Holidaymakers told to beware buying Avios points on Facebook after scams

Holidaymakers hoping to use frequent flyer points to reduce the cost of their holiday have been warned to beware of fraudsters claiming to sell them on third-party websites.
In a case that highlights the dangers of buying points through unofficial channels, a young couple were left hundreds of pounds out of pocket after they were defrauded by a scammer who claimed to be selling them British Airways loyalty points.
Nigel Turner*, a small business owner, believed he was buying Avios points from someone on a Facebook group when he was planning a trip to Corfu for the end of this month.
Turner paid £200 for 60,000 Avios points that he thought would contribute towards two business class flights for the 10-day break. Without the points, the flights cost £1,300.
But after the points had been transferred and he booked the tickets, it emerged that they did not belong to the seller. Turner was told by BA that the points had been 'fraudulently obtained'.
He was left with a non-refundable hotel booking and airport transfers worth £700.
'Both of us are self-employed so this has hit us hard, financially and emotionally,' he said. 'It's heartbreaking to tell someone you love that the holiday you both looked forward to for months is gone.'
He added: 'We would have never flown business class, to be honest, without seeing this. It was just a cool thing which we thought we could do and it would cost the same amount as a normal flight.'
Turner paid of the points using a bank transfer, and they were transferred to his Avios account.
But then BA contacted him and said the points had been fraudulently obtained and removed them from him. The airline said it knew Turner had nothing to do with the fraud, and refunded the additional legitimate Avios he used towards the flight.
'Scams like this can still happen even when you think you've protected yourself. I had the points in my account before paying – and I still got scammed,' he said. 'If it's happening in one Facebook group with 75,000 members, you can bet it's happening in others too.'
Up to 60,000 Avios points can be transferred legitimately between people on the airline's website for an admin fee of £50.
BA said in a statement that the sale of the points had violated its terms and conditions as selling or buying 'via outside sources' was forbidden.
It added that the stolen Avios points had been restored to the person who they belonged to. Turner said the person who sold him the fraudulent points had deleted his Facebook account.
New rules requiring banks and other payment companies to reimburse fraud victims who have been tricked into sending money to scammers took effect last October. Turner has now been refunded the £200 he paid.
* Names have been changed

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

41 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Marriage Diaries: Should I get a prenup for my second wedding or trust my husband-to-be?

Should you be planning the end of your marriage before you've even tied the knot? This is the question that's been plaguing me for the past few weeks. I'm 58 years old, and next March will be marrying Steve, 60. It will be a second wedding for both of us: I have three young adult daughters and he has a son. Steve and I are taking great pleasure in planning the next stage of our lives together. But – in between conversations about which location would suit our intimate ceremony, and what dress I should wear as a 50-something bride – I can't help but wonder whether we should get a prenuptial agreement. I'm so preoccupied about this decision that it's been keeping me awake at night. I've been fully open with Steve about my dilemma. He's quite relaxed about the subject, and isn't offended (at least, that's what he tells me) but doesn't think a prenup is necessary. I think this comes down to how we both experienced the end of our last marriages. My divorce from my ex-husband came through six years ago. It was nasty and protracted and expensive, mostly because my ex tried to hide money abroad and attempted to bully me into submission when I was hoping to appeal to his – ultimately absent – better nature. In the end, I had to hire a top family law firm. After a draining process – which ended up in court with a finance dispute resolution – I received a fair settlement. But it cost me the best part of £50,000 and a whole lot of tears. On the other hand, Steve's experience of divorce was far more pleasant. He and his wife had an amicable 'no fault' settlement, which barely involved lawyers. His son was also grown up, so it was less traumatic for everyone. After the sale of the London marital home, my children and I moved into a small cottage in West Sussex which I decorated with great care: I feel happy and settled here. I love my current home so much that Steve has agreed to move in with me while he rents out his Yorkshire house. When it comes to our respective finances, Steve and I are comfortable, but neither of us are rich: I'd say that financially, we are in a similar situation. We are both self-employed in the arts world and our properties are worth about the same. Prenuptial agreements didn't used to be binding in the UK, but I've consulted a lawyer who has told me that – done the right way – they can be. The problem is, setting up a legally watertight agreement could cost up to £4,000. My best friend is telling me that I'm being cynical and defeatist. Having known me for most of my life, she agrees that Steve is a far nicer man than my ex. I should embrace this happy new path with joy, she says, and not throw shade on the occasion by being negative. But she hasn't been through the pain of divorce: she hasn't seen how a white-wedding day can turn into a miasma of bitterness and hatred. I'm just not sure I could go through all that again. All I really care about is keeping this well-loved roof over my head, should we separate – this basic security is everything to me. 'We're both nice people,' says Steve. 'In the worst-case scenario we would sort it out, and I would never take your home from you.' But is it naive to believe this statement, uttered when things are at their rosiest? Surely one of the gifts of reaching midlife is learning from experience, and not making the same mistakes again. Should I listen to my gut and instruct a lawyer? Or am I being negative and doomy – and would my time (and money) be better spent on booking a super-luxurious honeymoon?

