Tax hike fears mount after government borrowing jumps in May
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said borrowing surged to £17.7 billion last month, the second highest figure on record for May, surpassed only at the height of Covid.
May borrowing was £700 million higher than a year earlier, though it was slightly less than the £18 billion most economists had been expecting.
The higher borrowing came in spite of a surge in the tax take from national insurance after Chancellor Rachel Reeves increased employer contributions in April.
The decision, which was announced in last autumn's budget, has seen wage costs soar for firms across the UK as they also faced a minimum wage rise in the same month.
Experts warned the higher borrowing figures raised the chances of tax hikes to come in the budget later this year, with Ms Reeves under pressure to balance the books amid rising borrowing and her spending commitments.
Thomas Pugh, economist at audit and consulting firm RSM UK, said he is pencilling in tax increases of between £10 billion and £20 billion.
He said: 'The under-performance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the Chancellor may already have lost the £9.9 billion of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March.
'Throw in the tough outlook for many Government departments announced in the spending review and U-turns on welfare spending and the Chancellor will probably have to announce some top-up tax increases after the summer.'
Danni Hewson, AJ Bell head of financial analysis, said the borrowing figures 'will only add to speculation that the Chancellor will have to announce more spending cuts or further tax increases at the next budget if she wants to meet her fiscal rules and pay for her spending plans'.
'One big shock could wipe out any headroom Rachel Reeves might have, and there are still question marks about how much of GDP (gross domestic product) should be spent on defence and where the money is going to come from,' she added.
Borrowing for the first two months of the financial year to date was £37.7 billion, £1.6 billion more than the same two-month period in 2024, according to the ONS.
The data showed so-called compulsory social contributions, largely made up of national insurance contributions (NICs), jumped by £3.9 billion or 14.7% to a record £30.2 billion in April and May combined.
Rob Doody, deputy director for public sector finances, said: 'While receipts were up, thanks partly to higher income tax revenue and national insurance contributions, spending was up more, affected by increased running costs and inflation-linked uplifts to many benefits.'
While May's borrowing out-turn was lower than economists were expecting, it was more than the £17.1 billion pencilled in by the UK's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), in March.
The figures showed that central government tax receipts in May increased by £3.5 billion to £61.7 billion, while higher NICs saw social contributions rise by £1.8 billion to £15.1 billion last month alone.
Public sector net debt, excluding public sector banks, stood at £2.87 trillion at the end of May and was estimated at 96.4% of GDP, which was 0.5 percentage points higher than a year earlier and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s.
The ONS said the sale of the final tranche of taxpayer shares in NatWest, formerly Royal Bank of Scotland, cut net debt by £800 million last month, but did not have an impact on borrowing in the month.
Interest payments on debt, which are linked to inflation, fell £700 million to £7.6 million due to previous falls in the Retail Prices Index (RPI).
But recent rises in RPI are expected to see debt interest payments race higher in June.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones insisted the Government had 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'.
'Since taking office, we have taken the right decisions to protect working people, begin repairing the NHS, and fix the foundations to rebuild Britain,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
UK's military and spy services set for £330m AI tech boost to help track enemies
Hundreds of millions of pounds will be invested in cutting-edge drones and artificial intelligence for the military as part of Rachel Reeves ' attempt to revive the flagging economy. The Chancellor's new industrial strategy will include a £330 million investment in technology used by the Armed Forces, such as 'next-generation drones' to be developed for joint use on the battlefield and by the emergency services. Money will also be ploughed into ultra-powerful computers for MI5, MI6 and GCHQ as well as artificial intelligence (AI) applications to track enemy targets. The investment, part of the strategy being launched tomorrow, comes as Ms Reeves is struggling to boost the UK's flagging growth prospects, which the Confederation of British Industry last week slashed to 1.2 per cent for this year and 1 per cent for 2026. In addition, government borrowing hit a non-pandemic record for May and retail sales last week were down. Without proper growth, the Chancellor will likely have to make the unenviable choice between hiking taxes further in autumn's Budget or breaking her fiscal rules. Ms Reeves has promised that the ten-year infrastructure strategy will lead to a 'decade of national renewal'. The Government is putting £15.6 billion into transport upgrades, £39 billion into social and affordable housing and £14.2 billion for the Sizewell C nuclear power station. Money will also be ploughed into ultra-powerful computers for MI5, MI6 and GCHQ as well as artificial intelligence (AI) applications to track enemy targets. pictured: MI6 headquarters Ms Reeves told The Mail on Sunday she intended to 'pull together a plan to exploit new opportunities, whether it's AI, energy technology, a whole range of parts of the economy'. She added: 'I'm really optimistic about Britain's future. We've got great businesses, we've got great trade deals... I don't see any reason for Britain not to be leaders in these jobs and industries of the future.' But Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'We have to put the public finances back on a sustainable footing. A future Conservative government will have to contend with a bloated national debt after Labour's reckless borrowing splurge. 'We will never make promises we cannot afford, and our plans will always be fully costed. Labour's "spend now, tax later" approach is utterly short-sighted. 'It mortgages Britain's future for short-term political convenience and leaves ordinary families to foot the bill.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: All that Lady Thatcher achieved will now go up in flames like an oil drum brazier on a picket line...
