
I-T raid unearths gold smuggling and hawala transactions
Kozhikode: The Income Tax (I-T) department conducted searches at multiple premises of Seashell Savoury Group and Pulikkal Group in Kozhikode on Saturday allegedly revealing hawala transactions, reverse hawala, gold smuggling, unreported foreign investments, underreported land purchases in cash and other undisclosed financial activities.
The I-T department said that the findings at multiple locations point to large-scale tax evasion and concealment of income and assets both in India and abroad.
Search was conducted at the residential and business premises of Abdu Razakh Pulikkal, Rasheed Ali Pulikkal, Ahammed Kabeer Pulikkal. Details of foreign dividends received over the years were unearthed in the raid. "Clear evidence of the use of hawala channels to send money amassed abroad to India was uncovered.
Undisclosed investments in several buildings, land, and illegal quarries/crushers were found," it said.
Sales suppression over the years was quantified from the offices of Delicia Group. "Details of income from GCC region transferred to Indonesia for purchases were also uncovered," it said.
Searches were also conducted at the residential premises of Hameed Narikolil, Kunhimoosa and their business premises. It says that the group has revenue from hotel businesses both in India and abroad. It operates more than 80 hotels in the GCC region, owned and managed by Indian residents but not disclosed for taxation in India.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Gazette
29 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Proposed dilution of local content rules may hurt Indian telecom firms, benefit MNCs: GTRI
New Delhi [India], June 22 (ANI): Major dilutions to local content rules for the telecom sector under the Public Procurement Order could negatively impact Indian firms by giving greater access to multinational corporations (MNCs) in government contracts without manufacturing in India, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) . The GTRI in a note further said that the move will benefit major foreign MNCs active in the Indian telecom component industry. Earlier this month, on June 3, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) initiated a public consultation to revise its Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) (PPP-MII) Order for the telecom sector. The consultation, open to industry comments until July 3, proposes a series of technical adjustments to the existing local content (LC) framework -- changes that could have far-reaching consequences for the sector's future. 'Department of Telecommunications (DoT) is moving to relax local content norms for government telecom procurement -- a shift that could favour multinational corporations (MNCs) like Cisco and Ericsson while undermining Indian manufacturers who have invested in domestic production and innovation,' GTRI's note added prepared by former Indian Trade Service Officer, Ajay Srivastava said. It added that MNCs are 'lobbying India's Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to ease local content (LC) requirements, as they struggle to qualify as Class-I local suppliers for government telecom tenders.' India's current PPP-MII policy, which was first updated in October 2024, mandates that any firm seeking preference in government telecom tenders must meet a minimum 50 per cent local content threshold. Srivastava added in the note that in order to qualify as a 'Class-I' supplier and enjoy pricing and selection advantages, firms must demonstrate that at least 50 per cent of a product's value is sourced or manufactured in India which has become a difficult task for MNCs. The PPP-MII policy applies to 36 key telecom product categories -- including routers, ethernet switches, GPON devices, media gateways, customer premises equipment (CPE), satellite terminals, telecom batteries, and optical fibre and cables. Under the current PPP-MII framework, several exclusions apply to the calculation of local content. Imported parts routed through Indian resellers, royalties, overseas technical fees, and refurbished products do not count toward Indian value addition. Design and software work performed in India is permitted, but the value generated is capped, with restrictions in place to prevent companies from inflating LC percentages purely on the basis of R&D activities while continuing to import most hardware components. Srivastava added in the note that global majors are finding it 'difficult to meet these thresholds.' He further added that the underlying issue is that most of the work performed in India is done on an outsourcing basis for their foreign parent companies. The parent companies retain ownership of intellectual property (IP) and earn the bulk of profits. Highlighting the impact of policy change, GTRI note said that the move will put Indian telecom firms -- who have made long-term investments in Indian-based manufacturing, R&D, and IP development -- at a severe disadvantage. 'Such Indian firms would face the prospect of losing market share to foreign MNCs whose products remain largely imported and foreign-owned,' the GTRI note added. It further points out that dilution of standards would discourage Indian firms from investing in genuine IP creation, as Class-I status could now be achieved simply through superficial assembly or software wrapping of imported goods. 'India's telecom sector would remain reliant on foreign technologies, with little strategic control,' the GTRI note added. (ANI)


