FCC Green-Lights Verizon's Acquisition Deal Following DEI Shutdown
The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Wireline Competition Bureau approved Verizon's $20 billion acquisition of Frontier on Friday, the FCC said in a May 16
'Verizon has also committed to ending DEI-related practices as specified in the FCC's record and has reaffirmed the merged entity's commitment to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination,' the agency said.
'This will ensure that the combined business will enact policies and practices consistent with the law and the public interest.'
The FCC approval comes a day after Verizon
'Verizon recognizes that some DEI policies and practices could be associated with discrimination,' Vandana Venkatesh, the company's chief legal officer, said in the May 15 letter. The changes were being made 'not just in name or in the way they are described, but in substance.'
The company shall no longer take into account identity-based goals when considering hiring, promotions, and bonuses for executives. Verizon said it updated supplier and sponsorship policies to remove gender- and race-based criteria.
Related Stories
5/16/2025
3/29/2025
In a May 16
Back in February, Carr had suggested Verizon's DEI efforts could influence the agency's decision on the Verizon-Frontier deal.
With the transaction now approved, Verizon can upgrade and expand Frontier's existing network spread across 25 states. Verizon is expecting to deploy fiber connections to 1 million or more homes every year, said the FCC statement.
'By approving this deal, the FCC ensures that Americans will benefit from a series of good and commonsense wins. The transaction will unleash billions of dollars in new infrastructure builds in communities across the country—including rural America,' Carr said.
'This investment will accelerate the transition away from old, copper line networks to modern, high-speed ones. And it delivers for America's tower and telecom crews who do the hard, often gritty work needed to build high-speed networks.'
Frontier is the
Carr Targeting DEI
President Donald Trump had
'The FCC's most recent budget request said that promoting DEI was the agency's second-highest strategic goal,' Carr said in an X post later that day. 'Starting next year, the FCC will end its promotion of DEI.'
The post included a screenshot of the FCC's 'Strategic Goal 2' at the time, according to which 'advancing equity is core to the agency's management and policymaking processes and will benefit all Americans.'
After Trump
'In the very first section of the Communications Act, Congress stated that it created the FCC for the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in communication 'without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex,'' he said.
'Promoting invidious forms of discrimination runs contrary to the Communications Act and deprives Americans of their rights to fair and equal treatment under the law.'
Carr said he was eliminating DEI from the FCC's strategic plan and budget, ending the agency's DEI advisory group and equity action plan, and getting rid of DEI analysis from FCC economic reports, among other things.
In a March 27 letter, Carr
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Another Fed official reveals when you might expect interest rate cuts
There's been a bit of a kerfuffle among Federal Reserve Board officials over the forecast for interest rate cuts. These are the same rate cuts that rattle and roll every aspect of the U.S. economy right down to your household. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter These interest rates are having a moment from consumer wallets and price increases to mortgage rates and housing starts to Treasury bonds and investments. Related: Fed official sends shocking message on interest rate cuts Millions of Americans – including President Donald Trump – want immediate relief. Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell urges patience as the full impact of Trump's tariffs and trade wars pass through inflation and employment numbers over the next three months. Hours after a Fed governor called for more immediate action in a move that gobsmacked Fed and market watchers, another Fed official chimed in with an the sixth month in a row, the central bank opted to hold the Federal Funds Rate steady at 4.25%-4.50% at its June meeting last week. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the expected lagging impact of tariff inflation on the economy's supply chain, while likely short term, led to the prudent waiting period. Trump's proposed tariffs – essentially an external sales tax to U.S. trading partners that we pay one way or another – face a July 9 deadline. Data shows the overall U.S. economy is "solid,'' Powell said at the June meeting. The Fed's biannual Monetary Policy Report to Congress, released June 20, supports this assertion. "Growth in private domestic final demand was moderate, reflecting a modest increase in consumer spending and a jump in capital spending,'' the report said. "However, measures of household and business sentiment have declined this year amid concerns about the effects of higher tariffs on inflation and employment as well as heightened uncertainty about the economic outlook.'' The Fed's dual mandate: prudent monetary policy that keeps both inflation and unemployment relatively stable to avoid a recession or worse. The Federal Open Meeting Committee controls the Federal Funds Rate, which banks charge each other overnight to borrow money. The funds rate is tied to the cost of borrowing money for consumers, investors and businesses. Related: Forget tariffs, Fed interest rate cuts may hinge on another problem The Federal Open Meeting Committee said July 18 it would keep the Federal Funds Rate at 4.25% to 4.50% for June. Data over the next few months will indicate if the Fed will decide on two or fewer rate cuts in 2025, portfolio manager Chris Versace said in a TheStreet Pro post after the FOMC released its quarterly "dot plot" on