UK government report calls for taskforce to save England's historic trees
Ancient and culturally important trees in England could be given legal protections under plans in a UK government-commissioned report.
Sentencing guidelines would be changed under the plans so those who destroy important trees would face tougher criminal penalties. Additionally, a database of such trees would be drawn up, and they could be given automatic protections, with the current system of tree preservation orders strengthened to accommodate this.
There was an outpouring of anger this week after it was revealed that a 500-year-old oak tree in Enfield, north London, was sliced almost down to the stumps. It later emerged it had no specific legal protections, as most ancient and culturally important trees do not.
After the Sycamore Gap tree was felled in 2023, the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs asked the Tree Council and Forest Research to examine current protections for important trees and to see if they needed to be strengthened. The trial of two men accused of felling the Sycamore Gap tree is due to take place later this month at Newcastle crown court.
The report, seen by the Guardian, found there is no current definition for important trees, and that some of the UK's most culturally important trees have no protection whatsoever. The researchers have directed ministers to create a taskforce within the next 12 months to clearly define 'important trees' and swiftly prepare an action plan to save them.
Defra sources said ministers were evaluating the findings of the report.
Jon Stokes, the director of trees, science and research at the Tree Council, said: 'Ancient oaks can live up to 1,000 years old and are as precious as our stately homes and castles,' Stokes explained. 'Our nation's green heritage should be valued and protected and we will do everything we can to achieve this.'
Currently, the main protection for trees is a tree preservation order (TPO), which is granted by local councils. Failing to obtain the necessary consent and carrying out unauthorised works on a tree with a TPO can lead to a fine of up to £20,000.
The Woodland Trust has called for similar protections, proposing the introduction of a list of nationally important heritage trees and a heritage TPO that could be used to promote the protection and conservation of the country's oldest and most important trees. The charity is using citizen science to create a database of ancient trees.
The report's authors defined 'important trees' as shorthand for 'trees of high social, cultural, and environmental value'. This includes ancient trees, which are those that have reached a great age in comparison with others of the same species, notable trees connected with specific historic events or people, or well-known landmarks. It could also include 'champion trees', which are the largest individuals of their species in a specific geographical area, and notable trees that are significant at a local scale for their size or have other special features.
Richard Benwell, the CEO of the environmental group Wildlife and Countryside Link, said: 'Ancient trees are living monuments. They are bastions for nature in an increasingly hostile world and home to a spectacular richness of wildlife. We cannot afford to keep losing these living legends if we want to see nature thrive for future generations. The government should use the planning and infrastructure bill to deliver strict protection for ancient woodlands, veteran trees, and other irreplaceable habitats.'
In 2020, the 300-year-old Hunningham Oak near Leamington was felled to make way for infrastructure projects.
In 2021, the Happy Man tree in Hackney, which the previous year had won the Woodland Trust's tree of the year contest, was felled to make way for housing development.
In 2022, a 600-year-old oak was felled in Bretton, Peterborough, which reportedly caused structural damage to nearby property.
In 2023, 16 ancient lime trees on The Walks in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, were felled to make way for a dual carriageway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ex-army chief Lord Dannatt lobbied ministers for millions to support commercial deal
A member of the House of Lords lobbied the government to get financial support worth millions of pounds for a commercial deal he was steering, documents reveal. It is the second time that Richard Dannatt, a former head of the British army, has potentially broken parliamentary rules that forbid lobbying. He is under investigation by the House of Lords authorities over a separate set of allegations, following undercover filming by the Guardian. The new documents reveal Lord Dannatt personally pressed ministers and a senior official to give political and financial backing to a venture he was chairing that was seeking to buy a Cheshire factory from a US owner in 2022. After the owner announced they intended to shut it down, Dannatt increased the pressure, urging the government to help. The crossbench peer made three key approaches. First, he contacted a minister he knew, asking for an introduction to the minister who was best placed to make the decision. Second, he sent an email pressing a civil servant to set up a meeting. 'My intervention is to elevate the discussion to ministerial level,' he wrote. Less than two weeks later, Dannatt and an executive behind the bid met Lee Rowley, the relevant business minister, to push for government backing. At issue is whether Dannatt broke the House of Lords rules that bar peers from lobbying ministers and officials in return for payment or financial incentive. Dannatt said he was not paid for engaging with the government. He said he helped a friend, a leading businessperson in the consortium, attempt to buy the factory as he believed it would save jobs and help the country. 