UK must impose sanctions on Israel to meet legal obligations, say more than 800 lawyers
The UK must impose sanctions on the Israeli government and its ministers and also consider suspending it from the UN to meet its 'fundamental international legal obligations', more than 800 lawyers, academics and retired senior judges, including former supreme court justices, have said.
In a letter to the prime minister, they welcome Keir Starmer's joint statement last week with the leaders of France and Canada warning that they were prepared to take 'concrete actions' against Israel. But they urge him to act without delay as 'urgent and decisive action is required to avert the destruction of the Palestinian people of Gaza'.
The signatories, including the former supreme court justices Lord Sumption and Lord Wilson, court of appeal judges and more than 70 KCs, say that war crimes, crimes against humanity and serious violations of international humanitarian law are being committed in Palestine.
There is mounting evidence of genocide, which is either being perpetrated or at a minimum at serious risk of occurring, the letter states, highlighting recent comments by the Israeli finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, who said Israel's army would 'wipe out' what remains of Palestinian Gaza.
The signatories tell Starmer: 'All states, including the UK, are legally obliged to take all reasonable steps within their power to prevent and punish genocide; to ensure respect for international humanitarian law; and to bring to an end violations of [the right to self-determination]. The UK's actions to date have failed to meet those standards … The international community's failure to uphold international law in relation to the occupied Palestinian territory contributes to a deteriorating international climate of lawlessness and impunity and imperils the international legal system itself. Your government must act now, before it is too late.'
The UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, last week announced the suspension of negotiations over a new free trade deal with Israel, but the two-page letter, backed by a 35-page legal memorandum, says he must go further, faster by reviewing existing trade ties, suspending the 2030 roadmap for closer UK-Israel partnership and imposing trade sanctions.
The legal experts call on him to immediately sanction Israeli ministers or senior officials in the Israel Defense Forces who they accuse of having incited genocide or supporting and sponsoring illegal settlements. They note that so far financial sanctions and travel bans have been limited to individual settlers, settler outposts and settler organisations.
The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has previously said: 'The charge of genocide levelled against Israel is not only false, it's outrageous, and decent people everywhere should reject it.'
The letter, also signed by the former court of appeal judges Sir Stephen Sedley, Sir Anthony Hooper and Sir Alan Moses, a former chair of the bar of England and Wales (Matthias Kelly KC) and of the bar of Northern Ireland (Brian Fee KC), says Israel has been responsible for 'an unparalleled assault on the United Nations'.
It points to Israel's banning of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Unrwa, which it calls the 'backbone of aid' for the Palestinian people, from operating in the occupied territory and 'attacks on UN premises, property and personnel'. These acts are said to 'go beyond isolated breaches. They amount to a broader challenge to the UN charter system itself.'
Accordingly, as a permanent member on the UN security council, the signatories say the UK should consider initiating proceedings that provide for suspension of a member state.
Moses said: 'We, in the UK, cannot expect peace unless we fulfil our obligations under international law. That is what upholding the rule of law means. It is an exercise in futility for a government to say it upholds the rule of law, if it then does nothing to demonstrate it.'
Prof Guy Goodwin-Gill, a signatory and emeritus fellow of All Souls College, University of Oxford, said: 'Now is the time for the UK to show its commitment to the rule of law and to a future in which Palestinians can freely fulfil their right to self-determination. Everyone must be free from persecution, from displacement and ethnic cleansing, from the devastation and death deliberately inflicted on them in their homes, schools and hospitals, in their farms and villages. No one should ever be a refugee in their own land.'
Lammy's strongest intervention on Israel to date came amid anger at Israel's refusal to allow thousands of aid trucks access to starving Palestinians. While an 11-week blockade has officially been lifted, the letter says that the limited aid allowed in 'remains gravely insufficient to address the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe'.
More than 53,000 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli offensive in Gaza since 7 October 2023 when a Hamas attack on southern Israel killed 1,200 people. An Israeli strike early on Monday on a school turned shelter, while people inside were sleeping, killed 36, according to health officials.
Also on Monday, one of Israel's staunchest allies, Germany, added to international condemnation, with the chancellor, Friedrich Merz, saying the harm inflicted on civilians 'can no longer be justified as a fight against Hamas terrorism'.
In order to meet its legal obligations, the UK is also urged in the letter to secure an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the resumption of aid and the lifting of Israel's ban on Unrwa. Finally, it says the UK should confirm that it would execute the international criminal court's arrest warrants against the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant.
The letter increases the pressure on Starmer to act in the same week that the attorney general, Lord Hermer KC, is due to deliver the Rusi thinktank's annual security lecture on 'the condition of the international-rules-based-order'.
