Ohio Bill Seeks to Ban and Criminalize Abortion: What We Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Republican lawmakers in Ohio have introduced a bill that seeks to ban almost all abortions in the state and criminalize the procedure.
State Representatives Levi Dean and Johnathan Newman introduced the Ohio Prenatal Equal Protection Act on Wednesday. The bill would grant legal protections from the moment of fertilization, meaning abortion would be treated as homicide, in a challenge to an abortion rights amendment to the State Constitution that voters approved in 2023.
Newsweek reached out to Dean and Newman for comment via email.
Why It Matters
Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, anti-abortion activists have been pushing measures to enshrine the rights of fetuses in a bid to end abortion nationwide.
Ohio voters enshrined abortion protections in 2023, prompting judges to strike down abortion bans in the state. Abortion is legal up to 20 weeks from fertilization in Ohio.
While Republicans in Ohio have historically passed abortion restrictions and bans, legislation in the past has been aimed at penalizing abortion providers rather than the people who have them.
But the new bill, if enacted, would change that. It could also affect in vitro fertilization (IVF) and some forms of contraception.
Demonstrators gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health on December 1, 2021.
Demonstrators gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health on December 1, 2021.What To Know
End Abortion Ohio, which collaborated with Dean and Newman to draft the bill, says the constitutional amendment approved in 2023 violates the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause.
Austin Beigel, the president of End Abortion Ohio, told Newsweek the bill is "a very, very simple piece of legislation" that "grants personhood to all human beings."
The bill would ensure that "from the moment of fertilization, when you have a new, distinct living organism, you have personhood rights, and you have the equal protection of the law," he said. "So the same laws that protect a born infant will protect that same person inside their mother's womb."
Beigel added that while the bill does not explicitly mention IVF, the "natural consequence of personhood rights for all human beings includes those currently living in petri dishes and cryochambers across our country and our state."
Abortion rights advocates say the bill goes against the will of Ohio voters.
"Ohioans spoke loud and clear that we want our access to reproductive healthcare protected, not attacked when we passed the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment in 2023," Kellie Copeland, the executive director of Abortion Forward, which worked to pass the amendment, said in a statement to Newsweek.
Beigel said that his organization is not concerned about going against what voters want because "the will of the majority of voters was for something evil."
"They were asking for the right to murder another person...and so we are proud to stand against evil, even when evil is the majority," he added.
Other groups that support abortion bans—Ohio Right to Life and Citizens for Christian—do not support the legislation, according to The Cincinnati Enquirer.
What People Are Saying
Abortion Forward executive director Kellie Copeland, in a statement to Newsweek: "Voters in Ohio sent a clear message in 2023 we must be free to make our own decisions, define our own path in life, and safely care for our families and communities. Deciding if, when, or how to become a parent is one of the most important decisions we make. These decisions should be up to each individual Ohioan, not government.
"These out-of-touch anti-abortion extremists want to give legal rights to fertilized eggs, embryos and fetuses. This would strip Ohioans' ability to make decisions for our lives, health, and well-being, including banning all abortion care, banning some types of birth control, and denying IVF treatment that helps people build their families.
"Bills like this embolden law enforcement to surveil and investigate people for their actions during pregnancy – families and loved ones could be targeted by law enforcement for helping someone access an abortion, miscarriage care, or even IVF. Black people, other people of color and immigrants are most likely to be targeted, questioned, and harmed by policies like this."
End Abortion Ohio, in a statement: "Ohio's pro-abortion constitutional amendment should be treated as null and void because it flagrantly violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by denying preborn persons the right to life. In appealing to the 14th Amendment, the Ohio Prenatal Equal Protection Act appeals to a higher law; the U.S. Constitution.
"But even so, we appeal to the highest law; the law of God. In the Holy Scriptures, All men are created equal, being made in the image of God."
Ohio Right to Life President Mike Gonidakis told The Cincinnati Enquirer: "We have never supported criminalizing a woman for having an abortion, and we never will. It's completely out of bounds and inappropriate."
Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin, in a statement: "Mere days after an anti-abortion fanatic targeted and killed reproductive rights advocates, Republicans in the Ohio legislature have decided that women who receive abortions are the actual threat. Ohio Republicans intend to charge women who receive abortions with homicide, ban IVF, and even some forms of contraception, as they proudly go against the people of Ohio. Nearly three years ago, Donald Trump opened the door to these extreme anti-choice policies through the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Now, with Trump's blessing, the far-right has declared war on women's rights."
What Happens Next
Beigel said the legislation has garnered seven co-sponsors so far. But while Republicans control both chambers of the Ohio Legislature, it remains to be seen whether the bill will have enough support to pass.
Republican House Speaker Matt Huffman told the Enquirer it's too early to know where House Republicans stand on the bill.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Newsweek

