Platform Vs. Point Solution: Palo Alto Networks Addresses AI Security
Photo Illustration by Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Nearly every enterprise is either deploying AI-powered applications or is preparing to deploy. Each of these efforts face the same challenge: every new AI application arrives with a new, and often overlooked, attack surface.
Palo Alto Networks wants to help solve that problem. Its new Prisma AIRS platform, unveiled at this year's RSA Conference in San Francisco, offers a enterprises a comprehensive approach to protecting AI applications.
The company also announced its intent to acquire Protect AI, an established provider of AI security solutions. Palo Alto will leverage Protect AI to enhance its Prisma AIRS offering and accelerate its capabilities in securing enterprise AI ecosystems.
The rapid integration of AI across business functions creates a near-perfect storm of vulnerability. Enterprises are deploying AI applications and are using LLMs in virtually every department. This accelerates innovation, but it also introduces new security blind spots.
These new security gaps create opportunities for sophisticated attacks, including model manipulation, data poisoning, and prompt injection attacks that traditional security tools are ill-equipped to handle.
The statistics tell a sobering story: while 90% of organizations are actively implementing or planning to explore large language model use cases, a mere 5% express high confidence in their AI security preparedness. This gap between adoption and protection represents a technical vulnerability and a strategic business risk that demands immediate attention from executive leadership.
Palo Alto Networks' Prisma AIRS, short for "AI Runtime Security,' is a comprehensive platform designed to address these challenges by protecting the entire enterprise AI ecosystem. Its protection spans development to deployment, including protection for applications, agents, models, and data.
Prisma AIRS delivers five critical capabilities:
Prisma AIRS is a continuation of Palo Alto Networks' 'platformization' strategy, first unveiled in April 2024. Platformization emphasizes unifying diverse security capabilities into cohesive platform, instead of more legacy approaches of offering disconnected point solutions. Prisma AIRS brings this philosophy into the AI security domain, where fragmentation would be particularly detrimental.
Palo Alto's platform-centric architecture gives the company several significant advantages: reduced complexity, streamlined management, comprehensive visibility, and enhanced operational efficiency.
By integrating AI security into their broader platformization framework, Palo Alto Networks builds on this, allowing organizations to address the full spectrum of AI vulnerabilities while maintaining consistency with existing security operations.
Acquiring Protect AI, a key player in AI application protection, further strengthens the story. Its integration into Palo Alto Networks' ecosystem creates a formidable market advantage that reinforces the company's platformization strategy.
The AI security market is evolving rapidly. Platform security leaders like Palo Alto Networks and Cisco have taken decisive early positions, with Cisco's acquisition of Robust Intelligence showing a serious commitment to this space.
Traditional cybersecurity firms, including Fortinet, Zscaler, and Netskope, are extending their security portfolios to address AI-specific threats, though often with less comprehensive approaches than dedicated platforms.
The market has also attracted specialized AI security startups like Lakera and HiddenLayer, which develop focused solutions for specific AI security challenges but may lack the integration capabilities of larger players.
Palo Alto Networks' advantage emerges from its early market entry combined with the comprehensive nature of Prisma AIRS. The platform's integrated, proactive security measures, like scanning and posture management, alongside reactive runtime protection capabilities, make it a compelling offering.
There's little question that the gap between AI adoption and security preparedness is a significant business risk that demands attention.
As Anand Oswal, SVP and GM at Palo Alto Networks, aptly noted when announcing the new offering: " As organizations integrate AI into every aspect of their operations, securing it requires a runtime security platform that provides continuous visibility and real-time insight. Without this, security teams are left in the dark about how AI is being used, misused, or manipulated, which puts critical data and decisions at risk."
The reality is that we're in a world where AI adoption is no longer optional, making security solutions like Prisma AIRS essential. Making AI safe and secure allows businesses to harness AI's transformative potential while avoiding its most significant risks. The enterprises that address these challenges comprehensively and strategically will be best positioned to thrive in the age of AI.
