Police Applicants Who Failed Physical Test Still Admitted For Training

Article – RNZ
Police have begun an audit into whether further breaches of the recruitment process had occurred., Political Reporter
Police are investigating after three applicants who failed physical testing were still admitted for training.
In a statement, assistant commissioner Tusha Penny said it was a clear breach of recruitment policy.
'Police recently became aware of three instances where applicants were approved to begin training at the Royal New Zealand Police College (RNZPC) without having met the full requirements for the Physical Appraisal Test (PAT).
'Our process does not allow for exemptions to the PAT, and this is a clear breach of the recruitment policy. Recruitment leaders have been reminded by email that there are no circumstances where discretion can be provided for applicants who do not pass the PAT.'
She said police had begun an audit into whether further breaches of the recruitment process had occurred, covering a six-month period.
The investigation would check whether the application process for recruits to the police college had deviated from the required standards, and the findings would be reported publicly.
Pressure is growing as the November deadline for the government's promise to recruit 500 additional frontline officers nears, but Penny said Commissioner Richard Chambers had been 'very clear publicly and internally that recruitment standards will not be compromised'.
'We have previously acknowledged the target of 500 additional officers by 27 November 2025 is ambitious, but we know this is a great opportunity and we are working hard to achieve the target,' she said.
'Police is looking into these matters and conducting an audit to establish if there have been any further breaches of the recruitment process.'
Police bosses in December told ministers it would be 'very very challenging' to meet the two-year target, noting at the time total office numbers had decreased by more than 50.
Police confirmed to RNZ that as of 21 April they were still 475 officers short of the target, noting that did not include the 334 recruits still at Police College.
'All recruits should be good to go'
Police Association vice president Paul Ormerod said it was pleasing to hear the Commissioner had ordered an audit.
'We wouldn't want to see any softening continuing in being a recruit for college, and any failures of college need to be addressed at college and not put on to districts. All recruits should be good to go when released to district.
'Hopefully this is the case, but we are seeing some fall through the cracks that need extra guidance after they have finished Police College.'
He said they particularly did not want to see further softening of other police college requirements, like psychometric testing 'and that stand down period – if they get that psychometric testing wrong, they have a six month stand down – so that's another aspect of recruiting procedures that we'd like ensure is continued'.
He said as of last month officer numbers were only up by six compared to the 2023 benchmark, and the government should focus on improving pay and conditions if it wanted to meet its target.
'We'd be naive to think that there isn't some kind of political interference. What I'd like to see personally, instead of so much effort put into new staff, pay officers more, improve the conditions that they already have, and retain the staff that we have. That'll go a long way … if we don't have so many leaving.
'I'm sure the Commissioner has had a number of talks with the minister in regarding how they're going to achieve it, but police and government need to invest in their current staff and retain the valuable knowledge that they have instead of recruiting and training for the Australian police forces.'
Ministers respond
Associate Minister Casey Costello, who has the delegated responsibility for the target, said decisions on recruitment and training were an operational matter for the organisation.
'How police recruit and train new constables is an operational issue. Ministers have no involvement in this,' she said. 'What the government has done is made a commitment to recruit an extra 500 frontline officers and we have backed police to do this with $225 million in extra funding.
'As ex-police officers, Minister Mitchell and I are well aware of the very high standards of NZ Police and it's very important that those are maintained.'
Police Minister Mark Mitchell told Midday Report police had taken 'immediate steps' to remedy the problem, and he backed the Commissioner's support for maintaining training standards.
He said the decision-making would have been 'very operational, it'll be out at district levels,' and ruled out there having been any political pressure involved, challenging Labour to come up with evidence of that.
'As a past police officer, I understand and I guard that operational independence strongly, and neither myself or my Associate Minister Casey Costello would ever be involved with instructing police on how to carry out recruitment, what the standards should be, or how they should be going about that.
'That is purely operational for police. We have been very clear as an incoming government and as part of our coalition agreement with New Zealand First that we will fund 500 more police officers, and we've set a target for the police in which to do that. That is as far as we can go as a government.'
In an earlier statement, he also said meeting that commitment was an operational matter for police.
'There has been no political interference with police and its recruiting programme. The coalition government set the police a recruitment target and the funding to increase police numbers by 500. The delivery of that is an operational matter for police,' he said.
He said he and Costello had been clear 'that standards were not to be dropped'.
'Under the previous Labour government police recruiting standards were relaxed for example by dropping the required swim standard and dropping standards around low-level offending.
'In contrast, Minister Costello and I have unequivocally supported the Police Commissioner's public commitment to the maintenance of standards and expect the police to maintain these standards.'
He made that accusation again 'when the police dropped the swimming standard' again.
'Now, I'm not saying that wasn't the right thing to do but I'm highlighting the fact that the dropping of those standards happened under a previous government.
'Under this government not only have we returned the recruit courses from 16 to 20 weeks, we've been very clear that we do not want standards dropped, there will not be any compromise on that.'
He pushed back when host Charlotte Cook pointed out the government had allowed applicants on their restricted licence to join the Police College on the understanding they would have their full licence by the time they got there.
'Again, those are operational decisions for the police, and that's why those decisions were taken. It's not for us to interfere or meddle in those,' he said.
Minister 'trying to excuse his own behaviour' – Labour
Labour's police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the decision to override recruiting policy would typically be made by someone in the police executive and despite the minister's claims of no interference, questions still needed to be answered.
'We need to understand why, then, did police – and who in police – made the decision for the rules to be bent in order to allow recruits through that hadn't qualified properly. It seems highly unlikely that police would do this of their own accord,' she said.
'It not only compromises public safety, but it also compromises the safety of those officers on the front line right now who rely on recruits being able to have all the skills necessary to be a police officer.'
She said the lowering of swimming requirements when Labour was in government was as a result of a review by police into what training was needed – an operational decision.
'Changes to standards for police recruits do happen over time, and that's in order to better reflect what is needed of an officer on the frontline, but what has happened here is recruits have entered training having not met the current requirements and police are worried enough to do an audit of that.
'It seems like he's trying to excuse his own behavior … it does seem odd that he's bringing things up from years ago when the pressing issue right now is that police recruits have been able to proceed through training without without completing required physical assessment tests.'
The minister should be held responsible for what was a political promise, she said.
'It is completely unfair for New Zealand police to be held accountable for a political promise that they have always said was unattainable by the 27th of November this year.
'The political deal making done by this government is now calling into question the reputation of New Zealand police, and that is not fair on the hard working and excellent police service we have.
She said the six-month investigation should be expanded to cover the whole two years police had been recruiting to try to meet the target.
'I think it would be better for the public's confidence for the whole period to be reviewed, six months doesn't cover the entire time that police have been trying to get the 500 extra and as we've seen that political pressure build on the government, there clearly has been something happened for standards to change.'
However, Ormerod said the time period would cover all those still at Police College, and 'everyone else should have passed and is out on the street and in district, so I think the timing is fair'.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Otago Daily Times

