REAL ID questions answered: What is it, and why did it take so long?
REAL ID questions answered: What is it, and why did it take so long? | Cruising Altitude
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Real ID explained: what it is, why it matters, and how to get yours
Real ID requirements: everything you need to know about getting compliant for travel and ID.
Starting May 7, a REAL ID-compliant driver's license or alternative acceptable identification is required for air travel and access to most federal facilities.
REAL ID enhances security by requiring stricter documentation for identity verification when issuing state IDs.
Implementation of REAL ID was delayed due to various factors, including slow adoption by states and the COVID-19 pandemic.
It's REAL ID day! Starting today (May 7), you'll need a REAL ID to get on an airplane, or to present for access at most federal facilities.
But you're not totally out of luck if you don't have a REAL ID-compliant driver's license and are hoping to travel. There are alternative documents like your passport and other federally issued ID cards, like the one you receive when you enroll for Global Entry, that will do the job just as well.
If you don't have any of those eligible documents, the Transportation Security Administration may subject you to additional screening or identity checks, but you won't necessarily automatically get turned away from your flight.
That said, it will be easier to travel if you have a REAL ID, and the alternative compliance options are only temporary, so you're better off getting a document that will work if you don't already have one.
As we enter this new era, here's what you need to know.
What is REAL ID?
I bet you've read a sentence like this many times if you've been keeping track of this rollout:
REAL ID is a state-issued identification document that complies with 'minimum security standards' established by Congress under the REAL ID Act, which was signed into law in 2005 in as part of Washington's response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
You can tell if your state-issued ID is compliant because it will have a gold or black star, or a gold or black circle with a star cutout typically in the upper right-hand corner (see photo below). A few states use the shape of the state, and California uses a bear shape, all with a star cutout, as their designator. Check with your state for enhanced driver's license designators, which are also REAL ID compliant.
So, basically, REAL ID is a set of rules for states on what kind of documentation they're required to check before issuing identification documents of their own.
How is REAL ID more secure?
The main thrust of the REAL ID requirements is that they will make state-issued identification documents more secure and standardized.
'To obtain a state-issued REAL ID, individuals must provide documentation showing their full legal name, date of birth, social security number, two proofs of address for their principal residence and proof of their lawful status,' a TSA spokesperson told me in a statement.
Before the REAL ID Act went into effect, states had more leeway and were not under such stringent requirements to actually verify a person's identity before issuing identification documents.
The law is meant to ensure that ID applicants are able to prove their identity and their lawful right of residency before obtaining a state-issued ID.
Some states, including my home state of New York, may continue issuing non-REAL ID-compliant documents for residents who are unable to provide the proper documentation to receive a REAL ID. But while those non-compliant IDs can still be used for other purposes like driving, they will not be accepted at airports or other federal facilities going forward.
Why did REAL ID take so long?
'But wait,' you're saying, 'the REAL ID Act was signed into law 20 years go. Why are we just making a big deal about this now?'
Great question. The short answer is: many states were slow to implement their Real ID programs for a variety of reasons, and then COVID hit, which interrupted things even further.
The initial deadline for compliance was May 11, 2008 (wishful thinking), and by March 2017, half the states were still out of compliance with their ID-issuing processes.
The Department of Homeland Security warned that repeated delays mean people may not be taking this 2025 deadline seriously, but I'm here to tell you this time, it's actually happening.
Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and you can reach him at zwichter@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
FedEx founder Fred Smith dies at 80
FedEx founder Frederick Wallace Smith, whose express shipping company revolutionized air cargo transportation and set the standard for "absolutely, positively" overnight delivery, died on June 21, FedEx has confirmed. He was 80. Smith, who led FedEx as its chairman and CEO for the vast majority of his tenure, took the rough idea detailed in his rushed college term paper and molded it into a global shipping juggernaut now worth tens of billions of dollars, handling millions of packages every day and employing hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. "Fred was more than just the pioneer of an industry and the founder of our great company. He was the heart and soul of FedEx – its PSP culture, values, integrity, and spirit," FedEx CEO and President Raj Subramaniam said in a message sent to FedEx team members. "He was a mentor to many and a source of inspiration to all. He was also a proud father, grandfather, husband, Marine, and friend; please keep the entire Smith family in your thoughts and prayers during this difficult time." It took years for Smith's vision to get off the ground. Financing hurdles and regulatory restraints extended the time it took to prove the immense value of an express shipping network for businesses who needed vital goods like machine parts and electronics delivered fast. Before FedEx, urgent air cargo was at the whim of passenger planes. 'I just knew it was correct, but there were only a few believers at first,' Smith said, according to the Robert Sigafoos' 1983 book 'Absolutely, Positively Overnight!' chronicling FedEx's early history. 'The overwhelming body of opinion said it wouldn't work, or that we couldn't raise the money.' After FedEx's business took off in the 1980s, Smith began to wield considerable influence in both the business and political realms. He forged close ties with presidents and presidential candidates — George W. Bush and John McCain in particular — and members of U.S. Congress while advocating for minimal trade barriers, a key FedEx policy interest. 'I thought then what I still think — he is the most impressive executive I have ever met,' former FedEx Vice President and COO Jim Barksdale, who later became CEO of Netscape, said of his first impression of Smith. FedEx vision forms at young age Smith was born on Aug. 11, 1944, to Frederick Smith and Sally Wallace Smith in Marks, Mississippi. He was raised by his mother in Memphis after his father, founder and chairman of one of the largest bus lines in the South, died in 1948. As a child, Smith wore braces and used crutches due to a hip disorder. The ailment went away as he grew older, and he was an active athlete while attending the private Memphis University School, playing both basketball and football. Smith had an interest in both aviation and business at a young age. At age 15, he both learned to fly and started Ardent Record Company with two of his classmates. The label's first release broke even. Well-prepared for higher education following his graduation from Memphis University School, he attended Yale University beginning in 1962, majoring in economics and political science. In a moment immortalized in company lore, Smith's 1965 term paper at Yale outlined the basis for what would eventually become FedEx. 'In the paper, he laid out the logistical challenges facing pioneering firms in the information technology industry,' according to FedEx's company history. 'Most airfreight shippers relied on passenger route systems, but those didn't make economic sense for urgent shipments, Smith wrote. He proposed a system specifically designed to accommodate time-sensitive shipments such as medicine, computer parts, and electronics.' Smith had described his term paper as a last-minute endeavor, but felt he had the right idea in pointing out that air freight would move best in a system designed specifically for it, not as a passenger add-on. The professor gave Smith an average grade for the paper, he later recalled. It took years for Smith to revisit the idea. After graduating from Yale, he served as a U.S. Marine Corps officer from 1966 to 1970. 'A lot of Fred's ideas then, and I think now, come from his ideas in the Marines on how to manage troops and how to move things and how to get things done,' Barksdale said in 2020. In his first tour, which lasted seven months, Smith was a platoon leader and later a company commander. He returned flying planes on reconnaissance missions and was discharged in July 1969, awarded with a litany of medals, including two Purple Hearts, the Navy Commendation Medal and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry. 'It's not that I'm more patriotic than anyone else, but there are 500,000 Americans over there now and there is a job that I've been asked to do,' Smith said in 1968 when asked by a Commercial Appeal reporter why he was returning for a second tour. 'I'm not being conceited, but I have had a year's experience and I know I can do it better than any new officer they might send in to replace me.' Smith jumped into the Mid-South business world after his service, buying controlling interest in the struggling Little Rock-based Arkansas Aviation Sales run by his stepfather in 1970. The funds came from his father's estate. Smith managed to turn the company around, solidifying its reputation as a timely, low-cost corporate jet equipment and maintenance center. However, he encountered challenges that would inform him of the need for express shipping. Getting urgent goods delivered quickly for the business was difficult, with air cargo transportation dependent on passenger planes focused most on moving people. He knew other businesses had the same problem. 