Iconic sports car brand reveals its very first SUV with focus on ‘light handling' and ‘daily usability'
It's set to rival the Porsche Macan and Cupra Tavascan
FRENCH CONNECTION Iconic sports car brand reveals its very first SUV with focus on 'light handling' and 'daily usability'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
ICONIC sports car brand Alpine is set to rival the Porsche Macan with its very first performance SUV - called the A390.
The French marque - part of the Renault Group - already has two cars in its line-up, the highly-acclaimed A110 sports car and the stunning A290 hot hatchback that's modelled on the new Renault 5.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
Alpine reveals the aggressive-looking, all-electric A390 SUV, set to rival the Porsche Macan
Credit: Renault
3
A driver-focused cabin features a portrait-oriented touchscreen, physical controls, and race-inspired adjustment dials - including a red overtake lever
Credit: Renault
3
The A390 boasts a tri-motor powertrain delivering up to 464bhp - while boasting surprising agility and performance
Credit: Renault
Now, they're adding a third; an aggressive-looking, all-electric SUV to pit them against the electric Macan Electric and the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N.
Described as a crossover-coupe, the A390 will start at around £60,000 - with UK orders to open in November.
Much like the A290, Alpine is seemingly attempting to further broaden its product range with the A390, as SUVs continue to be Europe's most popular type of car.
Essentially giving the people what they want - a luxury SUV that combines class, power and everyday usability.
Size-wise, the A390 matches the Tesla Model Y and Cupra Tavascan - with dimensions of 4.6m long by 1.5m tall - but boasts a corking 464bhp, making it more geared towards the performance SUV range.
What's more, using a bespoke tri-motor powertrain, with two at the rear and one at the front, it will feature rear-biased all-wheel drive and torque vectoring to help with agility and responsiveness.
Indeed, the tri-motor powertrain is capable of overspeeding the outside wheels in a bend, rather than simply braking the inside wheels, which Alpine says gives a 'much smoother, delicate feeling of control.'
Krief told Autocar: 'You can generate a quite immediate response time. It's like the behaviour of a light car.'
Inside, it comes with a portrait-oriented touchscreen angled towards the driver, as well as physical controls on the steering wheel and centre console.
Like the A290, it has a race-inspired adjustment dial on the steering wheel for the brake regen and the so-called overtake lever that gives the car full-power for short periods - somewhat giving drivers the gimmick of F1's DRS-tech.
Alpine A290 GTS delivers a hot hatch EV that comes with F1-style 'overtake button'
And for those not keen on the silence of an electric motor, it comes with the option of a synthetic 'Alpine drive sound' inspired by the A110's four-cylinder petrol engine.
The standard GT model produces 395bhp, with the 464bhp coming from the top-of-the-range GTS - which hits 0-62mph in 3.9 seconds.
For some context, that matches the ultra-light, stripped-out A110 R.
The A390 is the second of seven electric cars that Alpine plans to launch, with an electric successor to the A110 next in the pipeline.
Then, there's the A310 coming after, said to be a four-door fastback to rival the Polestar 4.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
20 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Conwy's soaring parking fees leaves Great Orme site swamped and forced to act
Soaring fees at Conwy's public car parks are 'displacing" demand to other facilities in the county, it's been claimed. Parking charges were this introduced this month at a popular spot on Llandudno's Great Orme that's long been free to use. Llandudno Snowsports Centre (LSC) said it had little option but to start charging because it was being swamped by visitors deterred by rising fees at the council's summit car park. Manager Nigel Treacy said others were gravitating to the site from town centre car parks. 'Some people were being sent here by local hotels,' he said. 'They recommended us because the parking was free. We know this because we heard it from hotel guests." From the start of June, a parking charge of £2 for up to six hours was introduced, overseen by Parking Eye. Some regulars have already been caught out by the switch: this week a dad watching his son on the ski slope complained of receiving a £100 fine – reduced to £60 if paid within 28 days. 