Times

44 minutes ago

• Times

Inside Mary Lou McDonald's plan to shake up Sinn Fein

Without a doubt, last year was something of an annus horribilis for Mary Lou McDonald, the Sinn Fein leader. The early omens were not good: February polling showed a surprising six-point drop in support as her party came under pressure over its stance on immigration. In the summer, McDonald's strategy to field a record 335 candidates in the local elections fell apart spectacularly. It was a disastrous day out, given that Sinn Fein took under 12 per cent of the national vote and more than 230 unsuccessful candidates were left picking up the pieces. For the first time, grassroots members of Sinn Fein began muttering about McDonald's future in charge of the party. With five months until a general election, the pressure on the leader was intense. At the same time, she was dealing with huge personal upheaval. Having recovered from a hysterectomy, McDonald and her family took a trip to Biarritz. In the airport in France, her husband, Martin Lanigan, became seriously ill. He later underwent surgery and was diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Then her father, Patrick, with whom she had a complicated relationship, died last summer. In October, a series of scandals rocked Sinn Fein, right as the country was on the precipice of a general election. A 'complete overhaul' of the party's governance structure was ordered by McDonald, and The Sunday Times can now reveal the outcome of those reviews and the new rules which TDs, senators and staff members will have to follow. The first big controversy last October came when it emerged that two press officers had given job references for a former colleague under investigation for child sex offences, for which he was later jailed. Seán Mag Uidhir, a well-known Sinn Fein figure who headed the party's media operation in the north, and his colleague Caolán McGinley left Sinn Fein when it emerged that they provided references for Michael McMonagle. McDonald said that McMonagle was immediately suspended when he was questioned by the PSNI about the allegations in 2021, and yet the following year, his two co-workers provided the references. As part of the 'complete overhaul' of governance, a review of human resources practices took place. An internal memo has been given to party members which lays out new rules. From now on, all requests for job references for staff who work or once worked for Sinn Fein need to be referred to the party's HR manager. Members and staff have been told they shouldn't give any references at all. If clearance is given by HR for former and current employees, only brief factual references should be provided, confirming only the person's start and finish date and their job title. References should not mention the person's character or ability, and line managers are now the only people authorised to provide these references. Furthermore, references should also not be given for elected representatives or activists, except in exceptional circumstances that must be approved by Sam Baker, the party's general secretary. Not everyone in the party is a fan of the rules, which are laid out in a private memo, but the new diktat will remain in place. Another huge issue that arose last October came with the shock resignation of the Laois TD Brian Stanley. After he left, he described an inquiry into a complaint made against him as 'seriously flawed'. A Sinn Fein draft report into a complaint made against Stanley came to the opinion that his conduct in an incident constituted 'sexual harassment', something he strongly denied. The internal inquiry into the complaint dragged on from late July of last year until early October, with claims and counter-claims being made. The second big piece of work as part of the overhaul was to look at how Sinn Fein disciplines its members. Barry Mulqueen, a Belfast barrister, undertook an in-depth review, looking at how the disciplinary committee had handled complaints to date. He was due to supply a report to Sinn Fein at the end of May. Sources say that what has emerged is that the party's disciplinary processes are not fit for purpose. Issues that are likely to be addressed will be the structure of internal inquiries, who carries them out and, crucially, the amount of time an inquiry takes. There is a view that complaints drag on for far too long, and that a structure needs to be put around the 'back and forth' nature of serious complaints. The third serious blow for Sinn Fein last year was the controversy over a former senator who was secretly suspended and later resigned from the party over inappropriate messages sent to a teenager. Niall Ó Donnghaile, a former Belfast lord mayor, was suspended by Sinn Fein over the issue but the party let him resign on health grounds without revealing the complaint against him. The teenager in question then said McDonald's tribute to Ó Donnghaile was 'like a mental stab'. At the time, she issued a statement thanking him for his service to the party, something she later apologised for. On foot of all of this, Gareth McGibbon, a registered social worker, has completed a new draft of the party's child protection policy. A source said that a part of this work involved making sure that everyone in Sinn Fein knew exactly what steps to take, and how to conduct themselves, if a matter of concern involving a minor arose. There has also been work done to make sure the policies are aligned north and south. All of these revelations, and