‘We are waking from a long sleep': France's ex-PM Gabriel Attal on revitalising relations with the UK

In the conference room of a hotel in Kensington, the man who would be France's next head of state is sharing his views about Brexit. Microphone in hand, Gabriel Attal is here to meet activists and expatriates. Once 270,000 strong, London's French community has dwindled in recent years. The 36-year-old leader of Emmanuel Macron's Renaissance party is doing his best to gee them up.
'We are waking at the moment from a long sleep when we talk about relations between France and the UK,' he says. In the face of war in Ukraine and turmoil in the US, old alliances are reforming. 'Many thought the channel would become an ocean. And that all the ties that bound us had to be cut. But we are emerging from this sleep because in some measure we are forced to.'
In two years, when the term of his mentor, Macron, comes to an end, Attal is positioning himself to lead their centrist party into battle against Marine Le Pen's populists. If he succeeds, he would take not only Macron's crown but also his record as France's youngest-ever president. For now, he is launching himself on the international stage, with visits to Ukraine, Israel and later this year to Africa.
In London last week, he was accompanied by his bodyguards and a team of smartly dressed young men, staffers and parliamentarians, graduates like him of France's elite Sciences Po university. During his visit he called on the former UK prime minister Tony Blair and laid a wreath at the statue of the French wartime leader Charles de Gaulle. On Wednesday evening in Kensington, in the heart of London's French quarter, he addressed his audience with the confidence and lyrical flow that have earned him the nickname of 'le snipeur des mots' – the word sniper.
'Liberty was given by the proponents of Brexit as a reason why they had to leave the European Union. But being free is not being able to choose the colour of your passport. It is about being able to choose the face of your destiny.'
Attal's rise through the ranks has been a succession of firsts. At 29, he became the country's youngest postwar minister after being put in charge of education. At 34, in January 2024, he became prime minister, another record. He was cheered in the national assembly when he spoke of his pride at being the first out gay man to hold the office. It was a short-lived success – Attal's term came to a premature end last September after Macron called a snap election in a bungled attempt to see off the hard right.
Dusted off and back in the saddle, he has not officially declared his candidacy for the presidential race in 2027, but he is fairly open about his intentions. Asked whether he would stand during an interview with the Guardian, Attal replied: 'J'y travaille.' (I'm working on it).
The interview was supposed to be in person but London traffic intervened, and Attal, after a polite apology, spoke by phone from a car as he raced to catch the Eurostar train back home. His focus for now, he said, was on policy and party renewal. Renaissance has been churning out papers, with proposals to curb immigration and tackle teenage screen addiction. The party wants a social media ban for under-15s, and an internet curfew between 10pm and 8am for those under 18. Videos would switch to black and white after half an hour's viewing. 'I'm working with my party, Renaissance. I want us to have a project and a candidate. Many candidates for the presidency today don't have a project.'
Gabriel Attal de Couriss followed a well-worn path through elite schools into the ranks of the political class. The son of Yves Attal, a lawyer and film producer, and Marie de Couriss, a film production worker from a family of traders who settled in Russia then Ukraine following the Bolshevik Revolution. He thrived despite the disruptions of divorce and his father's early death from cancer. After attending the exclusive École alsacienne private school, he studied public affairs at Sciences Po, the Paris university whose graduates include Macron and and a long list of presidents and prime ministers before him.
His social politics are a mix of liberal and authoritarian. He voted to make access to abortion a constitutional right, but has legislated to curb the wearing of clothes associated with Islam. As education minister he banned the abaya for girls and the qamis for boys in schools.
Last month, Attal proposed to go a step further, by outlawing headscarves in public for girls under 15. The reaction was swift and negative, with accusations he was just looking to grab headlines, and members of his own party distanced themselves. The Renaissance education minister expressed 'the most serious doubts' about asking police to question or even caution children in the street.
Attal rejects the notion that designating the clothing worn by children as the latest culture-war battleground puts them at risk.
'I think that what puts a little girl in danger is to impose on her an outfit that consists in inculcating to her the idea that she is inferior to man and that it is impure for her to discover her face.'
On immigration, he wants closer cooperation with the UK. He says Macron's state visit to Britain next month, during which the president will stay at Windsor Castle, will be an opportunity for bilateral talks.
'I think there are several subjects which are absolutely major on which we must move forward,' he said. He listed defence – 'the United Kingdom is part of the European continent and with France is one of the two countries that has a complete army' – the economy, energy and immigration.
On the vexed question of access for UK arms firms to a new €150bn EU armaments fund, he was diplomatic.
'When it comes to EU financial instruments, they come first to support the European defence industry, and it will depend on financial participation, but I know this is being negotiated right now. I hope we can find a way to deepen the military cooperation with the UK.'
He said the next big step would be discussion on how the UK can align with a new pact for asylum and immigration that will enter into force across the EU next summer.
The agreement allows faster processing and triage of migrants at designated entry hubs. Importantly, each member state will take an agreed share of new arrivals, or pay countries of reception €20,000 to keep them.
'It is very important that we can identify the way in which this pact will be implemented in connection with the United Kingdom,' said Attal. 'I remind you that there is an estimate of 30% of immigrants who come to the European continent who do so to go to the United Kingdom.'
For Ukraine, Attal wants an accelerated path to membership of the European Union. Hungary is threatening to use its veto, and farmers are worried about the continent's largest food-producing nation flooding the tariff-free single market with cheap agricultural produce. The pushback has delayed the accession talks, which were due to begin this month.
In March, Attal hosted a summit in Paris with allies from the European parliament, and members of opposition parties in Hungary and Slovakia. They agreed to campaign for Ukrainian lawmakers to attend the parliament as observers, starting no later than 2026. Other measures included seizing the €200bn of Russian assets frozen in Europe to finance Ukrainian resistance and increasing defence budgets to 3% of domestic product.
'We have a situation that is obviously unprecedented, with a country attacked, at war, which wants to join the European Union. And therefore the procedure itself must be adapted.'
Is he in favour of the parallel negotiation solution, which would allow progress without needing Hungary's approval, being suggested by some officials in Brussels? It seems so. 'I think all channels must be used,' Attal said.
He spoke with the confidence of a man adept at finding his way around obstacles. The interview came to an end as his car approached St Pancras station. A call to the French embassy, and Attal and his bodyguards were whisked through security, making the 11.30am back to Paris with minutes to spare.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

