
Zero hours contracts to be restricted in NI under new plans
Zero hours contracts could be tightly restricted in Northern Ireland under fresh proposals announced by Stormont's economy minister.The changes are planned as part of a major update to employment laws that Caoimhe Archibald intends to bring to the assembly.She said new legislation would put an end to "exploitative" zero hours contracts and enhance protections for workers.There will be exemptions for firms that carry out seasonal and casual work that will still be able to employ people using zero hours contracts, the minister said.
'Balanced approach'
The measures were first outlined by her predecessor Conor Murphy last year, but had to go out for public consultation before they could be progressed.Archibald took over as economy minister in February when Murphy quit Stormont after being elected to the Seanad (Irish Senate). It is understood that over 190 responses to the consultation were received and it is now expected that the bill could be introduced in the assembly next January.The minister has written to other executive parties seeking agreement for the bill.Archibald described the plan as a "balanced approach which will ensure our employment law framework works effectively for both workers and employers in the modern era"."This is an ambitious package of reforms to employment law which will see the biggest upgrade of our employment legislation since the Good Friday Agreement," she added.Zero hours contracts allow employers to hire staff with no guarantee of the hours they will work.The planned changes mean employees will have the right to request a "banded hours" contract, similar to a system in the Republic of Ireland.
'Increased costs for businesses'
The plans would allow employees the right to compensation if shifts are cancelled without adequate notice.Other measures the department plans to introduce include ensuring tips left to hospitality workers are passed on in full - something that is already in place in Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland.The proposals also include the right to a week's unpaid carers leave in any 12-month period, which would bring Northern Ireland into line with the rest of the UK.Introducing paid carers leave could cost the Stormont budget up to £60m unless a similar scheme is introduced in Great Britain.Retail NI chief executive Glyn Roberts was among business leaders and trade unions representatives who met the minister on Monday ahead of the announcement in the assembly."We are concerned because we're dealing with increased costs for businesses, we're concerned that if they're overly burdened with employment law which restricts their ability to grow and develop we'll have problems, but we're hoping we don't get to that point," he added."We want to ensure this legislation works for workers as well as businesses."Jacquie White, from the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, said she welcomed some of the measures that would bring Northern Ireland into line with other parts of the UK but added that there was a lot of detail to consider.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
3 days ago
- Rhyl Journal
ECHR must be reformed to restore ‘fraying' public confidence
Shabana Mahmood told the Council of Europe in a speech in Strasbourg the ECHR 'must evolve' to respond to new realities. It comes as the Government also seeks to tighten the interpretation of the human rights laws in the UK. On Wednesday, the Lord Chancellor said: 'Across Europe, public confidence in the rule of law is fraying 'There is a growing perception – sometimes mistaken, sometimes grounded in reality – that human rights are no longer a shield for the vulnerable, but a tool for criminals to avoid responsibility. 'That the law too often protects those who break the rules, rather than those who follow them.' 'This tension is not new. But in today's world, the threats to justice and liberty are more complex. They can come from technology, transnational crime, uncontrolled migration, or legal systems that drift away from public consent.' Ms Mahmood told European ambassadors the UK was committed to the ECHR, but that was 'not the same as complacency'. She added that when the application of rights 'begins to feel out of step with common sense', that is where trust begins to erode. Her call for change comes as the Government plans to tighten the use of Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to private and family life, in immigration cases in the UK. This includes cases involving foreign criminals. Under the plans unveiled in the immigration White Paper last month, the Home Office will bring forward legislation to try to reduce the number of people claiming 'exceptional circumstances' under Article 8 to stay in the UK. Ms Mahmood said: 'The right to family life is fundamental. But it has too often been used in ways that frustrate deportation, even where there are serious concerns about credibility, fairness, and risk to the public. 'We're bringing clarity back to the distinction between what the law protects and what policy permits.' She also said judges cannot be asked to solve political problems and so reform must be a 'shared political endeavour' among member states. The Lord Chancellor added: 'The European Convention on Human Rights is one of the great achievements of post-war politics. It has endured because it has evolved. Now, it must do so again.' Following Ms Mahmood's speech, a No 10 spokesman said it should be for Parliament and the Government to decide who has the right to remain in the country. 'We want to ensure the right balance is made in migration cases in relation to the national interest,' the spokesman said. The Lord Chancellor was making a broader point that 'now is the time for countries to work together to ensure the ECHR can evolve to meet the challenges facing modern democracies'. But, he added: 'The Government has been clear that Britain will remain a member of the ECHR, it underpins key international agreements on trade, security, on migration, on the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement.' A Tory spokesman said Kemi Badenoch had been clear that 'we would do whatever is necessary to ensure the supremacy of UK laws, and set a number of clear tests, including the deportation test, and made clear that if necessary, we would leave the ECHR'. But responding to the speech Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, said that any reform of the ECHR must 'shore up universal protections, not chip away at them'. He said: 'If the UK starts picking and choosing who merits protection from torture, family separation or arbitrary removal, it will undermine not just its moral authority but the rule of law itself, weakening its hand when speaking out against rights abuses abroad.'