'Put simply, I was helping a friend achieve an outcome very much in the national interest,' he said. Dannatt later received four payments during the period he was chairing the venture. He described these as 'honorarium' payments, but would not say how much he received. He was also the public face and 'chairman' of the 'embryonic' venture. Dannatt said his name and position added credibility to the discussions with the US company. 'I am not sure how else a retired four-star general who sits in the House of Lords could be described to the Americans,' he said, but he had agreed to take the title despite there being 'no board to chair, no meetings to attend or other business to conduct'. His involvement with the consortium, which was ultimately unsuccessful in its bid, ended in February 2023. Dannatt has been under investigation by the House of Lords authorities since March after the Guardian revealed he had offered to secure meetings with ministers for undercover reporters pretending to be commercial clients wanting to lobby the government. He had been secretly filmed telling the undercover reporters he could make introductions within the government and that he would 'make a point of getting to know' the best-placed minister. He is being investigated by the House of Lords commissioner for standards, the watchdog who scrutinises claims of wrongdoing in the upper chamber. Dannatt, 74, has previously denied the allegations, saying: 'I am well aware of … the Lords code of conduct … I have always acted on my personal honour.' He is one of five peers to face conduct inquiries after a months-long investigation by the Guardian. The Lords debate project examined the commercial interests of members of the House of Lords amid concerns their activities were not being properly regulated. It revealed that 91 peers had been paid by commercial companies to give political or policy advice. The new documents regarding Dannatt's communications with the government in June 2022 were disclosed under freedom of information legislation. At the time Dannatt was fronting a group of investors who wanted to buy a fertiliser factory in Cheshire. CF Industries, the US owners, planned to permanently close the factory after energy prices made it unprofitable. The consortium of investors argued that their proposal would save 500 jobs and keep important products used in the agriculture and hospitality industries within the UK. On 10 June 2022, Dannatt emailed a junior business minister he knew, asking if he could tell him who was the minister with responsibility for this area. 'If you could point me in the right direction, ideally with an introduction, and I can take it from there.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion He promoted his UK-based consortium as a better 'economic and political alternative' to the closure of the factory. 'The alternative scenario is that a hedge fund buys the factory, sells off its assets and exits with a profit, allowing 500 workers to become redundant, the UK dependent on imported CO2 and no increase in fertiliser production thus the price remaining high.' An introduction to the right minister was made. Six days later, the peer emailed a senior official in the business department, saying: 'I am aware that [Dannatt's friend] has been talking with officials but my intervention is to elevate the discussion to ministerial level. There are some quite key issues at stake here relating to jobs in the north-west and the price of some key commodities.' On 27 June, Dannatt and Mark Law, his friend who was also leading the consortium, met Rowley, then a minister in the business department. The Financial Times has previously reported that the consortium sought a government loan of up to £10m to help restart the factory. The government refused, arguing that it was purely a commercial matter. The consortium later collapsed. Dannatt said he had not had any formal arrangements or contract with the consortium, nor had he discussed with Law what his future role might have been if they had managed to buy the factory. 'My motivation and purpose was to get a deal over the line, in the national interest,' he said. He said any assumption that he 'would have developed a substantive and remunerated role as chairman and taken an active role in the work of the company' was wrong. He added that if the bid had been successful, 'it would have been a very different matter'. As well as the continuing investigation by the House of Lords authorities, another watchdog has examined Dannatt's conduct. Last month, it cleared Dannatt of being paid by the consortium to lobby the government. Harry Rich, the registrar of consultant lobbyists, is responsible for investigating whether individuals have broken the law by failing to declare that they have received money from a third party to lobby ministers or Whitehall's most senior officials. However the House of Lords watchdog is considering the matter under a different set of rules which take a wider view of lobbying than the registrar of consultant lobbyists. The question now is whether, as the consortium's chair, he advocated for the venture on the understanding that he could at some point benefit personally. This could be a breach of the Lords rules. Dannatt has passed his correspondence with the Guardian about his involvement with the consortium to the House of Lords commissioner who is investigating his conduct when speaking to undercover reporters.
