Buffalo Trace Adds E.H. Taylor To Its Coveted Antique Collection
E.H. Taylor Bottled-and-Bond
This fall, the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection (BTAC) is getting its first new addition in nearly two decades—and it's a big one. Buffalo Trace Distillery has officially confirmed that E.H. Taylor Bottled-in-Bond Bourbon will be joining its prestigious annual lineup, making its debut as part of the 2025 BTAC Collection.
The move marks the first addition to BTAC since Thomas H. Handy was introduced back in 2006. And for longtime fans of Buffalo Trace's heritage-rich portfolio, this update feels more like destiny than surprise. The Bottled-in-Bond expression pays tribute to Colonel Edmund Haynes Taylor Jr., widely considered the 'Father of Modern Bourbon,' and the driving force behind one of the most significant milestones in whiskey history: the Bottled-in-Bond Act of 1897.
'As a founding figure who helped define bourbon quality — not just for Buffalo Trace, but for the entire industry — it's only fitting that Colonel E.H. Taylor Jr.'s namesake brand takes its place among the collection,' Andrew Duncan, Global Brand Director, Buffalo Trace Distillery said in an emailed statement. 'With this release, we proudly pay tribute to Colonel Taylor's enduring legacy of innovation and craftsmanship.'
Buffalo Trace Antique Collection
The Antique Collection is known for its limited annual releases that highlight long-aged, high-proof, and meticulously selected barrels from Buffalo Trace's extensive warehouses. It typically includes five expressions:
These whiskeys are lauded not only for their complexity and rarity, but also for representing the pinnacle of Buffalo Trace's aging and blending programs.
The inclusion of E.H. Taylor Bottled-in-Bond—a 100-proof, single-season, federally bonded bourbon—signals a new chapter. While the standard Bottled-in-Bond expression remains a consumer favorite in the $40–60 range, this BTAC release is expected to reflect extended aging, increased rarity, and deeper barrel selection—placing it in direct conversation with the likes of Stagg and Weller in terms of prestige.
E.H. Taylor
Colonel Edmund Haynes Taylor Jr. purchased the O.F.C. Distillery (now Buffalo Trace) in 1869, and his impact on American whiskey cannot be overstated. He was a relentless innovator, responsible for modernizing the distillery with copper fermentation tanks, grain handling systems, and steam-heated warehouses—some of which are still in use today.
More importantly, Taylor was a key figure behind the Bottled-in-Bond Act of 1897, the first piece of federal legislation to establish standards for whiskey production and labeling. It defined what constituted a 'straight' whiskey, mandated a minimum of four years of aging, and required the spirit to be the product of one distillation season, one distiller, and one distillery—all bottled at 100 proof under federal supervision.
This act essentially introduced the idea of government-regulated whiskey purity—a vital protection for consumers during an era rife with counterfeit and adulterated spirits.
In homage to that legacy, the new BTAC release will bear Taylor's signature, just as his original bottles once did.
E.H. Taylor Bottled-and-Bond label
For collectors, the introduction of a new BTAC label is a rare event—only the second in over 20 years. With existing BTAC expressions already fetching high secondary market prices and being the subject of annual lotteries, this addition will only increase demand. The move also strengthens the long-term positioning of the E.H. Taylor brand as a cornerstone of Buffalo Trace's prestige portfolio.
While Buffalo Trace has yet to release details on age statement, mashbill, or barrel selection, expectations are high. The standard Bottled-in-Bond release already draws from Mashbill #1 (a low-rye bourbon mash), and if this BTAC edition follows suit—with additional aging and BTAC-level curation—it could become one of the more balanced and historically resonant entries in the collection.