'I always thought it was free as have never paid before,' he grumbled online. In recent years Conwy Council has steadily upped parking charges to off-set dwindling income from the Welsh Government. Prices vary by location but fees typically start at £1.50 for one hour, up to £7.50 for four hours. Some promenade parking now starts at £5.50. Previously free car parks have also been targeted, with pay-and-display recently introduced at facilities in Llanrwst and Llanfairfechan following planned upgrades. Council Council said its budgets are stretched and it's doing everything it can to protect vital services in the county. This includes boosting revenue as well as cutting back on non-essential services. Increasing parking fees are among the "difficult choices" it's having to make, said the local authority. In Llandudno, peak season demand for parking is so high that the local authority is currently consulting on a new 'summer' car park. Prices will start at £2.30 for one hour. It is against this background that Mr Treacy felt compelled to start charging at LSC, to safeguard spaces for customers. 'People tell us we're still too cheap!' he said. '£2 for up to six hours equates to 33p per hour. In contrast, the (Great Orme) summit car park is £5.50 for up to four hours, equivalent to £1.37 per hour – more than four times as much.' Five years ago the centre's 200-metre dry ski slope – the longest in Wales – underwent a £300,000 upgrade – to create a bouncier surface lubricated by a 300-head sprinkler system. LSC also offers a Cresta Toboggan run which, at 575 metres, is also the longest in Wales, as well as Sno-tubing and 'Alpine' crazy golf. Publicity for the new parking charges began a month before they were introduced. It's left Mr Treacy slightly mystified as to how any customers would be unaware of them. 'We sat down with the operator and looked at the factors people were most concerned about with parking,' he said. 'Signage is a big issue – drivers often complain they're not aware of charging. "So we've covered the site in parking signs. They are four provided signs at the entrances, and 13 in the car parks and around the building. We've also paid for an extra 24 signs around the site. 'Staff have been asked to remind customers when they come in – the last thing we want is to see people being fined. 'We also have multiple ways of paying – coins, contactless and online – and we have a 35-minute grace period without the need to pay: the industry standard is 10 minutes. This is for people who need to make quick bookings or for motorists who accidentally drive up here.' The main car park, and smaller one, a little downhill, now have pay-and-display machines. They're acessed via a single-lane road up through Happy Valley gardens. Both facilities have been described as 'basic', being gravelled surfaces first laid in 1986 and now suffering from erosion. LSC has long aimed to upgrade them. 'Eight years ago we looked at surfacing them with Tarmac but it was felt they would deteriorate too quickly without expensive new drainage,' said Mr Treacy. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Preliminary designs have now been drawn up for new parking facilities costing around £250,000. However it's hard to justify the outlay when the economic climate is chilly, especially in the lesiure and tourism sectors. It's hoped to new parking charges will help offset the risk. 'We going to need a lot of cars paying £2 a time to get near the target,' added Mr Treacy.
Reuters
3 days ago
- Reuters
Geely to hold 26.4% stake in Brazilian JV majority-owned by Renault
BEIJING, June 20 (Reuters) - China's Geely ( opens new tab said on Friday it and its parent Geely Holding ( would take a combined 26.4% stake in a joint venture controlled by its French partner Renault ( opens new tab as the two seek to produce and sell cars jointly in Brazil. The two automakers have entered an agreement that would see Renault take 73.57% in the venture that would focus on producing and distributing cars in Brazil under the Renault and Geely brands. It is also due to make and distribute light commercial vehicles under the Renault brand to "attract new customers", according to a filing by Geely Auto. The deal is subject to regulatory approvals, the company said. Geely and Renault first announced their partnership to produce and sell zero- and low-emission vehicles in Brazil in February. The Brazilian partnership builds on the two companies' thermal engine joint venture headquartered in London and their jointly owned manufacturing plant in South Korea.