Prisma AIRS isn't the only product announcement made by Palo Alto at RSAC. It also released a significant update to its Cortex Cloud offering. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM 3.0 brings new email protection capabilities and exposure management capabilities to its integrated solution. The two announcements show an aggressive and comprehensive approach to enterprise-class cybersecurity.
The early winners in the AI protection market will be the companies that help enterprises achieve this level of protection. Innovations like Prisma AIRS, coupled with the rapid evolution of its Cortex Cloud, show a deep understanding of current enterprise needs. It's precisely this that makes Palo Alto Networks one of the fastest moving and most dominant players in the industry.
Disclosure: Steve McDowell is an industry analyst, and NAND Research is an industry analyst firm, that engages in, or has engaged in, research, analysis and advisory services with many technology companies – this does not include Palo Alto Networks. Mr. McDowell does not hold any equity positions with any company mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Your AI use could have a hidden environmental cost
Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety. Whether it's answering work emails or drafting wedding vows, generative artificial intelligence tools have become a trusty copilot in many people's lives. But a growing body of research shows that for every problem AI solves, hidden environmental costs are racking up. Each word in an AI prompt is broken down into clusters of numbers called 'token IDs' and sent to massive data centers — some larger than football fields — powered by coal or natural gas plants. There, stacks of large computers generate responses through dozens of rapid calculations. The whole process can take up to 10 times more energy to complete than a regular Google search, according to a frequently cited estimation by the Electric Power Research Institute. So, for each prompt you give AI, what's the damage? To find out, researchers in Germany tested 14 large language model (LLM) AI systems by asking them both free-response and multiple-choice questions. Complex questions produced up to six times more carbon dioxide emissions than questions with concise answers. In addition, 'smarter' LLMs with more reasoning abilities produced up to 50 times more carbon emissions than simpler systems to answer the same question, the study reported. 'This shows us the tradeoff between energy consumption and the accuracy of model performance,' said Maximilian Dauner, a doctoral student at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences and first author of the Frontiers in Communication study published Wednesday. Typically, these smarter, more energy intensive LLMs have tens of billions more parameters — the biases used for processing token IDs — than smaller, more concise models. 'You can think of it like a neural network in the brain. The more neuron connections, the more thinking you can do to answer a question,' Dauner said. Complex questions require more energy in part because of the lengthy explanations many AI models are trained to provide, Dauner said. If you ask an AI chatbot to solve an algebra question for you, it may take you through the steps it took to find the answer, he said. 'AI expends a lot of energy being polite, especially if the user is polite, saying 'please' and 'thank you,'' Dauner explained. 'But this just makes their responses even longer, expending more energy to generate each word.' For this reason, Dauner suggests users be more straightforward when communicating with AI models. Specify the length of the answer you want and limit it to one or two sentences, or say you don't need an explanation at all. Most important, Dauner's study highlights that not all AI models are created equally, said Sasha Luccioni, the climate lead at AI company Hugging Face, in an email. Users looking to reduce their carbon footprint can be more intentional about which model they chose for which task. 'Task-specific models are often much smaller and more efficient, and just as good at any context-specific task,' Luccioni explained. If you are a software engineer who solves complex coding problems every day, an AI model suited for coding may be necessary. But for the average high school student who wants help with homework, relying on powerful AI tools is like using a nuclear-powered digital calculator. Even within the same AI company, different model offerings can vary in their reasoning power, so research what capabilities best suit your needs, Dauner said. When possible, Luccioni recommends going back to basic sources — online encyclopedias and phone calculators — to accomplish simple tasks. Putting a number on the environmental impact of AI has proved challenging. The study noted that energy consumption can vary based on the user's proximity to local energy grids and the hardware used to run AI partly why the researchers chose to represent carbon emissions within a range, Dauner said. Furthermore, many AI companies don't share information about their energy consumption — or details like server size or optimization techniques that could help researchers estimate energy consumption, said Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside who studies AI's water consumption. 'You can't really say AI consumes this much energy or water on average — that's just not meaningful. We need to look at each individual model and then (examine what it uses) for each task,' Ren said. One way AI companies could be more transparent is by disclosing the amount of carbon emissions associated with each prompt, Dauner suggested. 