Look for the 2025 Buffalo Trace Antique Collection—including the debut of E.H. Taylor Bottled-in-Bond BTAC Edition—to begin arriving in extremely limited allocations this fall.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Former In-N-Out employee accuses burger chain of discriminatory firing for natural hair
A former In-N-Out employee is suing the West Coast burger chain for alleged discriminatory treatment and termination due to his natural hair. Elijah Obeng filed a lawsuit against In-N-Out, alleging he was discriminated against and fired based on his natural hairstyle and texture. Obeng claims he has suffered damages from the termination, including emotional distress, reputational harm and loss of employment, court documents state. He is seeking $3 million in damages and $200,000 in pay he would have earned since his firing or could have earned in the future. In-N-Out declined to comment to USA TODAY on June 18, citing ongoing litigation. Obeng and his lawyer did not immediately respond to request for comment. Lawsuit accuses In-N-Out of 'humiliating and discriminatory' action According to court documents, Obeng began working at an In-N-Out restaurant in June 2020 after graduating from high school. He continued to work for the chain until he was terminated in spring 2024. Obeng went to work with his natural hair, in accordance with In-N-Out's grooming and uniform policy, the lawsuit reads. When Obeng's hair got longer, he was instructed by management to cut or alter it to fit under the required uniform hat. In an effort to comply with the policy, Obeng began wearing his hair in braids. Management then told him, court documents state, that he needed to cut his sideburns, which Obeng found "humiliating and discriminatory." When he did not cut his sideburns, Obeng began experiencing different treatment. He was punished for minor policy violations, like not attending work meetings, which Obeng claims his colleagues did not face, the lawsuit reads. In-N-Out's grooming and uniform policy is not readily accessible online, but Indeed forums indicate that male workers must arrive to shifts clean-shaven, with no facial hair. On around May 25, 2024, Obeng clocked in for what would be his last shift at In-N-Out. Upon his arrival, management told him to go home, shave his sideburns and return, court documents state. Instead, Obeng left and texted his supervisor that he would return for his next shift. A few days later, Obeng was fired, which In-N-Out claimed was due to prior write-ups, according to court documents. Obeng, however, alleges that his termination was because of his "ancestry, color and race, including his natural hairstyle and hair texture." Former employee says In-N-Out violated CROWN Act In the lawsuit, Obeng says In-N-Out violated the CROWN Act, a law that prohibits employers from discrimination based on hairstyle and texture. Standing for "Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair," the law was first passed in California in 2019 with the help of Dove, the CROWN Coalition and Los Angeles County Supervisor Holly Mitchell. As of June 18, the CROWN Act is law in 27 states, according to The CROWN Act website. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
Time Business News
3 days ago
- Time Business News
Surge in Carbon Credit Platforms Signals Shift Toward Profitable Climate Action
The global Carbon Credit Trading Platform Market, valued at USD 146.2 million in 2024, is projected to surge to USD 724.0 million by 2035, growing at a robust CAGR of 17.6%. This growth is driven by increasing global focus on emissions reduction, rising corporate sustainability efforts, and a widespread shift toward achieving net-zero emissions targets. In a comprehensive analysis led by Shweta R., Business Development Specialist at Prophecy Market Insights, the evolving landscape of carbon trading platforms is explored in depth, highlighting market dynamics, opportunities, and competitive strategies. Carbon credit trading platforms enable organizations to offset their greenhouse gas emissions by purchasing carbon credits tied to verified environmental projects. These platforms are gaining momentum as governments implement stricter climate regulations and businesses prioritize environmental accountability. The market is segmented by type (voluntary and regulated markets), system type (cap-and-trade, baseline-and-credit), end-use industries (industrial, utilities, energy, petrochemical, aviation, and others), and by region. Several key factors are accelerating market growth: 1. Government and Intergovernmental Policies: Programs like the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and California's Cap-and-Trade initiative are compelling businesses to participate in carbon trading, expanding platform adoption. 