Reuters
4 days ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - How UBS and Switzerland can come to terms
LONDON, June 18 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Switzerland is at a crossroads. Two years ago, politicians bent over backwards to help UBS (UBSG.S), opens new tab buy Credit Suisse, partly on the grounds that a failure would imperil the Alpine nation's status as banking hub. In 2025, the same leaders are calling for an extra $24 billion of equity from the enlarged giant, which could erode Zurich's status in another way by prompting UBS to take its $1.5 trillion balance sheet elsewhere. Yet a compromise, to stop the twin extremes of UBS moving or a ruinous bank bailout, looks within reach. Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter in 2023 controversially gave UBS significant sweeteners for the Credit Suisse deal, including a government loss guarantee, which Chair Colm Kelleher ultimately didn't need. Now, she wants, opens new tab the bank to fully deduct the value of foreign subsidiaries from the parent bank's common equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital. Keller-Sutter has grounds to insist on unusually high capital ratios. UBS's assets dwarf Switzerland's $950 billion GDP. It also has a large U.S. business, which arguably makes it prudent to have enough equity to withstand any writedowns to overseas operations. The current rules, along with other more bank-specific carveouts, meant that Credit Suisse's capital ratios were more fragile than they seemed in the runup to its rescue, undermining its ability to sort out a perennially loss-making investment bank. It's possible, at least in theory, that something similar could happen to UBS one day. Still, Kelleher and his CEO Sergio Ermotti can legitimately say that the new rules make their bank much less appealing to investors. The government's wider package of measures will by 2030 create a de facto 17.2% minimum CET1 ratio for the listed holding company, compared with 14% absent the planned changes, using UBS's estimates. That erodes returns. In May, before the government released its proposals, analysts expected $11.9 billion of annual earnings and $76 billion of regulatory capital by the end of 2027, implying a 15.7% return on CET1. Raising the capital level to 17.2% would shrink the result to 13.7%. Morgan Stanley's (MS.N), opens new tab equivalent return that year will exceed 19%, according to Breakingviews calculations using Visible Alpha data. What happens next is down to lawmakers in Switzerland's parliament, who will decide whether to approve the rules, or water them down. That process runs slowly. UBS may not decisively know their thinking until the end of 2026. One consideration is whether the bank is exaggerating the pain of the hit. Stock analysts reckon there are several billion dollars of spare capital in UBS's foreign subsidiaries. Keller-Sutter's number crunchers say the bank can shrink the de facto CET1 minimum below 15% through measures such as so-called repatriation, which involves pulling money out of the overseas units to shrink the capital required to back them. That lower number is close to Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan's (JPM.N), opens new tab CET1 levels, the government points out. Another possibility doing the rounds in Zurich is that UBS could use more leverage at its listed holding company to offset the capital trapped lower down in the corporate hierarchy. Finally, a six-to-eight-year transition period dilutes the intensity of the capital pain now. Ermotti and Kelleher have some strong possible counter-arguments, though. It would be perverse to partially solve a leverage issue at one set of subsidiaries by borrowing more at another level. Moreover, the government's international comparison mixes apples and oranges. Keller-Sutter's team benchmarks UBS's requirements against the 15% to 16% levels of Morgan Stanley and other American rivals, which are tangibly higher than what U.S. regulators order them to hold. Morgan Stanley's actual regulatory minimum is 13.5%. The basic fact is that UBS could have a meaningfully lower minimum equity ratio, and therefore higher returns and even share price, if it was based elsewhere. Those numbers add weight to an implicit threat: UBS could move its headquarters to New York or London if parliament sides with the government. The bank's growth opportunities are predominantly outside Switzerland. The planned rules make U.S. expansion costly, in capital terms. It's not a stretch to imagine that Kelleher, a former Morgan Stanley executive, would prioritise global expansion over local loyalties. If his old shop or JPMorgan lobbed in a bid, offering another way to switch domicile, he might listen. Switching HQ could create a meaningful tax bill under local laws and raise questions about whether UBS's additional Tier 1 (AT1) debt would be eligible under U.S. regulations. The bank also could lose any clients who like the fact that UBS is neither American nor British. Yet the conservative lawmakers, which currently constitute the biggest grouping in parliament, will also be acutely aware of the risk of going from having two globally relevant banks a few years ago to none. That could represent a big blow in a country where banking accounts, opens new tab for 5% of GDP. Yet the biggest reason a compromise is possible is that there are ways to fudge the Keller-Sutter plan while retaining its essence. Allowing UBS to cover the foreign subsidiaries' value with AT1 capital as well as CET1, for example, would still arguably protect the parent bank's equity. Letting all outstanding AT1s count for these purposes could cut the CET1 ask to just $5 billion rather than $24 billion, JPMorgan analysts have calculated. That might be too small for comfort, but lawmakers could in theory split the difference by saying that AT1s can cover 20% of the capital, with CET1 accounting for the rest. Doing so would imply $15 billion of extra CET1, or about two-thirds of the current ask, and imply a 15% de facto minimum requirement according to Breakingviews calculations. It might not be a satisfying outcome for capital purists, particularly after the controversial Credit Suisse AT1 writedown tainted the funky hybrid securities, but Swiss supervisors are already working to make those securities absorb losses more readily in a crisis. Kelleher and Ermotti have some leverage by virtue of the possible HQ move, but time is not on their side. UBS faces 18 months or more of capital uncertainty and its shares, off 20% since late January, could fall further if investors get jittery. Lawmakers preoccupied with avoiding a future bank failure, in contrast, will want to take their time. Yet they should remember that while Credit Suisse's rickety capital structure didn't help, it ultimately went bust because wealthy clients mistrusted its ropey business model. As such, hitting UBS's returns carries risks as well as rewards. Follow Liam Proud on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
