logo
Can missile air defense systems stop nuclear weapons? India's S-400 defence system can...

Can missile air defense systems stop nuclear weapons? India's S-400 defence system can...

India.com15 hours ago

Iron Dome vs S-400 Triumf. (File)
Global Air Defence systems vs Nuclear attack: In the recent few decades, India and other nations have been continuously developing missile defense systems aimed at intercepting most powerful weapons including nuclear-capable ballistic missiles. However, we all know that these systems face significant limitations like the recent terrible failure of China's HQ9 Air Defence System seen during India's ant-terror operation against Pakistan. One more question that arises is that can missile air defense systems stop nuclear weapons? Scroll down to get all your answers. Air Defence systems vs Nuclear attack!
We all know that world's most powerful countries like the U.S., Russia, Israel, and India possess advanced defenses such as the THAAD, Israel's Arrow-3 and Iron Dome, and India's Akash Missile system and S-400 missile defence system receptively but can they defend a nuclear attack?
As per media reports, intercepting nuclear warheads is technically challenging and expensive and even a high-performing system like the US THAAD or S-400 missile defence system has had several failures, pointing to inherent vulnerabilities and they may not succeed in stopping nuclear weapons. Iran strikes Israeli intelligence sites in Tel Aviv
In a significant development in the Iran-Israel war, Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) carried out strikes on 'key Israeli intelligence sites' in Tel Aviv, including military intelligence and Mossad facilities, while the Israeli Air Force said it launched a new wave of airstrikes in western Iran, as per a report by IANS news agency.
The IRGC said its Aerospace Force conducted an 'effective operation' in the early hours, penetrating Israel's 'highly advanced air defence systems', according to Iranian state media. The elite force claimed the strikes specifically targeted the Israeli army's Aman headquarters and a facility used for planning 'assassination operations attributed to the Mossad'.
Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that Iran killed 'a significant number' of officers and commanders in its strikes on Mossad and military intelligence centres.
(With inputs from agencies)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel-Iran conflict: Day after Israeli attack, nuclear watchdog confirms damages to key under-construction reactor near Tehran
Israel-Iran conflict: Day after Israeli attack, nuclear watchdog confirms damages to key under-construction reactor near Tehran

Indian Express

time16 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Israel-Iran conflict: Day after Israeli attack, nuclear watchdog confirms damages to key under-construction reactor near Tehran

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IEAE) has confirmed that Israel's strikes on Friday resulted in damages to key buildings at the partially constructed Khondab (formerly known as Arak) Heavy Water Production Plant including its distillation unit. The nuclear watchdog's statement comes a day after the global body said no damages were 'initially visible'. 'While damage to the nearby Heavy Water Production Plant was initially not visible, it is now assessed that key buildings at the facility were damaged, including the distillation unit,' the IEAE's latest statement on 'Updates on developments in Iran' said. No damage has been observed at Iran's other nuclear sites so far, it added. No radiological consequence was expected, IEAE's Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said. This has been attributed to the reactor not being operational and not containing any nuclear material. 'There is a lot of nuclear material in Iran in different places, which means that the potential for a radiological accident with the dispersion in the atmosphere of radioactive materials and particles does exist,' he added, stressing on the possible nuclear safety risks. IAEA, in its statement, also sought to receive timely and regular technical information about the nuclear facilities and their respective sites in the country. 'This information is needed to promptly inform the international community and ensure an effective response and assistance to any emergency situation in Iran,' Director General Grossi said. He added that the agency was also in constant contact with other countries in the region amid the ongoing tensions in the Middle East. The Khondab reactor was hit on Thursday (June 19) as the both Israel and Iran continued to trade strikes on the seventh day of the conflict. The Israeli strikea also damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. So far, Israel has announced that its attacks have hit prominent Iranian nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. With AP inputs

Israel's missile shield is failing, and shows Trump's Golden Dome unlikely to protect US from Russian and Chinese hypersonic nuke threats
Israel's missile shield is failing, and shows Trump's Golden Dome unlikely to protect US from Russian and Chinese hypersonic nuke threats

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Israel's missile shield is failing, and shows Trump's Golden Dome unlikely to protect US from Russian and Chinese hypersonic nuke threats

