MCA may amend IBC to scrap prior CCI approval for insolvency bids

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) is likely to amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to clarify that prior permission of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is not required for submitting bids under the corporate insolvency resolution process, government sources indicated.
This comes in the backdrop of the Supreme Court (SC) rejecting the winning bid of AGI Greenpac for Hindustan National Glass in January due to its failure to get CCI approval before the nod of the plan by the Committee of Creditors (Coc).
'We want to reduce the burden on CCI. We will try to address this issue in the IBC through an amendment,' the official source said.
The provision in question is Section 31A (4) of the IBC which states, '...where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002, the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that Act prior to the approval of such resolution plan by the committee of creditors.'
The SC in its January order had said, 'AGI Greenpac's resolution plan is unsustainable as it failed to secure prior approval from the CCI, as mandated under the provision to Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, the approval granted by the Committee of Creditors to the resolution plan dated October 28, 2022, without the requisite CCI approval, cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside and quashed.'
The SC's decision would impact future mergers that happen through IBC.
Experts feel a clarity by the government on this matter would bring relief to bidders who were concerned about approaching CCI before the CoC approval.
'Post the first submission of the plan, it could be significantly amended at the time of final submission for CoC approval. If the bidder approaches the CCI before final submission of the plan, there is no certainty that the plan being reviewed by the CCI would be the same that would be approved by the CoC,' said Anshul Jain, Partner & Leader - Regulatory, PwC India.
The top court on May 8 agreed to look into a request made by the CCI to reconsider its earlier judgment from January.
AGI Greenpac and Independent Sugar Corp (INSCO), were vying for HNG which went into insolvency in October 2021.
INSCO secured CCI clearance in 2022, but AGI Greenpac emerged as the successful bidder chosen by the CoC, despite not having received approval from the CCI at the time. INSCO challenged this in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
The crux of the dispute was whether CCI approval was mandatory before the CoC approved a resolution plan or if it could be granted afterward.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

2 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

MahaRERA orders Lodha Developers to refund booking amount of NRI homebuyers after home loan rejection for Mumbai project