BreakingNews.ie
3 days ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Restrictions on vape products will reduce appeal to teenagers, senator says
Action to regulate vaping products will help reduce their appeal to young people and help protect the environment, a Fine Gael senator has said. Senator Mark Duffy, who raised this issue in the Seanad on Wednesday with Minister John Cummins, said new legislation would be a significant step for protecting young people's health across Ireland. Advertisement Currently, a one-off registration system exists for tobacco, but not for nicotine inhaling products. 'We've all seen the growth of vape shops across the country, and parents are concerned about how this is impacting their children," he said. 'The variety of flavours and bright packaging on vaping products is clearly aimed at making these products more attractive to our youth. 'It's a cynical move to get them hooked, with vape companies targeting younger and vulnerable individuals with colourful, flavoured products designed for maximum appeal. Advertisement 'The proposed bill, drafted by my colleague Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill, addresses some of the major issues with the sale of vape products. Newsagents will be required to hide vape products in the same way as tobacco, and there will be an advertising ban in all shops where these products are sold." Duffy said it will regulate these products to reduce their appeal to young people, with restrictions on colours and imagery to avoid bright, "cartoon-covered" packaging, a ban on toy-like devices, limits to basic flavours, and a ban on single-use vapes. 'Currently, a one-off registration system exists for tobacco, but not for nicotine inhaling products, which has led to unregulated sales in sweet shops, butchers, phone repair shops, and fast-food takeaways. "The new system will require annual license applications with compliance declarations, alongside increased penalties for offenses, including suspensions and revocations for repeat violations. 'This legislation is really welcome. The growth of vape shops in Ireland has been rapid, and this regulation responds to the concerns of so many parents and families."

Leader Live
3 days ago
- Leader Live
ECHR must be reformed to restore ‘fraying' public confidence
Shabana Mahmood told the Council of Europe in a speech in Strasbourg the ECHR 'must evolve' to respond to new realities. It comes as the Government also seeks to tighten the interpretation of the human rights laws in the UK. On Wednesday, the Lord Chancellor said: 'Across Europe, public confidence in the rule of law is fraying 'There is a growing perception – sometimes mistaken, sometimes grounded in reality – that human rights are no longer a shield for the vulnerable, but a tool for criminals to avoid responsibility. 'That the law too often protects those who break the rules, rather than those who follow them.' 'This tension is not new. But in today's world, the threats to justice and liberty are more complex. They can come from technology, transnational crime, uncontrolled migration, or legal systems that drift away from public consent.' Ms Mahmood told European ambassadors the UK was committed to the ECHR, but that was 'not the same as complacency'. She added that when the application of rights 'begins to feel out of step with common sense', that is where trust begins to erode. Her call for change comes as the Government plans to tighten the use of Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to private and family life, in immigration cases in the UK. This includes cases involving foreign criminals. Under the plans unveiled in the immigration White Paper last month, the Home Office will bring forward legislation to try to reduce the number of people claiming 'exceptional circumstances' under Article 8 to stay in the UK. Ms Mahmood said: 'The right to family life is fundamental. But it has too often been used in ways that frustrate deportation, even where there are serious concerns about credibility, fairness, and risk to the public. 'We're bringing clarity back to the distinction between what the law protects and what policy permits.' She also said judges cannot be asked to solve political problems and so reform must be a 'shared political endeavour' among member states. The Lord Chancellor added: 'The European Convention on Human Rights is one of the great achievements of post-war politics. It has endured because it has evolved. Now, it must do so again.' Following Ms Mahmood's speech, a No 10 spokesman said it should be for Parliament and the Government to decide who has the right to remain in the country. 'We want to ensure the right balance is made in migration cases in relation to the national interest,' the spokesman said. The Lord Chancellor was making a broader point that 'now is the time for countries to work together to ensure the ECHR can evolve to meet the challenges facing modern democracies'. But, he added: 'The Government has been clear that Britain will remain a member of the ECHR, it underpins key international agreements on trade, security, on migration, on the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement.' A Tory spokesman said Kemi Badenoch had been clear that 'we would do whatever is necessary to ensure the supremacy of UK laws, and set a number of clear tests, including the deportation test, and made clear that if necessary, we would leave the ECHR'. But responding to the speech Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, said that any reform of the ECHR must 'shore up universal protections, not chip away at them'. He said: 'If the UK starts picking and choosing who merits protection from torture, family separation or arbitrary removal, it will undermine not just its moral authority but the rule of law itself, weakening its hand when speaking out against rights abuses abroad.'