July 18. The Fed continues "to telegraph that two 25-basis point rate cuts remain on the table for this year,'' Versace wrote. Both Fed and market watchers forecast the next probable rate cut could appear at the September FOMC meeting. San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly concurred with the FOMC and Powell. In a July 20 interview with CNBC, Daly said monetary policy is in "a good place." Inflation is coming down, which is "great news for American families." Daly took the long walk with Powell's slower stance. "Rate cuts might be necessary in the fall,'' Daly said. The FOMC meets in September. In a contrarian viewpoint, Fed Governor Christopher Waller, a Trump appointee, said the same day that a cut could come as early as July. The current economic data "has been fine" and the tariff inflation bump may follow historical trends to prove transitory in the short term, Waller said in a CNBC interview. "I don't think it's going to be very big," Waller said. His July forecast shocked Fed and market watchers. Both he and Daly agreed attention must be paid to the tariff impact on the jobs market. More Federal Reserve: Fed interest rate cut decision resets forecasts for the rest of this yearFederal Reserve prepares strong message on long-term interest ratesFed official revamps interest-rate cut forecast for this year "Additional softening could turn into weakening. We don't want to see that," Daly said. If it does, Waller said the Fed could pause the rate cut process. "We'll be very interested in the inflation commentary contained in Monday's Flash June PMI data from S&P Global,'' Versace wrote in his TheStreet Weekly Roundup. "Should those comments for input and output prices show rising pressures compared to April and May, they would support Powell's assertion for what's to come.'' The widely watched CME FedWatch tool puts the likelihood of a July cut in the Federal Funds Rate at 10.3% The Fed last cut the Federal Funds Rate in December 2024. The FOMC's next meeting is July 29-30, 2025. Related: Fed official revamps interest-rate cut forecast for rest of this year The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Why More Boomers Are Deciding to Rent
Baby boomers are redefining the rental market, a new study has found, with millions more older Americans now renting homes than was the case a decade ago. Over the past 10 years, the number of renters aged 65 and older has surged by nearly 30 percent, adding 2.4 million senior renters across the country-by far the largest growth of any age group, according to new research conducted by Point2Homes. While the number of renters declined in other age groups, particularly those aged 18 to 54, the number of seniors opting to rent has boomed. Past generations viewed homeownership as a hallmark of independence, but today's older adults are embracing the flexibility of renting. Downsizing, relocating to warmer climates, and avoiding the burdens of home maintenance are just a few of the more positive reasons behind the trend. But rising housing costs, inflation, and limited affordable inventory also play a critical role. As more seniors navigate retirement on fixed incomes, renting is becoming not only a practical alternative, but in many cases, a financially imperative one. The reasons behind the growing number of senior renters are varied, a mix of both lifestyle choices and financial necessity. "Seniors value the flexibility renting provides, which can allow them to downsize, move to better locations, or avoid the responsibility that comes with owning a home and its expenses," Alexei Morgado, a Florida realtor and CEO of Lexawise Real Estate Exam Preparation, told Newsweek. "Owning a home can take a lot of physical energy and money. When renting, you can simply enjoy life without worrying about major repairs, the uncertainty of property taxes, or if your home will lose value or be hard to sell." Shifting cultural attitudes toward aging and independence are also influencing this trend. "In the past, homeownership was viewed as a key indicator of independence in retirement," says Morgado. "The cultural shift in the thinking surrounding aging has moved rapidly, however, and seniors no longer feel as though homeownership is a mainstay of independence and a comfortable life in retirement." He notes that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this rethinking. "Seniors began to focus on flexibility and ease rather than stability and predictability, which is often associated with homeownership," Morgado said. "Many seniors have begun seeking smaller properties or apartments in more desirable areas away from their long-time homes and may prefer urban and suburban environments even if there is additional cost or a long-term rental lease. "In this way, renting allows for added freedom of movement if they feel they need to move or relocate." The study found that many senior renters are relocating to warmer climates, particularly in Florida, which is well-known for its large retirement community. Other southern states, such as Louisiana and Texas, are also experiencing an increase in the number of graying renters. In Baton Rouge, the percentage of properties rented by older Americans has boomed by 88.7 percent over the last ten years. Similar numbers are reported in Jacksonville, Florida, and Round Rock, near Austin, Texas. But for many, the switch to renting isn't just a matter of lifestyle-it's a financial necessity, Morgado explained. "The gap between owning and renting is widening, especially for seniors who rely on a fixed income. Home prices have skyrocketed in many parts of the country over the last 10 years with continued high mortgage interest rates," he said. "Rapid changes in housing demand mean that local areas with very limited affordable housing options have both renters and former homeowners looking for an affordable lifestyle. Seniors that once owned homes are now renting for value." Steve Sexton, CEO of Sexton Advisory Group, agrees. "This trend is fueled by both convenience