4 hours ago

• Otago Daily Times

Crown alleges woman killed mother after buying ballet tickets

By Kate Green of RNZ A Crown prosecutor has told a court Wellington woman Julia DeLuney violently attacked her mother, leaving her dead or dying, in January last year. A post-mortem found Khandallah resident Helen Gregory, aged 79, died from complications of blunt force trauma, with 12 lacerations to her head and three skull fractures. Her daughter DeLuney is charged with murder, to which she has pleaded not guilty, with her trial opening Monday morning in the High Court in Wellington. Crown prosecutor Nicole Jamieson told the court that on the evening of 24 January, DeLuney visited her mother to book tickets to the ballet. But sometime between 8.16pm - when DeLuney's email address received confirmation of the ticket purchase - and 9.45pm when she left the address, the Crown said she violently attacked her mother and then staged the scene to make it look like she had suffered a fall. But DeLuney's defence lawyers said the police investigation had suffered from tunnel vision, and failed to consider that someone else killed Gregory. The Crown's case Jamieson laid out the case for the jurors. Allegedly, DeLuney organised a visit with her mother via email, with the purpose of booking tickets to the ballet. She arrived a little after 6pm. Jamieson said phone records showed DeLuney messaged her husband on Facebook around 7.20pm, to say they were looking through her mother's clothes, and sent a photo of them together in the wardrobe. DeLuney's email account received a Ticketmaster confirmation of purchase for tickets to the ballet, and then at 8.16pm, DeLuney messaged her husband to say they were having dinner. She left at 9.45pm. It is in this window that the Crown alleged DeLuney attacked her mother, leaving her fatally injured. She said it was the Crown's understanding that DeLuney was experiencing financial difficulty, involved in trading cryptocurrency, and had recently received $15,000 from her mother to invest, which the Crown said it appeared she used instead to pay off her own debt. Jamieson said later evidence would show the possibility that Gregory was attacked using a vase which normally stood on the bedside table. DeLuney then drove home, stopped at a Mobil station, and then picked up her husband before returning to the Baroda St address. Her husband began performing CPR and an ambulance was called, but first responders were not successful, and Gregory was pronounced dead at 11.45pm. Jamieson said the case would be "an issue of identity". "Who killed Ms Gregory? And that is because Ms DeLuney denies it was her." She said in DeLuney's version of events, her mother went to put toilet roll in the attic and fell. At that stage, her injuries were not "significant". DeLuney put her in a bedroom and left her to go and pick up her husband to help, and when they returned, they found blood and significant injuries. According to Jamieson: "The Crown says that what Ms DeLuney told the police is not the truth." The case in defence Defence lawyer Quentin Duff told the jury the police investigation had failed to consider that someone else might have killed Gregory. He said from the very beginning, the "rot of tunnel vision" had excluded DeLuney's "honest, if not perfect explanation" of the evening, and the case had "developed a contagious case of tunnel vision", which excluded the most obvious explanation - that someone else had killed her. He said later evidence would show Gregory's phone ascending one floor into the attic at 9.30pm. He asserted that between 9.30pm and 10pm, a neighbour told police someone had knocked on their door, and when they went to investigate, nobody was there, introducing the possibility of a third person to the evening. The Crown began calling witnesses on Monday afternoon. The trial is expected to go for up to five weeks, and there are set to be more than 80 witnesses called in total.

