Land owner's nod not needed for projects of public interest: HC

Raipur: Chhattisgarh high court has ruled that a landowner's consent is not required for installation of electricity transmission lines, reiterating that such infrastructure projects serve a larger public interest and landowners are entitled only to compensation and cannot seek an injunction to halt the project.
The bench of Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad observed that while Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited (CSPTCL) is required to inform the petitioner before entering his land, prior consent is not mandated by Electricity Act, 2003, or Telegraph Act, 1885. It said CSPTCL would not claim ownership of the land where the tower is situated.
Justice Prasad ordered CSPTCL and other respondents to provide adequate compensation to the petitioner, a 94-year-old farmer.
He owns over 8.7 acres of farmland in Korbi village in Baloda tehsil of Janjgir-Champa district. He alleged that CSPTCL had dug 16 large pits and begun construction of transmission towers on his land without notice, consent, or compliance with mandatory conditions of the approval order dated March 11, 2024, issued by state govt.
The Petitioner's Side
The petitioner sought a court direction to immediately stop the construction work, arguing that the permission granted by Chhattisgarh govt had become void due to non-compliance with its conditions by CSPTCL.
He also sought restoration of his land to its original condition, removal of erected structures, and exemplary damages for mental harassment.
The petitioner submitted that over 4.8 acres (55.7%) of his land had been "illegally encroached upon and disturbed" as 16 pits were dug initially, followed by eight more on March 8, 2025, despite statutory requirements mandating prior identification of affected land in the landowner's presence, payment of compensation, and formal permission from the competent authority upon objection.
The petitioner had raised objections through a legal notice dated Dec 31, 2024, which he said were disregarded by the authorities.
He alleged that 'arbitrary compensation notices' were issued without site inspection or his presence, and no compensation was provided for Khasra Nos. 730/5 and 658/8.
The State's Side
Counsel for the respondents argued that the claim of sanction order being cancelled due to non-compliance was baseless.
They said compensation had been duly calculated and offered to the petitioner on June 24, 2024, and Jan 22, 2025, but he refused to accept it. They emphasised that under the law, consent from landowner is not a requisite for erecting transmission lines, as it is a project of national importance.
The respondents' counsel cited a previous HC order, which, in similar circumstances and for the same project, granted landowners liberty to raise grievances before appropriate forums.
They also highlighted a govt notification of Dec 13, 2006, which authorises CSPTCL officers to act as 'telegraph authority' for laying electricity transmission lines.
Court Cites SC Rulings
In its order, HC referenced Supreme Court rulings, which underscore the necessity of unobstructed access for laying electricity transmission lines in larger public interest for national development. The court noted that Chhattisgarh serves as a power hub, and electricity generation and supply from the state are of paramount importance. The bench asked the petitioner not to obstruct construction of electricity transmission towers, and directed authorities to disburse the compensation within 60 days.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NDTV