and necessity; however recent economic uncertainty is the more likely driver of seniors renting in retirement," Sexton told Newsweek, noting that many retirees live on fixed incomes that have failed to keep pace with rising housing costs and inflation. "Utilities, insurance, property taxes, and maintenance costs associated with owning a home continue to increase, while Social Security and pensions struggle to keep up," he said. This is exacerbated by a lack of affordable homes on the market, even for those who may prefer to own, Sexton said, a problem that is getting worse over time. As a result, "for many seniors, renting offers a more predictable and/or simplified budget in which they don't have to account for repairs and certain housing expenses." Yet the underlying issue of housing affordability remains a serious concern. A 2024 report by the Joint Center for Housing Studies found that more than 40 percent of renters aged 65 and older spend more than 30 percent of their income on rent, the threshold at which the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development considers a household "cost burdened." "The availability of affordable housing, however, is a glaring reality for many seniors," Morgado said, noting that it's "a barrier obstacle to seniors maintaining their independence." Boomers having to rent out of financial necessity is likely to continue. For now, most adults aged 65 and older are homeowners, according to the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University. However, more than one in five older households, some 7 million, choose to rent, according to the 2023 Housing America's Older Adults study by JCHS. Jeff Lichtenstein, CEO and broker at Echo Fine Properties, said the trend "will get worse in the next decade," with "inflation being the main culprit." "With increased costs coming from tariffs and with cuts in the new bill and from DOGE, it puts seniors in a tough situation," he told Newsweek. "In the next decade, there will be an explosion of baby boomers in that age group. As one loses a spouse or looks at financing, there should be more of a need to rent." Related Articles Gen Z Is Significantly More Afraid of This Trend Than Older GenerationsSocial Security Claims SkyrocketIt's Not Gold-Digging, but Gen Z Will Marry for Money, Predicts ExpertGen Z's Trauma Therapy Compared to Millennials, Boomers 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
What Went Wrong With DEI? 3 Ways To Move Forward
Concept of racial equality, anti-racism, diversity, stop racism, humanity, different wood textures, ... More silhouette, diverse cultures, cultural diversity, wooden face shape, Cooperation, collaboration With headlines dominating the news cycle—'The Death of DEI' to 'The Downfall of DEI'—it is time to learn from our past and pivot inclusion work forward positively. The backlash for DEI work has always existed. Most recently, the pushback focused on specific parts of DEI. For example, hiring goals for diversity were rebranded as 'DEI hires,' and support for LGBTQ+ rights became a political stance. In my interview with Paul Ladipo, CEO and Founder of Critical Conversations Consulting, he said, 'Anti-DEI activists started by picking on Critical Race Theory (CRT). Once that gained steam, it spread to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). Then, DEI became under attack at the state and university level to becoming the rationale for plane crashes.' Ladipo sees many organizations continuing DEI under different framing, pivoting to words like inclusion, belonging, or culture. He recommends leaders learn from the backlash and go beyond surface-level problems, focus on the long-term legacy impact of the work, and let go of the idea that everyone has to be an ally. Go Beyond Surface-Level Problems 'Most people know social causes at a surface level. They do not understand the more complex reasons why racism or sexism exist and how to navigate them. If they understood the issues more deeply, they would not have fallen for DEI backlash,' Ladipo proposed. Despite the recent backlash, most people want DEI work at their organizations. People cite DEI improving their employee experience and broadening their talent pipelines, leading to higher rates of innovation and business outcomes. Once people understand how issues of inclusion affect them and those they work with, they have greater empathy and connection with their teams. Reframing DEI requires going beyond surface-level problems, to deeper DEI solutions. Reframe DEI As Legacy Work Ladipo acknowledges that the DEI pushback will take a long time to heal from. Uncertainty and massive change take a toll on people over time. It is not sustainable to go through waves of pro-inclusion and anti-DEI with the news cycle. People crave consistency in times of uncertainty. Centuries of inequality will not be solved overnight. DEI is a long game. It is legacy work. It necessitates having a plan, goals, and metrics to monitor over time. Tying DEI to the business and human cases can emphasize the long-term nature of DEI with specific actions tied to a broader strategy. Accept Not Everyone Is An Ally 'Following the Civil War we saw the rise of Jim Crow discrimatory laws. After the Civil Rights Act, there was an increased focus on securing the Southern vote by appealing to white grievance politics. There will always be a part of the population that resists social change,' Ladipo cites. DEI is about meeting people where they are on their learning journeys. If people are not ready or are not interested in allyship, it cannot be forced upon them. Coqual's research finds that the overwhelming majority of people want to or are persuable as allies, yet 10% of people remain naysayers. We cannot want this work for everyone, yet 90% is reachable. The future of DEI may be uncertain, yet despite the backlash, accepting not everyone is an ally, reframing as legacy work, and going beyond surface-level problems are pivots leaders need to consider to move forward successfully.