Israel much-vaunted multi-layered defensive system to protect from aerial attacks including missiles, drones, rockets and artillery shells has blunted the enemy attack on several occasions, starting 2011 when it was first deployed. Taking a cue from Israel's success, US President Donald Trump in May 2025 announced the Golden Dome missile umbrella for America, an ambitious space-based defensive system. Israel claims threats from terror groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, and countries like Iran, Syria, Türkiye, Jordan and Egypt. None of them posses any technological/ military edge over or even parity with Israel. Unlike Israel, which has nuclear weapons, the others have no nukes in their arsenal. Israel's Iron Dome is designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets and artillery shells at a range of 4 to 70 kilometres, while David's Sling, and Arrow 2 and 3 along with the US Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) batteries can take out threats at a longer range, even in space. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Yet, after one week of missile and drone barrage by Iran following the June 13, 2025, strike by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Jerusalem's missile shield seemed to be overwhelmed and bleeding, in terms of their response time as well the cost. From a claimed success rate of almost "80 to 90 percent" in the first couple of days of Iranian attack, the Israeli defense is now able to only intercept only 65% of the incoming missiles. NBC News quoted a "senior intelligence official in Israel" as stating that on June 19 only 65 per cent of Iranian missiles launched in the last 24 hours were intercepted. Live Events You Might Also Like: Sejjil, Iran's highly maneuverable new missile a major threat to Israel; know all about it The Iranians, too, seemed to have changed their strategy. Starting with ballistic missiles and drones, Iran is now launching highly maneuvrable hypersonic projectiles to hits targets in Israel. As revealed by the Israeli defense officer above, from just 10 percent of Iranian missiles finding their targets, the percentage has gone up to almost 35. Israel also claims that Iranians are now firing a lot less missiles than they did in the first couple of days. From a reported 150 on the first day on June 13, the number of Iranian missiles flying towards Israel has come down to about three dozen. But many of attacks in the last couple of days have seen Iran firing hypersonic missiles like Fattah-1 and Sejjil, which have tested Israel's defense to the extreme and also punched holes through it. Stopping one missile costs several interceptors, sometimes going up to even double digits. Yet, as the Israelis are increasingly finding out, there is no guarantee that the incoming missile will be blown up in the skies by its interceptors. According to Israeli financial daily The Marker, Jerusalem is spending nearly 1 billion shekels ($285 million) each nigh in defending the country from Iran's barrage. The cost an Arrow interceptor is $3 million. Moreover, there is a limited number of interceptors left with a Wall Street Journal report on June 18 claiming for Israel has just enough for the next 10 to 12 more days if the Iranian armed forces continue with their current rate of firing missiles. You Might Also Like: Hypersonic missiles are stirring fears in the Iran-Israel conflict. Here's why Lessons for Trump's proposed Golden Dome US faces formidable adversaries like Russia and China, and to a lesser extent North Korea and Iran. Russia, China and North Korea have nukes as well as the means to deliver them at targets thousands of miles away. While the Americans claims to have better technology and a massive military, which can hit a target anywhere on the globe, its rivals are no pushover. Compared to Israel, the US have a near-equal and in some areas a technologically advanced enemy. Russia is the world largest nuclear power with a huge array of intercontinental ballistic missiles. The country has in the last few years rapidly developed and deployed highly maneuvrable hypersonic missiles. It's almost a similar case with China which is going ahead with rapid military expansion and the use of cutting-edge technologies. North Korea, too, has tested missiles which can reach the western coast of the US. You Might Also Like: Blind radar, blistering speed: How Israeli jets crippled Iran's air defence in 48 hours, something Russia couldn't do in 3 years To counter such threats, Trump in May 2025 announced the Golden Dome defence system. Estimated to cost around $175 billion, Trump stated that the shield would be operational by 2029, just before his term as the 47th President of the United States comes to an end. Mirroring Israel's system that has been active since 2011 but is essentially able to intercept short and medium range rockets and missiles, the US shield will face ICBMs and hypersonic missiles. As seen in the ongoing Israel-Iran was, a salvo of missiles can overwhelm a defensive shield leading to some of the projectiles hitting targets on ground. Golden Dome's big advantage is touted to be the ability to keep and eye from space and detect a missile in the boost stage, the short span of time when it is being launched. A boost phase lasts about a minute, and is detectable even from space-based assets. While it's theoretically possible to target missiles during the boost phase, to be able to track missile launches by Russia and China, both of which can do so from almost any part of the globe, is a Herculean task. American Enterprise Institute senior fellow in the Foreign and Defense Policy program Todd Harrison says such a capability needs hundreds, even thousands of satellites. "It takes about 950 interceptors spread out in orbit around the Earth to ensure that at least one is always in range to intercept a missile during its boost phase," he to told Citizen Tribune news portal. If Russia or China fire multiple missiles simultaneously, the number of US satellites required goes up exponentially. A launch of five missiles together by any one of the US rivals means over 4,500 spy satellites. Moreover, any US move to operationalize the Golden Dome will be countered by Russia and China with the deployment of more missiles, many of them nuclear tipped, and use of their space-based capabilities. You Might Also Like: Golden Dome to guard US from 'anywhere, even Space': What you need to know about Trump's $175 billion missile shield

Arak nuclear facility hit: Satellite images show extent of Israeli strike; see before-and-after pic
Arak nuclear facility hit: Satellite images show extent of Israeli strike; see before-and-after pic

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Arak nuclear facility hit: Satellite images show extent of Israeli strike; see before-and-after pic

Iran's Arak nuclear facility The Israeli military conducted a strike on Iran's Arak heavy water reactor facility on Thursday morning, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict between the two nations. The facility, located 280 kilometers from Tehran, had been inactive under the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal. The Arak Nuclear Complex's significance Built in response to Iran's security concerns following the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, the Arak facility was developed domestically after Iran failed to acquire heavy water reactor technology from other nations. The complex consisted of an experimental reactor and heavy water production facilities, with the latter being crucial for producing plutonium that could potentially be used in nuclear weapons. The strike and its impact Israeli Defence Forces targeted the facility "to prevent the reactor from being restored," specifically aiming at the reactor's core seal. Satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies revealed significant damage, including the partial collapse of the reactor dome and damage to surrounding structures. The Israeli military released footage showing multiple explosions at the site. Interactive content by Flourish 2015 nuclear deal context Under the 2015 nuclear agreement, Iran had previously disabled the reactor by filling its core with concrete as part of broader nuclear program restrictions in exchange for sanctions relief. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Despite these measures, Israel has maintained concerns about Iran's nuclear ambitions. Iranian atomic energy chief Mohammed Eslami condemned the attack as "barbaric and unlawful" and called for IAEA intervention. The IAEA confirmed no radiological release resulted from the strike. The attack came in response to Iranian missile strikes on southern Israel, which had damaged medical facilities and residential areas near Tel Aviv.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store