the resulting follow-up questions, emerged for Sinn Fein in a drip-feed manner that created a huge sense of dread, especially as the country was on the verge of a general election. One party member described the period as the party being 'in a death spiral'. Although Sinn Fein painted the results of the election as a triumph, it failed to replicate its quota-smashing performance of 2020, and ultimately failed to cross the threshold into Government Buildings. Since then, the results of the election have been studied carefully by strategists. Sinn Fein is ultra-secretive by nature and prefers to keep a tight lid on what is happening behind the scenes. However, The Sunday Times spoke to sources at all levels of the party to get a detailed insight into the mood within the camp. Sinn Fein's decision to present a united front with the rest of the 'combined opposition' of Labour, the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and others has gone down well with supporters, who feel voters might, in future, buy into the idea of a government made up of a left-wing bloc. 'Grassroots members are happy with this strategy, and with Mary Lou being front and centre of that. It was good red meat,' a local party member said. Close observers of Sinn Fein's daily attacks during leaders' questions may also have noticed a subtle shift. While TDs spent the five years leading up to last November's general election presenting the public with credible alternative policies, this time the plan of action is attack, attack, attack. There was, a source said, 'a certain amount of preparing for government that went on in recent years but now we are sticking to the principles of equality for the working class. It is going back to our roots on issues like neutrality, housing and health and disability services.' Away from the Dail chamber, the party is refocusing itself on its bread-and-butter issues. 'We are in a period of regrowth,' the insider said. 'Our focus from an activism and membership point of view is unity and the unity message. There is a big, big push now to focus on unity in messaging, for discussion and in terms of organising events. Party members have been asked to coalesce around this again.' Another criticism of Sinn Fein made after last year's elections came from John Hearne, the respected Waterford councillor. He said the party was being run by 'armchair generals'. Sinn Fein is actively trying to re-engage its membership base, and the decision-making process around the presidential campaign has been a case in point. 'There has been an interesting shift in attitude from the hierarchy,' a party source said. 'Every member was asked to consider making a submission to the party or through the structures to give their thoughts based on four scenarios.' The first option was Sinn Fein running its own candidate; the second was Sinn Fein promoting and backing a candidate with the united left; the third was giving tacit support to that candidate on the left; the fourth involved the party sitting it out on the sidelines. Some of the feedback so far has indicated strong support for option two: fully backing a candidate of the left. One decision from the top that has not gone down quite so well is the decision to cancel the ard fheis this year, and hold an annual conference in April 2026, which will happen in Belfast. The party cited 'logistical and strategic challenges' and said it was 'increasingly difficult' to find a suitable venue for the autumn and 'particularly one large enough to accommodate our growing attendance'. Party members who spoke to The Sunday Times said they were not consulted about this decision and they also said they had doubts about the reasons given for putting it off. A source with knowledge of the decision said it was taken because the party simply would not get enough media attention for an ard fheis when a presidential election is happening and a budget was being announced, particularly on TV shows. There are other pressing decisions to be made, however — decisions which may yet divide the party. On Saturday, July 5, in Dublin, selected party members will gather for a special conference on gender policy. It comes after Sinn Fein was banned from taking part in a trans Pride march in Dublin next month over its stance on rights for transgender people, despite meetings with LGBT+ groups. These groups want Sinn Fein to clarify its stance on puberty blockers in Northern Ireland, but also on the UK Supreme Court ruling on sex, gender and equality. David Cullinane, the Sinn Fein health spokesman, was 'rapped on the knuckles' by the party leadership after he posted on X that a Supreme Court ruling defining women by their biological sex was a 'common sense judgment'. He later deleted the message and apologised. The issue is particularly sensitive for McDonald given that she has a trans woman for a sibling. More liberal members within Sinn Fein are pushing for clear change and more conservative members are urging the party 'not to get involved', as one person put it, adding: 'It is not coming up on the ground.' Beyond this, members around the country are reporting that Sinn Fein remains under serious local pressure on immigration. 'We are still bruised from last year. Misinformation continues to fly across social media,' one said. There is a push among the membership for Sinn Fein to formulate a very clear and accessible immigration policy, but the sense is that, like many of the party's big plans, this is some way off in the future.