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has directed Lodha Developers (formerly Macrotech) to refund the booking amount to NRI homebuyers who cancelled their reservation after being unable to secure a home loan for a ₹ 2.27 crore apartment in their Lodha Mulund project in Mumbai. The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has directed Lodha Developers (formerly Macrotech) to refund the booking amount to NRI homebuyers who cancelled their reservation after being unable to secure a home loan. (Picture for representational purposes only)(Pexels) The couple had paid ₹ 7 lakh upfront, 'relying' on the developer's oral assurance that the amount would be fully refunded if their loan application failed. After informing Lodha of their loan rejection and requesting cancellation, they were allegedly denied the refund, prompting them to approach MahaRERA, which has now ruled in their favour. The two homebuyers, Vaibhav Kishor Ambukar and his wife Seema Ambukar, had booked a flat in 'Lodha Mulund Project Tower 1' by paying a booking amount of ₹ 7 lakh in two instalments in September and October 2021. The couple, residing abroad (Russia at the time of booking), made it clear at the time of booking that their ability to buy the flat was contingent upon securing a home loan. According to the homebuyers, Lodha's representatives had orally assured them that in case of loan rejection or a financial emergency, the booking amount would be refunded without deductions. However, after the loan application was rejected in November 2021, due to documentation challenges and the complainant's contractual employment abroad, Lodha allegedly refused to cancel the booking or process a refund. Developer's defence The developer- Lodha Group contended that the booking was governed by an application form signed on November 18, 2021, which included a clause (Clause 3.5) allowing the forfeiture of booking amounts — up to 10% of the total consideration — in case of cancellation. The developer maintained that the complainants had signed the application form after fully understanding the terms. Also Read: Maharashtra Tribunal backs homebuyers, orders Lodha Group to register portion of New Cuffe Parade Project with MahaRERA MahaRERA's order The MahaRERA, in its order dated June 10, 2025, stated that no formal agreement for sale had been executed between the parties. The Authority found the forfeiture clause to be 'one-sided, unconscionable, and unenforceable' and held that the refund denial violated the spirit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. 'The complainants' reason for withdrawal stemmed from a genuine financial crisis, not mala fide intent. The application form itself appeared partially filled and unsigned by Lodha's sales representatives. Moreover, it was signed just nine days before the refund request was made,' the order said. Following this, the MahaRERA ordered Lodha to refund ₹ 6.65 lakh to the homebuyers by July 15, 2025. The order said that if the timeline is not adhered to, the refund will attract interest at 2% above the State Bank of India (SBI)'s highest marginal cost of lending rate. Also Read: Over 29,000 complaints filed by homebuyers against 5,500 real estate projects in Maharashtra: MahaRERA data Additionally, the MahaRERA directed the developer to compensate homebuyers with ₹ 20,000 towards the cost of the complaint. Meanwhile, an email query sent to Lodha Developers did not receive a response. If a response is received, the story will be updated. Homebuyers should not rely on oral assurances According to legal experts, homebuyers should not rely on any oral submissions or assurances by the developer or its representative. "Homebuyers must exercise extreme caution and avoid relying on verbal promises or assurances from developers or their representatives when booking a flat, as such oral agreements lack legal enforceability under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) and the Indian Contract Act, 1872," said Sonam Chandwani, Managing Partner KS Legal & Associates. "A clear, written contract detailing refund policies, contingencies, and obligations is essential to safeguard against developers' potentially unfair practices," Chandwani said. Also Read: MahaRERA update: Maharashtra regulator surpasses 50,000 project registrations in 8 years Sanjay Chaturvedi, a Mumbai-based lawyer whose firm represented the homebuyers in MahaRERA, said, "The delivery of the home is always with the developer, and he can sell it either to the first buyer or any successive buyer. Then why deduct or forfeit any token amount? Such practices discourage honest homebuyers and are bad for the industry. This is a very well-adjudged order." Chaturvedi said his client was working in Russia at the time of booking and currently works in Dubai.

New Indian Express

3 hours ago

• New Indian Express

What you should know about India's 'good' problems

India's corporate and banking sectors have come a long way. In 2016-17, the Economic Survey highlighted a twin-balance sheet problem for India's economy. There was a crisis in the balance sheets of corporates and banks. Public sector banks unveiled stressed assets that unleashed a slowdown before the Great Pandemic hit the economy. Cut to the present day, and you will notice that corporate and bank balance sheets are more robust than ever. The latest analysis by ICRA, a credit rating agency, shows that The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is helping drive a change in the behaviour of borrowers and improving lenders' recovery. That is boosting the balance sheets of banks. Despite tepid credit growth, banks can maintain a strong balance sheet. Similarly, companies are sitting on record profits as a percentage of gross domestic product. They are utilising the money to repay debt. Businesses have already increased dividend payouts besides the buyback of shares. Companies either pay shareholders more cash, issue bonus shares, or both. That has enthused investors, and share prices are already near record highs. It is likely to continue to attract investors. The bad news about the good news Indian equity valuations are significantly higher than those of other key markets. While domestic mutual fund investors continue to support Indian listed companies with new money gathered every month, foreign portfolio investors are treading with scepticism. They are pulling out money at every new peak share price touch. A primary reason is that the external environment is getting difficult. Despite all the rhetoric about India turning into a manufacturing hub, the troubled geo-political situation and the US trade policies are likely to make job creation difficult. The latest minutes of the monetary policy committee quotes a survey of corporate performance that shows companies are paying off the debt with rising profits. Their capacity utilisation is above 75%, but the investment intentions have moderated in 2025-26. That means businesses do not want to invest in expansion. That causes a slowdown as fewer jobs are created. A primary reason for urban consumers' inability to spend more is worries about future income. If you live in a city, you are trying to meet all your expenditures and allocate money for your future. There is little space for ambition or early retirement due to a lack of income growth. The survey of corporate performance shows that companies are deleveraging their balance sheets with rising profits. Companies choose to pay back banks and reduce their interest burden with increased profits. Despite the capacity utilisation crossing beyond 75%, the investment intentions in manufacturing have moderated in 2025-26. The government will have to support the industry with further fiscal measures, and the RBI will have to focus on bringing down borrowing rates and take other measures that ease liquidity further in the financial system. It also shows the thinking about demand prospects. Experts are waiting and watching the impact of a cut in the personal income tax rates announced in Budget 2025. There is hope that it will leave more money in your hands to spend and revive the demand for consumption. What it means to your money There is a reason not to risk your money at this stage. Gold prices are near a record high. Share prices have continued to remain near historic highs. Most pundits advocate a 'bottom-up' investment approach. That means identifying companies with strong balance sheets and not trading at record highs. It is easier said than done for fund managers at institutions where they have access to a lot more information than you do. It is the right time to review investments towards your long-term goals. If share prices are consolidating, stronger balance sheets will ensure they get the necessary momentum for the next structural rally.