'If a hospital in Texas needs a heart valve tomorrow,' he told Memphis Magazine in 1978, 'it needs it tomorrow.' While running Arkansas Aviation Sales, Smith's mind wandered back to his term paper. He decided an express shipping company would fulfill a need worth pursuing full-time. Federal Express was incorporated on June 24, 1971, with the 'federal' piece of the name coming partly to woo a possible customer in the Federal Reserve Bank. Amid early FedEx struggles, faith placed in Fred The FedEx idea was initially narrow, focused on transporting bundles of checks for the Federal Reserve to expedite the process for clearing checks between banks. Although a deal with the bank fell through, Smith kept the name and decided to expand upon the idea, conceptualizing an operation catered around time-sensitive shipping. Building a profitable business off the idea wouldn't be easy. Others had attempted airmail services before but came up short. The transportation network had to be sizable enough and serve enough locations to bring in enough customers, meaning significant financing needed to be brought in. Federal Express was able to secure bank loans and receive enough in investments to begin making mail runs in 1972. The next year, Smith moved the company to Memphis permanently altering the economic trajectory of the Mid-South city. 'Memphis was chosen because of its central location within the U.S. and because Memphis International Airport was rarely closed due to bad weather,' per FedEx's company history. 'The airport was also willing to make the necessary improvements for the operation and additional hangar space was readily available.' FedEx deems April 17, 1973, as Federal Express' operational birthday. Fourteen small aircraft departed Memphis and delivered 186 packages to 25 U.S. cities. A total of 389 employees had a hand in the operation. Even after the successful run on April 17 and growing package volumes after that, Federal Express still had money troubles. Federal Express' first general manager, Roger Frock, wrote in his book 'Changing How the World Does Business' that by September, the company was essentially bankrupt and should have folded. Employees were sometimes asked to defer cashing their checks for a couple of days. Michael Basch, a founding officer and former senior vice president for FedEx, said a pilot had to use his own credit card to pay for plane fuel because the company 'didn't have any money.' Smith admitted in 1974 to forging documents to guarantee a $2 million loan from Little Rock Union Bank, Frock wrote, and amid the fallout investors and lenders hired Howell Estes as Federal Express' new chairman and chief executive officer. 'While it is possible to understand that, under extreme pressure, Fred was acting to save Federal Express from almost certain bankruptcy, and even to empathize with what he did, it nevertheless appeared to be a serious breach of conduct,' Frock wrote. Smith, still president, nearly resigned from the company amid the pressure. Senior managers voiced their support for his continued involvement and threatened to resign themselves if Smith was forced to. Estes resigned instead, and Smith became chairman and leader of the company once again. 'If Fred Smith lined up all 13,000 Federal Express employees on the Hernando de Soto Bridge in Memphis and said, 'Jump!' 99.9 percent of them would leap into the swift Mississippi River below,' Heinz Adam, the company's head of customer service said, according to "Absolutely Positively Overnight!" 'That's how much faith they've got in this guy.' Federal Express finally showed a profit in July 1975. Smith's company was primed to ascend as the standard-bearer of a unique service: rapid and reliable delivery of high-priority goods. 'We literally worked 20 hours a day, seven days a week, so it was tough,' Basch said of the early days of FedEx. 'We didn't think we were going to make it most of the time, but everybody hung in there.' Smith pushes for deregulation, global expansion Although Federal Express and Smith had a significantly more secure future, federal regulations placed a limit on how much the company could grow its express delivery operations. Most airlines had to land approval for new rates and routes from the Civil Aeronautics Board and expanding into new markets was an arduous process. Federal Express, using its small Falcon jets ferrying cargo, avoided these regulations in its early years, but the growing business wanted to fly larger aircraft and serve more markets. Smith spent time in Washington, D.C., to sway lawmakers to cut back these regulations. He directly testified before congressional committees seeking change to the law so his company wouldn't have to deal with CAB regulation. 'Our efforts down here, while they were enormously important to us, they were to some degree a sideshow to the much bigger issue that had bigger players with more of a voice than we did,' Smith said in 2014. 