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
Chaos in Clapham: a visit to the most dangerous cycle spot in Great Britain
It's 8am in Clapham, the area of south-west London where young professionals and well-off homeowners are crammed into 2 sq miles of buzzy high streets, a leafy common and rows of terraced houses. The popularity of the neighbourhood lies in its proximity to the city centre. A 4-mile hop to central London makes for an easy journey to work, especially for one kind of commuter: cyclists. On the morning we visit Clapham High Street, at the height of rush hour, their presence is immediate. In every direction bikes are weaving through traffic, filtering through busy roads in stops and starts. Drivers shout, horns blare and cars cut across each other. Adding to the sense of chaos are pedestrians who step off pavements without looking up from their phones. Near misses are common. At the traffic lights, cyclists, many of them ebike riders with no helmets, zoom through red lights as if they're not there. Some swerve in and out of bike lanes; one speeds up the wrong side of the road, narrowly avoiding a bus. If the scene looks dangerous, statistics on collisions involving bikes suggest it is. This is the stretch of road in Great Britain where the most accidents involving cyclists have happened since 2020. We visited the junction as part of a Guardian investigation into the safety of roads in England, Wales and Scotland. From 2020-23, there were 23 accidents involving cyclists reported to emergency services at the junction where Clapham High Street meets Gauden Road and Lenden Terrace. One pedestrian said crossing the road had become increasingly frightening because cyclists ran red lights, particularly since the arrival of ebikes. 'Cyclists put the fear of death into pedestrians now. They jump lights, they go on the pavement, they go counter to the traffic. It's awful,' she said. On the day we visit there are more law-abiding cyclists than those running red lights or cutting in front of cars. But during the observation period, a bike could be seen hurtling through a red light once every 90 seconds on average. Simon Munk, the head of campaigns and community development at London Cycling Campaign, said junctions could be particularly risky for cyclists even where there were cycle lanes, as there are at the Clapham junction. 'A hugely high proportion of serious and fatal collisions happen at junctions for people cycling and so junctions are the spot where danger is at its most intense.' Road design also played a big part. 'Some junctions are almost designed in a way that creates conflict by introducing too many traffic movements across the cycle lanes,' he said. This meant any benefits of the designated lanes 'completely disappear'. Kyle Linch, a chef in Mayfair, said he regularly saw cycling accidents around Clapham. 'I saw one girl fall off her Lime [bike] yesterday. These two cars came out of nowhere,' he said. 'The traffic's always mental so it's not that surprising. I definitely wouldn't say it's safe.' The popularity of ebikes undoubtedly contributes to the congestion on the road on the morning of our visit. The dockless bicycles whizz around in all directions, irking even other cyclists. One commuter riding their own bike at the junction said: 'There's a lot of cycle lanes and I think drivers are quite cautious. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'I have heard of some horrific accidents and know people who have been hit. The ebikes seem to be the worst – running red lights, no helmets – and perhaps that's because most of the people who ride them have less experience.' For campaigners who want to encourage people to take up cycling, the focus on accident data and dangerous riding is unhelpful. Duncan Dollimore, the head of campaigns at Cycling UK, a charitable membership organisation, said the statistics did not capture the experience of cycling. 'Cycling is not an unsafe activity, in fact it's statistically safe,' said Dollimore. 'But that's not how it feels to many people.' Making the roads safer for cyclists would help to overcome that perception, he said. 'The more protection and coherence and separation of infrastructure there is, the more people are likely to cycle, and do so safely.' For the Clapham High Street commuters, good news may be at hand. Helen Cansick, Transport for London's head of healthy streets investment, said changes were planned for this summer. 'We are committed to making changes across the capital so that people can travel safely, whatever mode of transport they choose,' she said. A spokesperson for Lime said the rental company supported the TfL and London councils' investment in cycling infrastructure. 'Cyclists running red lights not only endanger themselves and others, but also undermine public confidence in cycling as a safe, sustainable mode of transport,' they said. 'Through regular rider communications, training programmes and penalties for dangerous behaviour, we work to educate riders and encourage safer cycling on our roads.'
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Hit by a sonic boom, locals say the RAAF went quiet: Guardian 10 News First investigation
At 10.37am on 26 June 2023, the sleepy Queensland town of Greenvale was rocked by a gigantic blast in the sky. The 'blast' was an F-35, the most advanced aircraft in the Royal Australian Air Force, breaking the sound barrier directly overhead. Locals told the Guardian's Andrew Messenger the shockwave in its wake shattered windows, smashed light fittings and shook roofs. In a joint Guardian and 10 News First investigation, they say the RAAF has been quiet ever since
