
A Zoox and an e-bike collided in S.F. Here's what it says about robotaxi safety
The light turned green at a busy intersection in San Francisco's South of Market neighborhood, where Bryant, Division and 11th streets conjoin at acute angles — and traffic becomes an omnidirectional snarl.
What happened next was captured, probably in stark detail, by multiple cameras on a Zoox robotaxi. The company is not required to publicly share its footage, and has declined to do so. A spokesperson said Zoox supplied video to regulators.
But in a report filed to the Department of Motor Vehicles, Zoox gave a clinical description of the crash on April 4: A driverless taxi collided with a Bay Wheels e-bike whose rider had swerved into the car's path. The Zoox sustained fender damage while the cyclist rode away. Nobody called police.
Though apparently minor, the SoMa fender-bender came at an inflection point for Zoox, an autonomous vehicle company owned by Amazon. Widely recognized as the No. 2 player behind Waymo, Zoox is testing its buggy-shaped robotaxis and retrofitted Toyota Highlanders in the wilderness of downtown traffic, and preparing to launch passenger service. It's also endured some growing pains.
Four days after the e-bike jolt, another unoccupied Zoox vehicle collided with a passenger car in Las Vegas. Again, no one emerged with injuries, but the company opted to pause operations in Vegas for several days and recall 270 vehicles for a software update.
Such episodes could become more commonplace as self-driving cars flood the roads, treating cities like San Francisco not only as markets, but as laboratories. While the makers of these vehicles contend that a machine programmed to follow traffic laws is safer than an erratic human driver, the crash research is less conclusive. The stakes for these companies are high: Waymo, the most established among them, is rapidly expanding commercial service as Zoox test-runs its carriages in several cities.
As they integrate into the transportation system, robotaxis are drawing excitement and delight. At the same time, they're clashing with other road users. Last year a self-driving Waymo car struck and injured a bicyclist in San Francisco's Potrero Hill neighborhood, provoking anger from district Supervisor Shamann Walton. He questioned whether any car operated by artificial intelligence could quickly react to traffic chaos. Representatives of Waymo said an oncoming truck had occluded the Waymo vehicle's view of the cyclist.
A review of California DMV reports for March and April suggests that so far, most of these incidents have not caused injuries, and have resulted in minimal damage. Still, they raise a vexing question for the average San Franciscan: Should I be worried a robot car might hit me?
The notion has incited a spirited debate among experts.
William Riggs, a professor of engineering and management at the University of San Francisco who studies autonomous vehicles, is so confident in the technology that he doubts they pose much danger to other drivers or cyclists — even the ones who violate traffic laws.
'You probably have a greater chance of being struck by lightning' than by a robotaxi, Riggs said.
Other researchers are less certain. Scott Moura, a UC Berkeley professor of civil and environmental engineering, said past studies have shown a similar 'crashes-per-million miles' rate between self-driving cars and humans, though data also suggests that AV companies are learning from their experiences, and swiftly course-correcting.
In California, AVs are held to a higher standard than human drivers, with a requirement to report any collision that results in injury, death or property damage to the Department of Motor Vehicles and, in some instances, to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Yet since the companies write those reports, they are by definition one-sided and could omit details. The most notorious example is the crash of Oct. 2, 2023, in which a robotaxi operated by General Motors' Cruise struck a jaywalking pedestrian. Although initiated by a hit-and-run driver, the incident led to Cruise's suspension, largely because the company withheld video from state investigators.
When pressed about the April 4 collision with the cyclist in SoMa, staff at Zoox point back to their report to the DMV. It portrays two vehicles navigating a complex, unpredictable road space with crosswalks and traffic signals on all sides.
The scene unfolded shortly after 9:30 a.m., the fade-out of a Friday morning rush hour. According to Zoox, an e-bike rider had started crossing before the change in signal. Pedaling south down 11th Street, the rider zipped ahead of the robotaxi, which had no driver at the time. Both vehicles had nearly crossed the intersection when the cyclist abruptly turned left.
Sensing the maneuver, the robotaxi 'braked hard,' yet a collision 'was unavoidable,' Zoox staff wrote in their incident summary. The cyclist struck the self-driving car's right fender and body, causing minor damage. As the Zoox pulled over on Bryant Street, the cyclist rode to the sidewalk, briefly stopped, and then rolled away.
By slowing down and stopping, the Zoox demonstrated its ability to drive defensively, and likely preempted a more serious accident, according to a company spokesperson.
'Autonomous vehicles have the capability to see farther and understand the speed and trajectory of those sharing the road, which is especially important when interacting with vulnerable road users,' the spokesperson wrote in a statement.
