Viral Glasgow food stall set to open exciting new restaurant

The team behind HO LEE FOOK, based on Mcfarlane Street across from the Barras, has announced they are 'expecting' a new project.
They'll be taking over the shop previously owned by brunch spot Scran at 239 London Road.
Ho Lee Fook means good, wealth, and luck in Cantonese and the stall's menu, with highlights including haggis infused spring rolls, has queus forming around the corner.
Now, they'll be opening up a restaurant in the space already loved by brunch munchers.
Announcing the news on social media, they said: "HOLEEFOOK!! Is EXPECTING!!!
INTRODUCING… FOOK MEI @fookmeiglasgow.
"(I clearly need introduced to an iron).
"Follow our journey turning the epic @scrangla into a Noodz or Sando Bar. TBC."
Fans flocked to their post to share their excitement, one said: "This is news I needed today, holy hell, I'll never be out of there."
Another gushed: "OMG! Congrats Lee and Johnny! Amazing news!"
A third added: "YES MATE!!! Absolutely buzzing at this news!! Here we gooo!!!"
While a few fans wanted to ensure their stall would remain open, they said, "YES!! Are you still going to have the shack?"
HO LEE FOOK opened in 2023 and is run by Johnny and Lee. They were born in Scotland to Hong Kong parents and grew up as "takeaway kids," helping out in their families' shops.
The Glasgow Times reported when the previous London Road shop owners, Scran, announced their 'exciting new plans'.
At the beginning of this month, we reported that Scran will close its restaurant on London Road on Sunday, June 15, while a new eatery called Scran and Roadie will open at 180 Saltmarket on Saturday, June 21.
Announcing the change on Instagram, owner Chris Mearns wrote: "It's almost time to pull the shutters down on our wee cafe for the final time.
"Our last day will be Sunday 15th so you've still got two weeks to get your London Road Scran in.
"It's bittersweet, we've had loads of fun and made so many friends here over the last two years, but it's time to get serious and take things to a whole new level."
HO LEE FOOK have created a new page for new venture FOOK MEI, and you can follow its progress here.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

9 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

'I was on ITV's 1% Club and was gobsmacked by what I saw behind the scenes'

ITV's quiz show, The 1% Club, which is hosted by Lee Mack, pits contestants against each other to try and win £100,000 by answering questions only 1% of the UK get right ITV's game show The 1% Club has become a huge success since it first hit our screens in 2022. Hosted by Not Going Out star, Lee Mack, the primetime programme features IQ-style questions based on logic and common sense, as opposed to general knowledge. A total of 100 contestants are slowly whittled down as they attempt to make it to the end and successfully answer a question in 30 seconds, that only 1% of the population can get right in a bid to bag £100,000. However, what viewers don't know about the show is that some of the scenes are actually fake - according to a former contestant, who has lifted the lid on the smash-hit series, which she filmed in October last year. Spilling the beans on the programme, Heidi Phillips, 49, said she bagged a place on the show after seeing an advert on Facebook and then having a mock 1%-style quiz on Zoom. ‌ ‌ Revealing what really goes on behind the scenes of the series, which is one of ITV's most popular offerings, she claimed some of the scenes were fake, revealing that Lee's jokes are not filmed at the same time as the contestants are answering the questions. Heidi explained, while talking to Fruity Slots: "While contestants are answering questions on the tablet, Lee usually takes the time to make a joke to the audience at home. But all his comical parts are filmed later. "When we're answering the question, he remains silent. Then he has to be filmed asking the question again and we have to pretend to put our answers in. That was a bit weird!" Heidi also said the contestants had to abide by a very strict rule on the show, which, if flouted would mean they would be forced to hand back any prize money - immediately. The contestant, who bowed out of the programme at the 35% question, said: "When we got put in our seats in the studio, they gave us the tablets and told us it was important to keep our eyes firmly locked on the screens and not look at each other. "There were actually invigilators who go back through the show episode to make sure every contestant plays the game fairly. ‌ "You could have won the cash prize but if they go back through filming and see you glanced over at another contestant's screen before answering, you'll forfeit the prize." Heidi added: "That's not happened yet - but it was a stern warning!" Despite the strict warning from producers, Heidi said host, Lee, is very charming and "naturally funny", sharing: "He's honestly really funny. Very naturally funny. He also has banter with the warm-up comedian and creates a nice atmosphere." ‌ She also said she'd jump at the chance to go back on the show again and praised the programme's staff for "going back over the funny anecdotes I'd shared with them and make sure I'd be happy to discuss it on the show if Lee (Mack) wanted to". Heidi, who also said contestants had to make sure they were dressed appropriately for the show, wearing "nothing low cut", added: "They seemed really concerned about our welfare and us being happy to share things on TV. They really took the time to check in with us." And her advice for anyone wanting to go on the show, who has made it to the audition round? "When they ask you how you'll spend the winnings, don't say something boring like paying off the mortgage. Give a really wild question," said Heidi, adding: "I made silly jokes that if I won the prize, I'd spend it on opening a trifle sandwich shop."

Scottish Sun

15 hours ago

• Scottish Sun

The 1% Club wipes out seven players instantly on easy 90% question – but would you have known the answer?