37 minutes ago

• Reuters

Bank of England's Bailey defends bond programme after Reform UK criticism

LONDON, June 23 (Reuters) - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey defended the central bank's programme of government bond purchases and sales which has come under fire from some politicians for its cost. In a letter to Richard Tice, deputy leader of the Reform UK party which is led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage, Bailey said claims that the programme was more expensive than those run by other central banks did not tell the full story. Britain's government issued more long-term debt than other countries at a time when the BoE's bond-buying - or quantitative easing - was keeping borrowing costs low, giving the country a longer-lasting benefit, Bailey said. "Put simply, the cash flow cost of QE/QT is not therefore what it seems, and the outcome in these terms will be better," he said in the letter published on Monday. Reform - which is leading Britain's more established political parties in opinion polls - has said the government could save as much as 40 billion pounds ($53.6 billion) a year by stopping payment of interest to banks on reserves held at the BoE. Most of those reserves were created as a byproduct of the central bank's bond purchases which began in 2009 and reached a peak of almost 900 billion pounds in holdings in 2021. Since then, the BoE has sold much of its bond portfolio - known as quantitative tightening - and the programme is due to incur losses for the public finances because of a rise in interest rates and a subsequent fall in the value of the bonds. In his letter, Bailey said the bond purchases shielded Britain's economy from a string of economic shocks over the past 16 years. "It is easy to forget the severe problems we faced with these shocks," he said. "Although the counterfactual is unknowable with any precision, most estimates indicate that QE provided very significant support to the UK economy, protecting both jobs and tax revenues." Bailey said that ceasing paying interest on reserves was tantamount to increasing taxes on banks and would lead to lower interest payments for savers or higher interest rates for borrowers. He also disputed Reform's view that British banks were making excess profits. "Interest paid on reserves is not free money for the banks, not least as most of it is paid on to customers in the form of interest on their deposits," Bailey said.