Times

an hour ago

• Times

My week at the Channel smuggler trial that exposed their tactics

A few weeks after a dinghy overfilled with migrants sank in the English Channel, with the loss of up to eight lives, one of those accused of sending them to their deaths was bemoaning his own fate to his cousin. 'I was owed €1,200 in this case, but I only received €150,' Khaled Maiwand complained, as they chatted on the phone. 'It made me sad when I took the money, but it wasn't my fault. 'I wasn't guilty. I just went with them and helped them. It was the people at the head of the network who I work with that did everything.' The exchange was one of several that were read back by the judge to Maiwand, a 25-year-old Afghan with a mop of curly hair and bushy beard, as he stood sheepishly in a basement courtroom last week alongside eight other alleged people-smugglers. They face multiple charges, including manslaughter, for which the prosecutor has demanded sentences of six to eight years. The trial in the northern French city of Lille centres on the early hours of December 14, 2022, when the flimsy dinghy thought to be carrying 47 people — more than three times the number it was built to take — sank in freezing water. Four people, not all of whom have been identified, died. Another four were never found. Survivors reported that one of the boat's air chambers had already burst before they set off. The proceedings have provided a fascinating insight into the working of groups, mainly made up of Afghans and others from the Middle East, responsible for smuggling as many as 16,000 people across the Channel so far this year, and presenting yet another small boats headache for the British government. The size and complexity of the investigation has also shown the time and resources needed to 'smash' the gangs, long Sir Keir Starmer's preferred method of dealing with one of the most intractable problems the government faces. • Starmer urged to consider one-in, one-out migrant exchange scheme It came as French authorities — under pressure from Britain to stem the flow of refugees — revealed that they plan to change the rules finally to allow their forces to stop migrants at sea, up to 300 metres from the coast. The judge and her two colleagues will announce their verdict on June 30. The police operation began with the smugglers' phones and geo-locations that 'showed the position of the people using them', said Dorothée Assaga, the lawyer for Shoaib Shinwari, a fellow Afghan also among the accused. The alleged smugglers used their phones constantly to speak to and message each other, and also to liaise with migrants, known in their slang as 'chickens' and to arrange their 'games' (trips across the Channel), in return for payments, dubbed 'okays', which in this case ranged from €1,500 to €4,000. The accused, all Afghan and Kurdish men aged 21 to 40, also often recorded their exploits in photographs and videos shared on social media. They did not realise they were creating a trove of material that could eventually be used as a basis for tracking them down and building a case against them. 'For example, they thought that when they deleted a picture, it would disappear,' said Assaga. 'They didn't understand it would continue to exist somewhere.' Working in conjunction with their British counterparts, French investigators quickly realised the key to finding the perpetrators lay in their phone records. Their goal was to find numbers that had been used both on the afternoon of December 13 at Loon-Plage, seven miles west of Dunkirk, where the migrants were camped out, and then again between 10pm and 2am, another 35 miles or so further west in Ambleteuse and Wimereux, where they had gathered in the woods before setting off on their ill-fated voyage. Initial results produced three phones, one of which belonged to Maiwand, who was arrested in March 2023 at the hostel in Cherbourg where he lived. By tracing the numbers that he and the other two dialled, the investigators managed over the course of several months to round up the remaining accused, several of whom were by then far from the northern French coast. One, Toryali Walizai, the alleged ringleader, is still at large, and believed to be in Serbia. Another Afghan, thought to have been his deputy, is to go on trial separately in Belgium. Those in court in Lille were merely the 'petites mains' — 'the little hands' — according to Assaga. Shinwari, 21, her client, who is also accused of manslaughter, refused to accept he was responsible for the deaths, given that he had driven the migrants only as far as the woods where they initially hid, rather than on to the beach itself, she said. Prosecutors have nevertheless