Elon Musk's X sues New York to block social media hate speech law
Elon Musk's X Corp sued New York on Tuesday, challenging the constitutionality of a state law requiring social media companies to disclose how they monitor hate speech, extremism, disinformation, harassment and foreign political interference.
X said the law known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act violated the First Amendment and state constitution by subjecting it to lawsuits and heavy fines unless it disclosed "highly sensitive and controversial speech" that New York may find objectionable.
Deciding what content is acceptable on social media platforms "engenders considerable debate among reasonable people about where to draw the correct proverbial line," X said. "This is not a role that the government may play."
The complaint filed in Manhattan federal court also quoted a letter from two legislators who sponsored the law, which said X and Musk in particular had a "disturbing record" on content moderation 'that threatens the foundations of our democracy.' New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat who enforces the state's laws, is the named defendant in X's lawsuit. Her office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Musk, the world's richest person and recently a close adviser to Republican President Donald Trump, has described himself as a free speech absolutist. He did away with the content moderation policy of Twitter, as X was previously known, after he bought the company for $44 billion in October 2022.
New York's law requires social media companies to disclose steps they take to eliminate hate on their platforms, and to report their progress. Civil fines could reach $15,000 per violation per day.
The law was written by state Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assemblymember Grace Lee, both Democrats, with help from the Anti-Defamation League. It was signed in December by Governor Kathy Hochul, also a Democrat. X said New York based its law on a nearly identical 2023 California law whose enforcement was partially blocked by a federal appeals court last September because of free speech concerns.
California agreed in a February settlement with X not to enforce the law's disclosure requirements. In a joint statement, Hoylman-Sigal and Lee said they were confident a judge would uphold New York's content moderation law.
"The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers" shows why the law is necessary, the legislators said. The case is X Corp v James, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 25-05068.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
US judge blocks Trump ban on foreign students at Harvard
A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students, delivering the Ivy League school another victory as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White order from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston preserves the ability of Harvard to host foreign students while the case is sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7,000 foreign students — about a quarter of its total enrolment — to transfer or risk being in the U.S. illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university called it illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies around campus protests, admissions, hiring and other issues. Burroughs temporarily halted the action hours after Harvard than two weeks later, in early June, Trump moved to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move and Burroughs temporarily blocked that effort as stops and starts of the legal battle have unsettled current students and left others around the world waiting to find out whether they will be able to attend America's oldest and wealthiest Trump administration's efforts to stop Harvard from enrolling international students have created an environment of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion,' the university said in a court filing. Countless international students have asked about transferring from the university, Harvard immigration services director Maureen Martin has been warring with Harvard for months after it rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt April, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and on May 22 revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the suit action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal Watch
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump distances himself from Tulsi Gabbard's Iran nuclear remarks: ‘She's wrong'
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was wrong in suggesting there is no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump's comments came as the president has said he would weigh involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks.(Bloomberg) Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not working on a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. "She's wrong," Trump said. Gabbard testified to Congress in March that the U.S. intelligence community continued to judge that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead. Trump's comments came as the president has said he would weigh involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Gabbard's office has previously pointed to quotes from the spy chief saying that she and Trump were "on the same page" regarding the status of Iran's nuclear program. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment program was only for peaceful purposes. A source with access to U.S. intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Gabbard had not changed. They said U.S. spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. Some experts, however, believe it could take Iran a much shorter time to build and deliver an untested crude nuclear device, although there would be no guarantee it would work. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of U.S. intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a "deep state" cabal of U.S. officials opposed to his presidency. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with U.S. spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favor and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials. Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Judge halts Trump bid to limit Harvard's foreign student intake; university scores key court win; legal proceedings continue
(Photo credit: AP) A federal judge in Boston on Friday temporarily halted the Trump administration's move to strip Harvard University of its ability to enrol international students, handing the Ivy League school a key win as it fights back against a series of federal sanctions and tensions with the White House. Judge Allison Burroughs' decision ensures Harvard can continue hosting international students whilst the legal proceedings continue. In May, Harvard initiated legal action against the Department of Homeland Security following the agency's decision to revoke the university's authorisation to host foreign students and issue visa documentation. This decision would have affected approximately 7,000 international students, representing 25% of Harvard's student population, forcing them to transfer or face illegal status in the US. Additionally, new overseas students would have been prevented from attending Harvard. The university contended that this was unlawful retaliation for refusing White House demands regarding changes to campus protest policies, admissions procedures, recruitment practices and other matters. Burroughs promptly suspended the action following Harvard's lawsuit. In early June, Trump attempted another restriction on foreign students entering the US to study at Harvard, citing different legal grounds. Harvard contested this decision, and Burroughs again temporarily blocked the implementation. The ongoing legal proceedings have created uncertainty among current students, whilst prospective international students worldwide remain uncertain about their ability to attend America's most established and financially robust university. According to Harvard's court documentation, the Trump administration's attempts to prevent international student enrolment have generated "profound fear, concern, and confusion". Harvard's immigration services director, Maureen Martin, reported numerous international students enquiring about transfer options. The relationship between Trump and Harvard has been strained for months following the university's rejection of government demands aimed at addressing conservative criticisms about the institution's perceived liberal stance and alleged tolerance of anti-Jewish harassment. The administration has reduced research funding by over $2.6 billion, terminated federal contracts and threatened the university's tax-exempt status. Earlier in April, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem ordered Harvard University to hand over extensive records on any potentially illegal or dangerous activity by foreign students. Although Harvard said it complied, Noem claimed the response was inadequate and, on May 22, revoked the university's certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Harvard filed a lawsuit in response, arguing that the decision severely harmed its global standing and ability to attract top international talent. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the lawsuit stated, warning that the sanction would particularly disrupt graduate programs that rely heavily on foreign enrollment.