2. Corporate Net-Zero Commitments: A growing number of multinational companies are setting voluntary net-zero goals, fueling demand for high-quality carbon credits and reliable platforms for tracking and compliance. Despite its potential, the market faces several challenges: · Lack of Standardization: Inconsistencies in carbon credit quality, verification methods, and pricing across markets create uncertainty. · Limited Awareness: Especially in developing regions, understanding of carbon trading remains low, and supporting infrastructure is still emerging. · Growth in Emerging Economies: Asia-Pacific and Latin America are seeing increased government support for carbon pricing. As policy frameworks and infrastructure develop, these regions will become key growth areas. · Decentralized Markets: Blockchain-based platforms are lowering entry barriers and improving transparency, creating opportunities for small-scale traders and new market entrants. The market includes a diverse mix of global exchanges, environmental consultancies, and tech-driven startups. Leading players include: · Nasdaq, Inc. · CME Group Inc. · ACX (AirCarbon Exchange) · XPANSIV · ClimeCo LLC · VERRA · South Pole · Rubicon Carbon Services · European Energy Exchange AG · Carbonplace · ClimateTrade · SCB Group · Cloverly · Envex · ecoact These companies are leveraging technologies such as AI for credit assessment, blockchain for traceability, and digital platforms to streamline trading processes. · North America leads the market, driven by strong regulatory support, corporate leadership in sustainability, and advanced digital infrastructure. · Europe is a close second, supported by comprehensive climate policies and the longstanding EU ETS framework. · Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region, propelled by industrial expansion and evolving environmental regulations in countries like China, India, and Japan. · Latin America and MEA are emerging markets, gaining traction with increased interest in climate finance and international carbon offset projects. To maximize growth potential, stakeholders should: · Invest in platform transparency through blockchain and third-party verification. · Engage with regulators to support consistent standards. · Promote education and awareness in underserved markets. As global efforts to combat climate change intensify, carbon credit trading platforms will become essential tools in achieving sustainability goals. With rapid digital transformation and regulatory alignment underway, this sector presents a high-growth opportunity for innovators, investors, and policymakers alike. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hamilton Spectator
4 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
People with disabilities concerned proposed Liberal bill will increase federal taxes
HALIFAX - Advocacy groups are asking the federal Liberal government to adjust its proposed tax bill to ensure people with disabilities don't end up paying more to the Canada Revenue Agency. Inclusion Canada says it favours Ottawa lowering the lowest marginal tax rate from 15 to 14 per cent, as proposed in the bill that passed first reading earlier this month. However, the group says the unintended result of the change is that tax credits for people with disabilities will decrease in many cases. That's because the credit — used to reduce taxes payable — is generated by a formula that is tied to the marginal tax rate, and by dropping that rate to 14 per cent, the credit shrinks. Krista Carr, the CEO of Inclusion Canada, said in a telephone interview Monday 'we're really hoping this is something that will be remedied, but as of yet we've not had a response.' The lobby group says without this change, many lower income people with disabilities who rely on the tax credit will be paying about $100 a year more to Ottawa. The March of Dimes, an organization that also works on behalf of people with disabilities, says in a release that families with children with disabilities would lose an average of about $156 per child. The federal Finance Department didn't immediately provide a comment on the groups' request for the change to the bill. The Liberals have said reducing the marginal tax rate will save two-income families up to $840 a year in 2026. Ottawa has also noted that beginning in July eligible Canadians can receive up to $2,400 a year from the Canada Disability Benefit. Carr said people with disabilities will lose money in the tax credits 'that are fundamentally important to them as it helps offset the expenses related to disabilities.' She argues the simple fix is to amend the bill to keep the marginal tax credit rate at 15 per cent, 'just for the calculation of these particular tax credits.' Carr also said tax credits on medical expenses will also be affected, and that could further add to the tax bill for people with disabilities. Nicholas Taylor, a resident of Cooks Brook, N.S., said in an interview Tuesday that the extra $100 in taxes would be roughly equivalent to a month of medication costs. The 39-year-old has polyneuropathy — a condition that where peripheral nerves in the body are damaged — which limits Taylor's mobility and requires the use of a wheelchair. 'For myself, that's a month's worth of medication. I'm diabetic and the blood strips that I have to purchase, they're also about $100 for a package,' Taylor said. With tax payments annually of about $450 on $12,000 in income, Taylor estimates the extra $100 the changes may cost him represents a 25 per cent tax increase. 'We need people with disabilities to be consulted before policies like this are brought in,' Taylor added. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
