HC flags rise in deaths on Mumbai local, calls for preventive measures

The Bombay High Court on Friday expressed concern over deaths of commuters on Mumbai local trains, describing the situation as "alarming," an observation coming days after five people lost their lives post-falling off a packed suburban service.
The court suggested installing automatic door-closing mechanisms in Mumbai local trains to prevent commuters from falling off, but insisted this was an advice purely from a "layman" perspective and Railway expert views were needed on the issue. A division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne urged authorities to take measures to ensure tragic incidents don't occur on the Mumbai suburban network in the future. Citing an affidavit filed by the Railways, the court noted that in 2024 alone over 3,588 fatalities happened on local trains (due to various accidents on the suburban network), which means on an average ten Mumbaikars die everyday.
"This is an alarming situation. Though you have projected that there was a reduction (in casualties) of 49 per cent (compared to previous years)," the court added. The division bench made the observations while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) related to deaths of commuters in accidents on Mumbai's suburban network, considered the city's lifeline. Taking note of the June 9 incident where five passengers died and eight others sustained injuries after falling off a crowded local train near Mumbra station in adjoining Thane district, the court observed measures taken by authorities to stop such untoward incidents were not sufficient. The court suggested they (trains) should be equipped with automatic doors (currently they have open doors).
The bench, however, was quick to add that it was a "layman" suggestion and they were not an expert on Railway safety. The Railways informed the bench that they have set up a multi-disciplinary committee to examine the cause of the Mumbra incident and waiting for its report. The panel will give recommendations and suggestions for avoiding such untoward incidents in the future. The court directed the Railways to place on record suggestions made by the committee, along with timeline for their implementation. The committee should be open to including the suggestions made by the petitioner (a commuter) for avoiding reoccurrence of such incidents. Besides the disciplinary panel, a high-level monitoring committee has been set up separately and it is working towards a "zero death mission". Based on its suggestions, a number of steps has already been taken, the Railways told the court. One of the steps included building walls and fences between Rail tracks to stop commuters from crossing over. Also, stalls have been shifted from some platforms on suburban stations to avoid overcrowding, it said. The matter will be next heard on July 14.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

an hour ago

• Indian Express

Lilavati Trust files Rs 1,000-crore defamation suit against HDFC Bank, its CEO

The Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust (LKMM Trust), which oversees the Lilavati Hospital in Bandra (West), has filed a defamation suit against the HDFC Bank and its Managing Director and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan, seeking Rs 1,000 crore in damages. The Trust along with its authorised representative and trustee Prashant Mehta filed the suit in the Bombay High Court against Jagdishan, HDFC Bank and others. The Trust filed the suit last week, claiming the bank was running a 'deliberate and sustained smear campaign' against it. The Trust has also filed a criminal defamation complaint before the magistrate court in Girgaon under sections 356 (1) (defamation), 357 (breach of contract), among others, of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). As per case records, the magistrate court on June 16 issued notice to the bank, Jagdishan and others, and posted further hearing to July 18. The criminal complaint against Jagdishan alleges that he made malicious and derogatory statements against the Trust and its permanent trustee. 'The legal action aims to counter what the Trust views as a coordinated campaign to malign its reputation and obstruct its operations as a public charitable institution,' a statement by the Trust stated. Earlier this week, Jagdishan approached the Bombay High Court, challenging the FIR filed against him on a complaint filed by the Trust, which has accused him of accepting a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore to help a group consisting of one Chetan Mehta and other erstwhile trustees to retain illegal control over the Trust. On May 29, the magistrate court had ordered the Bandra police to register offences punishable under sections 406, 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and had directed the police to probe the matter as per section 175 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The Bandra police registered the FIR on May 31.

India Today

2 hours ago

• India Today

Court clears NCP leader's chartered accountant in graft case due to lack of proof

The Bombay High Court on Friday acquitted a 62-year-old chartered accountant, Shyam Malpani, of the money laundering case linked to Maharashtra minister Chhagan Bhujbal and his family. The court ruled that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had no substantial evidence to prove Malpani's involvement in the case.A bench of Justice RN Laddha said, 'The (ED's) complaint lacks material to establish a nexus between the applicant and the alleged criminal conspiracy or money laundering activities.' The court noted that the ED's claims were based on 'bare assertions' and lacked proof that Malpani knew about or was negligent regarding the alleged sham served as a statutory auditor for some companies in the Bhujbal Group. The ED had alleged that he played a role in laundering money by failing to report suspicious transactions and arrangements. They claimed his inaction helped the Bhujbals hide and move illicit funds. However, Malpani's lawyers—Senior Counsel Pranav Badheka and advocate Prashant Pawar—argued that Chhagan Bhujbal and his family had already been discharged in related cases by the Special Court in also said Malpani was neither named as an accused nor was he named in any FIRs filed by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) or Taloja Police, which were the basis of the ED's Enforcement Case Information Reports (ECIRs) registered in June advocates Hiten Venegaonkar and Ayush Kedia, representing the ED, claimed Malpani knowingly hid the flow of illicit money. They argued that he was aware of the sham deals and failed to perform his professional duties, thereby assisting in the laundering court reviewed all arguments and concluded that Malpani was not involved in the placement, layering, or integration of the alleged proceeds of crimeMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Nationalist Congress Party

India Today

6 hours ago

• India Today

Local train death cases alarming: High Court seeks report from Railway committees

The Bombay High Court on Friday termed the situation 'alarming' after taking note of the June 9 incident in which eight passengers fell from two local trains passing each other, resulting in five division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne, while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by daily commuter Yatin Jadhav, directed the Railways to provide detailed information on two expert committees — one specifically investigating the June 9 incident between Mumbra and Kalwa stations, and another high-level panel focused on the broader issue of commuter court asked the railway authorities to submit the committees' recommendations along with implementation timelines. 'You have to take action to ensure that this should not happen in the future. This should not happen,' said Chief Justice Aradhe during the hearing. Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Anil Singh, representing the Railways, informed the court that a multidisciplinary committee headed by a senior divisional safety officer has been constituted to investigate the incident. The report from this committee is awaited."Apart from this, looking into the concerns about the safety of daily commuters, the railway has set up a high level committee, which is a separate committee from the Mumbra incident, and the entire object of the committee is 'zero death mission'. This is on the entire Central and Western Railway. That committee is already working and a number of steps have already been taken,' Singh told the the bench expressed grave concern over the continuing accidents. 'No, but obviously, these steps taken by you are clearly not sufficient. What should be done?' the Chief Justice Marne cited railway data from 2024, which recorded 3,580 deaths — an average of 10 fatalities per day. 'This is an alarming situation. Ten deaths every day! This is your own data,' he said. He acknowledged a 46 per cent reduction compared to 2009 but emphasised that the numbers remain Justice Aradhe underlined the need for immediate and effective action. 'What is required to be done, do it. This can't be accepted. The doors should not be open and you should ensure that there is no scope for falling,' he Singh then told the court that the railways are working towards that and have already undertaken work like fencing of railway tracks so that trespassing can be curtailed. 'Construction of fencing between two railway tracks is also being looked into. We have shifted stalls from stations to prevent overcrowding and we have increased the number of coaches.'The bench has scheduled the next hearing of the PIL for July Watch