33 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Trump TikTok Executive Order Sparks MAGA Backlash: 'Brazenly Illegal'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's decision to extend the deadline for TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, to sell its United States operations has provoked an intense backlash from prominent conservative voices. The new executive order, signed on Thursday, grants ByteDance an additional 90 days, until September 17, 2025, to divest TikTok or face a ban. Why It Matters Thursday's extension marked the third time Trump has delayed enforcement. The first came via executive order on January 20, his first day in office, after the platform briefly went dark when a national ban approved by Congress and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court took effect. The second extension came in April, when White House officials believed they were close to a deal to spin off TikTok into a new U.S.-owned company. The agreement ultimately collapsed after China withdrew following Trump's tariff announcement. What To Know With each new extension, a U.S. ban on TikTok seems increasingly unlikely in the near future. But the decision to keep the app running by executive order has sparked criticism, even from some of the president's own allies. "This is lawless—nothing in statute or otherwise permits the President to extend the deadline like this," Heath Mayo, founder of conservative group Principles First, wrote on X, formerly Twitter. National Review journalist Charles C. W. Cooke called the move "brazenly illegal," while conservative commentator Guy Benson was even more direct: "This is illegal." Even those generally aligned with Trump's policy goals took issue with the method. "Um there's nothing in the law (or the Constitution) that allows for this," wrote Jonah Goldberg, co-founder of conservative news outlet The Dispatch, on X. The inaction is also prompting unease on Capitol Hill. Mississippi Republican Senator Roger Wicker, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told the Washington Examiner that he was "not overly delighted" about the delay. "I don't think it's a good idea," Wicker said. "I think there is growing frustration," Illinois Republican Representative Darin LaHood, who serves on both the House Intelligence Committee and the Select Committee on China, told the Examiner. "The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways." The administration has defended the delay as part of a larger diplomatic and strategic approach to U.S.-China relations. Trump told reporters on Thursday he would "probably" extend the ban and suggested he would need approval from Chinese President Xi Jinping. Americans are now more divided on how to handle TikTok than they were two years ago. While lawmakers largely agreed, passing the law with overwhelming bipartisan support in the House (360–58) and Senate (79–18) last year, the public has begun to take a different view. The original deadline was set for January 19. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that approximately one-third of Americans supported a TikTok ban, down from 50 percent in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they were unsure. Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report. Photo illustration of the TikTok logo on a phone screen backed by the American flag. Photo illustration of the TikTok logo on a phone screen backed by the American flag. Photo byWhat People Are Saying President Donald Trump, Thursday on Truth Social: "I've just signed the executive order extending the deadline for the TikTok closing by 90 days (September 17, 2025). Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, told the Associated Press: "An executive order can't sidestep the law, but that's exactly what the president is trying to do." What Happens Next For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the U.S., and tech giants Apple, Google, and Oracle were persuaded to continue offering and supporting the app, on the promise that the Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them.

The Hill

36 minutes ago

• The Hill

GOP congressman said he was run off the road by ‘deranged man' on the way to work