It continued: 'Safety is foundational at Zoox, and we are continuously learning from our testing across markets to improve the overall safety of roadways.'
Whether the Zoox performed worse or better than a human driver in this instance is unclear, said Matthew Raifman, a transportation safety researcher at UC Berkeley's Safe Transportation and Research Education Center.
'There are scenarios where an AV might see (a cyclist) that a human wouldn't see, because they have 360 degree views,' Raifman said. Even so, he noted, an AV doesn't have a human's intuition or ability to anticipate behavior. For all of its perspectives and sensors, a robot car might not understand how a cyclist moves through space.
'I think that's where there's a heuristic process that human drivers have. Maybe a computer can replicate that perception and understanding, but it's also possible that a human driver would have eye contact with the cyclist, or detect something in that cyclist that was indicative they were going to turn instead of go straight.'
Or alternatively, perhaps the robotaxis could over time become more perceptive than humans, Raifman said. What if, for instance, a network of them are passing through that intersection every day, collecting data, and sharing it with all of the other robotaxis in a company's fleet?
Steven Shladover, a research engineer at UC Berkeley's Institute of Transportation Studies, had a more cut-and-dry reading of the incident.
'It sounds like this was probably the fault of the cyclist,' he said, surmising that a human motorist wouldn't have been able to avoid the collision either.
Every expert who spoke with the Chronicle acknowledged the basic math of exposure: More autonomous vehicles traveling more miles means more opportunities to crash. Yet the companies are making a case that their fleets will eventually make the roads safer. After all, a robot won't drive while intoxicated, or start texting friends at a stop light, or get distracted and fail to yield to a pedestrian.
Robotaxis 'are getting safer over time as the companies gain more experience with driving in traffic,' Shladover said. 'But that's a long, slow process.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla is set to launch its robotaxi service in Austin this weekend, entering a crowded autonomous vehicle field
The launch of Tesla's robotaxi service is tentatively set for this weekend in Austin, Texas, entering a crowded arena of autonomous vehicles already operating in the city. Tesla is competing with driverless Waymo taxis that are already transporting people around the city, while Amazon's Zoox and Volkswagen are testing robotaxis there too. Tesla's driverless taxi service launch has been highly anticipated by investors and fans, however, officials and lawmakers have expressed automotive safety concerns. On Wednesday, Texas lawmakers sent a letter to Tesla urging the company to delay its robotaxi service launch until September, when a new state law regulating autonomous vehicles takes effect. It adds to another letter, sent by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to Tesla last month, asking for additional safety information about its robotaxi rollout. That same month, Elon Musk, Tesla's chief executive, acknowledged the need for national regulations around autonomous vehicles. 'It's going to be important to have a unified set of national regulations for self-driving cars,' he told CNBC. 'Otherwise, you're going to get into this weird situation where, if you're driving from Maine to New York, you're going to go through 10 different sets of regulations. Cars are going to behave differently. It's not going to make any sense.' Here's what we know about the driverless service set to launch this weekend. For the initial launch of the fully autonomous ride-hailing robotaxi service, Tesla will use its internal fleet of Model Y electric vehicles, updated with the company's Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, without a driver. If the autonomous cars run into a safety issue, a remote driver can step in and take control of the vehicle. The Cybercab is Tesla's driverless taxi that will also rely on the FSD software without a human driving the vehicle. The initial launch of Tesla's robotaxi service won't include the Cybercab because it isn't expected to go into production until at least 2026. Musk says each Cybercab will likely cost less than $30,000 to produce. The fully autonomous vehicle won't have a steering wheel or pedals and will have a large center touchscreen. The two-passenger vehicle won't have a backseat or a rear window but will have a rear cargo area. Musk says it won't have a traditional charging port and will rely on inductive (wireless) charging, which will charge by parking over a pad embedded in a designated charging area. Musk said earlier this year that the service would launch sometime in June. Bloomberg News then reported the launch was poised to happen on June 12, citing a person familiar with the matter. Two days before the anticipated launch, Musk reposted a video on X that showed Tesla testing a self-driving Model Y car in Austin, with what appeared to be no driver. Later that day, Musk replied to a user on X that the tentative rollout of the robotaxi service was June 22. 