Time of India

8 hours ago

• Time of India

Homebuyers in Bengaluru feel betrayed as builders flout Rera orders with impunity

Bengaluru: For thousands of homebuyers across the city, the dream of owning a home has turned into a never-ending legal and financial nightmare. Despite securing favourable rulings from the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Rera), many buyers allege that builders are openly flouting the law with no consequences, while govt agencies look the other way. From construction delays and refund refusals to outright defiance of Rera compensation orders, aggrieved buyers say enforcement is virtually non-existent. What began as a hopeful investment has, for many, turned into a fight for justice that drags on for years. Gopal Agarwal, a 47-year-old chartered accountant based in Whitefield, invested in a project back in 2012 with the promise of possession by 2015. He finally received the flat only in 2019. The builder initially agreed to pay Rs 10 lakh in compensation but later backed out. Agarwal approached Rera, which passed a favourable order in Oct 2022. "I'm still running around for execution (of the order). I've visited the deputy commissioner and tahsildar offices more than a hundred times. Even the high court directed the DC to recover the money within eight weeks — nothing happened. The builder managed to get a stay and I'm back to square one. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Rera is doing its job, but it's toothless without enforcement powers. Revenue officers don't act," he said. Govind Narayan, a 36-year-old resident of Jalahalli, booked a flat near Electronics City in 2018. Possession was initially promised by Aug 2022, later revised to March 2024. However, construction stopped in 2022 and hasn't resumed since. "Every time we contact the builder, we're told 'work will start tomorrow'. It's the same excuse every time. I've invested Rs 37 lakh — my entire savings — and have no home, no returns. The flat's market value is now more than Rs 80 lakh. Even after winning a Rera case and receiving a revenue recovery certificate, there's no enforcement," Narayan said. Businessman Sudhakar Lakshmanaraja said that despite a 2021 Rera order to recover Rs 46 lakh from a well-known builder, there has been zero progress. "I've approached everyone — the PMO, CM, housing department, human rights commission — but to no avail. Officers pass the buck. Meanwhile, these fraudulent builders are still operating. What message are we sending to honest citizens?" he asked. According to data from Rera, 796 enforcement orders have been issued since the Act came into effect. Homebuyers' associations estimate that while roughly 50% of these involve builder refunds, nearly 30% of those refunds are stuck because of non-compliance. Dhananjaya Padmanabhachar, convener of Karnataka Homebuyers Forum, said: "Rera needs its own revenue collection officer with powers to attach properties of defaulters. Paper orders without enforcement mean nothing to homebuyers." A senior Rera official admitted the authority's limitations: "We don't have the power to recover money. That lies with the govt. We can pass orders, but without execution powers, enforcement suffers."