Argentina to get $20 billion IMF loan
Argentina's maverick pro-free market President Javier Milei went with hammer and tongs – in his own words a chainsaw – to set the sinking economy with its soaring inflation in order through the-now-familiar-remedies of reducing the size of the government, subsidies. He had pushed the economy to the brink of collapse in the opposite direction.
He needs a loan of $20 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). And on Tuesday, the IMF team had agreed in principle to give the loan, and the final decision now rests with the executive board. Milei needs the IMF rescue package so that he can keep up the foreign exchange reserves and there is no default in paying the loans.
Meanwhile, the majority of Argentinians, mostly the poor and those who are nearly poor, are paying the price for Milei's ruthless austerity measures. But the pop economist and television-presenter that he was before he plunged into politics more than two years ago will not be able to save the economy if he does not get the IMF loan.
The IMF loan of course comes with its own stringent conditions. Sometimes, the IMF loan and its repayment process in itself becomes a trigger for the collapse of the economy, and Argentinians remember well that this had what had happened with the IMF loan in 2001. Milei has however other worries. The $20 billion loan will be released in tranches and not at one go. He hopes that the first tranche will be substantially large enough to balance the tilt in the lopsided economy. Meanwhile, the country's trade unions have gone on a general strike, and life had come to a standstill in Buenos Aires. Most of the people who have responded to the strike calls were pensioners.
One of Milei's measures was his refusal to adjust the pension amount to the inflation rate. As a result what they get as pension remains woefully inadequate. This is the third general strike, and Milei does not seem to be unduly worried about its impact.
He is much more concerned about the size of the first tranche of the $20 billion loan from the IMF. If the IMF had refused, he would have had to borrow from another country. As a matter of fact, Milei, a great admirer of US President Donald Trump and an ardent fellow-free market advocate, was looking to Washington for the foreign bailout.
The IMF loan if managed prudently should help Argentina recover from the economic turmoil, but it does not seem to be the end of troubles. The loan can help Argentinian businesses to stabilise and increase their productivity. At the same time, the businesses and manufacturers need to create jobs and pay reasonable wages.
The austerity measures have helped in reducing inflation, but low inflation in itself is not much of a remedy. There is need for jobs, and if the production both on the front of primary goods and the manufactured goods is on a firm footing, this could lead to the hoped-for stability.
Many a time, the kind of shock treatment meted out by the likes of Milei to an economy that was caught in the inflation spiral is that it leads to other extreme fallout. The remedy of austerity measure has the likelihood of becoming worse than the uncontrolled inflation spree. So, Milei has the difficult task of piloting the economy through the phase of recovery. Milei has a good precedent in Brazil's president from 1995 to 2003, a sociologist who guided a fragile Brazilian economy through a difficult period. Milei may have to up his sledgehammer free market methods and adopt more calibrated economic policies at home.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
The Turkish public asks: After Israel's attack on Iran, are we next?