'We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift,' Musk said. He also indicated that the first driverless trip from the Tesla factory to a customer's house will take place on June 28, which is the billionaire's birthday. The letter that Texas Democratic lawmakers sent Wednesday to Tesla's director of field quality urged the company to delay the robotaxi service launch until a new Texas law takes effect, on Sept. 1. The law revises previous state guidelines for autonomous vehicles and requires the operators to receive prior authorization from the Department of Motor Vehicles. The letter states that in order to get that authorization, Tesla needs to show: that the vehicles can operate while abiding by state traffic laws, have a recording device, comply with federal standards, are properly registered and insured, and can 'achieve a minimal risk condition' if the autonomous system stops working. The Texas lawmakers asked the company to provide 'detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be compliant with the new law upon the launch of driverless operations in Austin' if they decide to proceed with the launch over the weekend. Yahoo News has reached out to Tesla for comment. In addition to the Model Y taxis being remotely monitored at first, Musk told CNBC that the vehicles will also be 'geofenced' to certain areas of Austin that Tesla considers the safest to navigate. 'We want to deliberately take it slow,' Musk said. 'I mean, we could start with 1,000 or 10,000 [robotaxis] on day one, but I don't think that would be prudent. So we will start with probably 10 for a week, then increase it to 20, 30, 40.' For the initial launch, the robotaxi service is expected to only be available to Tesla employees or by invite. 'The service will probably not be available to the general public for several months, analysts said,' according to the New York Times. Musk says he hopes to have by the end of 2026 'over a million Teslas' doing 'unsupervised full self-driving, where you do not need to pay attention.' Musk had originally promised in 2019 that there would be 1 million self-driving robotaxis on the road by 2020.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
TechCrunch Mobility: Applied Intuition's eye-popping valuation, the new age of micromobility, and Waymo's wild week
Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility — your central hub for news and insights on the future of transportation. Sign up here for free — just click TechCrunch Mobility! Waymo might be the largest commercial robotaxi operator — offering 250,000 paid rides per week — but it is hardly smooth. The past seven days in Waymo's world illustrates just how dynamic the burgeoning robotaxi business can be. The company limited service nationwide on June 13 ahead of scheduled 'No Kings' protests against President Donald Trump and his policies. Days later, Waymo announced it was expanding its robotaxi service area by another 80 square miles in Los Angeles, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Silicon Valley. And now Waymo is eyeing the biggest city in the United States: New York City. One note on NYC: This will be a marathon for Waymo. The company is applying for a permit to test its autonomous vehicles in the city, but even if it gets approved, it won't mean driverless testing. A truly driverless (no human behind the wheel) vehicle will require a change in state law. Expect lobbying activity to ramp up in the state. Let's get into the rest of the news. Got a tip for us? Email Kirsten Korosec at or my Signal at kkorosec.07, Sean O'Kane at or Rebecca Bellan at Or check out these instructions to learn how to contact us via encrypted messaging apps or SecureDrop. Applied Intuition keeps attracting investors, and it has an eye-popping valuation to show for it. The buzzy startup, which makes software that helps companies and government agencies develop autonomous vehicle solutions such as simulation software and managing data, closed a $600 million Series F and tender offer. That round, which was co-led by BlackRock-managed funds and Kleiner Perkins, pushed its valuation up to $15 billion. Yes, $15 investors included Qatar Investment Authority, Abu Dhabi Investment Council, Greycroft, and more. Existing investors General Catalyst, Lux, Elad Gil, and Mary Meeker's growth fund Bond also participated. Reminder: The round comes just one year after it completed a $250 million Series E, which put the company at a $6 billion valuation. Archer Aviation raised an additional $850 million through a registered direct offering of 85 million shares at $10 per share. The company noted in its announcement that this followed President Trump's executive order to implement an eVTOL Integration Pilot Program in the United States. stems, a Southern California-based startup developing wire harnesses for aerospace, raised $25 million in a round co-led by Dylan Field, the co-founder and CEO of design software company Figma; VC firm CIV; General Catalyst; Peter Thiel's Founders Fund; Sequoia Capital; Joe Lonsdale's 8VC; and Andreessen Horowitz. This newsletter used to have a dedicated section for micromobility, a reflection of its popularity at the time. Micromobility went through a period of consolidation and tightening capital, which forced the industry to grow up. But it hasn't disappeared, and that's why I'm bringing it back this week (and occasionally in the future).Reporter Rebecca Bellan hosted a roundtable with Voi CEO Fredrik Hjelm, Bird co-CEO Michael Washinushi, and Dott/Tier CEO Henri Moissinac at the Micromobility Europe event in Brussels. Here are some of her insights from the panel and from the broader event: Honda launched an all-electric last-mile delivery vehicle called the Fastport eQuad. The eQuad comes in two sizes built on the same basic platform, small and large. Both are smaller than the smallest Mini Cooper but can carry between 320 and 650 pounds. They have pedals, and their top speed is limited to 12 mph (20 kph), both requirements to keep them bike-lane