Newsroom

5 hours ago

• Newsroom

Middle East military action ‘extremely worrying', but no call yet on bombing

This story first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission The foreign affairs minister says the Government will gather facts before taking a position on the United States' airstrikes on Iran. The US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, with President Donald Trump saying the country's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been 'completely and totally obliterated.' Trump said Iran 'must now make peace' or there would be further attacks. In response, Iran has accused the US of launching 'a dangerous war,' and of violating the United Nations Charter and international law. But on Sunday afternoon, shortly after the attack was launched, Foreign Affairs Ministers Winston Peters said the New Zealand government was waiting for the facts. 'Look, this has just happened. These are circumstances in which we will first of all gather the facts, and the circumstances, before we give our opinion.' Peters said the crisis was 'extremely worrying' and New Zealand would continue to call for diplomacy and dialogue. 'Ongoing military action in the Middle East is extremely worrying, and it's critical further escalation is avoided. We strongly support efforts towards diplomacy and urge all parties to return to talks,' he said. 'Iran's nuclear activities have long worried New Zealand. We want Iran to comply with its international obligations. Our concern is that further military action is not going to deliver a sustainable solution to this problem. 'We're a long way from the region, but New Zealand will continue to convey these measures in favour of diplomacy and dialogue directly to Iran, Israel, and the other parties involved in possible talks.' Labour's defence spokesperson Peeni Henare backed Peters' calls for a return to talks, but said the government should acknowledge the US breached international law and be 'perhaps a bit stronger' in the first instance. Henare said Trump's statements had made it 'quite clear' what had happened. 'Countries can't call for peace and de-escalation, only to take the action that's been taken.' Waikato University law professor Alexander Gillespie said the airstrikes were 'clearly' illegal in terms of international law. 'There's nowhere in the UN charter that says you can bomb someone who won't negotiate with you. But whether you get to a point where that is actually condemned is going to be very different,' he said. 'There's the theory of international law, with the UN Charter, and then there's the reality of international politics at the moment, which means that America will not be condemned internationally by the Security Council or even through the International Court of Justice.' The Prime Minister is heading to NATO this week. New Zealand is not a member, but in recent years has been invited as a partner along with fellow Indo-Pacific Four nations Australia, Japan and South Korea. While Christopher Luxon would be 'on the margins,' Gillespie expected he would be watching closely to see what like-minded partners were saying. 'This is an act which is not self-defence, and even if you argued it was pre-emptive self-defence, it wasn't necessary because there were other options of diplomacy still open. It will create difficulties if we speak out and say that, I don't think we're in a position to do that right now, for fear of the reaction that you get from America.' Australia's government has already issued a statement on the airstrikes. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,' the statement said. 'We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy.' Defence Force plane leaves today The Government is sending a C-130J Hercules plane to the Middle East, with Defence Force and Foreign Affairs personnel, to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel. Defence minister Judith Collins said the plane was a contingency, and would not be able to aid in evacuation flights until airspace restrictions in the region eased. In the meantime, those who were able to leave via a safe route were urged to do so. Peters said the flights would get people to a safe place. 'We're not bringing them home. We're getting them to where they can make arrangements to get home.' The Government has been warning New Zealanders in the region to leave for a long time, Peters said. The number of New Zealanders registered as being in Iran or Israel had increased in recent days. The decision to send the Hercules was made even before knowledge of the airstrikes had come through. 'Our anxiety was enunciated and formulated into policy, warnings, and collections of views months ago. We've been saying it, and it's a sad circumstance here, but we said 'look this is very dangerous, get out,'' Peters said. Citing security reasons, Collins would not say where the plane and personnel would be based. Both Henare and Gillespie supported the move. 'I think if we're ready and on standby, at the very least, to make sure we can respond to our citizens and their needs, and also those of our diplomatic staff, I think that's a really smart move,' Henare said. Gillespie said sending a plane was prudent in case the situation worsened quickly, and the damage became more indiscriminate.

RNZ News

6 hours ago

• RNZ News

Urban Issues: The case for keeping the Gordon Wilson flats

The Gordon Wilson flats in Wellington. Photo: RNZ / Krystal Gibbens Urban issues correspondent Bill McKay discusses the government's decision to introduce a bill to demolish Wellington's Gordon Wilson Flats and why he believes it's a new low in the story of our architectural heritage. Bill McKay is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Architecture and Planning at the University of Auckland.