Many Labour and Tory backbenchers have already said that the suspension of talks on the free trade deal does not go nearly far enough.
A previous letter from members of the UK legal community sent last year said the UK was breaching international law by continuing to arm Israel. Weapons sales are not addressed in the latest missive because the issue is awaiting judgment by the high court in London after a legal challenge.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
28 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK must push for diplomatic solution following US strikes on Iran, says Swinney
The Scottish First Minister's response to the developments in the Middle East came after Sir Keir Starmer urged Iran to return to negotiations. UK minister Douglas Alexander said the Government 'has been putting contingencies in place' as the region braces for any potential retaliation from Iran. US President Donald Trump said three key nuclear sites in Iran were 'completely and fully obliterated' in the military strikes. The US is thought to have used B-2 stealth bombers to drop bunker-busting munitions on the sites – including the deeply-buried Fordo facility – as well as 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from submarines. The US-UK base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean is not thought to have been used in the operation. Posting on X, Mr Swinney said: 'The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran. 'The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the UK Government must insist on that now.' The Prime Minister had earlier said Iran should 'return to the negotiating table', noting the region remains 'volatile'. The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran. The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the U.K. Government must insist on that now. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) June 22, 2025 He said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf was critical of the Prime Minister's response. He posted on social media: 'An awful statement from the PM, which ignores our collective responsibility to uphold international law. 'Supporting illegal military action in Iran, and gas-lighting us about an imminent nuclear threat, is hauntingly reminiscent of the lies told in the run up to the Iraq war.' During a protest march in London, Mr Yousaf had earlier accused the UK Government of 'abusing' anti-terror laws against the Palestine Action group, which vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call… — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 22, 2025 Trade policy minister Mr Alexander, who is the MP for Lothian East and a former international development minister, spoke to the BBC's Sunday Show. He said: 'I understand that people have woken up this morning to the news that was breaking overnight with a real sense of concern. 'I want to assure your viewers that the British Government has been putting contingencies in place. 'There have been a whole series of meetings, I and other have been attending Cobra meetings in the course of the week.' He said plans are being put in place to move UK nationals in affected countries to safety, stressing the UK 'took no part in this military action'.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK could boost growth by radically reshaping the Treasury: Peacock
LONDON, June 20 (Reuters) - UK finance minister Rachel Reeves insists higher economic growth is her top priority, but the government's current plan to address the country's chronically low investment is unlikely to be ambitious enough. What may be needed is a structural rethink of the finance ministry itself. Reeves has adjusted her fiscal rules to allow for an extra 113 billion pounds of investment over five years, while remaining committed to ensuring debt falls as a proportion of national income within five years. In the UK government's latest spending plan unveiled last week, she started to allocate the extra capital to areas including defence, housing, transport infrastructure and a new nuclear power plant. Even so, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility, an independent fiscal watchdog, UK capital spending will climb to a peak of 3.9% of GDP in 2027/2028 but then fall back in the following two years, continuing a limp public investment record stretching back to the global financial crisis. Reeves is searching for other growth levers, including deregulation and increased UK investment by British pension funds. Additionally, the government is seeking to streamline planning laws and taking steps – albeit small ones – to rebuild trade relations with the European Union. But the government is fundamentally hamstrung by its fiscal rules. Departments are currently required to go cap in hand to the finance ministry to learn what they can spend and then undergo frequent check-ins to see if the fiscal position has deteriorated, which could lead to spending cuts or tax rises. This is not a system that will produce a viable long-term growth strategy. The International Monetary Fund – not known for being a fan of unfettered state spending – said last month that the UK should consider taking a more pragmatic approach to avoid having to change policy too often. The IMF suggested minor breaches should not require instant corrective action and that assessment of the rules should be done no more than once a year. But something more radical is likely required for Britain to break out of the low growth, low productivity loop it has been trapped in for almost two decades. Over this period, debt as a proportion of GDP has almost tripled while the national tax take has held steady, suggesting that part of the problem might be with the way the finance ministry operates. The machinery of government needs recalibration to focus more systematically on productive investment that can ultimately help to drive debt down over time. Reeves is trying on this score. She has asked the OBR to assess the long-term impact of capital spending decisions to determine whether they could improve public finances. She is also changing the Treasury's "Green Book" rules that dictate approval of capital projects, shifting from a narrow cost-benefit analysis to an assessment of the impact on broader strategic goals such as lifting poorer regions of the UK. However, a fundamental issue