'But we just became a part of this conversation, more than anything else, because it was so obvious it was stupid to prevent us from doing what we were doing.' Many airlines carrying both passengers and cargo opposed Smith's proposal. Eventually, Smith won out. In 1977, President Jimmy Carter signed the Air Cargo Deregulation Act passed by Congress. Federal Express had the right to operate larger aircraft and expand its operations. Sixty-six days after deregulation, Federal Express received its first Boeing 727 cargo plane from United Airlines, Frock wrote. Smith's company was in the clear, and revenues soared after. Growth for company, Smith's influence Federal Express didn't look back. In 1983, the company reached revenues of $1 billion. It also expanded internationally throughout the decade, notably purchasing cargo airline Flying Tiger Line in 1989. The influence of Federal Express' Chairman, president and CEO grew as his company did. When Japan resisted FedEx's efforts to seek increased air rights in the country in the 1990s, Federal Express pressed the Senate to introduce a resolution — which it did — threatening sanctions against Japanese airlines. Smith also landed a 45-minute meeting with President Bill Clinton on the issue, the Wall Street Journal reported then. Japan eventually opened up for FedEx under a new treaty. Smith also enjoyed a close relationship with President George W. Bush, a fraternity brother of his at Yale. Bush's first choice for Defense Secretary after his victory in the 2000 election was Smith, but he declined for medical reasons, Bush wrote in his book 'Decision Points." Smith backed John McCain in his run for president in 2008, serving as national co-chair of his campaign committee and raising more than $100,000 for the Republican nominee. In 2018, Smith was one of the pallbearers at McCain's funeral, the BBC reported. It wasn't just Republicans who admired Smith. In 2010, President Barack Obama singled out Smith when asked by Bloomberg BusinessWeek to name a chief executive he admires. 'He's an example of somebody who is thinking long-term,' Obama said. Smith was critical of Obama's successor, Donald Trump, for his approach on global trade and use of tariffs. Still, FedEx coordinated with the Trump administration and played a key role in distributing personal protective equipment and vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Smith made an appearance in 2020 at a roundtable with then-Vice President Mike Pence in Memphis to discuss the vaccine distribution effort. By then, public appearances were fewer and farther between for Smith, who ceded his role of FedEx president in 2018 and CEO in 2022. Smith's legacy was cemented well before then. His ambitious idea became a giant in American business, with enough gravity to influence presidents and policies while making tens of billions of dollars each year. 'I'm very focused on the here and now,' Smith told the Wall Street Journal in 2019. 'I don't care about any legacy. The legacy will be the success of the company.'
Wall Street Journal
5 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Tax Bill Would Deliver a Big Win for Private Schools—and Investors
Republicans' tax-and-spending megabill would give the school-choice movement a major, long-sought victory—and deliver an unusually generous tax break to wealthy taxpayers. The bill includes a new way for taxpayers—whether they are parents or not—to direct tax dollars to private-school scholarships instead of the Treasury. There is an extra twist: It could deliver virtually risk-free profits to some savvy investors.
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
How The Big Beautiful Bill Will Handicap Clean Energy
The Capitol Building, home of the United State Congress. Green Technologies At Risk In Current Mega Bill As it was written, the Big, Beautiful Bill (Mega Bill) passed by The House of Representatives in May would handicap certain green projects (solar, wind, and batteries) that are in line to receive tax credits made available by the Biden government. The handicap is hard to understand because in the U.S. over 90% of new energy projects in 2023 and 2024 was generated by solar, wind, and batteries. What is the handicap? The Mega Bill mandates that such projects must begin within two months of passage of the bill, and would have to be completed, and in service, by the last day of 2028, or the tax credits would be canceled. To see what impact this would have on green projects, one analysis looked at clean electrical projects that are currently in the interconnection queue, and due to go online during 2028 or later (it wouldn't be uncommon for projects slated to complete in 2028 to spill over to 2029, which would cancel the tax credits.) The total for all these at-risk projects in Figure 1 amounts to 600 GW (gigawatts). The largest three projects are CAISO of California at 183 GW, ERCOT of Texas at 128 GW, and MISO (Midwest and South) at 111 GW. Figure 1. The truth is, current electrical production in U.S. is 1200 GW, and this will need to grow rapidly to power new AI data centers. So, if all these seven green projects lost their tax credits and dropped out of the interconnection queue, it would represent a huge loss that is 50% of current electrical production in the U.S. This loss would be like tossing away 600 traditional power plants that added up to 50% of current U.S. electricity supply. Granted, a number of projects in Figure 1 would drop out of the queue anyway, due to other factors such as financial commitments that fall through. But still, a loss of remaining projects that would stand to boost current U.S. power by 30% or 40% or 50% would be an unforgiveable loss—especially since solar, wind and battery projects have all the market momentum in the past few years. Speaking of momentum, in 2023 and 2024 in the U.S., the vast majority (93%--94%) of new energy sources were solar, wind, and batteries. The only commercially proven competitor is gas-fired power plants, which are facing serious delays, and they cost more. What if projects that lost their tax credits were to go ahead to completion? They might, but it's obvious this would translate