Daily Mirror

37 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

Have your say on whether Brexit has been a success nine years after referendum

As the UK marks nine years since the Brexit referendum, we want to know whether you think leaving the EU has been a success June 23rd 2025, signalling the country's intention to leave the European Union. The vote ultimately ended a 47-year relationship with the political and economic bloc - but with nearly a decade now past since we went to the polls, do you think Brexit has been a success for the UK? The referendum - in which Brits narrowly voted to leave by 51.9% to 48.1% - lead to years of uncertainty across the country. Shortly after the result was released, David Cameron stepped down as Tory leader leading to a flurry of four different Conservative prime ministers in the space of five years - including Liz Truss, whose premiership lasted just 49 days. ‌ Rachel Reeves has previously blasted the Tories' Brexit deal, saying it 'reduced trade flows' between Britain and Europe. Similarly, Starmer has also criticised Boris Johnson's botched deal to leave the EU, stating it hampered the UK's ability to tackle the small boats crisis. ‌ The current Labour government has now committed to repairing the 'fractured' relationship with their nearest neighbours. In May, the PM announced his 'common sense' deal with the EU, which he declared was a 'win-win' deal that would put the UK 'back on the world stage'. Starmer announced key changes, including allowing tourists to use e-gates at airports in Europe. He said businesses will be able to sell burgers and sausages into the bloc again and shoppers will see cheaper prices in the supermarket. The deal marked a stark difference from the tensions during Theresa May's time as PM, when the UK and EU were locked in fraught negotiations to get a Brexit deal over the line. The PM said: "It's time to look forward. To move on from the stale old debates and political fights to find common sense, practical solutions which get the best for the British people.' If you can't see the poll below, click here. At the beginning on 2025, a YouGov poll revealed that just 30% of Brits believe it was right to leave the EU, with 55% believing Brexit was wrong and just 11% seeing it as more of a success than a failure. The survey also revealed that one in six leave voters now say it was the wrong choice, marking the lowest public belief in Brexit since YouGov began asking after the 2020 referendum. ‌ In a previous poll, Mirror readers shared their comments slamming Brexit as an 'unmitigated disaster' without 'one single benefit'. Orient Geoff wrote: "Unmitigated disaster! Nothing we were promised has happened, especially with regards to immigration, and it has cost the country billions in lost trade. "That's before we deal with the mountain of red tape people have to go through when importing or exporting goods, little of which existed when we were members of the EU. It certainly wasn't perfect but we should have dealt with that from within. not isolate ourselves on the back of false promises.' ‌ Agreeing with the overwhelming anti-Brexit response to the questions, Taeidy said: 'Another EU referendum is necessary and this time the result would be different. UK economy from around the fourth strongest sliding down to a break-down economy with no chance of recovery." Iron57 also wrote: 'I voted for Brexit and realise I got it badly wrong. I cannot name one single benefit of Brexit, but I can name plenty of negatives. Given the information we now have, I'd relish the chance to reverse my mistake, and so would many others in my experience.' Ralan said: 'I think we were betrayed by those who advocated for Brexit. Political sovereignty was a perfectly legitimate objective and we expected a cost to do that. However it now appears that the economic cost was played down quite considerably and the immigration problems were overstated."

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

Palestine Action protesters clash with police as government confirms ban on group under anti-terror laws

Protesters clashed with police at a demonstration in support of Palestine Action as the government confirmed a move to ban the group under anti-terror laws. The crowd surged towards police when officers tried to detain someone in Trafalgar Square in central London, while onlookers chanted 'let them go'. The protest had initially been planned to take place outside the Houses of Parliament, but the location was changed early on Monday morning after the Metropolitan Police imposed an exclusion zone. The Met commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said he was 'shocked' by the planned protest and described Palestine Action as an 'organised extremist criminal group'. Shortly after the protest began, Home Secretary Yvetter Cooper announced she had decided to proscribe Palestine Action, following the group's vandalism of two planes at an RAF base. She said she would lay an order before Parliament next week which, if passed, will make membership and support for the protest group illegal. Belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation, along with a number of other actions, are criminal offences carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. On Sunday, Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds said he could not rule out the possibility of a foreign power being behind Palestine Action. Speaking at the protest, Palestine Action spokesperson Max Geller said there had never been any evidence of such claims. 'I can't overstate how absurd and disappointing that accusation is,' he said. 'I want to make very clear that there has never been any evidence offered to support such a claim, and if we were allowed to be a legally recognised group, that man would be being sued right now for libel.' Asked about Sir Mark Rowley 's comments, he said: 'It's really troubling that the head of the Met would pre-empt the government and ban us from protesting (at the Houses of Parliament). 'It's a frustrating turn for democracy in this country.' The decision comes after the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. Speaking on Sunday, the head of the Met said he was 'shocked and frustrated' at the protest, but that until the group is proscribed the force had 'no power in law' to prevent it taking place. 'The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest,' he added. 'Thousands of people attend protests of a different character every week without clashing with the law or with the police. The criminal charges faced by Palestine Action members, in contrast, represent a form of extremism that I believe the overwhelming majority of the public rejects.' Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group. Palestine Action has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.