India Gazette
29 minutes ago
- India Gazette
India's agrochemicals market eyes $14.5 billion by 2028 with 9% CAGR: Report
New Delhi [India], June 22 (ANI): India's agrochemicals industry remains resilient and is projected to grow to USD 14.5 billion by 2027-28, with a CAGR of 9 per cent, despite global headwinds, according to a report by Rubix Data Sciences -- a leading provider of risk management and monitoring solutions. CAGR is Compound Annual Growth Rate. According to the report, India's agrochemical industry is valued at USD 11.2 billion in 2024-25, having grown 8.7 per cent year-on-year despite a challenging global environment. Exports saw a sharp 22 per cent decline in 2023-24, driven by global inventory destocking, aggressive price competition from China, and weak demand in major markets. As global supply chains stabilise and agricultural activity rebounds, a moderate recovery is projected in 2024-25, supported by improved demand and cost-competitive manufacturing by Indian players. One of the key trends highlighted in the report is the rapid growth of herbicide exports, which recorded a 20 per cent CAGR from 2019-20 to 2024-25. Their share in India's total agrochemical exports rose from 31 per cent to 37 per cent over this period. According to the report released this week, the shift reflects both rising global demand fueled by the growing cost of agricultural labour--and India's strength in producing affordable, effective crop protection solutions. Japan has now overtaken Brazil as the second-largest export destination for herbicides, while the US and Brazil continue to lead as key markets for insecticides and fungicides. 'The drop in agrochemical exports over the past year has definitely been a setback, but it's also part of a larger global reset,' said Mohan Ramaswamy, Co-founder and CEO at Rubix Data Sciences. 'What we are seeing now is Indian manufacturers adapting fast, whether it's by improving cost efficiency, diversifying portfolios, or tapping into new markets. The sector is resilient, and we believe the recovery underway will be steady and sustainable. At Rubix, we are committed to helping businesses make sense of these shifts through data-led insights that support smarter decisions and long-term growth,' Mohan Ramaswamy added. (ANI)


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Dubai man trolled for inviting IIM students to work for free: ‘No stipend, get real-world exposure'
A Dubai-based Indian professional has sparked a wave of backlash after inviting MBA students from India's top business schools to apply for an unpaid short-term project. Sahil Deshmukh's LinkedIn post on a 'no stipend' position for MBA students was met with outrage, with many calling it a slap in the face of students who spend lakhs and work hard to secure admission to B-schools like the IIMs and XLRI. Unpaid internship for IIM students? Hiring post draws flak (Representational image) Deshmukh, who works as a Manager in the Global CEO's Office at Erba Mannheim, is himself a graduate of IIM Lucknow. In a post shared on LinkedIn one day ago, he announced a vacancy for MBA students from top institutions like the Indian Institute of Management and the Faculty of Management Studies, Delhi. 'Looking for MBA students from IIMs, FMS, SPJIMR, XLRI, MDI, or other top B-schools for a short-term live project,' Deshmukh wrote. 'It's a 3-4 week remote project with no stipend, but a good opportunity to work closely with the leadership team on strategic initiatives,' the Dubai-based employee revealed. He called the position 'Ideal for someone looking to get real-world exposure and contribute meaningfully.' The backlash The backlash was swift, massive and entirely expected. In the comments section of the post, many called out Deshmukh for expecting MBA students to work for free. has reached out to him for a statement. This copy will be updated on receiving a response. 'Let's put an end to the exploitation of unpaid internships. As Indians, it's time we speak up against a toxic work culture that normalizes offering no stipend in exchange for full-time effort,' wrote one LinkedIn user. 'And the saga of unpaid work (in the name of 'gaining experience'), keeps on thriving. Quite sad,' another said. 'Pay. It's not a difficult thing to do. Don't loot people in the name of experience,' LinkedIn user Piyush said. 'You want people from top B-schools to put their heart and soul into a project , 'contribute meaningfully' but with no stipend? Crazy,' another added. The post also reached Reddit, where reactions were overwhelmingly negative. 'Getting freshers with no experience a start is different, hiring generic MBAs is different. But asking for tier 1 MBAs and refusing to pay them is crazy,' a user said.