A day before Israel attacked Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was at the Knesset, welcoming Argentinian President Javier Milei with open arms. "Argentina became a safe haven for thousands of Jews," Milei told Israeli politicians. "They sought refuge from economic hardship and antisemitic persecution. Not only in Eastern Europe, but also in the Ottoman Empire. "An empire that I don't think will be renewed anytime soon, even though there are those who disagree with me." The remarks, which were clearly directed at Turkey and its long-serving President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, were not lost on officials in Ankara. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters A burgeoning regional power, Turkey has played an outsized role in the Middle East since the so-called Arab Spring uprisings of the 2010s. Amid the new power dynamic that has taken shape in the region, Ankara has seen its stock increase in major western capitals. Such has been its rise that on Thursday, Turkey was among a small group of US allies notified in advance that Israel would be launching its attack on Iran. Hours later, early on Friday, Israel began its assault on Iran's military and nuclear facilities, and started assassinating high-profile security, intelligence and military commanders, along with nuclear scientists. The attacks, which also targeted residential areas and civilian infrastructure, have so far killed more than 500 people and wounded at least 1,300, many of them civilians. In response, Iran has fired barrages of missiles towards Haifa, Tel Aviv and other major Israeli cities. Turkey has lamented the escalation, describing Israel's assault as unprovoked, especially at a time when US intelligence suggested Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon. While the escalation has been characterised as sudden, and one that has caught many regional states by surprise, Ankara was long bracing for an Israeli attack on Iran. In September, when Israel killed Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, Turkish officials studied possible scenarios in the event of a severe Israeli attack and a potential wider regional conflict. They prepared contingency plans, including measures against possible waves of refugees. In October, Ankara also initiated negotiations with the imprisoned leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), Abdullah Ocalan, to prevent the group from being used as a proxy by either Iran or Israel. Israel-Turkey relations Turkey has historically maintained good ties with Israel, despite ups and downs due to Israel's wars with the region's countries. Turkey was the first Muslim country to recognise Israel, in 1949, and gradually became an ally of Tel Aviv in the 1990s, when the Turkish security apparatus needed its help to counter the PKK during a period of domestic instability. Since Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan took power in 2003, the relationship has gradually deteriorated from a strategic partnership to that of neighbours who frequently confront each other over the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere. 'This isn't Turkey's war. Yet it shows that we should… take relevant steps to prepare us for any possible future risk and options' - Ankara insider Relations soured after Israel raided the Mavi Marmara ferry in 2010, killing 10 Turkish activists in international waters, but they later improved. But tensions heightened again in late 2023 when Ankara decided to walk back from the rapprochement due to the war on Gaza, which Turkish officials believe constitutes a genocide. Since Israel's campaigns to degrade Hezbollah last year and the fall of the Assad dynasty in Syria, the region has been transformed by Netanyahu's actions. Where Iran once dominated, Israel is now increasingly the key regional power. Israeli officials have publicly begun to state that the only other player with significant resources they face is Turkey. How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East Read More » Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has reiterated several times since December that the region should not be dominated by any single power, including Turkey itself. The first significant challenge between Turkey and Israel was Syria, as Netanyahu's government made sure to oppose any Turkish bases with radar and air defence installations in southern Syria. American officials, worried about possible incidents, encouraged both countries to hold talks, resulting in the establishment of a hotline between Turkey and Israel in April. Talks progressed to the point where Turkish officials included Syrian representatives in discussions with the Israelis, in the hope of finding a middle ground to stop Israeli attacks on Syrian territory. The main issue was control of Syrian airspace. Ankara delayed its plans to quickly take control of the bases until the deconfliction talks with Israel were completed, effectively later giving Israel a window of opportunity to attack Iran. For the Turks, this did not involve Turkish airspace. Turkish officials advised Israel to address its concerns over the airspace issues directly with Syria rather than Ankara. Missile programme accelerating For decades, Turkey has viewed Iran as a destabilising force and opposed Tehran's ambitions to obtain a nuclear weapon. However, Israel's unilateral attack on Iran, which has failed to provide convincing evidence that Tehran is close to developing one, was seen by the Turkish public as a sign that Israel could one day target Turkey, a Nato ally deeply integrated into the western security architecture. This sense of threat was echoed by the head of Turkey's Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), Devlet Bahçeli, a key ally of Erdogan. On Tuesday, Bahçeli warned that Israel's military campaign against Iran is part of a broader strategy to encircle Turkey and undermine its regional ambitions. "The political and strategic goal of Israel is clear," he said. "To surround Anatolia and sabotage Turkey's path toward a terrorism-free future on behalf of its masters." To reassure the Turkish public, officials began leaking certain details to the media. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear Read More » One Turkish columnist claimed that on the night of the initial attack, Turkish radars detected Israeli F-35s, prompting Turkey to scramble F-16s and AWACS early-warning aircraft to track the Israeli operation. Another columnist claimed that some of the Israeli jets that took off for the attack unintentionally violated Turkish airspace on the same night, and left rapidly after Turkey scrambled F-16s and warned them by radio. "This isn't Turkey's war," said one Ankara insider close to the government. "Yet it shows that we should study this attack in depth and take relevant steps to prepare us for any possible future risk and options." High-ranking Turkish officials held two rounds of security meetings to discuss further contingency plans. The Turkish military has also closely studied the war tactics employed by Israel. Erdogan himself responded to the attack by calling regional leaders, and US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. He also made specific calls to Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al Sudani, both of whom lead Turkey's land neighbours. Turkish readouts suggest Erdogan specifically advised them not to get involved in the recent escalation between Israel and Iran. On Monday, Erdogan said that Turkey was accelerating its medium- and long-range ballistic missile programme and deepening its deterrence to make Turkey a country no one would dare to defy. He vowed on Wednesday that Turkey would make its defence industry completely independent. He later shared his speech on X, featuring the Ottoman Imperial seal, as Netanyahu referenced last week. "The victorious army of the Ottoman Empire had a principle," Erdogan said. "If you want independence, if you want freedom, if you want to live on this land with your honour, dignity, and integrity, if you want economic prosperity, if you want abundance, wealth, and harmony, if you want peace, you must always be ready for war."
Khaleej Times
2 days ago
- Khaleej Times
Pakistan draws five potential buyers for national airline PIA, including military-backed group
ISLAMABAD, June 19 (Reuters) - In its efforts to sell its struggling national airline, Pakistan has received expressions of interest from five parties, including business groups and a military-backed firm, the Privatisation Ministry said on Thursday. The bids were submitted ahead of a June 19 deadline to acquire up to 100% of Pakistan International Airlines , which has accumulated over $2.5 billion in losses in roughly a decade. Still, following a major restructuring, it posted its first operating profit in 21 years in the year through June 2024. The sale is seen as a test of Pakistan's ability to shed loss-making state firms and meet conditions of a $7 billion International Monetary Fund bailout. It would be the country's first major privatisation in nearly two decades. Eight parties submitted their expression of interests, but only five of them provided documents of qualification, the ministry said in a statement.
Zawya
4 days ago
- Zawya
Senegal delays publication of quarterly budget execution reports
Senegal has postponed until June 23 the publication of its budget execution reports for the last two quarters, the finance ministry said in a statement, as the new administration works to rebuild investor trust after a hidden-debt scandal. The original release date for the reports was not immediately clear. The International Monetary Fund froze disbursements on its programme with Senegal last year after the nation admitted it had misreported debt and deficit data. The IMF, whose financing is seen as key for the West African nation, said no talks on a new arrangement can start until the case is resolved. A review of government finances by Senegal's court of auditors in February found Dakar had understated its deficits by up to seven percentage points of GDP a year, pushing the end-2023 debt ratio to about 100% of GDP versus the 74% the previous government had reported. The finance ministry said in a communique dated June 16 that fourth-quarter 2024 and first quarter data will now be released on June 23 to guarantee the "sincerity and reliability" of the figures. That reflects the government commitment to "restore budget orthodoxy and transparency", it said, adding identifying, reclassifying, and verifying data was part of its strategy to clean up public finances. Earlier in June, the IMF welcomed Senegal's plan to boost tax compliance and cut reliance on external funding, but stressed it does not affect the waiver process, leaving the programme still in limbo after a year without cash. Kevin Daly, investment director at aberdeen Investments, said it was still potentially "a very bumpy road ahead for Senegal". "We are negative on Senegal," he said. Senegal's dollar bonds are the worst performing in Africa according to JPMorgan data, handing investors losses of 11.5% year-to-date, against 4.9% returns for the average African sovereign. Senegal's 2033 bonds traded 0.3 cents down at 65.75 cents, Tradeweb data showed. They are at a significant discount to regional peers, said Ninety One portfolio manager Thys Louw.