'Generally, if people were more informed about the average (environmental) cost of generating a response, people would maybe start thinking, 'Is it really necessary to turn myself into an action figure just because I'm bored?' Or 'do I have to tell ChatGPT jokes because I have nothing to do?'' Dauner said. Additionally, as more companies push to add generative AI tools to their systems, people may not have much choice how or when they use the technology, Luccioni said. 'We don't need generative AI in web search. Nobody asked for AI chatbots in (messaging apps) or on social media,' Luccioni said. 'This race to stuff them into every single existing technology is truly infuriating, since it comes with real consequences to our planet.' With less available information about AI's resource usage, consumers have less choice, Ren said, adding that regulatory pressures for more transparency are unlikely to the United States anytime soon. Instead, the best hope for more energy-efficient AI may lie in the cost efficacy of using less energy. 'Overall, I'm still positive about (the future). There are many software engineers working hard to improve resource efficiency,' Ren said. 'Other industries consume a lot of energy too, but it's not a reason to suggest AI's environmental impact is not a problem. We should definitely pay attention.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI's Sam Altman Shocked ‘People Have a High Degree of Trust in ChatGPT' Because ‘It Should Be the Tech That You Don't Trust'
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman made remarks on the first episode of OpenAI's new podcast regarding the degree of trust people have in ChatGPT. Altman observed, 'People have a very high degree of trust in ChatGPT, which is interesting, because AI hallucinates. It should be the tech that you don't trust that much.' This candid admission comes at a time when AI's capabilities are still in their infancy. Billions of people around the world are now using artificial intelligence (AI), but as Altman says, it's not super reliable. Make Over a 2.4% One-Month Yield Shorting Nvidia Out-of-the-Money Puts Is Quantum Computing (QUBT) Stock a Buy on This Bold Technological Breakthrough? Is AMD Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold on Untether AI Acquisition? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! ChatGPT and similar large language models (LLMs) are known to 'hallucinate,' or generate plausible-sounding but incorrect or fabricated information. Despite this, millions of users rely on these tools for everything from research and work to personal advice and parenting guidance. Altman himself described using ChatGPT extensively for parenting questions during his son's early months, acknowledging both its utility and the risks inherent in trusting an AI that can be confidently wrong. Altman's observation points to a paradox at the heart of the AI revolution: while users are increasingly aware that AI can make mistakes, the convenience, speed, and conversational fluency of tools like ChatGPT have fostered a level of trust more commonly associated with human experts or close friends. This trust is amplified by the AI's ability to remember context, personalize responses, and provide help across a broad range of topics — features that Altman and others at OpenAI believe will only deepen as the technology improves. Yet, as Altman cautioned, this trust is not always well-placed. The risk of over-reliance on AI-generated content is particularly acute in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, legal advice, and education. While Altman praised ChatGPT's usefulness, he stressed the importance of user awareness and critical thinking, urging society to recognize that 'AI hallucinates' and should not be blindly trusted. The conversation also touched on broader issues of privacy, data retention, and monetization. As OpenAI explores new features — such as persistent memory and potential advertising products — Altman emphasized the need to maintain user trust by ensuring transparency and protecting privacy. The ongoing lawsuit with The New York Times over data retention and copyright has further highlighted the delicate balance between innovation, legal compliance, and user rights. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Media advisory - Minister Solomon to participate in Toronto Tech Week 2025
TORONTO, June 22, 2025 /CNW/ - The Honourable Evan Solomon, Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario, will participate in a series of events, meetings and visits with Canada's AI ecosystem and business leaders for Toronto Tech Week 2025. Minister Solomon to participate in a site visit at Xanadu Date: Monday, June 23, 2025 Time: 11:00 am (ET) Note: Members of the media are asked to contact ISED Media Relations at media@ to receive event location details and confirm their attendance. Stay connected Find more services and information on the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada website. Follow Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada on social media.X (Twitter): @ISED_CA, Facebook: Canadian Innovation, Instagram: @cdninnovation, LinkedIn: Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada SOURCE Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada View original content: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