's Employment Rights Bill, hurtling its way onto the statute books, threatens to turn Britain's economy back 50 years. Then, the all-powerful trade unions brought the nation to a shuddering halt, offering a foretaste of what is to come over the next few years as Labour's Bill will light the match for widespread strikes. The potential damage to an already stuttering economy, weighed down by the Chancellor's growth-sapping £40 billion of tax rises, doesn't bear thinking about. Passage of the Bill – a project long cherished by former union chieftain Rayner – would be a shattering blow to the bitterly won reforms of the 1980s. Margaret Thatcher 's embrace of lower taxes and the free market, and her crushing of union power, ushered in decades of rising living standards and prosperity. That Tory legacy, unchallenged by the 1997 Blair-Brown government, is set to go up in flames, like an oil drum brazier on a picket line. We have already seen how Chancellor Rachel Reeves 's award of inflation-busting pay rises to railwaymen, NHS staff, employees across the public sector – without any productivity agreements – have done nothing to assuage the greed of some workers. Resident doctors are leading the charge, their sense of grievance and entitlement stoked by the rabidly Leftist union, the British Medical Association. Barely a day now passes without union groups threatening to bring vital sectors of the economy to a standstill, from oil rigs and trains to healthcare. As a young financial journalist in the 1970s, I witnessed firsthand the appalling damage done to Britain by unchecked union power. As inflation soared after the 1973 oil embargo imposed by Arab countries, the Labour government was bombarded with demands for double-digit pay increases. Binmen let the streets of London pile up with rat-infested rubbish, and quaysides were stacked with essential imports waiting to be loaded onto lorries, as dock workers joined in the chorus of strikes. It would be wrong for me to suggest that anything so calamitous is approaching. The cold embrace of the IMF seems a long way off. However, the spectre of a general strike, which Angela Rayner's Bill brings us closer to, will jangle nerves in boardrooms and the Treasury alike – as it will in homes across the country. Many commuters hold bitter memories of shivering at stations and being unable to get to work as rail staff went on strike last year. Similarly, nurses and junior doctors undid the post-pandemic goodwill when they cancelled appointments and left accident and emergency wards skeleton staffed while they banged the drum for absurdly high pay rises. Those strikers were paid off by Starmer on coming to power, and inevitably they are now grumbling for more. There appears to be no understanding among our union brothers and sisters that the UK faces dire budgetary problems, a legacy of the shocks caused by the pandemic and the war in Ukraine. Reeves added to the woes with her tax on employment when she raised National Insurance Contributions on businesses. The result has been predictable, with 276,000 more people unemployed and a return to stubborn, above 2 per cent, inflation. The Employment Rights Bill, which allows for bullying strike powers and attacks flexibility afforded by part-time work and zero hours contracts, will be the latest blow to business confidence. And Labour wonders why its growth mission has failed. For Rayner, extending the right of trade unions to strike by lowering the 50 per cent turnout rule for ballots and allowing instant notice of industrial action, is her reward to a union hierarchy that helped her rise up the greasy pole. In her biography, she boasts: 'I was mouthy and would take no messing from management.' Let's see if she takes any 'messing' from the public on whom she is about to inflict her socialist agenda. The Deputy Prime Minister and her party are embarking on a course that will add to business costs, sap the willingness of companies to invest and devastate efforts to reboot the economy.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Angela Rayner's workers Bill 'is a wrecking ball for the UK economy' that could wipe out struggling businesses, Tories warn
British businesses have been urged to rise up and fight Angela Rayner 's crippling new labour laws, amid dire warnings of the devastating effects they will wreak on the economy. Conservatives have sent an open letter to company bosses this weekend urging them to speak out against the Deputy Prime Minister's radical plans – or be 'sleepwalked into disaster'. Ms Rayner has been accused of taking a 'wrecking ball to the economy' with her Employment Rights Bill – which has also been dubbed 'the Unemployment Bill' over fears it will deter firms from taking on staff. The proposals, currently being debated in the Lords and due to take effect later this year, will make it more burdensome to employ workers and will leave businesses vulnerable to ruinous strikes. Central