Ohio Republican Rep. Max Miller said on Thursday he was run off the road by a 'deranged man' who waved a Palestinian flag in his direction and lobbed death threats before driving away. Miller recounted the incident in a video posted to the social media platform X and pledged to hold the individual involved accountable, saying, 'I will not hide in the face of this blatant antisemitic violence.' 'As I was driving to work, some unhinged, deranged man decided to lay on his horn and run me off the road, when he couldn't get my attention, to show me a Palestinian flag, not to mention death to Israel, death to me — that he wanted to kill me and my family,' Miller said in the video. The Ohio lawmaker did not specify whether the death threats were made verbally or otherwise. Miller said he submitted police reports to the local police and to the U.S. Capitol Police. 'You have an issue? Take it to our office. You want to run me off the road? That's a different story,' Miller said in the video. 'We know who you are, young man, and the police are going to be paying you a visit, and I hope what you did this morning is worth it to you and anyone else who plans on doing this to anybody within our district, state or country,' he added. Rocky River Police Department confirmed that Miller called the station Thursday morning to 'report a road rage incident' and came to the station at 2 p.m. to give a written statement. The spokesperson said the congressman was not able to wait to speak with officers in the morning. Capitol Police was also notified, the spokesperson said, and will be handling the investigation. The Hill has contacted Capitol Police for comment.

New York Post

38 minutes ago

• New York Post

NYers' miserable options for mayor: Letters to the Editor — June 20, 2025

The Issue: The candidates running for NYC mayor in the upcoming Democratic primary on June 24. I've lived in New York City my entire adult life, and I've felt apathetic during the mayoral elections, in which I've mostly failed to participate ('Mamdani gaining on leader Cuo,' June 18). But this election is different: Zohran Mamdani is running on a set of beliefs that are antithetical to New York City. Advertisement Mamdani wants to raise taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations, which have already demonstrated that they will simply leave New York for more favorable economic climates, like Miami, if city policy becomes too prohibitive. That would not only cause unemployment, it will also reduce the operating budgets of the many cultural institutions that rely on donations. If you want to protect the greatness of New York City, simply leave Mamdani off of the ballot. It doesn't matter who wins. Advertisement It only matters that Mamdani loses. If Mamdani loses, New York City wins. Quinn Larrabee Manhattan Advertisement To all the New Yorkers who are concerned about the upcoming mayoral election, please understand that none of the Democrats in this primary have the city's best interest at heart. The only candidate that cares for you and this once-great city is Republican Curtis Sliwa. Yes, as a Democrat, you can vote for Curtis in the general, and you should if you want to live in a safe New York. Advertisement Tom Falanga Brooklyn Has anyone stated the obvious? This upcoming election for mayor is a casserole of disaster that needs all new ingredients. There's not one person running who I'd vote for with the belief that they have what's best for the voters in mind. They are all delusional, selfish individuals with themselves in mind. Alfred Bonnabel Manhattan Advertisement Why does The Post constantly run op-eds and editorials criticizing Andrew Cuomo? While no candidate, including Cuomo, is perfect, he is our best hope of defeating Mamdani, who would ruin New York City if he becomes mayor. The upcoming primary is pivotal. Bashing Cuomo could contribute to a disaster. Advertisement Anne J. Roth Forest Hills It is inconceivable that New Yorkers may have to choose between Mamdani, Cuomo and several other low-lights in the race for mayor. Mamdani, a radical socialist, espouses ideas that are absurd and would ruin New York's economy. Cuomo's audacity to even think about running after his callous and moronic decisions during COVID killed countless people, which he then tried to cover up, is beyond belief. Advertisement The rest of the Democratic field is pitiful as well. Robert DiNardo Farmingdale Since Cuomo is the supposed frontrunner, I'd like to remind New Yorkers of several things: He issued an order that resulted in the deaths of numerous seniors, and he shut down the Moreland Commission investigation when it was getting too close to his office. Advertisement He gave New York bail reform, which resulted in a crime wave. He's using New York as a springboard to the White House. You can do better. Robert K. Greco Milford, Pa. Will the moron Democrats in New York City ever wake up? I guess they like lying politicians, who tax the hell out of them and are more worried about illegals than Americans. Vote for a Republican, and things will get better for the working man. Donald Coles Boynton Beach, Fla. The race for mayor makes me thankful I don't live in New York City. The leading candidates are a disgraced former governor who was forced to resign amd a pure socialist who wants to give away everything for free and defund the police and hates Israel. And the incumbent, running as an independent, smokes cigars with a pair of antisemites. I can't vote in New York, but if I could, my choice would be 'none of the above.' Warren Goldfein Mount Arlington, NJ Mamdani is gaining on Cuomo? With all the upheaval going on in the city, you'd think people would be ready to jump ship. But if they vote Mamdani into office, then they deserve what they get! Patti Brazzi Punta Gorda, Fla. Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.