demanded one of the tougher sentences — seven years — because he is accused of taking part in further smuggling operations the following autumn. Yet their carefully delineated roles — whether, like Shinwari as drivers, or as logisticians or as a saraf, the one who collects and launders the money paid by migrants — were crucial to a massive illegal enterprise stretching from the Channel to the Middle East and beyond. One such saraf among the accused is alleged to have handled payments of more than €800,000 (£690,000) in just over a year. Maiwand appears typical of many young men who begin their long journeys to Britain and other European countries as migrants — whether escaping persecution or simply searching for a better life — but then end up as members of the gangs that transport their compatriots. After leaving Afghanistan when he was still underage, Maiwand headed for Germany, where his request for asylum was denied. He then moved to France, where he spent at least two years sleeping rough, and attempted to take a small boat across the Channel at least twice. By the time of the disaster, he had somehow obtained a French residence permit. Paid €700 each month in social security, he is not thought to have done any legitimate work. In an impassioned final statement to the court, he denied having received any money from smuggling, insisting that he wanted only to help people. 'I am really upset by what happened,' he said. 'I have no responsibility for it.' But his — and the others' — varying degrees of contrition appeared at odds with the matter-of-fact way in which they discussed the disaster in telephone conversations and messages played to the court. 'Like the others, he does not consider himself as a trafficker, but instead as someone who helps the traffickers. It is a big psychological difference for them,' Maiwand's lawyer, Kamel Abbas, told me earlier during a pause in proceedings. 'They think that if you are a smuggler, then you are a gangster, you take advantage of death, you make a living with it, you get rich with it,' he added. 'They admit that they cook, carry the cans of petrol, show the migrants the way and drive the vehicles, but that's all, and it's only so they can get to England.' • How small boats crisis is linked to rise in rough sleeping The charges — which also include membership of an organised band — are not the only crimes of which the men are accused. Shinwari, for example, faces another trial over his alleged participation in the gang rape of an underage male migrant. A photograph of him, taken from social media, apparently showing him committing the crime, was flashed up briefly on a screen. Asked by the judge, Marie Compère, to talk about his life, Shinwari described himself as a loving husband and father of three. This did not prevent him from also being a rapist, Compère told him. In France, she added, with the air of a teacher giving a civics lesson, you can 'love whom you like' — man or woman — but when you assault or rape them, you 'transform them into an object'. In the more than two and a half years since the disaster, close to 90,000 migrants are thought to have successfully crossed the Channel — while growing numbers lost their lives during the attempt: a record 73 migrants are confirmed to have died last year, five times more than in 2023, according to Oxford University's Migration Observatory. In the meantime, the methods of Channel crossing have changed. Under the current French rules, police and gendarmes are unable to intervene once the migrants are in the water — leading to a number of recent embarrassing incidents in which officers have been filmed watching as boats overladen with migrantsput to sea in front of them. Under the planned new '300-metre' rule, confirmed by the interior ministry and expected to be announced at Starmer's summit next month with President Macron, this would change. Yet French officers who will have to implement the new rules appear sceptical that the change will provide the instant solution the two leaders are hoping for. 'Who is going to intervene? We are talking about 200km of coast here,' said Marc Musiol, a representative for the Unité police union for the coastal area including Calais and Dunkirk, who told me he and his colleagues had only learnt of the plan from the media. Police and other law enforcement agencies have few suitable boats, and will have to be given both proper training and new operating procedures, he said. And even then, intervening once a boat is at sea could end in disaster. 'The migrants panic so much at the sight of police, that even just five metres from the beach someone could drown or a baby could be crushed underfoot on the boat.'