nuclear power plant currently hosts thousands of kilograms of nuclear material. He warns of potential nuclear disaster: 'Countries of the region have reached out directly to me over the past few hours to express their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and completely clear — in case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity,' Grossi tells the UN Security Council. More highlights from Grossi's UN address via Al Jazeera: Countries of the region have reached out directly to me over the past few hours to express their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and completely clear that, in case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment. Similarly, a hit that disables the only two lines supplying electrical power to the plant could cause its reactor core to melt, which could result in a high release of radioactivity to the environment. In their worst case, both scenarios would necessitate protective actions, such as evacuations and sheltering of the population, or the need to take stable iodine with a reach extending to distances from a few to several hundred kilometres. Radiation monitoring would need to cover distances of several hundred kilometres, and food restrictions may need to be implemented. Any action against the Tehran nuclear research reactor could also have severe consequences, potentially for large areas of the city of Tehran and its inhabitants. Armed attack on nuclear facilities should never take place and could result in radioactive releases with great consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the state which has been attacked. I, therefore, again call for maximum restraint. Oil facilities are still getting hit by Israeli warplanes into Friday: A series of headlines, some contradictory, on where things stand with Iran nuclear negotiations with the US, sent oil sliding, then pumping, then extending losses again. One senior Iranian official told Reuters that Iran is 'ready' to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment, while a quick follow-up headline said 'zero enrichment will undoubtedly be rejected' by Iran 'especially now, under Israel's strikes.' The official said 'the role of European powers is now more prominent, as Tehran is unwilling to engage with US amid Israeli attacks. After that glimmer of hope offered for negotiations, the clarification that nothing has in fact change, sent oil dropping further Friday morning. Oil prices declined on Friday but stayed on track for a third straight weekly increase, following the White House's postponement of a decision regarding US participation in the Israel-Iran conflict: Brent crude futures were down $2.57, or around 3.3%, to $76.28 a barrel by 1204 GMT but still set to gain nearly 3% on the week. According to the latest from Bloomberg: Israel will complete the task of preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons whether or not the US joins the operation, its energy minister said. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said the only way to end the war is to 'unconditionally' stop Israel. And Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has clarified just before meeting European officials in Geneva related to EU efforts at mediate that 'Iran is not prepared for negotiations with anyone while Israel continues its attacks.' Click here to read more…