to the plans are the repeal of Tory trade union laws which will reduce the threshold for strike action and make union funding of the Labour Party automatic. But it also contains a raft of other measures, including the end of zero-hours contracts, strengthened redundancy rights, more flexible working and the power for ministers to take companies to employment tribunals on behalf of employees even if they do not want to sue. The Bill has led to tensions in the Cabinet, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves trying to dilute the measures as she battles to revive a moribund economy. Asked by The Mail on Sunday this weekend if she was working to limit the economic damage which Ms Rayner's measures are expected to cause, the Chancellor did not deny she was trying to mitigate the effects, saying: 'We talk all the time to businesses.' In the open letter, Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith says he has been moved to act because he is 'genuinely concerned that British businesses are being sleepwalked into disaster' and the Tories cannot oppose it alone In the open letter, Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith says he has been moved to act because he is 'genuinely concerned that British businesses are being sleepwalked into disaster' and the Tories cannot oppose it alone. He writes: 'We need more voices to persuade the Government to listen. The Government's own calculations – which many consider to be an underestimate – say this will cost British businesses £5 billion a year and the economy 50,000 jobs... This is not good for the economy. I know it and every business I speak to around the country knows it. 'I urge you to please share this letter with others, seek advice on the impact of the Bill from your professional advisor and encourage business groups to speak up clearly on your behalf.' Speaking to this newspaper, Mr Griffith said: 'The economy badly needs the growth that only business can create. Yet Labour's Bill for Unemployment is a trade union charter that will increase strikes, slash jobs and raise prices. 'Going back to 1970s-style domination by the unions is the very last thing Britain needs right now and shows just how little this socialist government understands business. Angela Rayner is taking a wrecking ball to the UK economy.' He was echoed by a chorus of leading business figures, including Lord Karan Bilimoria, founder of Cobra beer and UK chairman of the International Chamber of Commerce. He said: 'Making it easier for workers to strike will inevitably increase their number and frequency. This is like the 1970s, and look where that got us. We were called the sick man of Europe. 'We don't want to go back in time. Of course, you want fair employee rights, but there's got to be a balance. If you create the environment this bill is putting us on the path towards, it's going to be very damaging to business and our economy.' He called on the Government to 'think twice' before pushing ahead with the reforms. Luke Johnson, entrepreneur and former chairman of Pizza Express, said: 'At a time when unemployment is rising, the economy is weak and the number of failing businesses is on the increase, introducing a new swathe of burdensome regulations is, to me, little short of madness. 'In the 1970s our country was going broke and we had to go to the International Monetary Fund for a bailout. 'It feels as if we are headed back towards that period. I lived through that time. But a lot of the MPs writing and supporting this bill are too young to remember what it was like. '[Angela Rayner] doesn't even speak the same language as people who work in the private sector. She has no clue what it's like to build a business and have your house on the line if you go broke, or struggling to pay wage bills and bank loan repayments each month. 'She just doesn't care. She only ever talks to people in the public sector, civil servants and trade unionists. But eventually, their ideology is going to collide with reality and unfortunately, they are going to drag the economy into a serious recession.' Alex Veitch, of the British Chambers of Commerce said: 'There remains a high risk of unintended consequences that could limit employment opportunities and economic growth.' And Luiza Gomes, from the British Retail Consortium, said: 'Maintaining a 50 per cent threshold for strikes is important to ensure ballot results legitimately and accurately reflect the consensus amongst workers, rather than the minority view.' A Labour spokesman said: 'The public will see right through the sheer hypocrisy of a party that crashed the economy and family finances now opposing better rights for workers. 'Labour do not think it's fair for workers to be sacked without any good reason or denied sick pay from the first day they are ill. The Tories and Reform need to explain why they do. 'These measures are developed with business, and good for workers and the economy.'