remains. The Treasury still wields huge influence within the UK government, and when growth falls short, the impulse is typically to tighten the fiscal screws, thereby worsening growth prospects. The Institute for Government, a UK-based think tank, has argued that the economic heft of the prime minister's team needs strengthening as a counterbalance. EU nations – Germany, Spain and the Netherlands among others – have both a finance ministry and a separate, growth-focused economy ministry at the heart of government. Calls for a dramatic change in the Finance Ministry are growing. Maurice Glasman, who heads "Blue Labour", a campaign to reverse what it says is the Labour Party's abandonment of working-class communities, advocates abolishing the Treasury, scrapping fiscal rules and pursuing heavy infrastructure investment. While Glasman's prescription has little chance of being implemented in full, his ideas could gain influence within a government threatened by the rise of Nigel Farage's populist Reform UK party, which is targeting traditional Labour voters. Recent opinion polls have given Reform UK 27%-32% public support compared with 22%-24% for Labour. Ensuring public finances do not spiral out of control is, of course, critical for any government. And less oversight by the Treasury could result in wasted taxpayer money spent on unproductive investments that appeal to the political base. Moreover, the bond market has not reacted well to perceived UK fiscal imprudence in recent years, as demonstrated by the rapid demise of Liz Truss's premiership of 2022. But bond investors are apt to respond more positively to a long-term, investment-led approach to reducing public borrowing, even if it involves some upfront spending. It helps that the UK currently faces less political uncertainty than some of its peers and is in the middle of the pack in terms of developed market debt burdens. Reeves appears to understand that an investment-led structural reset is required to jump-start the UK growth engine. But to make that a reality, the first change may need to be rethinking the relationship between the Treasury and the prime minister's office. The opinions expressed here are those of Mike Peacock, the former head of communications at the Bank of England and a former senior editor at Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Take East seriously', mayor warns government
The Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough has warned the government not to take the region for Bristow says the lack of any mention of improving the Ely rail junction in this month's spending review threatens to undermine the region's ambitions for growth and could "demonstrate the East is not being taken seriously".The government has announced plans to spend £725bn on infrastructure projects over the next decade but so far has said nothing about upgrading the two key rail junctions at Ely in Cambridgeshire and Haughley in sources have told the BBC that a lot of funding has already been announced for the East and more is likely to follow. For some time both the business community and local politicians have described the need to improve Ely and Haughley junctions as "the big ask" for the is now surprise and frustration that in the flurry of spending announcements this month nothing has been said about the two projects, leading to fears that they may have, once again, been a directly elected mayor whose job is to oversee economic growth in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, says the region is a place of "innovation and world-changing breakthroughs"."But if the government thinks success can be taken for granted they are making a costly mistake."He points to more than £400m of rail spending given to rail upgrades in the north of England, pointing out that the investment would return £2.50 for every pound spent, while the Ely improvements would return nearly £5."Nobody doubts the north needs investment (but) when government invests it should do so with value for money in mind. Not funding Ely junction would further demonstrate the East is not being taken seriously." The Liberal Democrat MP for Ely, Charlotte Cane, has also spoken out, saying "the government's failure to fund the Ely junction upgrade is both economically short-sighted and inexcusable"."The chancellor must stop stalling and get this project back on track and fully funded without further delay," she former mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, James Palmer, who now runs the business lobby group Eastern Powerhouse, told the Politics East programme: "I know for a fact that the previous transport secretary backed Ely junction, we know that Labour in opposition campaigned in favour of Ely junction."We get the first spending review of this new government and Ely has disappeared off the face of the map again."Who is actually making the decisions?" More spending expected Government MPs have been keen to stress that the East has already done well out of the spending review, with money for East West rail, Sizewell C, the lower Thames crossing and two regeneration projects in Abbott, the MP for Ipswich, who is also the government's so called 'mission champion', recently told Look East: "We have seen some really big ticket funding announcements along with a big up lift in day-to-day spending for the police, NHS and local government."He said more spending announcements would Jermy, the Labour MP for South West Norfolk, raised Ely junction in Parliament this week, telling the Treasury Minister Darren Jones: "The project would help not only my constituency but dozens in the east of England, and help drive economic growth in our part of the world."Jones encouraged him to talk to transport ministers about the scheme, saying: "We are absolutely in the business for high value-for-money cases that unlock growth and opportunity in every part of the country."I understand that the Department for Transport plans to announce long-term spending plans for capital projects in July along with a proposed timetable for tell me there will be more money for rail projects but will not confirm if Ely or Haughley are on the £500m, Ely junction is expensive and complicated but publicly and privately local MPs and the business community are continuing to make their case in the hope that after more than 25 years of campaigning this scheme will move forward.