to higher cost of electricity for consumers. Mega Bill Changes Suggested By Senate. The House Mega Bill has gone to the Senate, and on Monday June 16 they have proposed some changes. UtilityDive reports that the harsh 'start by – complete by' House requirement to access the tax credits has been removed. In one box, nuclear, geothermal and hydropower can claim the tax credits so long as they start construction by 2033. But in another box, wind and solar can obtain only 60% of the tax credits and only if they break ground by 2026. Or 20% if by 2027. Or zero if after that. This is a serious handicap for the frontrunners, solar and wind, that have provided over 93% of new electrical capacity in 2023 and 2024. And it comes at a crucial time, because the U.S. needs to quickly boost its power capability by a massive amount to supply AI data centers. One positive: battery storage or BESS (battery energy storage systems) can access tax credits until 2036, although the credits will be tapered down, according to Canary Media. Also, some solar and wind projects would be able to keep the tax credits beyond the end of 2028—provided they exist on federal land, generate 1 GW or more power, and have obtained right-of-way approval from the BLM (Bureau of Land Management). The next steps are: the Senate as a whole has to pass these changes, and then attempt to reconcile with the House. The timeline is short as the goal is to get the final version of the Mega Bill to President Trump's desk by July 4. Coming out of all the discussion and debate, it seems the Mega Bill wants to handicap wind and solar and batteries. But why? Reasons Why The Mega Bill Would Handicap Wind And Solar Energy. First, the Bill will cause electricity prices to rise. If cheap wind, solar and batteries are handicapped in preference to expensive almost-defunct coal power plants, commercially unproven SMRs (small modular nuclear reactors), and next-gen geothermal methods, then prices of electricity will rise. Table 1 lays this out, using the most recent LCOE data from Lazard. Table 1. Most recent LCOE estimates for various electrical sources. With tax credits and based on a utility scale, solar PV + BESS and wind + BESS are cheaper than geothermal with tax credits, and much cheaper than gas-fired power, nuclear, and coal. If the Mega Bill handicaps wind and solar in the race, electrical costs will zoom upwards. Second, the Bill seems to be unaware of green energy success in Australia. In the state of South Australia renewables plus batteries have been providing 72% of grid electricity continuously for three years, and this is expected to rise to 100% by 2027. Solar, wind, and batteries have proven the stability and reliability of renewables commercially. The first grid-scale BESS was started in 2017 by Elon Musk in South Australia, and BESS are expanding rapidly in the U.S. as well as in Australia. Intermittent power is no longer a reason to dismiss renewables, despite what the Energy Secretary says, because BESS have solved this problem and electricity from solar and wind renewables with BESS is dispatchable. Third, the Bill assumes new investments in old energy (coal, natural gas, and nuclear) will be embraced by the U.S. population. However, global spending on low-carbon power has doubled in the past five years. Solar PV is the leader in this space, with investments that will reach $450 billion in 2025. Coal is too dirty when it burns, and in the U.S. the market share has dropped from 50% in 2011 to 11% in 2024. Natural gas burns cleaner than coal, but the market for new gas-fired power plants has dropped out in the past two years, due to cost and delays in permitting and supply chains. The cost of new nuclear reactors, whether traditional reactors or SMRs, is substantially higher than renewable energies (Table 1). There is also the ubiquitous threat of being exposed to nuclear radiation, either from nuclear accidents or from underground storage of nuclear waste. It has been reported that U.S. nuclear reactors that were decommissioned some time ago can be recommissioned, but at a heavy cost of around $1 billion per unit. Fourth, the Bill enables China to forge ahead with a green energy economy, while the U.S. goes backward. Energy from solar, wind, and batteries is cheap, and has a short new-build time. It will continue to provide jobs and grow the economy, and benefits include lower electricity prices and less pollution. A key advantage is already-commercialized power for data centers that will enable the U.S. to compete with China in the race for AI. The handicap and setbacks of a thriving clean industry in the U.S. would be China's gain. Fifth, the Bill will force job losses by handicapping green industries. If projects in the above list of seven in Figure 1 were to be canceled due to the Mega Bill handicaps, there could be serious job losses. To illustrate by results in 2024, one report quotes $80 billion invested in clean power in 2024, which supported 1.4 million jobs in the U.S. Another answer is that current tax credits would enable strong economic growth by 2035: almost $2 trillion of monetary growth and almost 14 million jobs. This amounts to a return on the federal investment by four-times. The green energy benefits and financial returns of wind and solar with battery storage apply to both Republican and Democratic states in the U.S.. But so do the losses, if Congress decides to handicap wind and solar renewables. The biggest losses may be soaring electricity costs in the U.S., and the U.S. bending to China's clean energy boom of surging solar and BESS projects that will reliably service their AI data center programs.