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A QUESTION on The 1% Club wiped out players from the get-go - despite being deemed as easy. The popular quiz show, fronted by Lee Mack, is known for leaving players with their minds boggling thanks to its tough questions as the game goes on. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 3 This question wiped out The 1% Club players straight away 3 Would you have been able to answer it? However for most of the 100 players, they manage to sail through the first few round which are deemed easy thanks to most of the general public being able to correctly answer them. But for one episode of the Saturday night quiz favourite, seven people fell at the very first hurdle. They all failed to correctly identify the answer to the opening 90% question - which was all about letters. Reading the question aloud, Lee said: "Which of the following words still makes a valid word if you change the first letter to the next letter in the alphabet?" Lee then told the players of the three choices they had to pick from, which were - Page, Rage and Wage. With 30 seconds on the clock, the 100 players did their best to attempt to answer the question. However, for seven of them, they could not get to the right answer. Lee then confirmed that the answer was in fact, Rage. By switching the 'R' to an 'S' - the following letter in the alphabet - players were left with the word, Sage. Page would have produced "oage", whilst Wage would have read "xage". The 1% Club wipes out 20 people on tricky numbers question One player who got it wrong admitted it was his "biggest fear" to go out on the 90% question. He told Lee that he panicked and failed to read the question properly before selecting the answer as "wage". Hardest Quiz Show Questions Would you know the answers to some of quizzing TV's hardest questions Who Wants To Be A Millionaire - Earlier this year, fans were left outraged after what they described as the "worst" question in the show's history. Host Jeremy Clarkson asked: 'From the 2000 awards ceremony onwards, the Best Actress Oscar has never been won by a woman whose surname begins with which one of these letters?' The multiple choice answers were between G, K, M and W. In the end, and with the £32,000 safe, player Glen had to make a guess and went for G. It turned out to be correct as Nicole Kidman, Frances McDormand and Kate Winslet are among the stars who have won the Best Actress gong since 2000. - Earlier this year, fans were left outraged after what they described as the "worst" question in the show's history. Host Jeremy Clarkson asked: 'From the 2000 awards ceremony onwards, the Best Actress Oscar has never been won by a woman whose surname begins with which one of these letters?' The multiple choice answers were between G, K, M and W. In the end, and with the £32,000 safe, player Glen had to make a guess and went for G. It turned out to be correct as Nicole Kidman, Frances McDormand and Kate Winslet are among the stars who have won the Best Actress gong since 2000. The 1% Club - Viewers of Lee Mack's popular ITV show were left dumbfounded by a question that also left the players perplexed. The query went as follows: "Edna's birthday is on the 6th of April and Jen's birthday falls on the 15th of October, therefore Amir's birthday must be the 'X' of January." It turns out the conundrum links the numbers with its position in the sentence, so 6th is the sixth word and 15th is the fifteenth word. Therefore, Amir's birthday is January 24th, corresponding to the 24th word in the sentence. - Viewers of Lee Mack's popular ITV show were left dumbfounded by a question that also left the players perplexed. The query went as follows: "Edna's birthday is on the 6th of April and Jen's birthday falls on the 15th of October, therefore Amir's birthday must be the 'X' of January." It turns out the conundrum links the numbers with its position in the sentence, so 6th is the sixth word and 15th is the fifteenth word. Therefore, Amir's birthday is January 24th, corresponding to the 24th word in the sentence. The Chase - The ITV daytime favourite left fans scratching their heads when it threw up one of the most bizarre questions to ever grace the programme. One of the questions asked the player: "Someone with a nightshade intolerance should avoid eating what?" The options were - sweetcorn, potatoes, carrots - with Steve selecting sweetcorn but the correct answer was potatoes.

Wales Online

2 days ago

• Wales Online

TV licence rules explained as changing watching habits could save £174

TV licence rules explained as changing watching habits could save £174 Some households may not even need a TV Licence, but avoiding it when you do need one could cost £1,000 Deciding what to watch could cost your £174 or more (Image: GETTY ) TV Licence regulations can be confusing, with some people potentially paying £174.50 unnecessarily, while others could be risking a £1,000 fine by unlawfully evading the fee. The need for a TV Licence largely hinges on the type of television you watch or record, and if you don't meet the criteria for a TV Licence, completing a straightforward form can keep the agency at bay. According to the TV Licensing authority, you'll need a TV licence if you watch any of the following: All live TV channels such as BBC, ITV and international channels Paid live TV services like Sky and Virgin Media Live streaming on services like Amazon Prime Video and Netflix BBC iPlayer This also encompasses watching, recording or downloading any of the above on any device. However, if you aren't watching any type of live TV or using BBC iPlayer, there's a chance that you might not require a TV licence. For instance, if you're solely watching DVDs, on-demand services like ITVX and All 4 or streaming sites like Netflix and Disney+, then according to the Daily Record, you won't need a licence. Article continues below Lee Stuart, a resident of Kirkby, falls into this category as he exclusively watches online streaming services. Initially, Lee had a TV licence registered at his home, but after ceasing to watch broadcast TV, he cancelled his licence. Months later, he subsequently received a Single Justice Procedure Notice in January alleging that he was watching live TV without a valid licence. When a case escalates to such an extent, people may face a penalty of up to £1,000 plus legal costs if they are brought to court. However, Lee, who represented himself in front of the judge, saw his case thrown out due to lack of proof. Following the judgement, a spokesperson from TV Licensing said: "This was reviewed by TV Licensing following the court hearing in April 2025 as is standard practice, and no failings were highlighted." Lee was under the impression his ordeal had ended, but he was promptly reminded by the agency about a potential need for a TV licence. Consequently, he lodged an official complaint and completed a 'No Licence Needed' (NLN) declaration. TV Licensing has acknowledged receipt of Mr Stuart's NLN form. Article continues below The online NLN declaration process involves outlining your viewing activities to establish whether you indeed require a licence. TV Licensing warns: "If you tell us you don't need a licence we may visit you to check. "If we then find that you have been watching, recording or streaming programmes illegally, you risk prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000 plus any legal costs and compensation you may be ordered to pay." TV Licensing's spokesperson further clarified that by declaring no need for a TV licence, one could halt the barrage of correspondence recommending and reminding the individual to procure a licence; this respite from letters will only persist for a year, after which they will recommence in case there has been a change in situation.