5 hours ago

• NDTV

Madhya Pradesh High Court To Hear Nursing College Scam Case Daily From July 3

Bhopal: Four years after NDTV first exposed a massive fraud in Madhya Pradesh's nursing colleges, the case has taken a critical turn. The Madhya Pradesh High Court will now hold daily hearings in the case starting July 3, underlining the gravity of what the court has called a "sensitive issue in the health sector." A division bench of Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice DK Paliwal made the decision during a hearing earlier this week. The court is now treating the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Vishal Baghel, as the lead case, which is also under investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). "Capital Punishment Should Be Given" In a dramatic moment during the hearing, Justice Sreedharan was visibly shocked after going through the photos and order sheets, revealing the condition of some nursing colleges. "Oh my god," he exclaimed and asked, "Has the court seen these photos before? What is happening?" One photograph showed how the same campus had different boards put up - Engineering, BEd, and Nursing College - changed as per convenience. Another revealed colleges that existed only on plastic boards, without any infrastructure. "There should be capital punishment for people doing this. We forgive them for murders because that's a crime of passion, but these are premeditated offences," Justice Sreedharan said sternly. The bench expressed deep concern, calling the scam a systemic rot that threatens the future of healthcare in the state. The court rebuked officials of the Indian Nursing Council and Madhya Pradesh Nursing Council for repeated non-compliance. Despite 48 hearings and 96 exemptions granted to the officials so far, key records have still not been submitted. The bench observed that this kind of deliberate delay would be treated as "interference in the judicial process." In a previous hearing, too, the court had expressed displeasure over the absence of council representatives. The petitioner has alleged that officials are deliberately obstructing the investigation and shielding those responsible for running fake institutions. After the CBI stepped in, the number of recognised nursing colleges in Madhya Pradesh reportedly dropped from over 600 to around 200, raising serious questions about how these institutions were ever allowed to operate in the first place. "This is not just about education; it's about the quality of health services in the country. We are heading towards destruction," Justice Sreedharan warned. Petitioner Mr Baghel told NDTV, "For the first time this matter was heard by the new bench, and when we presented a complete briefing of three years, the court was

Hindustan Times

6 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

NGT notice to CPCB, Bihar authorities over rise in lightning deaths due to felling of palm trees

New Delhi, The National Green Tribunal has sought a response from the Central Pollution Control Board and others in a matter related to the large-scale felling of palm trees in Bihar which is reportedly causing an increase in lightning-related deaths. NGT notice to CPCB, Bihar authorities over rise in lightning deaths due to felling of palm trees The green body was hearing a matter where it had taken suo motu cognisance of a newspaper report on alleged widespread cutting of palm trees that is directly linked to a sharp increase in lightning-related fatalities, with over 2,000 lives lost since 2016 in Bihar. In an order dated June 5, a bench of NGT's judicial member Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi and expert member A Senthil Vel said, "According to the article, dozens of towering palm trees are being felled, leading to more frequent lightning strikes that result in deaths." According to the report, after the ban on toddy tapping due to Bihar's prohibition policy, palm trees lost their economic value and have since been widely cut down. This ecological loss appeared to have made rural areas more vulnerable to lightning strikes, with the state recording over 2,000 lightning-related deaths since 2016. "The article states that the number of lightning deaths began to rise following the rampant felling of palm trees. The worst-affected districts include Aurangabad, Patna, Nalanda, Kaimur, Rohtas, Bhojpur and Buxar. Most lightning-related deaths occur between 12:30 and 4:30 pm, when many people are outside for work," the NGT said, citing the report. It further noted that the area under palm tree cultivation in the state had decreased by 40 per cent and that plantation of the trees had almost stopped. "The matter seems to attract the provisions of the Environment Act," it said. The tribunal impleaded CPCB, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, regional office of the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and Bihar Disaster Management Department as parties or respondents. "Let notices be issued to the respondents for filing their response/reply," the NGT said, listing the matter for further proceedings on August 7 before the eastern zonal bench in Kolkata. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Time of India

11 hours ago

• Time of India

‘Serious threat to public health': Telangana HC upholds preventive detention of bootlegger

HYDERABAD: The Telangana high court upheld the state govt's decision to detain a habitual bootlegger under the PD Act, observing that the manufacture and sale of illicitly distilled liquor can have irreversible and dangerous consequences for society. A division bench comprising Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice BR Madhusudhan Rao made these remarks while dismissing a petition filed by a Warangal woman challenging her husband's preventive detention. The bench said that the man's repeated involvement in bootlegging posed a serious threat to public health and safety, thereby warranting detention under section 2(A) of the PD Act, 1986. "His actions endangered the health of the public and created a sense of fear and insecurity," the court said in its judgment. The court further observed that the sale of spurious liquor goes beyond mere law and order concerns and directly undermines public health and societal stability. In arriving at its decision, the bench cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Pesala Nookaraju versus govt of AP (2023), which upheld preventive detention in similar cases involving habitual bootleggers.