legal. VanMoof is back and has launched its first e-bike since bankruptcy. Reporter Rebecca Bellan digs into what is the same and what has changed at VanMoof. Bellan also provided a list of startups rolling out of Europe's early-stage micromobility scene. Zoox has opened its first full-fledged production facility, where it expects to one day build 10,000 robotaxis per year. Tesla has partnered with Electrify Expo to launch full-weekend EV test drives. This is an interesting move by Tesla, which has historically used other methods besides third-party events like auto shows or expos to attract new customers. It also could make Electrify Expo a target of protestors who are behind the Tesla Takedown movement. Zoomcar, the Indian car-sharing marketplace, said a hacker accessed the personal data of at least 8.4 million customers, including their names, phone numbers, and car registration numbers. The company became aware of the incident after some of its employees received external communications from a threat actor who claimed to have gained access to the company's data. The Paris Air Show included lots of news under the ever-evolving category I call 'Future of flight.' Too much to cover everything here, but there were a few highlights: an announcement from U.S. DOT Secretary Sean Duffy that the Federal Aviation Administration and four other regulators will collaborate on an advanced air mobility (AAM) roadmap; Archer Aviation showcased its Midnight aircraft and hosted delegations from more than 20 countries; and Beta Technologies' Alia became the first electric aircraft to fly at the show. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Veteran Tesla analyst makes boldest robotaxi call yet
Veteran Tesla analyst makes boldest robotaxi call yet originally appeared on TheStreet. The closer we get to Tesla's () robotaxi debut on Sunday, the hotter things get. Though it's been patchy, Tesla bulls would argue we're finally getting close to what could be a watershed moment for the business. 💵💰💰💵 Analysts have been talking up Tesla's self-driving game for a while. Few have built a serious reputation on bold, on-point calls. Now, one veteran bull just upped the ante on the robotaxi event, calling this the potential start of Tesla's 'golden era of autonomous.' Truth be told, Tesla's robotaxi rollout turned out bumpier than Tesla's maverick CEO, Elon Musk, teased an Austin debut in May, things have proven rather rocky. Just yesterday, a band of seven Texas lawmakers called on the EV giant to pump the brakes on its trials until September's tougher AV rules to kick in. Then there's the safety concern, which adds another layer to the dynamic. In mid-June, a Cybertruck prototype drifted into oncoming traffic while on FSD. Days later, a Tesla Model 3 stalled on train tracks, getting clipped in the process. These hurdles and fresh incidents suggest the vision-only autonomy might still be brittle. Meanwhile, Tesla's robotaxi competition in the likes of Waymo and Cruise continues chugging along in geofenced zones. These companies have taken a more cautious route with safety drivers and slow expansions. Tesla, on the other hand, appears to be going full throttle, relying heavily on its massive owner fleet and Musk's no-brakes style. For now, though, hiccups have weighed down Tesla's stock price, which has settled back into the low $320s. More Tesla Stock News: Tesla robotaxi launch hits major speed bump Musk's AI chatbot weighs in on Tesla stock and Robotaxi SpaceX faces a surprising rival Tesla is already battling Nevertheless, Tesla has repeatedly proved the naysayers wrong, and it's operating in what could become a multi-billion-dollar market. Grand View Research estimates the global robotaxi market at $1.95 billion last year, potentially soaring to $43.76 billion by 2030 (a staggering 73.5% CAGR from 2025). In an X post today, the veteran tech analyst deemed Sunday's robotaxi rollout in Austin 'the golden era of autonomous' for feels this chapter could be the biggest in Tesla's rich history, tipping its AI roadmap as a potential $1 trillion valuation boost over the coming years. To put things in perspective, that's double the stock's current worth at around $1.1 trillion. Ives sees the event as a high-stakes test of autonomy at scale. If the technology can effectively live up to the hype, investors could be looking at a paradigm shift in both ride-hailing and Tesla's market positioning. Even though the initial fleet may seem relatively modest (20 Model Ys), Ives believes a quick ramp to some 25 U.S. cities over the next year is possible. Moreover, he lauded Tesla's unmatched scale, including its massive fleet, global footprint, and deep data trove. Also, beyond operating its network, Ives feels Tesla could license its Full Self-Driving stack to traditional automotive players, opening up a huge, long-term revenue stream. Sure, there are likely to be some speed bumps. These include tricky regs, politics, and a race towards full autonomy. However, Ives still sees Tesla as having the competitive edge due to its software muscle, hardware control, and deep pockets. It's important to note that Dan Ives has been a Tesla bull for years, even through the rough patches. He's voiced his support for the stock, stating that his 'longstanding bull view of Tesla remains'. Wedbush maintains an 'Outperform' rating on Tesla stock with a lofty price target of $500. This target represents a whopping 55% upside to the stock's current price, which is hovering near the $321.3 Tesla analyst makes boldest robotaxi call yet first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 20, 2025, where it first appeared.